forum

[centre][b][color=#ff0086][size=175] [/size][/color][/b][/centre]

posted
Total Posts
60
show more
Polyspora
the alien virus is spreading.
McEndu

Winnyace wrote:

ok
here's an outlier
z0z
im pink
Karmine
That's pretty cool.
Jangsoodlor
pink
[ Rynn ]
yass!!!
Winnyace

you know, I really like pink, but I also really like light blue
Achromalia

Winnyace wrote:


you know, I really like pink, but I also really like light blue

oooo, youre right... cyan looks wonderful like this


although i find that im liking blurple/lavender more and more lately, may be my new fav color


pair those two with lemon cream <3
reffty_gag
Thanks for the tutorial man 👍 👍
- Marco -

Good Morning chat
z0z

Achromalia wrote:

Winnyace wrote:


you know, I really like pink, but I also really like light blue

oooo, youre right... cyan looks wonderful like this


although i find that im liking blurple/lavender more and more lately, may be my new fav color


pair those two with lemon cream <3

ORANGE
abraker

⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

Winnyace

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
McEndu

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

Why so named
Achromalia

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
keremal and abraker did, and a few others at the time (i remember being a small bystander in the midst of it and probably played along), it's just rather anachronistic at the moment

or maybe it's not, it is only as anachronistic as people leave it to be, abraker is offering up one thing (or probably was making an in-group reference to a time that seemed fun) and if nobody takes it then we inevitably move on to the next thing

if we're too afraid to offer anything up, even if it's roleplay, we're not gonna get much of anything to talk about or play with or have fun with. not everyone has to agree to play one particular thread, they'll just form subcultural subdivisions of their own subforum

...in fairness, i should probably realize that you're only representative of one opinion and that this was a given. i suppose it's moreso that i find myself thinking of this after being spoken for with "no one [cares]", which flicked on a switch of some kind
Winnyace

Achromalia wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
keremal and abraker did, and a few others at the time (i remember being a small bystander in the midst of it and probably played along), it's just rather anachronistic at the moment

or maybe it's not, it is only as anachronistic as people leave it to be, abraker is offering up one thing (or probably was making an in-group reference to a time that seemed fun) and if nobody takes it then we inevitably move on to the next
I'm not sure and I don't know. All I know is that I don't care about this RP and I find it annoying for the simple reason that I haven't fit in it.
Achromalia

Winnyace wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
keremal and abraker did, and a few others at the time (i remember being a small bystander in the midst of it and probably played along), it's just rather anachronistic at the moment

or maybe it's not, it is only as anachronistic as people leave it to be, abraker is offering up one thing (or probably was making an in-group reference to a time that seemed fun) and if nobody takes it then we inevitably move on to the next thing

edit:

if we're too afraid to offer anything up, even if it's roleplay, we're not gonna get much of 
anything to talk about or play with or have fun with. not everyone has to agree to play 
one particular thread, they'll just form subcultural subdivisions of their own subforum

...in fairness, i should probably realize that you're only representative of one opinion 
and that this was a given. i suppose it's moreso that i find myself thinking of this 
after being spoken for with "no one [cares]", which flicked on a switch of some kind
I'm not sure and I don't know. All I know is that I don't care about this RP and I find it annoying for the simple reason that I haven't fit in it.
this is a better-distilled statement, it makes sense... i won't argue with having an opinion, but i do hope it'll be channelled into something else, like forming the kind of thread you would like to see. not that we could expect it to reliably be treated any better than most other threads, but it's some kind of useful and transformative outlet at least
Winnyace

Achromalia wrote:

this is a better-distilled statement, it makes sense... i won't argue with having an opinion, but i do hope it'll be channelled into something else, like forming the kind of thread you would like to see. not that we could expect it to reliably be treated any better than most other threads, but it's some kind of useful and transformative outlet at least
I have done it multiple times. It went, I think, pretty well. I don't know. Maybe I can try again.
lostsilver
i like purple the most :3
Corne2Plum3

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
I care about it
Winnyace

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
I care about it
I don't care what you care about. This shall burn

B0ii
:p
Corne2Plum3

Winnyace wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
I care about it
I don't care what you care about. This shall burn

I don't care that you don't care.


Nanofranne
waaao, I've never feeling so pink before :3
Achromalia

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
I care about it
I don't care what you care about. This shall burn

I don't care that you don't care.



"you know what? i'm about to say it, okay? so--:
i don't care that you broke your curiosity u.u"
Winnyace

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I don't care that you don't care.


1v1 me right now cunt. I give you the mge server

Polyspora

Winnyace wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
keremal and abraker did, and a few others at the time (i remember being a small bystander in the midst of it and probably played along), it's just rather anachronistic at the moment

or maybe it's not, it is only as anachronistic as people leave it to be, abraker is offering up one thing (or probably was making an in-group reference to a time that seemed fun) and if nobody takes it then we inevitably move on to the next
I'm not sure and I don't know. All I know is that I don't care about this RP and I find it annoying for the simple reason that I haven't fit in it.
You not caring about it and not fitting in doesn’t mean others don’t care, and it’s pretty rude to say otherwise. Not that you actually care for being rude, since all you do is be an asshole most of the time.

RP is what got people like Scyla, Remi, me, Stomiks, Abraker, Kere, Manishh and many more able to meet each other and even become somewhat friends. it’s a pillar of this sub forum and has been one for the longest time. Don’t shit on the founding fathers, even if you disliked their mandate.

Also have fun. Don’t take things so seriously.
Penguin

Polyspora wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
keremal and abraker did, and a few others at the time (i remember being a small bystander in the midst of it and probably played along), it's just rather anachronistic at the moment

or maybe it's not, it is only as anachronistic as people leave it to be, abraker is offering up one thing (or probably was making an in-group reference to a time that seemed fun) and if nobody takes it then we inevitably move on to the next
I'm not sure and I don't know. All I know is that I don't care about this RP and I find it annoying for the simple reason that I haven't fit in it.
You not caring about it and not fitting in doesn’t mean others don’t care, and it’s pretty rude to say otherwise. Not that you actually care for being rude, since all you do is be an asshole most of the time.

RP is what got people like Scyla, Remi, me, Stomiks, Abraker, Kere, Manishh and many more able to meet each other and even become somewhat friends. it’s a pillar of this sub forum and has been one for the longest time. Don’t shit on the founding fathers, even if you disliked their mandate.

Also have fun. Don’t take things so seriously.
based
Achromalia

Polyspora wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:


⚠️⚠️⚠️ WARNING ADVISED ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This is a potential trap to assimilate denizens into Kere's POG fleet.

no one cares about your shitty rp
keremal and abraker did, and a few others at the time (i remember being a small bystander in the midst of it and probably played along), it's just rather anachronistic at the moment

or maybe it's not, it is only as anachronistic as people leave it to be, abraker is offering up one thing (or probably was making an in-group reference to a time that seemed fun) and if nobody takes it then we inevitably move on to the next
I'm not sure and I don't know. All I know is that I don't care about this RP and I find it annoying for the simple reason that I haven't fit in it.
You not caring about it and not fitting in doesn’t mean others don’t care, and it’s pretty rude to say otherwise. Not that you actually care for being rude, since all you do is be an asshole most of the time.

RP is what got people like Scyla, Remi, me, Stomiks, Abraker, Kere, Manishh and many more able to meet each other and even become somewhat friends. it’s a pillar of this sub forum and has been one for the longest time. Don’t shit on the founding fathers, even if you disliked their mandate.

Also have fun. Don’t take things so seriously.
mmyeah;; this is a pretty strikingly compelling point, i didn't fully realize how much people were able to find community specifically through roleplay-- i mean it was intuitive enough to assume but i just never personally engaged in discord servers or anything like that to the extent that i knew people personally, so i never saw those connections truly form. it always was something facing the public, and i never really liked being isolated into private discord servers anyway

well... i figure that winny already understands this premise of "i don't care but i guess others do" for the most part, and he's actually moreso being willing to at least responsibly admit to the limits of his experience and the extent of what he reasonably can say about something, it just... seems to take a little pushback in order to extract that from what he actually explicitly communicates with people

i imagine it's more like... winny knows enough about identifying his own faults-as-perceived (at surface level), but it hardly really seems like he consequently managed to transform that into anything constructive yet. he already has his honesty, which is a great boon to his credit, but of course in the pursuit of his concept of rationale, it seems like some occasionally-measured "brutal honesty" is how this goes. it seems as though rationale and charisma are almost mutually exclusive, somehow, when that's a bit of a false dichotomy, but i'm not sure that's the point-- maybe it's not whether that's true, but rather whether he personally can manage both with sincerity

...there might be more to say on this but i think this suffices for now

Penguin wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

You not caring about it and not fitting in doesn’t mean others don’t care, and it’s pretty rude to say otherwise. Not that you actually care for being rude, since all you do is be an asshole most of the time.

RP is what got people like Scyla, Remi, me, Stomiks, Abraker, Kere, Manishh and many more able to meet each other and even become somewhat friends. it’s a pillar of this sub forum and has been one for the longest time. Don’t shit on the founding fathers, even if you disliked their mandate.

Also have fun. Don’t take things so seriously.
based
PENGUIN <3333 hi!!! hello! haiiii!!!! :p
Penguin

Achromalia wrote:

PENGUIN <3333 hi!!! hello! haiiii!!!! :p
HELLO ACHRO! I see you're still just as verbose as you've always been :)
Topic Starter
keremaru
rp's cool n all
but OT has outgrown it
oh shit hi penguin
Achromalia

Penguin wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

PENGUIN <3333 hi!!! hello! haiiii!!!! :p
HELLO ACHRO! I see you're still just as verbose as you've always been :)
is this my one defining character trait???;; help :sob: /j

it's always wonderful to see you visit :> i'm verbose but just like,, a maybe-different kind of verbosity now? i don't really remember who i was in the past but it seems like a lot has stayed very similar, i'm just like... a little more aesthetic about everything ^-^"
Penguin

Achromalia wrote:

Penguin wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

PENGUIN <3333 hi!!! hello! haiiii!!!! :p
HELLO ACHRO! I see you're still just as verbose as you've always been :)
is this my one defining character trait???;; help :sob: /j

it's always wonderful to see you visit :> i'm verbose but just like,, a maybe-different kind of verbosity now? i don't really remember who i was in the past but it seems like a lot has stayed very similar, i'm just like... a little more aesthetic about everything ^-^"
Verbose, introspective, artistic, expressive, but most of all, ur cute c:
abraker
Hey look it's 3 OT Presidents in succession!
Now where is Ghouly?
Achromalia

Penguin wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

Penguin wrote:

Achromalia wrote:

PENGUIN <3333 hi!!! hello! haiiii!!!! :p
HELLO ACHRO! I see you're still just as verbose as you've always been :)
is this my one defining character trait???;; help :sob: /j

it's always wonderful to see you visit :> i'm verbose but just like,, a maybe-different kind of verbosity now? i don't really remember who i was in the past but it seems like a lot has stayed very similar, i'm just like... a little more aesthetic about everything ^-^"
Verbose, introspective, artistic, expressive, but most of all, ur cute c:
awwwhhghj youre wonderful i melt

abraker wrote:

Hey look it's 3 OT Presidents in succession!
Now where is Ghouly?
the cross-over spin-off episode!! we need it now!!!!
Winnyace

Polyspora wrote:

You not caring about it and not fitting in doesn’t mean others don’t care, and it’s pretty rude to say otherwise. Not that you actually care for being rude, since all you do is be an asshole most of the time.

RP is what got people like Scyla, Remi, me, Stomiks, Abraker, Kere, Manishh and many more able to meet each other and even become somewhat friends. it’s a pillar of this sub forum and has been one for the longest time. Don’t shit on the founding fathers, even if you disliked their mandate.

Also have fun. Don’t take things so seriously.
You know what? Fair. What you've written is correct. I don't see how I am an asshole here, but maybe I don't see it. If you are willing, please tell me what mannerisms make me one.
Achromalia

Winnyace wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

You not caring about it and not fitting in doesn’t mean others don’t care, and it’s pretty rude to say otherwise. Not that you actually care for being rude, since all you do is be an asshole most of the time.

RP is what got people like Scyla, Remi, me, Stomiks, Abraker, Kere, Manishh and many more able to meet each other and even become somewhat friends. it’s a pillar of this sub forum and has been one for the longest time. Don’t shit on the founding fathers, even if you disliked their mandate.

Also have fun. Don’t take things so seriously.
You know what? Fair. What you've written is correct. I don't see how I am an asshole here, but maybe I don't see it. If you are willing, please tell me what mannerisms make me one.
to preface this... often times, it's an entangled mess of characteristics and mannerisms rather than an isolated action or trait, and it'll tend to be susceptible to interpretation from the viewer's experience and familiarization and awareness/proximity to the subcultural environment of a subject

but in my mind you tend to appear generally apathetic or inconsiderate of any collaborative social intention people might have, even a bit hostile if it does not seem to cause anything disagreeable to anyone but yourself. you've also seemed to have a habit of getting into minor trouble with people for disagreements where no charity-of-perspective is afforded (for example, "i imagine it's possible you've learned to adapt to stress and challenge by attempting to confront it with hard reason, and you've described some reactive sensitivities which i think are possible justifications for holding onto the need to be and appear factual... but it always seemed to me that this approach simply won't be universally applicable, not at the exclusion of gentleness and levity, and i just don't think this Rational And Factual bit is necessarily the only thing you can aim for")

most of the time, it just seems like you're largely uninterested/cold (not extremely so, but just enough where any critique you make tends to chill the room for a moment, so-to-speak, until people move past it), when instead you've pointed to a more moderately reactive and sentimental disposition that i imagine you save for specific personal interests that don't face the public-- and at rare moments, you'll point to something as being cute or make a comment about something you wish would happen for you to the effect of what i'd consider a longing for comfort

in text, manneristically, it's also in your techinique and style of speech

+ "proper" capitalization and punctuation which often does not necessarily describe rationale or correctness but can sometimes instead create an impression of a stiff/rigid/callous person usually if joined by other traits

+ typically short and sometimes curt phrasing, and limited explorative evaluation unless explicitly asked. i imagine this is pretty normal, but it happens to conflict with the informal mood, which you join in on through tone and subject, but the form/technique of it is still carrying that impression of stiff callousness. and in the singular personal conversation i've shared with you, though i can believe it is partly a matter of english being a secondary language, you just seem to... never really be curious about examining any premises that exist beyond your range of opinion and interest, especially when you already have a conclusion settled for yourself

+ quick to critique on occasion, depending on circumstance. though many people here are like this, i think most are simultaneously doing so while being moderately playful and sloppy. you seem to release a critique nearly on impulse (given how this conversation started, in that you would describe and project your experience as if you were speaking for others), but it could even be possible that it isn't on impulse and that instead those are just the moments you chose to post something about a subject, implying that you're critiquing everything even more than it would've appeared

...though i genuinely don't really know exactly what it is that definitively creates these impressions of you. you just tend to appear like a moderately isolated affection-starved person with opinions, and you probably handle it in ways that make it so that you just appear callous and severe, sabotaging your socialization with whichever people happen to pick up on or be sensitive to that. it's not that everyone must be befriended, and i don't assume you wouldn't be fine with just being selective about which people you actually care to befriend, but...

you worry about fitting in (many others did too, like sametdze and myself and patatitta, maybe more) while separating yourself of your own accord,,, and it's not as though people needed to share the same interests either-- i'm not a particularly media-literate person so i can't readily engage with many topics around most media with any depth (usually ruling out the patatitta review thread + anime and waifu threads + anime meme threads). i think you just,, happen to implcitly and explicitly draw a lot of lines. you're somewhat like patatitta in judging whether to accept/qualify something for review, but instead it's generalized and extrapolated to how you appear to some people at almost every corner of off-topic

...but again, you make strikingly vulnerable or charitable or salient comments at other times in surveys or in general discussions or in conversations that merit it. additionally, you believe you're not funny but... sametdze absolutely loves you and eats the sardonic blunt-to-a-fault vibe up, you seem to know how to be quippy and clap someone in the head with it, and sometimes even i believe you're fairly aware and funny in particular corrections you made in reply to someone. i always thought it was because you were already well-established here until i heard that you never saw yourself this way

...im losing track of myself, i might leave it at that, but... i'd be happy to elaborate more if you have questions or are curious about possible contexts/connections/implications, or why for example i might believe one thing or another about you
sametdze
i dont love him i just have a high amount of enjoyment when it comes to winny
sametdze
but i suppose it could be titled as "love" if you really bend it that way
Achromalia

Achromalia wrote:

...but again, you make strikingly vulnerable or charitable or salient comments at other times in surveys or in general discussions or in conversations that merit it. additionally, you believe you're not funny but... sametdze absolutely loves you and eats the sardonic blunt-to-a-fault vibe up, you seem to know how to be quippy and clap someone in the head with it, and sometimes even i believe you're fairly aware and funny in particular corrections you made in reply to someone. i always thought it was because you were already well-established here until i heard that you never saw yourself this way

sametdze wrote:

i dont love him i just have a high amount of enjoyment when it comes to winny
ah

ok, samet highly enjoys you :>
Winnyace

Achromalia wrote:

to preface this... often times, it's an entangled mess of characteristics and mannerisms rather than an isolated action or trait, and it'll tend to be susceptible to interpretation from the viewer's experience and familiarization and awareness/proximity to the subcultural environment of a subject

but in my mind you tend to appear generally apathetic or inconsiderate of any collaborative social intention people might have, even a bit hostile if it does not seem to cause anything disagreeable to anyone but yourself. you've also seemed to have a habit of getting into minor trouble with people for disagreements where no charity-of-perspective is afforded (for example, "i imagine it's possible you've learned to adapt to stress and challenge by attempting to confront it with hard reason, and you've described some reactive sensitivities which i think are possible justifications for holding onto the need to be and appear factual... but it always seemed to me that this approach simply won't be universally applicable, not at the exclusion of gentleness and levity, and i just don't think this Rational And Factual bit is necessarily the only thing you can aim for")

most of the time, it just seems like you're largely uninterested/cold (not extremely so, but just enough where any critique you make tends to chill the room for a moment, so-to-speak, until people move past it), when instead you've pointed to a more moderately reactive and sentimental disposition that i imagine you save for specific personal interests that don't face the public-- and at rare moments, you'll point to something as being cute or make a comment about something you wish would happen for you to the effect of what i'd consider a longing for comfort

in text, manneristically, it's also in your techinique and style of speech

+ "proper" capitalization and punctuation which often does not necessarily describe rationale or correctness but can sometimes instead create an impression of a stiff/rigid/callous person usually if joined by other traits

+ typically short and sometimes curt phrasing, and limited explorative evaluation unless explicitly asked. i imagine this is pretty normal, but it happens to conflict with the informal mood, which you join in on through tone and subject, but the form/technique of it is still carrying that impression of stiff callousness. and in the singular personal conversation i've shared with you, though i can believe it is partly a matter of english being a secondary language, you just seem to... never really be curious about examining any premises that exist beyond your range of opinion and interest, especially when you already have a conclusion settled for yourself

+ quick to critique on occasion, depending on circumstance. though many people here are like this, i think most are simultaneously doing so while being moderately playful and sloppy. you seem to release a critique nearly on impulse (given how this conversation started, in that you would describe and project your experience as if you were speaking for others), but it could even be possible that it isn't on impulse and that instead those are just the moments you chose to post something about a subject, implying that you're critiquing everything even more than it would've appeared

...though i genuinely don't really know exactly what it is that definitively creates these impressions of you. you just tend to appear like a moderately isolated affection-starved person with opinions, and you probably handle it in ways that make it so that you just appear callous and severe, sabotaging your socialization with whichever people happen to pick up on or be sensitive to that. it's not that everyone must be befriended, and i don't assume you wouldn't be fine with just being selective about which people you actually care to befriend, but...

you worry about fitting in (many others did too, like sametdze and myself and patatitta, maybe more) while separating yourself of your own accord,,, and it's not as though people needed to share the same interests either-- i'm not a particularly media-literate person so i can't readily engage with many topics around most media with any depth (usually ruling out the patatitta review thread + anime and waifu threads + anime meme threads). i think you just,, happen to implcitly and explicitly draw a lot of lines. you're somewhat like patatitta in judging whether to accept/qualify something for review, but instead it's generalized and extrapolated to how you appear to some people at almost every corner of off-topic

...but again, you make strikingly vulnerable or charitable or salient comments at other times in surveys or in general discussions or in conversations that merit it. additionally, you believe you're not funny but... sametdze absolutely loves you and eats the sardonic blunt-to-a-fault vibe up, you seem to know how to be quippy and clap someone in the head with it, and sometimes even i believe you're fairly aware and funny in particular corrections you made in reply to someone. i always thought it was because you were already well-established here until i heard that you never saw yourself this way

...im losing track of myself, i might leave it at that, but... i'd be happy to elaborate more if you have questions or are curious about possible contexts/connections/implications, or why for example i might believe one thing or another about you
Hmm... I see. I appreciate the post you've made. I think I understood what you've said here and I will see about fixing it, though, I'm honestly not even sure how I could go about doing that. Either way, thank you for taking your time for this post.
vi_xlt
color....
Aireunaeus
I GOT
I GOT
I GOT
I GOT
so i was takin a walk the other day...
B0ii
you have just lost the game
Jun Maeda
I LOVE OSU!
sametdze

B0ii wrote:

you have just lost the game
FUCK
Achromalia

sametdze wrote:

B0ii wrote:

you have just lost the game
FUCK
:)
Topic Starter
keremaru
guys, it's just a thread
i don't know what happened here
but y'all can chill now
sametdze

Achromalia wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

You not caring about it and not fitting in doesn’t mean others don’t care, and it’s pretty rude to say otherwise. Not that you actually care for being rude, since all you do is be an asshole most of the time.

RP is what got people like Scyla, Remi, me, Stomiks, Abraker, Kere, Manishh and many more able to meet each other and even become somewhat friends. it’s a pillar of this sub forum and has been one for the longest time. Don’t shit on the founding fathers, even if you disliked their mandate.

Also have fun. Don’t take things so seriously.
You know what? Fair. What you've written is correct. I don't see how I am an asshole here, but maybe I don't see it. If you are willing, please tell me what mannerisms make me one.
to preface this... often times, it's an entangled mess of characteristics and mannerisms rather than an isolated action or trait, and it'll tend to be susceptible to interpretation from the viewer's experience and familiarization and awareness/proximity to the subcultural environment of a subject

but in my mind you tend to appear generally apathetic or inconsiderate of any collaborative social intention people might have, even a bit hostile if it does not seem to cause anything disagreeable to anyone but yourself. you've also seemed to have a habit of getting into minor trouble with people for disagreements where no charity-of-perspective is afforded (for example, "i imagine it's possible you've learned to adapt to stress and challenge by attempting to confront it with hard reason, and you've described some reactive sensitivities which i think are possible justifications for holding onto the need to be and appear factual... but it always seemed to me that this approach simply won't be universally applicable, not at the exclusion of gentleness and levity, and i just don't think this Rational And Factual bit is necessarily the only thing you can aim for")

most of the time, it just seems like you're largely uninterested/cold (not extremely so, but just enough where any critique you make tends to chill the room for a moment, so-to-speak, until people move past it), when instead you've pointed to a more moderately reactive and sentimental disposition that i imagine you save for specific personal interests that don't face the public-- and at rare moments, you'll point to something as being cute or make a comment about something you wish would happen for you to the effect of what i'd consider a longing for comfort

in text, manneristically, it's also in your techinique and style of speech

+ "proper" capitalization and punctuation which often does not necessarily describe rationale or correctness but can sometimes instead create an impression of a stiff/rigid/callous person usually if joined by other traits

+ typically short and sometimes curt phrasing, and limited explorative evaluation unless explicitly asked. i imagine this is pretty normal, but it happens to conflict with the informal mood, which you join in on through tone and subject, but the form/technique of it is still carrying that impression of stiff callousness. and in the singular personal conversation i've shared with you, though i can believe it is partly a matter of english being a secondary language, you just seem to... never really be curious about examining any premises that exist beyond your range of opinion and interest, especially when you already have a conclusion settled for yourself

+ quick to critique on occasion, depending on circumstance. though many people here are like this, i think most are simultaneously doing so while being moderately playful and sloppy. you seem to release a critique nearly on impulse (given how this conversation started, in that you would describe and project your experience as if you were speaking for others), but it could even be possible that it isn't on impulse and that instead those are just the moments you chose to post something about a subject, implying that you're critiquing everything even more than it would've appeared

...though i genuinely don't really know exactly what it is that definitively creates these impressions of you. you just tend to appear like a moderately isolated affection-starved person with opinions, and you probably handle it in ways that make it so that you just appear callous and severe, sabotaging your socialization with whichever people happen to pick up on or be sensitive to that. it's not that everyone must be befriended, and i don't assume you wouldn't be fine with just being selective about which people you actually care to befriend, but...

you worry about fitting in (many others did too, like sametdze and myself and patatitta, maybe more) while separating yourself of your own accord,,, and it's not as though people needed to share the same interests either-- i'm not a particularly media-literate person so i can't readily engage with many topics around most media with any depth (usually ruling out the patatitta review thread + anime and waifu threads + anime meme threads). i think you just,, happen to implcitly and explicitly draw a lot of lines. you're somewhat like patatitta in judging whether to accept/qualify something for review, but instead it's generalized and extrapolated to how you appear to some people at almost every corner of off-topic

...but again, you make strikingly vulnerable or charitable or salient comments at other times in surveys or in general discussions or in conversations that merit it. additionally, you believe you're not funny but... sametdze absolutely loves you and eats the sardonic blunt-to-a-fault vibe up, you seem to know how to be quippy and clap someone in the head with it, and sometimes even i believe you're fairly aware and funny in particular corrections you made in reply to someone. i always thought it was because you were already well-established here until i heard that you never saw yourself this way

...im losing track of myself, i might leave it at that, but... i'd be happy to elaborate more if you have questions or are curious about possible contexts/connections/implications, or why for example i might believe one thing or another about you
honestly would been funny if you wrote it in the keremaru text style
Achromalia

sametdze wrote:

honestly would been funny if you wrote it in the keremaru text style
... ok, so if i just,,,

...right, so

let me tell you a story
about? love, and. friendship
and compromise...






...







...







...







anyway have y'all told your
i just
thought it would be sweet
if you








Achromalia wrote:

to preface this... often times, it's an entangled mess of characteristics and mannerisms rather than an isolated action or trait, and it'll tend to be susceptible to interpretation from the viewer's experience and familiarization and awareness/proximity to the subcultural environment of a subject

but in my mind you tend to appear generally apathetic or inconsiderate of any collaborative social intention people might have, even a bit hostile if it does not seem to cause anything disagreeable to anyone but yourself. you've also seemed to have a habit of getting into minor trouble with people for disagreements where no charity-of-perspective is afforded (for example, a balance of charitability and critique such as "i imagine it's possible you've learned to adapt to stress and challenge by attempting to confront it with hard reason, and you've described some reactive sensitivities which i think are possible justifications for holding onto the need to be and appear factual... but it always seemed to me that this approach simply wouldn't be universally applicable, not at the exclusion of gentleness and levity, and i just don't think this Rational And Factual bit is necessarily the only thing you can aim for")

most of the time, it just seems like you're largely uninterested/cold (not extremely so, but just enough where any critique you make tends to chill the room for a moment, so-to-speak, until people move past it), when instead you've pointed to a more moderately reactive and sentimental disposition that i imagine you save for specific personal interests that don't face the public-- and at rare moments, you'll point to something as being cute or make a comment about something you wish would happen for you to the effect of what i'd consider a longing for comfort

in text, manneristically, it's also in your technique and style of speech

+ "proper" capitalization and punctuation which often does not necessarily describe rationale or correctness but can sometimes instead create an impression of a stiff/rigid/callous person usually if joined by other traits

+ typically short and sometimes curt phrasing, and limited explorative evaluation unless explicitly asked. i imagine this is pretty normal, but it happens to conflict with the informal mood, which you join in on through tone and subject, but the form/technique of it is still carrying that impression of stiff callousness. and in the singular personal conversation i've shared with you, though i can believe it is partly a matter of english being a secondary language, you just seem to... never really be curious about examining any premises that exist beyond your range of opinion and interest, especially when you already have a conclusion settled for yourself

+ quick to critique on occasion, depending on circumstance. though many people here are like this, i think most are simultaneously doing so while being moderately playful and sloppy. you seem to release a critique nearly on impulse (given how this conversation started, in that you would describe and project your experience as if you were speaking for others), but it could even be possible that it isn't on impulse and that instead those are just the moments you chose to post something about a subject, implying that you're critiquing everything even more than it would've appeared

...though i genuinely don't really know exactly what it is that definitively creates these impressions of you. you just tend to appear like a moderately isolated affection-starved person with opinions, and you probably handle it in ways that make it so that you just appear callous and severe, sabotaging your socialization with whichever people happen to pick up on or be sensitive to that. it's not that everyone must be befriended, and i don't assume you wouldn't be fine with just being selective about which people you actually care to befriend, but...

you worry about fitting in (many others did too, like sametdze and myself and patatitta, maybe more) while separating yourself of your own accord,,, and it's not as though people needed to share the same interests either-- i'm not a particularly media-literate person so i can't readily engage with many topics around most media with any depth (usually ruling out the patatitta review thread + anime and waifu threads + anime meme threads). i think you just,, happen to implcitly and explicitly draw a lot of lines. you're somewhat like patatitta in judging whether to accept/qualify something for review, but instead it's generalized and extrapolated to how you appear to some people at almost every corner of off-topic

...but again, you make strikingly vulnerable or charitable or salient comments at other times in surveys or in general discussions or in conversations that merit it. additionally, you believe you're not funny but... sametdze absolutely loves you and eats the sardonic blunt-to-a-fault vibe up, you seem to know how to be quippy and clap someone in the head with it, and sometimes even i believe you're fairly aware and funny in particular corrections you made in reply to someone. i always thought it was because you were already well-established here until i heard that you never saw yourself this way

...im losing track of myself, i might leave it at that, but... i'd be happy to elaborate more if you have questions or are curious about possible contexts/connections/implications, or why for example i might believe one thing or another about you
Jun Maeda

keremaru wrote:

guys, it's just a thread
i don't know what happened here
but y'all can chill now
NO
Please sign in to reply.

New reply