OnosakiHito wrote:00:30:367 (193) - I believe having kkkd plays and sounds better. Beside that, it would be a nice contrast to the ddk pattern. Ok
00:33:367 (212) - I guess you don't have to, yet I would suggest to delete this note. dkdk(1/6)dkdk(1/4) is something I see a bit problematic, even though it fits good to the song. I will leave it to you. It actually still sounds fine with the note gone, so ok.
00:39:453 (251) - Unrankable. Finishers are not allowed at the beginning of a 1/4 pattern / stream. Remove it. whOA THAT WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE THERE I'M SORRY THAT WAS AN ACCIDENT
01:05:339 (421) - Recommending to delete this note so it fits better to 01:04:653. Ok
01:32:767 (634) - Recommending to delete this note so it fits better to 01:32:082. Ok
01:39:796 - Unrankable as well. You are allowed to accelerate down notes which are far away from each other and don't overlap the other notes. In this case the notes are too dense an overlap each other (http://puu.sh/aAfPo/6184d98cb9.jpg). You must changed this. Add at 01:39:796 - x1.20 and delete the other 4 timlines would be my suggestion. Added x1.00 at 01:39:796 - instead, but changed.
01:39:625 - Suggesting to change to normal kat. A finisher isn't really needed here if you ask me. Ok
01:39:796- How about kkkkd ? I find this to fit better and makes the end of this part a bit easier, which gives upcoming part a bigger impact. Ok