00:40:044 (123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131) - this sounds the same as all the other patterns of similar kind before it, why the sudden kat at the end of it?
00:49:770 (184) - this clearly doesn't need to be a finisher kat, there's no hard cymbal sound, unless this was intended remove the finisher
00:56:362 - from here to 01:01:637 - the sudden abundance of kats is kinda weird but that's due to the general abundance of dons used before...00:52:241 (198) - listen to this ;w; it's a kat sound not a don sound. if you're gonna keep the general pattern structure as it is at least change all the dons like this one up until the first timing point in this suggestion to kats and the same from 01:02:791 (263) - onwards.01:06:912 (291) - why no finisher here...if there's a finisher at 01:09:219 (306) - ? ;w;
01:15:318 (341,342,343) - this section sounds like 3 dons to me; the second note doesn't really sound like it should be a kat imo
01:17:461 (356) - this isn't really dragged out; a finisher probably wouldn't fit here too well imo.
01:27:021 (420) - this sounds really high pitched, not like a don would be! (also YES I GOT TO MENTION 420
)
01:27:845 (426,427,428) - invert these so that (429) can have a greater reason to be a kat (same reason as previous, just without the 420 :c) since the instruments work best with kkd, or even kdd if you think that wouldn't work
01:37:570 (500) - perhaps change the pattern slightly to give reason for this being K or D? there's a cymbal playing here so I'd assume that would be a finisher in your book judging on the previous bits of the map
01:50:427 (597) - ^ and you used a finisher on the next note which is a little bit less emphasised, definitely should have a finisher here!
01:59:823 (666) - ^ although idk if you'd want to change the pattern here as it fits quite nicely...also 666
02:10:372 (724) - see 01:27:845, except without the inverting colours bit
02:11:361 (730) - no finisher here but a finisher at 02:11:691 (732) - ;w;
02:29:328 (844,845) - these two parts sound alike when you listen to it without the don/kat, make it look like it!
02:38:063 (906) - the cymbal is pretty intense here, perhaps make it a K instead?
02:47:293 (978,979,980) - perhaps make these all dons? nothing much to follow here...
02:47:622 (981) - again, cymbal's intense here, make it a K instead?
02:48:776 (992) - ^ although you may have to change the pattern slightly
03:06:249 (1112) - and 03:06:908 (1117) - ^
03:09:216 (1131,1132,1133,1134,1135) - why suddenly 5 notes when you normally do 3 notes like this? intentional or inconsistency?
03:16:139 (1181,1182,1183,1184,1185,1186,1187,1188,1189,1190,1191,1192,1193,1194,1195,1196,1197,1198,1199,1200,1201,1202,1203) - this pattern's a doozy, let me try and break it down. first: the high-pitched sound is not correctly shown at 03:16:469 (1185) - probably gonna have to tweak the pattern to keep the flow. secondly: 03:17:540 (1198,1199,1200) - this doesn't really follow anything, so maybe delete these in order for this pattern not to be seen as super OP compared to the rest. It would also help with the third issue: 03:17:787 (1201) - this should be a finisher as it's a very significant part of the song, but you'd need to delete the next note for this to be even rankable...so if the last part isn't applied then you might not be able to apply the rest of this1st Kiai time as a whole: Why are there so many triplets that keep on coming, like ddd kdd ddd without something like ddd k d ddd? ;w; this happens up to 6 times at once which is unusual considering the rest of the map before and there are NO 1/1 breaks at all ;~;
03:38:886 (1373) - there's not really much need for a finisher here imo.
04:17:624 (133) - relatively high pitch here so it may be seen as a K but it's not really THAT high...the decision is yours I guess
2nd Kiai time: aaaaaaa way harder than the rest of the map beforehand at the first bit!!!! then it gets a lot tamer afterwards...at least there's 1/1 breaks here unlike the previous Kiai
3rd Kiai time: why so many doublets compared to the rest of the map? it seems more of them are here than the rest of the map combined. was this for flow or rhythm purposes or variety or...???
05:56:030 (789,790,791,792,793) - maybe make this kdddk to map the more prominent instrument that happens at 789 which sounds like a k?
06:01:965 (830,831,832,833,834) - see 03:09:216
06:08:888 (881,882,883,884,885,886,887,888,889,890,891,892,893,894,895,896,897,898,899,900) - the way you mapped this seems really weird and off-putting compared to the rest of it which was pretty decently mapped (at least you put a 1/2 break in just before the Kiai begins)
Final Kiai time: nothing new here really apart from the kdddddkddddd pattern (which is kinda neat imo) and the slightly more complex patterns (but they're not very new either) although I must question this pattern 06:50:261 (1280,1281,1282,1283,1284,1285,1286,1287,1288,1289,1290,1291,1292,1293,1294,1295,1296,1297,1298,1299,1300,1301,1302,1303,1304,1305,1306,1307,1308) - which doesn't accommodate for the finishers at all, making the map seem inconsistent in that way plus why is it so LONG (29 notes! jeez! break it up a bit at least for the accommodation of the finishers...)
06:53:723 (1318) - Yet again, intense cymbals here, why not make this a K instead?
07:07:073 (1414) - and 07:07:568 (1419) - ^ but you'll need to change the pattern again ;w;
07:08:007 (1422) - perhaps make this a don? it would make the pattern play with the music a bit better
07:19:271 (1493) - perhaps make this a don for variety instead of a kat, which will flow well with the next bit
07:19:436 (1494) - make this a K instead because the cymbal's quite intense
07:24:876 (1517) - make all notes like this dons for consistency