I personally oppose the new timing and going to reasoning as to the old timing really off?
I take a hear closer on somewhere like 01:12:147 (1,2,3) - on this new timing and this is really off.
It does lie on vocal quite correctly but the way hitsound usage mainly hits on the heavy beat as in a normal hit, it is pretty much off by -20 to -30 in this whole section. no, probably the whole mapset.
I re-downloaded the mp3 to make sure and it still is. It might just be me though but I would like to question as to follow the timing base on vocal which is really softer than the heavy beat like a normal hit suitable?
Following heavy beat makes more sense because they come along more consistently constant while vocal following can fluctuate more than usual as human voice can never be more constant than electrical instrument.
I take a hear closer on somewhere like 01:12:147 (1,2,3) - on this new timing and this is really off.
It does lie on vocal quite correctly but the way hitsound usage mainly hits on the heavy beat as in a normal hit, it is pretty much off by -20 to -30 in this whole section. no, probably the whole mapset.
I re-downloaded the mp3 to make sure and it still is. It might just be me though but I would like to question as to follow the timing base on vocal which is really softer than the heavy beat like a normal hit suitable?
Following heavy beat makes more sense because they come along more consistently constant while vocal following can fluctuate more than usual as human voice can never be more constant than electrical instrument.