alacat wrote:

Beautiful BG :>

[General]

1. Nothing!

[Normal]

1. 00:06:922 (5) - I prefer to use soft-clap and finish here. It would fit well with this kind of music.
2. 00:07:922 (1,1) - I think the notes appear too early considering the level of this difficulty also it's high BPM. I hope to give bigenners some time to recover here. So you should consider remaking this part.
3. 00:33:458 (3) - How about adding a clap to the repeat instead the tail ?
4. 00:53:256 (4,1) - In my opinion, having these use the same combo colour makes it easier to read. So Consider adding new combo here 00:53:256 -
5. 01:03:922 (4) - missing a clap
6. 01:08:256 (3) - I feel this slider doesn't fit here. It's better to use repeat slider same as here 01:10:922 (3) - .
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:30:589 (4,1) - Same as above about new combo.
8. 01:36:256 (1,2) - a bit nazi mod, please put more distance for appearance. It is nice to look at.
9. 02:18:589 (4,1) - Same.

[Hard]

1. 00:06:088 - I feel it's better to use soft-clap instead drum.
2. 00:06:588 - ~ I have a sense of discomfort with this new combo from here. Please try to do this
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:21:589 (1) - add a finish to the head of the slider here to follow the crash cymbal in the music. like your previous slider 02:20:089 (5,7) -

[Insane]

1. 00:07:922 - About new combo. It's better to use it with constant rhythm for playing. like this
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:25:322 - hmm ... remove a clap to the head ? since it follows nothing.
3. 00:31:763 (4) - missing a finish
4. 01:14:589 (6) - you already have the up and down motion from your previous patterns, the transition from this to the next slider almost feels like unnatural jump. so i recommend you to use ctrl + G command to this slider.
5. 01:39:589 - ,01:40:922 - Why did you add a clap here ? o.o

jonathanlfj wrote:

for next BAT: please double check the timing around 00:42:589, it sounded and played fine for me

Nice timing ! I agree with you :>

then, Let me know whenever you're ready