Various Artists - The Law of Ueki Compilation

posted
Total Posts
91
show more
pieguyn
fullmod

[Marathon]

00:25:604 (1,2,3,4) - this was confusing for me bc the spacing makes it seem like a 1/4 (not 1/6) stream. imo use a closer spacing like this

would feel a lot better for stream like this. (if you agree, you'll have to rearrange the notes after bc spacing)
00:29:734 (1,3) - imo normal-hit isn't enough to emphasize this part- you make a jump here but i can hardly hear the hitsound @_@ imo standard soft-whistle fits a lot better here.
00:55:821 (1) - remove clap? imo no need to put a clap here.
01:20:386 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - imo jump here would fit well (and also more consistent with 02:08:865 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - )
01:47:126 - normal-slidertick here? seems you use cymbals on 1/2s for this part, but this one isn't
02:43:213 - how about add whistle here, 02:43:647 - , and 02:44:952 - ? imo feels a lot better here to keep the rhythm going.

03:26:631 (7) - blanket fix http://puu.sh/eFZiH/11c8787cc1.jpg
437,272,206631,2,0,B|360:228|396:152|396:152|444:136|476:68|448:16,1,300,0|2,1:3|0:0,0:0:0:0:
03:24:131 (7) - x196 y56? feel more natural than back-and-forth pattern imo
03:41:215 (1) - missing hit-normal here

05:30:918 - add note?

05:48:946 (1) - NC here for spacing change
07:01:603 (1) - remove NC? not necessary to have combo with 1 note here imo.
07:52:463 (5) - ctrl+G to keep curve?
08:53:569 (1) - imo add NC here to differentiate between pattern
08:55:060 (1,2) - switch NCs for pattern?
09:14:622 (1,2,3,4,5) - imo this pattern was a lot less fun than its counterparts (07:01:976 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 08:20:967 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ) which were really cool because of the way they flowed with the vocal. i think it'd be better if you made a pattern more similar to that.

372,192,554622,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,360,554808,1,0,0:0:0:0:
310,165,555181,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,360,555367,1,0,0:0:0:0:
241,160,555740,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,360,555926,1,0,0:0:0:0:
174,175,556298,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,356,556484,1,0,0:0:0:0:
120,216,556857,5,14,1:2:0:0:
262,356,557043,1,0,0:0:0:0:
118,216,557416,2,0,P|184:7|376:115,1,500,6|2,1:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
there might be a different way, that's just one example. anyway just a suggestion

10:14:968 - any reason different hitsound here?
10:22:100 (5) - imo clap here sounds really out of place... given you're using clap on slidertick before, i think it'd be better if you removed claps here and added clap at 10:22:837 -
10:57:878 - add note (stack on tail of 10:56:771 (5) - )? fits instrument in background, and current spacing to 10:58:124 (1) - is confusing bc it feels like a 1/2.

11:42:953 (3) - how about this rhythm instead, then add whistle on (4)? emphasize beat better imo

11:58:203 (7) - this rhythm instead, then add clap at 11:58:453 - ?

12:45:953 (1,2,3) - imo this rhythm is better here to emphasize the beat:

12:54:078 (2) - this plays really bad imo; since most of the sliders have 1 repeat, putting a slider with 3 repeats makes the rhythm really awkward. imo smth like this

would feel a lot more natural to play.
13:01:578 (1) - same idea as before. imo this rhythm is good here:


i honestly don't have any problems with this map, just some minor suggestions. call me back when you get someone to check the timing orz
Yumeno Himiko
As requested



you can ask someone else to check it www
Topic Starter
Setsurei
00:25:604 (1,2,3,4) - ok
00:29:734 (1,3) - I prefer the normal hit
00:55:821 (1) - removed
01:20:386 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - changed
01:47:126 - ok
02:43:213 - ^
03:26:631 (7) - fixed
03:24:131 (7) - ok
03:41:215 (1) - added
05:30:918 - ^
05:48:946 (1) - ok
07:01:603 (1) - ^
07:52:463 (5) - done
08:53:569 (1) - ok
08:55:060 (1,2) - switched
09:14:622 (1,2,3,4,5) - changed to something else, lol
10:14:968 - I forgot to change, it was a slider back then
10:22:100 (5) - ok changed
10:57:878 - added
11:42:953 (3) - nice idea
11:58:203 (7) - changed, but 11:58:203 - HC here, and slider 11:58:453 - 11:58:703 - , did add the clap though
12:45:953 (1,2,3) - ok
12:54:078 (2) - changed
13:01:578 (1) - ^

after I change the timing
05:23:049 (3) - is this supposed to be 1/1 or 3/4? it was once on the red tick though fixed


examination wrote:

As requested



you can ask someone else to check it www
thank you!

updated
reverting back to old client, fk new client can't update large map
wendao
Timing check as requ-- wait you don't request anything to me...

random timing check!!!

special thanks to statementreply for his/her awesome Timing Analyzer!!!





hope it's better!!! :oops:
pieguyn


i just think songs 3-6 all need about +10ms. i'll try to get some other ppl to check this (for reference, i do think 160.03 is correct here)
no kds (obv)
Topic Starter
Setsurei

pieguy1372 wrote:



i just think songs 3-6 all need about +10ms. i'll try to get some other ppl to check this (for reference, i do think 160.03 is correct here)
no kds (obv)
ok ok, will update soon

updated
meii18
Hey timing check ~

Earthship ~Uchuusen Chikyuugo: Set on 04:38:935()- <- Second offset

No regret : Set on 05:50:632()- <-- New chorus

True Blue : Set on 13:29:924()- <-- New chorus

And something : 14:15:101()- ~ 14:23:571()- The objects are inaudible and unclikable . Why you not raise the volume in this part ? =/

That's all from me

Good Luck ~
Topic Starter
Setsurei

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

Hey timing check ~

Earthship ~Uchuusen Chikyuugo: Set on 04:38:935()- <- Second offset

No regret : Set on 05:50:632()- <-- New chorus

True Blue : Set on 13:29:924()- <-- New chorus

And something : 14:15:101()- ~ 14:23:571()- The objects are inaudible and unclikable . Why you not raise the volume in this part ? =/

That's all from me

Good Luck ~
uh why do I need second offset... I don't think that's necessary
and about that part, is audible o.o

btw thanks for checking!
meii18
no kd ? ;w;
Topic Starter
Setsurei

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

no kd ? ;w;
I give kudos if I applies the mod and or the mod is useful enough

or it will be denied

sorry ;w;
meii18

Setsurei wrote:

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

no kd ? ;w;
I give kudos if I applies the mod and or the mod is useful enough

or it will be denied

sorry ;w;
alright ;______; just try to increase my mod score . I'm not so pro at timing ;--;
wendao
W i P

coooool
Topic Starter
Setsurei
timing updated, changes on some hitsounds and note placements
wendao
howdy
Topic Starter
Setsurei
why
do
you
always
steal
the
2
kds
post
wendao
no, it said only gave 1 kudos to modder

that's why I post :(((
Bearizm
00:08:872 (2,4) - not a major issue but the circle inside this blanket isn't exactly in the middle

00:12:350 (1) - blanket not perfect x)

00:18:872 (1,2,3,4) - why are these 1/8? all i hear is 1/2 notes

00:26:154 - you could add a circle here

01:00:611 (1) - would be better if you replace this with 2 circles to emphasize the vocal, because you've been following the vocals :P

01:03:437 (3) - ^

01:07:567 (1) - ^ but 3, this one's pretty important because you skipped a strong point here

01:27:133 (4) - I would imagine this would be pretty difficult to read due to the DS and NC, though, I have no solution for this.

02:09:307 (1,2,3) - the angle of turn is a little bit too much I think, cursor movement would be a little bit problematic imo for DT

02:41:480 (1) - missing the emphasize on vocals again. :(

02:44:089 (3) - ^

02:48:437 (1) - ^

03:10:611 (5,1) - I think it would be better if it ends with a triple, so maybe change (5) to a 1/2 and add a circle after?

04:16:839 (6) - better if it's changed to circles

06:59:005 (1,2) - Change them to sliders?

08:20:418 - could add a circle here

08:44:637 (2,3,4) - a bit random imo

09:26:044 (2) - ^

09:37:110 (1,3) - fix the blankets lol

10:06:249 (7,1,2) - just make these into streams from 10:06:126 -

10:10:798 (6) - lack of vocal emphasis :<

10:57:888 (6,1,2,1) - NC and DS issues here.. it's inconsistent. NC 6 & 1

10:59:240 (1,2) - NC

11:03:421 (4) - NC

11:21:210 (1) - repeating a slider 5 times isn't very common, and it could be difficult to indicate.

11:46:960 (4) - place this in the middle of the triangle? people may mistake it as another 3/4 due to the DS

11:49:460 (5) - NC

11:53:460 (6) - ^

11:57:460 (6) - ^

12:46:335 (2) - the DS. this plays like a spaced stream. although this is low BPM but please consider, this is a bit of a difficulty spike

13:15:806 (5,1) - NC

13:18:630 (4) - NC

15:20:041 (6) - NC

That's it :D
Topic Starter
Setsurei
fixed most of it thanks
sorry late lol
wendao
lol this song again (999th post omg)

  1. 00:18:872 (1,2,3,4) - overmapped?
  2. 00:29:741 (1,2,3) - might be a good idea to reduce the distance
  3. 00:33:220 (1,2) - oh come on you're good at blanketing stuff
  4. 00:34:089 (4,5) - ^
  5. 00:44:089 (2) - ga ada suara 'dub' deh disini
  6. 00:56:263 - clap
  7. 05:43:367 (7,1) - I'd have these two NC swapped
  8. 05:55:663 (2,4) - not quite good
  9. 06:37:570 - intentional preview point?
  10. 06:40:374 (1,1,1) - absolutely no
  11. 06:44:101 (1,2) - kenapa ga dibikin bow slider?
  12. 07:06:457 (1,2,3) - Normal Sampleset (with Soft as Additions ofc)
  13. 07:13:164 (6,8) - daripada saling nabrak, mending (8) ditaroh di bawah (like.. 256,336?)
  14. 07:15:400 (4,1) - swap these NC too
  15. 06:01:810 (1,2,3,4) - 06:04:791 (1,2,3,1) - 06:16:715 (1,2,3,1) - 07:20:802 (1,2,3,4) - 07:23:783 (1,2,3,1) - 07:32:725 (1,2,3,4) - you really need to check those inconsistent NC)
  16. 07:48:188 (5) - ^ (consistent with 06:29:197 (1) -
  17. 08:01:602 (1,2,3) - awkward jump??
  18. 08:11:476 (1,2,3) - this one too
  19. 08:20:418 - ada suara loh disini??!?!? (well pointing this out as you mapped the rhythm at 08:19:487 (1,2,3,4) - )
  20. 08:46:127 (3,4) - err any reason? (karena ya.. misread sebagai 1/2 snap, well)
  21. 08:51:344 (5,1) - bad overlap?
  22. 09:03:267 (5,1) - ^
  23. 09:06:807 (7) - err.. lol, feel awkward about this circle (gw sih mending taroh di 09:06:993 - dengan spacing yang sesuai)
  24. 09:14:073 - same as 08:20:418 -
  25. 09:14:632 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - no more NC? (well like 08:20:977 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - )
  26. 09:26:044 (2) - I'd put this one on 256,136
  27. 10:32:499 (4) - nudge to 10:32:529 - ?
  28. 10:33:482 (6) - nudge to 10:33:513 - ?
  29. 10:34:097 (7) - nudge to 10:34:128 - ? (dan extend slidernya sebesar 1/16 snap)
  30. 10:44:855 (5,1,2) - 10:55:060 (3,1,2,3) - 10:56:781 (5,1,2) - 10:58:626 (3,4) - not a good idea
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply