Stefan wrote:

00:46:862 (363,364) - I find a Double is too overused here. While 00:46:862 (363) is totally fine - due vocals - 00:46:948 (364) isn't really. I however get the transistion you want to use here.
01:00:577 (482,483) - same here but this time 01:00:577 (482) sounds not that good.

qoot8123 wrote:

00:47:205 (366,367) - reverse these notes? i think it can make a good reflect with 00:46:862 (363,364) - this doublet. I have changed this in another way so the structure remains the same and there is no more double (people complained about it).

00:48:062 (373) - how about move this note to 00:48:234 - and change to d i know you make a consistent with former part, but i think the vocal on this paragraph is different with former part, so it would be better if you use another pattern. I see what you're doing here, and you are right, but what my intention here was is that progressively as the pitch changes, the patterns change too, but not in an unexpected way. For example, I was using kdd to reflect the guitar rhythm, which was changed to kkd here because there was a change in the music.

01:00:919 (485) - how about change it to d? i feel the drum sound is heavy on 01:00:834 (484) - ,only put kat here may emphasis the drum more clearly Same as the above
It's a progressive pattern transformation as they song goes, kdd -> kkd.

01:27:920 (693) - move to 01:28:091 - and change to k , it may make the rhythm more clear

01:28:605 (697) - ^

04:19:005 (200) - ^

04:19:690 (204) - ^ I actually like your idea here, but it goes against the idea of the breaks I had here. Since the map is really dense and packed with notes, these breaks were made according to the vocals because you could say the singer is "taking a breath" here, so I wanted the player to "take a breath" here too.

01:37:177 (763,764,765) - change to ddk ? , to make consistent with 01:39:748 (786,789) -

01:48:320 (860) - ^

04:28:433 (275) - ^

04:39:405 (374) - ^ I'd rather not to. :< The idea here was to use kats as the primary "interrupt", creating rhythm. If I had more of them then the rhythm would be stale, besides the intention here was to alternate dons and kats on every downbeat as much as possible, so it creates more diversity.

03:56:290 (18) - move to 03:55:604 - and change to d? it would be better if make the break on 03:56:290 - Actually just adding a note there would be even better, but I don't want to add more notes, there are 2808 of them already.

TKS wrote:

just minor things.

00:07:434 (27) - feels a little weird that compare with previous pattern. maybe that should be changed to kkk.
actually 00:03:234 (2,3,4) - and 00:05:977 (18,19,20) - both have kkd there even though each has different pitches. You are correct, the kdk was because of difference in pitch, but changing either of these kkd would reduce gameplay I think. I just don't think kdd would work here.

00:09:748 - no needed to make a break there. you are focusing at both the drum and guitar sounds, right? if so, you should make a break at 00:10:434 - . i mean consider removing these 00:10:434 (47,48) - notes since there is no their sounds(i can hear an instrument sound but must not follow it for the flow). instead, you can add a don at 00:09:748 - . thats plays better imo. This is actually an amazing catch. I removed those 2 notes but I didn't add a don here because it would feel a bit dense to me. Removing those 2 notes actually brought this kd into a bigger light as well, so it looks much better to me.

00:40:520 (312) - don fits better to emphasize kat at 00:40:777 (315) - . also its just for the bassdrum(tom?) sound. Hmm, while you're right, I also think a kdkkd for these 00:40:262 (308,309,310,311,312) - is a little better than kdkdd, so I want to keep ;_;

00:50:377 - suddenly following sound has switched to the vocal ;_; consider adding a don to maintain the previous flow.
00:50:891 (395,396,397,398) - are alright since 00:50:720 (394) - works for that. You are absolutely right.

btw, if you want to use a silent spinner. drum sampleset is better than normal sampleset because taiko mode doesnt have a hitsound for drum sampleset basically. idk its rankable tho
Sure. About rankability, I don't think it would matter here at all since it changes nothing, just a small aesthetic change which works wonders.

Nwolf wrote:

*attempts to steal heart*


...ok that wouldn't end good maybe???