idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
forum
EXILE ANNOUNCEMENT
posted
Total Posts
63
Topic Starter
beehivePatatitta wrote:
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
PLESE COOK THEM SINNERS! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
WE CLEANIN OT WITH THIS ONE 🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
BEEHIVE 🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
I LOVE THE MODS
PLESE COOK THEM SINNERS! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
WE CLEANIN OT WITH THIS ONE 🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
BEEHIVE 🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
if its the word im thinking of there are 10k people with it as name or in name and 176 maps
classic lul
classic lul
Who
Bijéiv
Topic Starter
44 players, 40 mapsDuck o-o wrote:
if its the word im thinking of there are 10k people with it as name or in name and 176 maps
classic lul
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
mr bloosher pls can u contact the peppster and get him to namechange all people with that word in the name, also plis get him to censor the 19 instances of the word in this post on the wiki wiki/en/Tournaments/o%21BAM/2 ,its actually very strange that its allowed on the kid friendly platformBlushing wrote:
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
ty in advance for ur service
sure I can tryDuck o-o wrote:
mr bloosher pls can u contact the peppster and get him to namechange all people with that word in the name, also plis get him to censor the 19 instances of the word in this post on the wiki wiki/en/Tournaments/o%21BAM/2 ,its actually very strange that its allowed on the kid friendly platformBlushing wrote:
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
ty in advance for ur service
itll actually help to set up a filter much like with the n word because likeee realistically when will people ever use that word other than for the 1 purpose it hasBlushing wrote:
sure I can tryDuck o-o wrote:
mr bloosher pls can u contact the peppster and get him to namechange all people with that word in the name, also plis get him to censor the 19 instances of the word in this post on the wiki wiki/en/Tournaments/o%21BAM/2 ,its actually very strange that its allowed on the kid friendly platformBlushing wrote:
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
ty in advance for ur service
hope he does something about it if the game is actually trying to become more kid friendly, cos otherwise any moderation about it is senseless considering the content being moderated is already on the website and in some cases on the wiki
I will say that wiki is not necessarily moderated by the gmt, and is only brought up to us by the users, so its a little... rough in that department. thanks for bringing it to our attentionDuck o-o wrote:
itll actually help to set up a filter much like with the n word because likeee realistically when will people ever use that word other for the 1 purpose it hasBlushing wrote:
sure I can tryDuck o-o wrote:
mr bloosher pls can u contact the peppster and get him to namechange all people with that word in the name, also plis get him to censor the 19 instances of the word in this post on the wiki wiki/en/Tournaments/o%21BAM/2 ,its actually very strange that its allowed on the kid friendly platformBlushing wrote:
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
ty in advance for ur service
hope he does something about it if the game is actually trying to become more kid friendly, cos otherwise any moderation about it is senseless considering the content being moderated is already on the website and in some cases on the wiki
blushing censoring talking about the problem that you yourself want to fix doesnt make sense
if we really want to change things for the better then talking about them is necessary, deleting the word is just counterproductive and wont fix anything
if we really want to change things for the better then talking about them is necessary, deleting the word is just counterproductive and wont fix anything
theres nothing to talk about here. the word isnt allowed, and wont be allowed.Reyalp51 wrote:
blushing censoring talking about the problem that you yourself want to fix doesnt make sense
if we really want to change things for the better then talking about them is necessary, deleting the word is just counterproductive and wont fix anything
Blushing wrote:
theres nothing to talk about here. the word isnt allowed, and wont be allowed.Reyalp51 wrote:
blushing censoring talking about the problem that you yourself want to fix doesnt make sense
if we really want to change things for the better then talking about them is necessary, deleting the word is just counterproductive and wont fix anything
Topic Starter
when you're reading a history book there are words and events and stuff that is horrible, worst shit humankind has ever done, but it's important to read about it and remember those events, if we start censoring history and doing like nothing is ever wrong, it will just increase the chances of something like this happening again, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, I don't think me saying jang was exiled due to them being a pedo is going to cause more people to become pedoBlushing wrote:
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
I have no idea what Jangsoodlor posted in OT over the last few days, and I don't want to know from someone with a "UOHHHHH" profile picture.
lmao
Topic Starter
they didn't post anything too of the ordinary, it's just that chomb finally got fed up with that shit and actually did somethingI AM VERY SMART wrote:
I have no idea what Jangsoodlor posted in OT over the last few days, and I don't want to know from someone with a "UOHHHHH" profile picture.
So can someone explain what happened, without a GMT coming in the way and censoring? I literally leave for a bit because this sub-forum became a cesspool and I find it a bigger cesspool.
Making a comparison with history books is quite absurd knowing that we are literally in a sub-forum talking about a user's exile. I think most people here know that behaving weirdly online is very bad for everyone and that if you do it anyway, there will be sanctions.Patatitta wrote:
when you're reading a history book there are words and events and stuff that is horrible, worst shit humankind has ever done, but it's important to read about it and remember those events, if we start censoring history and doing like nothing is ever wrong, it will just increase the chances of something like this happening again, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, I don't think me saying jang was exiled due to them being a pedo is going to cause more people to become pedoBlushing wrote:
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
Good!Patatitta wrote:
they didn't post anything too of the ordinary, it's just that chomb finally got fed up with that shit and actually did somethingI AM VERY SMART wrote:
I have no idea what Jangsoodlor posted in OT over the last few days, and I don't want to know from someone with a "UOHHHHH" profile picture.
Topic Starter
I don't agree with you, the concept of history is still the same no matter how lame or tame the history is, and with history, the less you censor, the better.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
Making a comparison with history books is quite absurd knowing that we are literally in a sub-forum talking about a user's exile. I think most people here know that behaving weirdly online is very bad for everyone and that if you do it anyway, there will be sanctions.Patatitta wrote:
when you're reading a history book there are words and events and stuff that is horrible, worst shit humankind has ever done, but it's important to read about it and remember those events, if we start censoring history and doing like nothing is ever wrong, it will just increase the chances of something like this happening again, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, I don't think me saying jang was exiled due to them being a pedo is going to cause more people to become pedoBlushing wrote:
yes that is what I did. You know the word you initially posted is not allowed. if its not allowed for 1 person, its not allowed for any person, for any reason. My description of the reason is still truthful.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I think it's important to let people know what the actual things that got them exiled are right?, the actual words itself is not the problem, but the context of it, we cant just start censoring OT historyPatatitta wrote:
multiple misbehaviours and walking the line too much for it to be acceptable.Ymir wrote:
why?
sorry, pata we cant have that word on here.
Long live the Legend, He will be never forgotten
he posted [REDACTED]Winnyace wrote:
So can someone explain what happened, without a GMT coming in the way and censoring? I literally leave for a bit because this sub-forum became a cesspool and I find it a bigger cesspool.
his acts on [REDACTED] will never be dismissed.sametdze wrote:
nvm jang isnt a hero for getting exiled
Being exiled is shameful actuallysametdze wrote:
nvm jang isnt a hero for getting exiled
if this is a sincere post it's so mindboggling delusional idk how any rational person could respond to itPatatitta wrote:
when you're reading a history book there are words and events and stuff that is horrible, worst shit humankind has ever done, but it's important to read about it and remember those events, if we start censoring history and doing like nothing is ever wrong, it will just increase the chances of something like this happening again, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, I don't think me saying jang was exiled due to them being a pedo is going to cause more people to become pedo
if it's a troll post then gg it's a masterpiece
he said [REDACTED]ShinRun wrote:
Did he say some no no words
As far has i remember. He is a frequent offender, uses terms that reference pedophile stuff and exhibit behaviour of being a pedophile. Since it was always indirect he didn't receive any hard ban or mute even after many of us mentioning him.Jun Maeda wrote:
I'm really curious what they did actually.
All of this is when I was active, things might have changed.
Also the word "pedophile" isn't against the rule right? That would be stupid
the mention of the word shouldn't cause too much to happen but yeah jangsoodlor did put quite a bit of blue archive stuff upManishh wrote:
As far has i remember. He is a frequent offender, uses terms that reference pedophile stuff and exhibit behaviour of being a pedophile. Since it was always indirect he didn't receive any hard ban or mute even after many of us mentioning him.Jun Maeda wrote:
I'm really curious what they did actually.
All of this is when I was active, things might have changed.
Also the word "pedophile" isn't against the rule right? That would be stupid
Anaxii is right wtf what timeline are we in?
Damn rip bro lol
wow
I dont know who he is but thats pretty cool
depending on what he said i believe blushing is right in censoring it. there are plenty of other places where so called ‘history’ can keep that word. but OT is not that place and will never be that place
Oh i seeManishh wrote:
As far has i remember. He is a frequent offender, uses terms that reference pedophile stuff and exhibit behaviour of being a pedophile. Since it was always indirect he didn't receive any hard ban or mute even after many of us mentioning him.Jun Maeda wrote:
I'm really curious what they did actually.
All of this is when I was active, things might have changed.
Also the word "pedophile" isn't against the rule right? That would be stupid
Topic Starter
yeah like, I got a few posts deleted that didn't even include that one word, I would like to say which one word it is since we're discussing it on a meta level but I guess I will literally destroy OT if I do thatManishh wrote:
As far has i remember. He is a frequent offender, uses terms that reference pedophile stuff and exhibit behaviour of being a pedophile. Since it was always indirect he didn't receive any hard ban or mute even after many of us mentioning him.Jun Maeda wrote:
I'm really curious what they did actually.
All of this is when I was active, things might have changed.
Also the word "pedophile" isn't against the rule right? That would be stupid
it's just, come on, at least let us fucking discuss what happened, the using that word is just a escapegoat
Something happened. Because if that something didn't happened then he wouldn't be exiled.
thats a dangerous way of thinkingRhythm32 wrote:
Something happened. Because if that something didn't happened then he wouldn't be exiled.
Polyspora wrote:
thats a retarded way of thinkingRhythm32 wrote:
Something happened. Because if that something didn't happened then he wouldn't be exiled.
Topic Starter
yeah, point is, we should be able to talk about why he got exiled, I think it's important for everyone to know what he did (lolicon posts)Rhythm32 wrote:
Something happened. Because if that something didn't happened then he wouldn't be exiled.
honestly mods can just lock this thread because it's not allowed to discuss bans here lol
hmm