This is ranked DAYUM. Congrats.

Well, I did normal, then I almost died. I can’t imagine the work you put into this, and the manual snapping. -_- I’ve mentioned the parts that seem off to me, but for the most part, timing seems acceptable. Maybe if I’m feeling really motivated someday I’ll go through insane. Only thing I really noticed was slider tempos. It feels smoother when you’ve got an increased tempo slider as the cellist is moving faster compared to when you keep the two sliders the same in different tempos. i.e.

GREAT! - 00:23:201 (3,4) -

lil' wacky - 00:11:773 (1,2) - judging slider speeds based on their visual length isn't really a good way to look at intensity on this diff. every timing point with a slider has an sv change calculated so that every slider is the same speed, regardless of bpm. so like the examples here have the same speeds for all four sliders. making it variable would be too wtf for the lowest diff

oh there was one slider that was a different speed though, whcih you pointed out. that one was a mistake so i gotta fix it lol. for the other ones where you mention speed tho, there's not much i can do without breaking concept

[Normal]

00:05:024 (1) - I feel like this slider should match 00:01:874 (1) -
it eliminates the awkward single 00:06:369 (3) - too, if you match earlier pattern, or replace with a long slider then short slider. timeline lengths for these are super different, so woudln't really work. both are 1 beat in the timeline, but the first is twice as long because it's slower lol

00:06:755 (4) - I like the long slider more for that phrase for sure. same

00:12:379 (2) - This slider feels too fast, since 00:13:068 (1) - is slowing down, and tempo is slowing ahead. Slowing slider would prep for next slider.

00:15:842 (1) - Feels like you’re cheating the phrase by giving this a single. @ 00:17:365 (1) - it’s a slider and sounds much better i get what u mean, but the point of a circle is to show how much quieter this section has gotten compared to the previous stuff. wouldn't stand out if it were another slider

00:26:130 (4,5) - This sounds jazzy, not cello prelude. Maybe this?
http://puu.sh/omiPE/1f9fb860b7.png trying to avoid anything too weird for the lowest diff (and 1/2 sliders are that lol)

00:30:783 (2) - I feel like the end of this slider should get it’s own hit, feels weird hitting 3 without a lead in i kinda dont feel the same way about clicking there. if anything, clicking beat 3 would make more sense since it's emphasized more

00:38:740 (1) - This doesn’t feel right. I think its 00:38:740 (1) - needs to be more defined than just a slider. maybe something likehttp://puu.sh/omj3m/b004735941.png (real rough) yea would also be too dense for the lowest diff like that rip

00:53:125 (2) - Feels wacky with a long slider here. Note ends before slider is over. Shorten slider to match note end then transition or turn into single then pick up with next phrase @ 00:53:985 (3) - this one's sort of complicated since i'm avoiding consecutive 1/2 clicks and i want to have an object on 00:53:125 (2) - 's current tail since it's super emphasized. only real way to do that is to have a sliderend there and click again at the downbeat with 00:53:985 (1) -

01:01:613 (1) - ? http://puu.sh/omjd7/34be5c65f8.png timing between 2 and 3 kinda weird, so if doing this i'd want a slider where 3 currently is, but cant since music is stopping so longslider

01:13:239 (3) - Whenever I want to change something it’s in like 3 tempos. -_- 1/2sliders2dense
http://puu.sh/omjFZ/580875cc43.png

01:29:006 (2) - Two hits on the end of slider makes the single end feel really wrong, dunno if you can fix that or not, that’s tough i actually dont know what you mean by 2 hits u m um

01:31:256 (3) - Pretty sure the timing is wrong on the end of this guyyae

01:33:520 (3,4) - Speed these sliders SV up

01:45:791 (4) - This feels perfect , match this ^ (please don’t tell me they’re the same, I don’t wanna check…) this was actually the one that was snapped wrong lol. thanks for pointing it out tho it's fixed (and not the way you want me to lul)

So it's been over two years now, huh. :^) im a big boy!!

I'd just like to raise a few concerns about the accuracy of this map based on the music, as it appears to be mapped this way entirely.

00:53:483 (4,1) - This doesn't need to exist at all, as well as all other instances of sliders that don't end on a specific note. From the beginning you've mapped the notes as pairs of two tones (mapped with a slider), or a run of tones (circle runs), regardless of the length of rubato the instrumentalist has chosen to use. Fix: remove 00:53:798 (1) - , change 00:53:985 (2) - to two circles. musically it may be correct to do this, but it's really not how i'd choose to map it. 1 starts the pitch dropping thing, so i'd want to click there (ruling out your recommendation) and making 4 a circle is also not practical since timing is balls. stacking it could work, but it would also be stopping all movement in a place where that shouldnt really happen.

this and all the extended sliders below follow the same logic

01:22:818 (1,2) - Like above, but use spacing between 01:22:818 (1,3,4) - instead to emphasize the rubato.

01:24:585 (2,1) - 01:26:441 (5,1) - 01:28:009 (6,1) - 01:29:529 (5,1) - like above.

01:05:066 (1,2,3,4) - Downbeat is at 01:05:326 - but you've mapped this with a slider end. Fix: change pattern to circle-slider-slider-slider, or change 01:03:489 (3) - to a slider until 01:05:066 - and then use slider-slider-slider. this is pretty similar to the previous thing. clicking on the start of the pitch change (which happens to be the note before the downbeat) seems necessary and starting with a circle leads to misleading timing between the first and second object

01:29:851 (1,2,3,4) - Sliders start on the wrong beats, and as a result you have a slider end on the downbeat at 01:31:047 - i thought that starting 01:26:778 (1) - i was placing sliders on offbeats. right now im emphasizing 01:25:406 (1,2,3,4) - these sounds here, which are correctly on beat, then the next measure the same emphasized sounds are off beat. so i decided to treat the same sounding things the same regardless of what the sheet music says

01:47:330 (1) - Questionable; you haven't missed or a tone yet, probably shouldn't start here. yeah, ill change this one. it was originally for the sake of showing section was different, but i can do that without leaving out sounds too

im only doing insane because im bad

00:12:679 (4) - not a perfect overlap Xd
00:15:462 (2) - ^^^
00:16:977 (4) - ^ like literally all slider overlaps are like thsi and it triggers me harder than u even know
00:26:975 (2,4) - why are these stacked it looks ugly pls move 4
00:28:080 (1,3) - g
00:53:483 (4) - why isnt this just one slider, would be better and less awkward imo
00:56:165 (2) - you never overlapped sliders like this in this part b4 now u do y
01:03:330 (1,2,3) - better off as a repeat slider imo
01:22:818 (1) - basically same thing as 00:53:483 (4)
02:00:694 (3) - nc cuz slower sliders and bpm