Delis
Delis wrote:
Hello! Hi!
GeneralInsane
- probably, change to Hajimari no Sayounara in romanised title. サヨウナラ is able to read "Sayounara", if there was written サヨナラ, you could write it as "sayonara" then. I dunno, ask some japanese bat to correct this. Yeah I originally had the 'u' in there but someone told me to change it. I will get BAT clarification on this one on how to properly romanise
- move ぎんぎつね or gingitsune to source from tags? I'm not sure, just make sure that you were forgot or not. Well the song is not actually from the gingitsune anime so I wasn't sure whether to make it the source. It is from the same op single though, so dunno haha.
- also remove widescreen support for all diffs, because this map didn't use any SB~ Hype http://puu.sh/9uejt/8a757a6a9e.png
OD+1 or 2, honestly OD6 is boring for me to play, and too easy for this diff. actually both I and Rei24 could get SS in first play lol, I would recommend OD8 for this diff, then it will really fun to play~
I changed OD8 and tried it is hard or not, ah it was still very easy to ss for me, anyway it's really more enjoyable than OD6, try it out! haha ok well #1 both you and Rei are pros! and #2 this map is not meant to be difficult. I will consider raising the OD though, espically since decimals have been implemented; but OD8 seems to be bit too high for me.
also, I'm trying suggestion the new thing, AR-0.5? just this map was DTable map, if you change AR to readable on DT, it would more better, and AR8.5 on none also fits this song and map well (about AR8.5 on none is just my opinion lol) :o but 8.5 is a bit too slow for playing no mods - which is what I mapped it for.I pointed out almost hitsound stuffs, because nothing issues for placement~ ~
- 00:35:195 (7) - missing whistle here? Yep, nice catch.
- 00:48:695 (1) - maybe add finish with S:C4 on the head Ok sure
- 00:56:028 (3) - add a whistle on the head= Ah yeah there was supposed to be one here. I even had the volume change and everything.
- 00:58:028 (5) - ^ k
- 01:27:361 (1) - remove a whistle on the head, there's nothing any strong beat to emphasize with whistle. Oh I agree with you there.
- 01:36:695 (1) - what is this single New combo, remove this or 01:37:028 (2) - , just this new combo is really unnecessay. 01:36:695 (1) - nc is meant to be for the new measure and 01:37:028 (1) nc is meant to be for the 1/1 gap and increase in sv.
- 01:38:028 - make a triplet to follow the drum? sound on the song. maybe it will more fun pattern to play. Maybe, but I'm trying to following vocal here and to continue the flow form the previous pattern.
- 01:40:028 - insert a break time here? just suggestion it feels better and quite match with the song. You mean add the short break or delete some of the notes? either way I think I'll keep it the way it is.
- 02:08:695 (1) - I guess you could add a finish here, and it will keep consistency with 01:58:028 (1) - here. maybe use S:C4 for adding a finish. mhmm
- 02:19:028 (5,6) - I recommend you to make a symmetry them, current pattern is kinda look randomly, if change them to symmetry, it would be smoothly flow and more cool to look. It was only a tiny bit off! Fixed~
- 02:35:361 (4) - maybe remove a whistle on reverse point, I tried to hear some strong beat to emphasize here, but I could not hear anything beat for adding a whistle. ok
- 02:44:695 (6) - ^ on tail too You're good at this :3
- 02:54:028 (1) - perhaps remove a whistle on the tail, there is something small sound but it couldn't follow with a whistle imo. ~
- 03:04:695 (1) - add a whistle on the head, sound much better with whistles on before part. So whistle and finish? Sure.
- 03:11:028 (4) - remove a drum whistle on the tail? if it's intentional, 03:05:695 (4) - you could add head and reverse, and more.. Yeah it was intentional. For some reason this particular one was louder so I added it but forgot the rest. Added a couple more
- 03:22:695 (7) - actually a whistle on the tail is unnecessary stuff I guess. remove it Alright
- 04:31:361 (3) - same as 01:38:028 , actually I don't like using triplet from white tick, but there's something enough sound to make triplet. try it out~ Same thing here; I want to follow vocal and there is a stream right after it!
Good song ……………………………..
Pref more increase stream hitsound Oh? It's plenty audible for me. I will consider this and it shouldn't be hard to implement.
00:42:361 (6) –pref long slider or without putting circle on the hip of slider :> I think a long slider would not fit because there is no sound on 00:42:695. I think this 1/1 stack is nice :3
01:39:361 (1) –NC? NC for new new measure!
01:56:361 (3) –How is this rhythm? http://puu.sh/9rDc1/e33af5110d.jpg You mean add a note here 01:56:195 ? But there isn't really anything mappable there and a 1/1 gap emphasises the vocal and noise at 01:56:361 (3).
02:10:528 (6) –pref picking vocal sound :3 http://puu.sh/9rE6R/f3c01febeb.jpg Well actually the vocal sound doesn't actually start on that blue tick I don't think, so it would be safer to map it on the down beat.
by Rei24 Thanks Rei :3
good luck! and it was so good song! Yes, I totally agree! Thanks so much Delis (and Rei) great suggestions