Lanturn wrote:

[General]
Title: lower-case on 'first' and 'unison'
Artist: remove the space between 桜庭 and 統 | Japanese names are to be written without them.

Tags:
ヴァルキリープロファイル <-- Valkyrie Profile written in Katakana.
http://vgmdb.net/album/1256

All done.

[Easy]
About your Easy rhythms.. honestly I had no problem 100% 4 modding it (on my second try, thanks to the stupid anti-flow thing you had near the end) so I don't really feel like they're random or anything. Nothing made me cringe when playing or surprised me.

1. 00:03:730 (1) - This is really one of the few patterns of notes I was a little sad with. These would fit so much better as 3/2 sliders, to the point where I think it'd actually be easier to play them as 3/2 sliders. I had no problem holding these to the end.. I just didn't really like it. I would seriously consider using more 3/2's in areas like these. | To me, this looks fun: http://puu.sh/8LHCe.jpg Used a 3/2 slider with a repeat instead.
2. 00:11:931 (3) - Now to be the biggest jerk. I honestly think you should consider making this a 2/1 slider instead of a 3/2 slider. and then add a circle at 00:13:161 - | http://puu.sh/8LHGo.jpg | This follows the music so much better no? Well, I guess since everyone tells me to do this, I'll try it for now.
3. 00:15:211 (3) - How about following the music a bit more. Maybe try changing this to a 1/1 slider? The note that plays at 00:15:621 - feels a bit important. Done.
4. 00:21:772 (4) - You're probably going to hate me again for this. But really honestly the same suggestion as | 00:11:931 (3) - | To add onto this. I think following the violin or whatever instrument that is is the most important thing you should be doing in a simple Easy such as this. The drums should only be followed as an extra to fill some gaps. ^
5. 00:37:764 (3) - I prefer this circle at 00:36:944 - since it seems to capture more of the.. holy crap I'm bad at naming instruments. It just seems more dominant there. | after the update you added a circle at 00:36:124 (4) - so this might not work that great. I'll leave this in though. ^
6. 00:39:404 (5) - Not so important note. You could probably get away with deleting this, but it plays fine either way. ^
7. 00:39:814 (1) - Sorry to be that repeat but you should try to map 00:40:634 - if at all possible. I really feel this is too important to skip. Changed to a 1/1 slider with a repeat followed by a circle.
8. 00:51:295 (3) - Snug the ball into the middle of the red node: x280 y139 works nicely, but similar positions work as well, as long as it ends up something like this | http://puu.sh/8LI7I.jpg | This is so the ball bounces correctly in the center instead of a little early or late. I guess I did stuff here.
9. 01:01:136 (2) - Maybe try stacking this on where the 00:59:086 (3) - is? No longer needed since you deleted the circle before
10. 01:04:417 (3) - Nudge the red over to about x338 y320 or somewhere similar, so the slider ball fits snug when you are at 01:04:827 - | http://puu.sh/8LI2U.jpg I guess I'll keep my slider like how it is for now... I can't see why should I make it like that o.o
11. 01:07:697 (3) - I guess this honestly would be the same suggestion as 00:15:211 - about changing it into a 1/1 slider. Sure.
12. 01:12:618 (1) - I'm not sure how picky you are with flow. But if you want more flow, consider rotating this a bit. something like this | http://puu.sh/8LIn2.jpg | You deleted the previous note here, so it might not be as good anymore. I'll leave this in though just in case. Hmm idk; I feel that the current pattern has a better flow...
13. 01:17:538 (3) - How about blanketing this around the (4) so it gets that nice curved flow coming from the previous two notes? | http://puu.sh/8LIqw.jpg Only made this curved without any blanketing; doing a blanket would need too much effort to rearrange the notes.
14. 01:34:760 (4,1) - RIP first attempt ;_; Keep this
    ---
    Maybe consider removing some of the whistles in the map where you already use finishes. That's really the only thing I can think of for peoples complaints about using too many whistles. Oh, and just to be sure on this since it may sound a bit forced. I really dont' have a problem with anything in this difficulty playability-wise. Everything works and flows nicely so you really don't have to change much or anything if you don't want to. These are more say alternative ideas in-case you might like something. I'm not expecting you to really use much. Oh and one more thing. I think the whistles are fine. Again, it's just an idea for your hitsounding Tweaked the hitsounding a little bit~

[Normal]

1. 00:02:090 (2,3) - If I recall correctly on Easy. You put the whistle on the Tail of (2) instead of the Head of (3). maybe swap? Done.
2. 00:07:010 (1) - Optional. Maybe blanket this around the (2)? Sure.
3. 00:13:161 (5) - Maybe try moving this circle with distance snap on, up a hair so it can angle a bit better into the next slider. ^
4. 00:13:571 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe avoid using claps here? Not really sure but the clap at 00:14:801 - feels really off, like it shouldn't belong. Still not too sure; I think it's okay...
5. 00:17:671 (2,3) - If you want to be a bit more creative and true to the music, consider using a 3/4 reverse slider here. | http://puu.sh/8LJ7m.jpg I'd like to keep the rhythm simple here.
6. 00:23:412 (1) - Maybe an upwards curve for better flow? | http://puu.sh/8LJa3.jpg Done.
7. 00:25:667 (4) - I don't really care for this slider. It feels like it plays too sudden since the previous notes all seemed to follow the instruments. Maybe just stick to a 1/1 gap? ^
8. 00:28:128 - Although it might just be me, doesn't this spot feel powerful enough to have a note? Not sure if this would be too many though in your eyes. I don't really like to have too many chains of sliders and circles.
9. 00:33:048 (7) - such an uneven gap.. Look at the distance spacing on this note please Fixed.
10. 00:36:534 (1) - Consider reducing this by 1/2 and adding a circle in the now empty spot at 00:37:149 - ? It seems to capture the instruments better. ^
11. 00:42:889 - optional, but how about adding a circle? No real reason. Just the extra sounds kind of imply there should be one there. Added.
12. 00:49:655 (1) - Same as 36 seconds I guess. If you don't want to add a circle, consider adding a red node at the tick so players can easily judge the slider is 3/2 instead of 1/1 (which is the impression it is giving off) Just shortened toe slider.
13. 00:54:576 (3) - Maybe also consider reducing this by 1/2 as well. I feel players will let go too early on this slider trying to follow the instruments. Done.
14. 00:58:676 (4) - pretty big gap between (4,5) 1.21 DS Fixed.
15. 01:01:751 (4) - I guess this is the same as 25 seconds. a 1/1 gap instead of the 1/2 gap from the previous note would be bettter I think. Sure.
16. 01:10:157 (2) - Since you use a lot of 1/1 sliders here. I highly recommend going for the 3/4 reverse slider here! ^
17. 01:25:739 (1,2,3) - Maybe convert all of these into a big 2/1 slider? At first I was thinking that this would be a good spot for a 1/1 slider, but then I noticed that you use a lot of 1/1s from here out, and never use anything larger. Maybe this is a good final spot to include something a bit larger than 1/1? This is just me thinking outside of the box. It really isn't needed, but I guess ideas never hurt. Sure!

[Hard]
Alright, Good morning.. well Evening now \o/ \o/
Let's do this.

1. That random distance spacing on each measure of notes.. 0_o I swear you must have went through everything from 1.0 to 2.0 all varying lol. Some of it can feel uncomfortable at times for a hard I know it can feel random at times. I'm using different values of spacing to follow how will I make the pattern that follows the jumps.
2. 00:03:115 (4) - Balance the distance between these notes? I personally don't see any effect in the song that should make these jumps uneven? | Try something like x348 y108 Sure.
3. 00:10:291 (1) - Nazi, nudge the red node over a hair so it snugs the ball. Umm, I can't really see why should I do this...
4. 00:13:571 (1) - These slow downs really bug me on 3/2 sliders. I think on almost every single one the first time I played through this, I was letting go of these too early. Not asking for a change, just wanted to throw out my feelings on them lol okay
5. 00:13:571 (1) - Also while you're at this. (very very Nazi) You should nudge the red node (again) so the curve starts happening when it hits the red | http://puu.sh/8MHC5.jpg Hmm, no I guess... Same reason as 00:10:291 (1).
6. 00:14:391 (2) - ^ ^
7. 00:18:902 (2) - Consider moving this to about x396 y152 so it supports the curved slider. Done.
8. 00:25:975 (3) - Control+G this. I mistook this for a 1/4 jump and having them facing the same way would really help prevent that. ^
9. 00:36:534 (1) - Consider reducing the distance between the last note and this one. It feels a bit too forced as a 2.24 distanced note. I would recommend below 2.0 if at all possible. You'll probably have to adjust other notes coming up so keep that in mind. Reduced to ~2.0x.
10. 00:49:655 (1) - When playing this set. A soft whistle occurs instead of a normal whistle. You have a soft sampleset on the body. make sure to put a Normal addition on the head so it gets the whistle effect! Fixed.
11. 00:53:755 (2,3) - because you were using 1.70 DS earlier, this slider gives off an odd impression to hit earlier than one would expect. Maybe consider increasing the gap from the previous (1) slider and then placing the (3) between (2) and the upcoming (1) slider the (3) is stacked on. Done.
12. 00:57:446 (4) - Maybe consider making this a duplicate of (3) and either moving it up, or rotating it twice. | http://puu.sh/8MGZf.jpg or http://puu.sh/8MH0F.jpg ? First is obviously for better flow, but a ladder effect can work alright here as well. I personally think that the flow of the current pattern. Let's see on what others say.
13. 01:00:214 - It feels a bit odd you didn't use a triplet here. No there really isn't anything playing in the song, but it sure gives off an impression there could be one here. Let's try it then.
14. 01:28:199 (5) - Read 49 seconds. Same problem! Fixed.
15. 01:30:455 (5) - Why not just use 1.6 or 1.7 spacing here? This way you could have a bit more room to make 01:30:660 (1) - blanket a bit better, and flow more naturally into the (2) ^
16. 01:32:300 (1,1) - Any reason to the different curvature on this? Ah, you're right. Made them the same.

[Extra]
How about calling this something interesting like "Asgard" since this music plays on Asgard Hill in the game. I'll probably consider renaming this to Valkyrie lol
Don't really have any suggestions.. maybe some minor ninja things. Don't expect much though.

1. 00:02:090 (1) - make the red node and the slider ball match? Done... I guess?
2. 00:30:588 (4) - Seems like you hand-made your streams. causing a few little gaps here and there. Really nazi, but this one has a 0.04 unbalance. Try x128 y99 All my streams are hand-made lol. Okay, fixed.
3. 00:35:918 (3) - More nazi: x377 y51 ^
4. 00:47:400 (4) - Maybe try a slight downwards curve? Done.
5. 01:03:597 (2) - I've watched a few people play this, and everytime they were getting 100s or slider breaks. maybe consider cutting this note and moving (1,3) away from each other a bit? ^
6. 01:15:693 (6,1) - Control+G and move the new (1) to around to where 01:17:333 (7) - is positioned? ^
7. 01:17:948 (2) - while you're at it, maybe stack the (2)'s tail where the (7) is? That one isn't really important, IMO. It won't have any effect while playing.
8. 01:26:969 (1) - There are points where I really really don't understand your NCing.. What is the point of this note exactly? >_< By the end of the song, I can't really figure out what you were planning with everything. Maybe go through the song quickly and make sure all the NCs are where they should be? Removed the NC here. My combo pattern mostly follows the object placement, so they might be not really accurate compared to the song's rhythm.

This was well.. rushed a bit as well. Hopefully even some of it can help.

Good luck, take a Mario err..

IamKwaN wrote:

Hi, from my queue here.
I am really sorry for my lateness and of coz, laziness.

General

1. Clear, mostly mentioned by Lanturn already. \o\
2. I prefer N:C1 clap to the default one, coz the N-clap is kinda noisy and doesn't match with the atmosphere of the song. Replace it in N, H and Ex please / Shit, I forgot.

Extra

1. 00:05:165 (4) - There isn't a solid sound but only echo of 00:04:960 (3). A slider starting from 00:04:960 instead of a circle is recommended for a better feeling. Sure.
2. 00:06:498 (2) - This is definitely overmapping. I'm certain I heard some kind of instrument sounds here.
3. 00:14:596 (4,5) - Combine them into a reversed slider like 00:13:776 (2) makes it more comfortable to hit imo. In fact, if you change them into something like this, it would be even better. Not quite sure about it... I prefer my current rhythm since it's following the music more accurately.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:17:671 (6) - Why not NC here but 00:18:081? I just got confused with your NC pattern. Without any jumpings or 1/6 pattern, you sometimes NC at third white tick, sometimes fourth. It would cause some kinds of readability problem imo. Try making the pattern consistent throughout the diff please. The following NC suggestions are made based on the third white tick NC pattern. The NC here follows the objects' placement. Yeah, it's kinda unpopular and is regarded as a bad thing sometimes, but... I don't really have too many choice. Remapped stuff here.
5. 00:21:054 - According to what you did before, I wonder why you miss this beat. I think an Extra can capture every stream sound in the music. ^
6. 00:21:157 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I found it difficult to understand your intention of what to follow here. if you are following the string, then these: 00:21:772 (1,2,3), should be a slider, since there is an obvious difference in the pattern of string between 00:21:157 (1,2,3) and 00:21:772 (1,2,3). On the other hand, if you are capturing the drum, as mentioned above, some blue ticks between 00:20:747 (3) to 00:21:772 (1) are missing. It would be much better if you can consider the consistency here. ^
7. 00:24:642 (1) - Really nazi, place this in a position such that 00:24:027 (3,4,5,6,7,1) forms a blanket. Moreover, remove the new combo on 00:24:642 (1). I'm already blanketing 00:25:257 (2), though, and why should I remove the NC? I think it's needed to denote the new pattern.
8. 00:23:002 (1) - Remove the NC. Okay for this.
9. 00:24:642 (1) - ^ Nope for this. I think you should know why already.
10. 00:26:282 (1,2,3,4,1) - Tbh, I think the angle of this short streams is quite non-aesthetic. But I can't think of any alternatives.. So, let it go lol Well, I just wanted to make it straight for variations.
11. 00:35:508 (6) - Identical to 00:24:642 (1). I tried my best.
12. 00:36:431 (7) - Overmapping again? Not really; there's something that supports this circle.
13. 00:38:891 (3) - ^ Same on 00:49:553 (5), 00:50:578 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) and 00:54:063 (3), I can't hear sounds for streams at blue ticks. Keep track of the music and don't create your own beats please Fixed stuff here and there.
14. 00:38:994 (4) - Why not NC like 00:27:513 (1) and 01:06:877 (1) and 01:18:358 (1)? Uh, I don't know how to explain this. Well, I remapped this part anyway, so...
15. 00:43:914 (4) - ^ Because this is still a part of the current stanza in the music? (Goddammit, I wish I knew more musical vocabularies and terms so I can make more sense when explaining things like this.)
16. 00:48:937 - Place a circle here please if you want keeping up with the drum closely. Added at 00:49:348 and 00:49:553 instead.
17. 01:01:751 (1) - Remove this NC, it's kinda unnecessary imo. Done.
18. 01:10:157 (6) - NC here. No; same reason as 00:43:914 (4).
19. 01:15:078 (1) - Does this NC in between a stream necessary? Sometimes you didn't NC at the third white tick because of existence of streams but here you did. Why? XD Accelerated spacing. I guess the way I map can reflect how weird of a person I am IRL lol.
20. 01:16:513 (3,4,5,6) - Streams mapping to drums are possible. And obviously, 01:16:103 (2,3) are different in the sense blue tick of 01:16:103 (2) doesn't have a sound. So I suggest differentiating them by doing a stream from 01:16:513 to 01:17:128. I think the sound at 01:16:821 isn't strong enough to be mapped, and there has been too much stream in the diff... It can get boring fast, really.
21. 01:19:998 (4) - NC. Same as 01:29:840 (4). I'll stay with the stanza. Can't really see why should I apply an NC here.
22. 01:23:689 (1) - Why NC here? NC at 01:23:279 (4) instead. Also, I can't figure out the purpose of NC at 01:26:969 (1). Removed the NCs and did stuff.
23. 01:26:867 (6) - Delete this, there's no drum, unlike 01:26:457 (3). Done.
24. 01:27:072 - Place a circle here to follow the drum thoroughly. Same applies on 01:27:277 and 01:28:097. ^
25. 01:36:400 (1) - Why NC here? I don't see any awkward NCs in between a triplet or stream before. Beginning of a new pattern.
26. 01:36:913 - For consistency of following the drum throughout the combo, circle here, so as to 01:37:118. Done.

Hard

1. Using 2.00x as DS with AR7 is quite hard to read imo. However, I see you want a nice diff spread between the three higher difficulties. So, AR7 is the only AR which can be chosen. Let it go ;w; ;w;
2. 00:03:730 (1) - Why a drum clap at tail? Consistency of hitsounds throughout all diffs is important imo. Yay for consistency.
3. 00:49:142 (4) - No sound lies on blue tick, just a circle at 00:49:245 is fine. Done.
4. 01:01:751 (2,3,4) - Kinda difficult imo. Replace them with two sliders, I see them as two pairs instead of a whole. Also, they can be treated as a warm up of 01:05:032 (2,3,4,5). ^
5. 01:14:155 (5) - Overmapping. 01:15:795 (3) also. ^

Normal

1. Personally, I think AR4 is high enough. The settings of H, I and Ex are quite low imo. Raising the difficulty in lower diffs is kinda incomprehensible. Okay.
2. 00:03:730 (1) - Why drum clap again? Or is a drum clap missing in Extra? Removed the clap.
3. 00:20:132 (1,2,3) - This pattern seems confusing, I think you are following the string at 00:21:362 (2,3,4,5). So, put them like this? Done.
   
   SPOILER

   

I glance through Easy once and it's quite a good work. Actually, I have skipped hitsounds of all your diffs. Forgive me please, given that I have spent four hours to mod your set. XD
Tell me if you have got any problems regarding to my mod

Mao wrote:

M4M by PM Request, here's my part. Sorry for not too detailed Opinions, I'm almost falling asleep, modding for 5 hours now x-x

1. Unrankable Issue/Highly Suggested
2. Comment

General

1. Check AiMod :c wtf. Fixed.

Easy

• 
  Mod

1. 00:05:370 (2) - Consider moving this somewhere around 285|150 to continue the movement from the curved repeat slider. As it is right now it breaks the flow a little bit due to the player having to stop at it's head in order to get the curve right which could be a bit hard to play for newbies. Done.
2. 00:26:692 (1) - Just a comment, but I dislike the Slider's shape a bit. You could do some adjustments to it. The main reason I don't like it is that the end is so short compared to the rest which makes it look a bit "squeezed" to me. Reshaped.
   
   Screenshot

   
3. 00:37:764 (4) - This tick being ignored feels so wrong since you've mapped all the previous ones. I don't see any reason but playability why it's not here. There's no gap in the instruments playing for the other circles. I'd suggest you to add one here and if you don't want to make it too hard, just change everything into 1/1 Sliders as seen in the Screenshot below. Made a 1/1 slider.
   
   Screenshot

   
4. 00:39:814 (1) - Move this a bit higher to improve the flow from 00:38:174 (3) - into this one. Reason is a curvy movement given by 00:38:174 (3) - which could be continued with this one. Done.
5. 00:45:145 (2) - Watch your spacing. This is really messed up and unplayable for newer payers because they usually read after distances >< Oops.
6. 00:48:015 (2,3) - Symmetry between these two objects could create a neat effect here! Done!
   
   Screenshot

   
7. 00:49:655 (1,2,3) - Same here as well. It would look so tidy and it would fit the map very well. ^
   
   Screenshot

   
8. 01:01:136 (2) - The rhythm could be slightly improved here. Nothing your really have to fix but I personally think following the drums here could be better because the red tick feels kinda unneeded to me here due to the stronger drums. You've also mapped the previous ones (e.g. 00:07:010 (1,2,3) - ) without the red tick. Did something like that, and also added a circle at 01:02:366.
   
   Screenshot

   
9. 01:17:128 (2) - Move this to 266|135 to get the curvy movement this looks like it was though to be. It would play way smoother to let this follow a fleunt curve. Sure.
10. 01:37:220 (2) - Move this a little bit upwards to extend the curve of 01:35:580 (1) - . It would look way better and flow more fluent because of the smooth circular movement. ^
    
    Opinion
    Hmmm, I don't like the flow for some patterns. This is the easiest difficulty in this Set so it should have smooth transitions to give the player a fluent experience while playing it. It's given most times but there are some expectations which feels weird and could easiely be hard for newbies. Consider always having a fluent movement and not to sharp direction changes, especially if the player has to stop first in order to get a Sliders movement which causes some newer players to combobreak the slider :/ If you have a curved slider try to make the following objects either follow the curve of the previous slider or to change the whole direction but not to make the player have a shaky movement to get the following objects right because that could be tricky for them. Otherwise fine. Some aesthetics could be better though, but that's just my person preference I guess ;b Okay, I will keep this in mind. It's quite hard for me to make a really nice Easy, so I can't say I didn't expect this lol

Normal

• 
  Mod

1. 00:07:010 (1) - Hm, I think this looks a bit random. I'd move this somewhere around 381|124 to create a Circular shape with the previous objects. Okay.
   
   Screenshot

   
2. 00:19:722 (6) - You could make some adjustments to this slider to let it point more into 00:20:132 (1) - 's direction for a smoother movement here so that the turn is easier to play for newbies. ^
   
   Screenshot

   
3. 00:23:412 (1) - I don't really agree with the rhythm here. It sounds a bit weird since the red tick at 00:24:027 - has been mapped at a similar spot in the music (00:20:132 (1) - ). No matter how weird this may sound, I'd like to keep it for the sake of variety. Can't really be too consistent.
   
   Screenshot

   
4. 00:26:692 (1,2,3) - 1's Tail, 2 and 3's head seem to be thought to create a line. The transition would be actually way better in a line imo. Just move 00:27:513 (3) - to 453|64. Played around with the objects here.
5. 00:33:253 (1) - Move this a bit more to the left (90|90) to let it follow the curve of the previous objects for a slightly better flow. Done.
6. 00:50:475 (2,3,4) - This plays a bit weird to me due to the snaky movement which could be hard to play for newer players. This could fixed by getting a fluent curve from 2 to 4 by placing 00:51:090 (3) - somewhere around 130|58. ^
7. 00:59:496 (1) - Shortening this to 3/2 could improve the rhythm here. It would be same as 00:20:132 (1) - . Reasons for this is #1 The note at the red tick which is neither too strong nor to quiet for a slider's tail and #2 consistency with the other one. Done.
8. 01:03:597 (2) - Watch your spacing to the next object. This looks like it's not on purpose owo Oops.
9. 01:05:442 (6,7) - I would unstack these two. (I actually missed 6 /me hides) The main reason is that you don't have any more stacks in the map which could confuse newer player if there suddenly appears one. Also I don't think it's really needed and you could space it since you did it with similiar spots in the music as well. Sure.
   
   Opinion
   Looks fine, some untidy patterns but otherwise good structure I guess. Some transition and rhythm could be fixed though, otherwise not much to say here. Nice diff. \o/

Hard

• 
  Mod

1. 00:00:450 (1) - The shape here looks a bit messy to me. Make the first and the third lines parallel and the middle line go through the middle of the slider to create a fluent S-Shape. Used a red node in the middle of the slider and adjusted the other nodes.
   
   Screenshot

   
2. 00:10:906 (2,3,4) - I don't know but this triplet sounds a bit weird to me. Reason for this is the sound on the white tick which is so soft compared to the sound at 00:11:213 - . I'd go for the rhythm seen in the Screenshot below since it's something you've used several times in this section as well ;b Is it? I believe the sound at 00:11:111 is stronger than the tick you mentioned... And I only used that rhythm if I really need it, since I'm aware that it can get a little tricky in Hard.
   
   Screenshot

   
3. 00:23:002 (4) - Making this parallel to 00:22:387 (2,3) - would actually look way more tidy and structured if you ask me. Like this it looks a bit messy imo :c Done!
   
   Screenshot

   
4. 00:36:534 (1) - Huh, this one is weird. It should be 3/4 reversed as you did it at 00:49:655 (1) - to cover the strong instrument's sound at 00:36:841 - . ^
5. 00:50:475 (2,3,4) - The repeat slider (4) sounds a odd to me since there's nothing at all. Instead I'd suggest a repeated 3/4 Slider at 00:50:475 (2) - to cover all the instruments sounds, similiar as 00:49:655 (1) - . Done.
   
   Rhythm

   
   Placement

   
6. 00:57:036 (3,4) - Playability would be better with a 120° rotated version of 3 instead of 4 due to a smoother circular movement C: Uh, I think they're just the same...? o.o
   
   Screenshot

   
7. 00:58:471 (2) - Same as I've said for the first S-Slider goes here as well ;w; ;-;
8. 01:07:697 (1,2,3) - Consider enlarging the spacing here. These overlaps feel weird since there isn't much stuff like this in this map and especially because there were gaps between the same Sliders at 00:28:333 (3,4,1) - . Crap, I forgot.
9. 01:17:538 (1,2,3,4,1) - I would make some adjustments here to improve the flow. I'd reuse 5 in order to get a better circular movement from 1 to 3. So it would also create a blanket with 01:16:718 (4) - . Did... stuff, I think.
   
   Screenshot

   
   
   Opinion
   My favourite diff in this mapset, everything was nicely arranged and the rhythm was nice as well, epsecially at the part I don't like in the Extra because here you've actually mapped the main instrument which sounds way better to me. Otherwise nice aesthetics, it looks way tidier than the other diffs do. Also the flow is poretty nice. Everything flows pretty fluent. Good job! Yay \o/

Extra

• 
  Mod

1. 00:03:115 (4,5,6) - Maybe it's just me but the pattern feels a bit overdone here. It just doesn't work here due to this section being rather calm. I could understand that if it was a certain pattern but here's it's just a kind of triangular shape where the spacing could be easily tweaked. Just place 00:03:320 (5) - somewhere around 149|279. Sure.
2. 00:04:447 (2) - I would rather use two circles here since the drums are stronger on the white tick than on the blue tick, so I'd prefer something clickable there. You've also used two circles for places like this before (e.g.00:02:807 (2,3) - ), so it could fit very well. The sound at the beginning and end of this slider is "connected", and I can't see any better way to emphasize that than to use a slider...
3. 00:06:498 (2,3,4,5,6) - Why is this spaced by 1,00 even if your usual stream spacing is 0,80? Also the spacing is a little messed up here. If we take a closer look, we can see that some notes are spaced with 1,00 DS but some are spaced with 0,87 which creates a weird messy effect. Consider changing that for a tidier feeling and a better playability of the stream. It's because the music is more intense here. Also, 00:06:908 (6,1) is consistently spaced, visual-wise. The spacing looks inconsistent in terms of the DS value because of the SV multiplier.
4. 00:06:498 (2) - Hm, if you listen closely, you can hear that the actual instrument that indicates the 1/4 Stream starts at 00:06:600 - . So, I'd suggest you to delete this note since it feels really weird here :/ Hmm idk; I'm sure enough that the instrument here supports the note well.
5. 00:15:109 (6,1) - I'd go for your usual 0,80 spacing here because there's no real special emphasis on this note :c No; see 00:06:498 (2,3,4,5,6). Not the intensity part, though, but the fact that I'm changing the SV multiplier.
6. 00:17:671 (6,7,8) - How about doing something as seen in the screenshot below? I mean, I agree with the note on the blue tick being clickable but I personally think that the one at the white tick should be clickable as well. Soo you could use a 1/2 Slider there to get the hold of the instrument. Sure.
   
   Screenshot

   
7. 00:28:128 (3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - This took me some tries to see what this actually is. I mean it was obvious that it's 1/3 but it was so hard to read and to actually recognize it >< Consider changing this either to something similiar as 00:15:211 (1,2) - or at least unstack 00:28:128 (3,1) - . Actually, I feel really disappointed with this section. Remapped.
8. 00:43:914 (4,5) - You've placed gaps between most of this slider (expect these ones that introduce the new section) so I'd suggest you to space these with a 1,50 DS. The main reason here ist the playability because it would play way better because the player doesn't have to stop due to the abrupt lower spacing here. ^
9. 00:50:578 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This stream feels overdone and unfitting due to no instrument playing at the 1/4 ticks imo. This sounds so weird since the section is pretty calm. I'd suggest you the rhythm as seen in the screenshot below. I've changed the red tick slider because the instrument is much more emphasized at the white tick than on the red one :/ You could also change it differently if you don't like mapping the instrument here but I'd highly suggest you to get rid of this weird stream because it sounds wrong here imo ;w; ^
   
   Screenshot

   
10. 01:07:697 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This surprised me so much. How should a player be able to read this? ;____; Consider changing it into something more simple. You could just simply let it follow the hexagons shape but without the jumps because they play so weird. Made a far easier pattern.
11. 01:26:354 (2,3,4) - Consider lowering the spacing here a bit. Even if the spacing is pretty low with 0,70 it is really high due to the SV change. Triplets are better playable with a lower spacing due to them being pretty fast and short and could be missed easily. Sure.
12. 01:38:861 (1) - Adjust the spacing to the previous note here a bit. It's inconsistent with the rest of the stream's spacing which makes it look a bit squashed. This looks like it was made by mistake due to not recognizing the SV change at the Kiai's end. Oops, I slipped on this one.
    
    Opinion
    Well, the overall feeling of the map was pretty good until the section starting at 00:33:253 - to the 00:59:394 - which ruined it a bit for me. What I mean is that I don't like your choice of the instrument you are following here. I'd personally go for the main instrument. It wouldn't be so bad if you don't follow it but another big problem that bothers me is that I kinda think this section is overmapped with all of these streams that doesn't really fit the music due to the instrument you are following with them is either extremely quiet or doesn't even exist (e.g. 00:49:348 (4) - ). If you delete some objects you maybe notice that there isn't actually anything. That wouldn't be such a bad thing (it would still be bad imo but not as bad as here imo) if it was a faster section with a lot of instruments to map but this section feels so calm to me due to the main instrument holding the notes so long. Other than this section it seems nice. I don't like all of your streamshapes though. They could be tidier (using "Convert Slider to Stream") but that's a personal preference I guess. On the other hand something bothering me at the streams is the inconsistent spacing within one stream since it varies about +-0,10 which looks a bit messy. Overall a solid Map. I know what do you feel. I won't say that the section you mentioned is overmapped since I'm sure I only followed the noticeable instrument sounds (and by sure, I mean I'm really, really certain on that fact), but yes, for the most part, it's just uncomfortable, bland, and feels very random. So uh, I remapped that. Also, I think I fixed a bunch of stuff related to your opinion on this diff~

Please reply! I hope it was helpful and good luck! :3 Take another star from me as well ><

Desperate-kun wrote:

Mao too pro

1. 00:29:563 (3,2) - This seems a bit close together, spread it out a bit

1. 00:07:010 (1,2) - Make this a blanket so there is a better sling effect going on (slider flows in to the circle smoother).
2. 00:21:157 (2,3,4) - This is pretty stressful imo, maybe just make this a slider?

1. 01:05:032 (2,3,4,5) - For consistency's sake just use 1/4 sliders like you did in other parts that sounded similar

Lust wrote:

from my queue o/
not a big fan of the song but ill try my best
try to add spinners in places so there is some score variation I wish there were a place where it feels natural to place one. I've looked at the ranked map of this song, but uh... the spinners don't seem to flow well with the music.

[Easy]

1. 00:29:563 (3,2) - This seems a bit close together, spread it out a bit Sure.

[Normal]
I recommend AR5 because there is a lot going on here and it'll make it easier to read the 1/2, will also fit spread better Done.

1. 00:07:010 (1,2) - Make this a blanket so there is a better sling effect going on (slider flows in to the circle smoother). ^
2. 00:21:157 (2,3,4) - This is pretty stressful imo, maybe just make this a slider? Combined (3,4) to a 1/2 slider.

[Hard]

1. 01:05:032 (2,3,4,5) - For consistency's sake just use 1/4 sliders like you did in other parts that sounded similar Yup, changed.

[Extra]
Fun extra, but maybe try HP8. Its already pretty easy as is and I feel as if players can enjoy the extra challenge I feel that HP7 is already challenging enough. HP8 is going a little too far, IMO, but if more people says that HP8 is necessary, I'll reconsider.

Clean set, good luck!

1. 00:00:450 (1) - red point could be adjusted so it splits the slider better, like 00:02:090 (2) - does
2. 00:03:730 (1) - you have a drum sample on the repeat, while you had it just as normal on 00:00:450 (1) - , I'd say to pick one or the other since these follow the same thing in the music
3. 01:14:258 (2) - slider seems uneven to me, I think the first half curves more than the second half at the moment

1. Test out CS 3.5, I think it suits normal difficulties well, to fit between Easy and Hard
2. 00:09:471 - add a note for the melody note here? should still be straightforward to play since it's only two clicks in a row
3. 00:35:713 (6) - personal thing of mine, but I think this would look better curved the opposite way, I just don't think the obvious circular pattern here looks that great
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:42:274 (4) - spacing inconsistency
5. 00:51:090 (3) - ^
6. 01:04:417 (4,5,6) - might be better to move 5 to 01:05:237 - , the red line rhythm feels odd here

1. 00:02:807 (2,3,4,5) - this doesn't seem like a great idea to me, since you go from a slow slider and 1.0x stream to suddenly 2.0x jumps that don't have much musical backing. I'd either reduce the distance on 00:02:910 (3,4,5) - quite a lot or you could just delete 4
2. 00:03:730 (1,2) - try making the curve of these two more similar, would look a lot better imo
3. 00:51:295 (1) - should move the red point to the slidertick to split the slider evenly
4. overall I think this is a pretty large jump from the Normal, since that had mostly 1/1 and 1/2 rhythms, and then this goes into a lot of 1/4. I'd recommend trying to cut down on some of the streams to fix the spread

1. 00:15:621 (2) - I'd move this to the left of 00:15:211 (1) - instead, will help the flow into the slider after a lot more. x256 y140 feels nice to me
2. 00:29:153 (1) - is the clap on the end of this intentional? you don't have it 01:08:517 (3) - here. In fact, the hitsounding for this part is kinda inconsistent in the map, check out the three times it happens 00:13:571 - 00:26:692 - and 01:06:057 - and try to keep them the same
3. 01:00:931 (5) - I'd even out the spacing for this note, will look neater and be a bit more smooth to play

captin1 wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:00:450 (1) - red point could be adjusted so it splits the slider better, like 00:02:090 (2) - does Fixed, I guess?
2. 00:03:730 (1) - you have a drum sample on the repeat, while you had it just as normal on 00:00:450 (1) - , I'd say to pick one or the other since these follow the same thing in the music I'm pretty sure I used Drum in all the diffs... o.o
3. 01:14:258 (2) - slider seems uneven to me, I think the first half curves more than the second half at the moment Should be fixed.

[Normal]

1. Test out CS 3.5, I think it suits normal difficulties well, to fit between Easy and Hard Sure.
2. 00:09:471 - add a note for the melody note here? should still be straightforward to play since it's only two clicks in a row Decided to simply lengthen 00:08:650 (3) to that tick instead.
3. 00:35:713 (6) - personal thing of mine, but I think this would look better curved the opposite way, I just don't think the obvious circular pattern here looks that great Done.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:42:274 (4) - spacing inconsistency Oh God.
5. 00:51:090 (3) - ^ ^
6. 01:04:417 (4,5,6) - might be better to move 5 to 01:05:237 - , the red line rhythm feels odd here Done!

[Hard]

1. 00:02:807 (2,3,4,5) - this doesn't seem like a great idea to me, since you go from a slow slider and 1.0x stream to suddenly 2.0x jumps that don't have much musical backing. I'd either reduce the distance on 00:02:910 (3,4,5) - quite a lot or you could just delete 4 Deleted (2) instead.
2. 00:03:730 (1,2) - try making the curve of these two more similar, would look a lot better imo Done.
3. 00:51:295 (1) - should move the red point to the slidertick to split the slider evenly ^
4. overall I think this is a pretty large jump from the Normal, since that had mostly 1/1 and 1/2 rhythms, and then this goes into a lot of 1/4. I'd recommend trying to cut down on some of the streams to fix the spread I hope I did this correctly. This is why I don't really like to make Hard diffs sometimes lol

[Xinely's Insane]

1. 00:29:153 (1) - is the clap on the end of this intentional? you don't have it 01:08:517 (3) - here. In fact, the hitsounding for this part is kinda inconsistent in the map, check out the three times it happens 00:13:571 - 00:26:692 - and 01:06:057 - and try to keep them the same Should be consistent now.

Extra is fine for me, just try and reduce the Hard diff a bit and then let me know

LunarSakuya wrote:

oh my god i love this game. Me too~


Easy
00:13:161 (4) - Clap would sound nice Sure.
01:19:178 (1,2,3) - i feel like you could make these more symmetrical

SPOILER

It'll also avoid the small overlap with 01:17:128 (2) - ^

Normal
00:03:730 (1) - the tail sounded a bit empty, especially coming from after 00:02:090 (2) - , I'd suggest a clap here or Normal sample hit so it's not too quiet Yep, added a clap.

Hard
00:18:081 (5) - missing clap Someone roll me left and right.
00:20:849 - highly suggest you add note here. Keeps a smoother transition that matches the drums and creates a feeling of continuity with the flute Done.
00:37:354 (2,3,4) - why not create a repeat slider like (1)?

SPOILER

It'll keep some diversity instead of having 1/2 rhythms in more unique areas Done.

Freedom
00:04:960 (3) - I understand the antijump somewhat but might be less confusing if you just stacked the head on (2)'s tail; maybe to match 00:05:780 (3,1) - too I made an anti-jump here to emphasize the instrument sound that is being held at 00:04:550 - 00:04:960. There isn't anything similar at 00:05:780 (3,1), and after some testing, I believe this isn't going to be confusing.
00:24:642 (1) - Delete NC Sure.
00:37:149 (3,4,5,6) - I don't really understand the streams/repeats here, the bgm seems pretty flat here. I suggest you follow the melody more if possible I'm very sure there are some kind of wobbles (?) from the instruments on every tick here. I personally feel that it's quite obvious while listening to my speaker, thus I mapped all the white, red, and blue ticks, but if this really can't stick around, I'll do something about this.
00:50:270 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^ ^

nice~ let me know anytime lol