Voted yes. It will make the rankings more accurate.
correcting your grammar a little *for those whoXcrypt wrote:
For most of us, these maps will seem too hard. For expert players though (non-acc 98%+ players), there is only one challenging ranked o!m song atm: imperishable night.
YES FOR ME +1- R u m i a - wrote:
i agree to rank harder maps. but it needs a proper flow and good reasons.
and NO to just random overmap maps
SO YES FOR ME . +1
that was theold approved map criteria , the new ones need to be at least 6 mins-Kamikaze- wrote:
Why don't we just go for approval with ET maps? Lenght of the map isn't a problem, I've seen A LOT of standard maps with even less than 4 mins approved, so there shouldn't be any problem. If map is well done and playable we should be able to get them in approved section.
Approved section in mania is only what Rumia has said but for ET maps to be in Approved section? That, you have to persuade BATmanager or some BATs who have knowledgeable about this Approved thingy.-Kamikaze- wrote:
Why don't we just go for approval with ET maps? Lenght of the map isn't a problem, I've seen A LOT of standard maps with even less than 4 mins approved, so there shouldn't be any problem. If map is well done and playable we should be able to get them in approved section.
That's exactly my point of view. The new ranking system, although far from perfect, is a breath of fresh air for o!m. I feel like it's time for us, the o!m community as a whole, both us, simple players, and BATs or staff members alike, to make o!m what it really should be after a year of existence.Xcrypt wrote:
I didn't mean to say that the current ranked maps are bad or too easy. There's definitely a place for those first timer/beginner/intermediate maps too, they are equally and perhaps even more important than ET maps because the majority of the players is not ET. I just think we need to start ranking harder maps aswell, the community is getting better at it and we need to start thinking about the real ET guys too.
I have been told part of the problems lies with BATs but I hope with some community effort we might get there too. The new ranking system (even though it is still quite unrefined) is a new hope for o!m imo - it certainly can be - and we as community can only try to make the best of it.
Hard time? More like less than a second for the algorithm.ishimaru94 wrote:
inb4 Tom94 would have a hard time to recalculate these harder maps if these maps would get their deserved place.
I guess more people have similar thoughts like me.Tom94 wrote:
Hard time? More like less than a second for the algorithm.ishimaru94 wrote:
inb4 Tom94 would have a hard time to recalculate these harder maps if these maps would get their deserved place.
This.Akihiro wrote:
I'm fine with ridiculously hard maps. This game is supposed to be competitive.
And, good players have no reason to stay here if there's nothing interesting ranked...
So, yeah, there's no good reason to keep really hard from ranking.
The skill cap in this kind of RG is really really high.
And if we're speaking technical stuff, most ranked maps aren't good technically.
Especially the anime stuff >_> I see just random 8ths and some random LNs. Boring patterns too.
quit ranking worldPyaKura wrote:
General RC are prohibiting this and I don't see the issue with forcing mappers to have a well designed diffspread for both beginners and expert players if they want to get their maps ranked.
... pretty sure they all know about this thread lol.Stefan wrote:
You know, the wrong thing you're doing is not to involve any o!m BAT (and BAT with o!m knownledge) here in this discussion. I respect the opinion here why you want that so urgent and I understand that it really feels boring to play a game without real challenges (I cannot judge this). But; you have to talk with the BAT too. I am sure some of you already have talked with some BAT member via PM but please let them know about this discussion here.