I think that the vocals are the most important part in almost any music. It sure dosen't make sense to map the drums instead of the vocals, as the drums is just plainly a not important accompaniment for the main melody.
It's even worse when people put random beats on white ticks when there is no drums, no guitar, no vocals on the part, and they just justify it with "argh this note is on a white tick uguu~'
I just want to know how the community thinks about this, detesting following vocals and following drums and empty beats instead.
I want to know why its bad following vocals yet acceptable to put beats on random white ticks where there's no music...
a quote at last~~
It's even worse when people put random beats on white ticks when there is no drums, no guitar, no vocals on the part, and they just justify it with "argh this note is on a white tick uguu~'
I just want to know how the community thinks about this, detesting following vocals and following drums and empty beats instead.
I want to know why its bad following vocals yet acceptable to put beats on random white ticks where there's no music...
a quote at last~~
I'm sorry if I offend any of you, but I'm just curious about this problemD33d wrote:
May I ask why you detest the mapping of vocals? If they're carrying the song, then it's usually a good idea to map them. Because the melody usually has the most variance, changing between the lead and rhythm gives the map as much unique interest as possible. If the vocals ARE awkward and are being followed, then the mapper should be following their approximate rhythm and what's happening behind them, in a way which coincides with them.mnto wrote:
1. Any notes/sliders that attempt to follow the vocals in a song. Especially if the vocals aren't quantized, or are on awkward beats.