forum

How relevant is your recommended difficulty for you?

posted
Total Posts
21
Topic Starter
Nanofranne
For me it's a bit relevant. I know it's calculated based on pp, thus your answer will wildly vary.

Personally, it's a guesstimate on my present capability. It sits at 5.61 currently, and I can naturally FC on that range, assuming typical and non-marathon maps.

It's way off with mods though. EZ is just impossible on mid 5* currently, both HR and DT separately is still too hard, at least for achieving same my acc standard (for mastery) at 99% as NM.
suipiss_
5.1 rlly accurate

i can only get meaningful pp when i fc at that star range
Joon Yorigami
My recommended difficulty is 5.5*4 yet the maps I can consistently fc are in 4.9*. At least it reminds me that I need to fc 5.54* to gain ranks ww
JLuca913 891
my recommended difficulty is 3.59*, which is very wrong because i can fc 4* maps and pass 5* maps...
Voidedosu

JLuca913 891 wrote:

my recommended difficulty is 3.59*, which is very wrong because i can fc 4* maps and pass 5* maps...
But you don't have a single 100pp play and any 4*/[insane] plays you do have are only mid in terms of pp (below 70pp). Seems about accurate, actually.

As for me, it's probably a measure of my upper boundary in terms of SS more than anything. And in that sense, I agree 5.28* is about the highest I could conceive of me getting SS's (albeit with a LOT of grinding or lucky runs). As far as my real SS range it's definitely about a full 1* lower.
Louis Marble
Not relevant at all . My recommended difficulty is 6.1*, but I don't even need to play >5.5* to gain pp. I can already gain pp and even top play from 5 - 5.5* LUL.
peacefulcat
It's abt 85% relevant & It works really well. I mean, i only have 1k pp so that is probably why. I heard it's really good for beginners
FlowyYQ
6.42, its 0% relevant because i dont look at star rating and i dont let star rating control what i play
MrMcMikey22
Idk about the recommended star rating thing...

Idk a 3.95* kind of seems inaccurate even though I had done some 4* fc's in the past...
dung eater
i don't know what it is so not very relevant
Akisu
Mine is rlly inaccurate at 3.4* but I have a 5 star fc and the medal
Ymir
5.6, I don't know why it increased because I don't even play the game. Probably inaccurate.
JLuca913 891

Voidedosu wrote:

JLuca913 891 wrote:

my recommended difficulty is 3.59*, which is very wrong because i can fc 4* maps and pass 5* maps...
But you don't have a single 100pp play and any 4*/[insane] plays you do have are only mid in terms of pp (below 70pp). Seems about accurate, actually.
i'm struggling to get a 100pp top play, it's kinda hard, and my current top play is 98pp....


100PP WWHHHHEEEEENNNNNN
Duck o-o
mines at 5.54 yet depending on the map i struggle fcing some 5* maps or can fc 6*
its a really inconsistent metric lol
Voidedosu

dung eater wrote:

i don't know what it is so not very relevant
Go to beatmap listing.

The topmot option will say "Recommended Difficulty (x.xx)" Where the x's are what it suggests for you.

MrMcMikey22 wrote:

Idk about the recommended star rating thing...

Idk a 3.95* kind of seems inaccurate even though I had done some 4* fc's in the past...

JojoXD wrote:

Mine is rlly inaccurate at 3.4* but I have a 5 star fc and the medal
Like I told JLuca (more or less), just because you have a 4/5* FC or two doesn't necesssarily translate to you being able to play at that level.

Granted, I don't know for sure if it tracks pp gains or whatnot, but if jojo's 5* FC is on the lower end of his top plays (or not even on it), I suspect that wouldn't be a factor at all, while the 3* FCs/SS's you do have will have a great effect. Or Mikey's 4* FCs to a similar degree (if perhaps a bit less since Mikey likes playing old-style pattern maps).

I think a good metric to judge it by is to consider both the maps that you personally find comfortable to play (aka that magic 95% acc) and what you think the game thinks about your top plays. In my case, the top half of my top plays are mosstly all high 4* maps including HR/DT adjustment (only a handful are below 4.5*), so putting the recommended at 5.28* seems pretty accurate by that measure because it's just above what the game considers my comfort zone. What it can't necessarily infer is how dedicated I am to an SS-only playstyle, so maps at that high 4* range aren't actually in my comfort zone nor what I would currently play frequently, which in turn would move it down closer to 4.5-4.7* instead.
Indomi-chan
4.96*? I FC'ed a few of low 5* maps to gain pp even though that's dependent on accing so it might depend. If I FC a 5* map with great accuracy (98%), I would get a ton of pp from it. Take a look at Abracadavre (Insane). My highest FC star rating (5.36*) yet also a top play but I didn't get 98%. If I SS a 4* map with (HD)HR, I get a lot of pp since it's OD10.

So, it's slightly relevant. (Recommended difficulty shows you maps 0.5* more your recommended difficulty value)
Toph
Mine is 6.77* and I mean, I get it but I don't even enjoy playing maps that hard most of the time. I guess my farming has messed with the recommendation.
Naiad
7*

I think it's somewhat reasonable. 7* comfortable aim maps are definitely fcable for me, provided they aren't extremely long with constant difficulty, and 7* flat raw stamina maps are also easily fcable for me.
anaxii
I have no idea actually

I just play whatever I want and if I can FC, I FC

I usually FC maps that are 6-6.5* if I'm not washed (like right now)
Babilfrenzo
My recommended difficulty is 6.05 stars. It's completely irrelevant to me outside of very few dt farm maps and maybe 1 or 2 aim maps. I think I have 3 or 4 six-star FCs in total. I struggle to FC most high 4 stars with nomod/hidden - especially if its aim or high density, if its dt farm then I can do mid 5 stars quite comfortably.
DM FOR MUTUAL
7.52 stars, the only 7.52 star maps I can play with any sort of competency are dt aim farm maps lol

It's useful for filtering beatmaps so I can download all the 7 star ones
Please sign in to reply.

New reply