1. need more sweg tag

1. random pitchmapping????
2. Soo many unmapped pitch i look here. maybe try map some of it?
3. HP+1 OD+1?
4. 00:36:655 (4,1,1) - looks very empty here from unmapped pitch. 00:36:945 (1) - i think you should move it to red tick that unmapped pitch.
   00:39:120 (1,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - ow mai gad empty too ahue from 00:39:264 i think you should add circle at 00:39:264 that was very empty and unnecessary circle pitch is 00:39:409 (1,2,1,2)
   00:41:293 (4,1,1) - so empty ;w; 00:41:728 (1) - move it to red tick that unmapped pitch.
   00:57:959 (2,3,4,5) - why should kat these? i think pitches are neither higher nor lower.
   01:02:017 (1,2,1,1) - maybe make it d k d k pattern? seems that was really not fitting the pitch when not repeating same sounds again.
   01:19:988 (1,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,2) - That sounds really shit bad. maybe try this?
   
   SPOILER

   
   01:34:626 (1,2,3) - you should don these because stream pitch are hidden and lower /o/ \o\
   01:48:539 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4) - YOU FORGOT FOLLOWING THE FINISH DRUMMMMM U FORGOT ahue make it follow the finish drum.
   01:49:988 (4) - delete kat almost this is lower.
   02:04:771 (1) - this kat almost unnecessary for instrumental.
   02:18:539 (1,2,1) - maybe swap? almost of the them so weird if don be higher for me. don is not higher ;w; make it ddk.
   02:19:699 (1,2,1) - this stream is bad starting on here. make it perfect, start the stream at 02:19:844 that almost perfect for me because no drum instrumental but vocal instrumental :v vocal is easier than drum.
   02:32:307 (1,2,1) - the kat not should 02:32:452 (1) - here but 02:32:380 (2) - here most perfect.
   02:35:206 (1,2,3,4,1) - do not make stream here, there mixing pitchmapping vocal + drum almost weirdest ever i see.
   02:49:119 - I'm still wondering that this part so empty and the beside the note has 1 kat and 4 dons, missing 1/4 instrumental i see over there.
   02:50:568 (5) - change it to D so lower than (6).
   03:03:322 (1,2,1) - owait--------- what do you follow here?
   03:07:452 (2) - delete this note. no more 1/4 instrumental again C: then add kat on here 03:07:380 (1).
   03:34:191 (2,1,1) - swap, following vocal i see. d k d is not following drum not following
   03:54:771 (4,5,6,7) - delete kat, lower drum i see. like happy30's map \o\ /o/
   03:55:351 - 04:03:322 - so bad what you following here. skip modding from this part.
   04:04:046 (5) - add kat, then reversing pitch, 04:05:061 (3) - add kat here.
   04:05:930 (2,3,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,1) - sooooooooooooo much repeating here. make new pattern.
   04:14:481 (2,3,1,2,1) - swap them. make it like k k ddk. much easier way to make perfect note pitches.
   04:45:206 - 04:58:974 - i rly krzy nao. DAMN STREAMS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA skip modding from this part.
   05:03:612 (2) - should be circle i think.
5. maybe other parts is ok. clean~!

DenoisoGoiso wrote:

SPOILER

[taekowzhakeh]

1. random pitchmapping???? It's not random. I just don't map strictly to it since I have my own patterns in this map. I stopped for example at 00:36:800 to emphasize 00:38:104 (1) - much more. Also I wanted to bring variation in.
2. Soo many unmapped pitch i look here. maybe try map some of it?
3. HP+1 OD+1? No need for it. Map is already really long which makes it kinda demanding.
   00:57:959 (2,3,4,5) - why should kat these? i think pitches are neither higher nor lower. Hm, I will think about this.
   01:02:017 (1,2,1,1) - maybe make it d k d k pattern? seems that was really not fitting the pitch when not repeating same sounds again. Changed. Same at 01:06:655 .
   01:19:988 (1,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,2) - That sounds really bad. maybe try this? Used something else. I wanted to change this anyway since that time I just mapped it quick. lol
   01:34:626 (1,2,3) - you should don these because stream pitch are hidden and lower /o/ \o\ This was intensional.
   01:48:539 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4) - YOU FORGOT FOLLOWING THE FINISH DRUMMMMM U FORGOT ahue make it follow the finish drum. No, I didn't. A mapper doesn't have to map strictly to a song.
   01:49:988 (4) - delete kat almost this is lower. I'm fine as it is.
   02:04:771 (1) - this kat almost unnecessary for instrumental. But necessary for the pattern.
   02:18:539 (1,2,1) - maybe swap? almost of the them so weird if don be higher for me. don is not higher ;w; make it ddk. I didn't mapped to the song strictly. Especially the kiais have their own beats which are intended to fit only the song, but not follow it strictly.
   02:19:699 (1,2,1) - this stream is bad starting on here. make it perfect, start the stream at 02:19:844 that almost perfect for me because no drum instrumental but vocal instrumental :v vocal is easier than drum. It is true that at this time line the pattern sounds better, but looking at the overall pattern constellation you will notice that it doesn't fit that well.
   02:32:307 (1,2,1) - the kat not should 02:32:452 (1) - here but 02:32:380 (2) - here most perfect. ^, but this time I will check to make the patterns overall a bit smoother.
   02:35:206 (1,2,3,4,1) - do not make stream here, there mixing pitchmapping vocal + drum almost weirdest ever i see. Didn't mapped to the vocal after all. Just conincidence this happened.
   02:49:119 - I'm still wondering that this part so empty and the beside the note has 1 kat and 4 dons, missing 1/4 instrumental i see over there. It's not all about following the song, sometimes you have to look at the patterns as well. I don't find it appieling for gameplay to play K ddk
   02:50:568 (5) - change it to D so lower than (6). This was rather intensional. No partical reason for it, but I like it as it is.
   03:07:452 (2) - delete this note. no more 1/4 instrumental again C: then add kat on here 03:07:380 (1). Sounds okay.
   04:04:046 (5) - add kat, then reversing pitch, 04:05:061 (3) - add kat here. ok
   04:05:930 (2,3,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,1) - sooooooooooooo much repeating here. make new pattern. Makes no sense. First you were dedicated to follow the beat and now you don't. Denided. I'm fine with this.

Frostmourne wrote:

From my test playing queue~

You have done really great job here. You successfully eliminated what can make this map boring by patterns that never look the same and great rhythmical wise. The most one I totally love is around 04:58:974 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - where you created the best structure in this map on here.
All rounded-amazing.
Just some personal taste and one critical thing you need to consider!

04:16:365 (1) - 04:17:525 (1) - 04:18:684 (1) - 04:22:742 (6) - I personally think 2 repeatedly- kicked sliders are not fitting much. Having them and the followed note is a circle feels hard to count the beat and hit properly. It's also feeling much softer and meaningless on such an intense part like this.
I would change them to all circles there.
04:21:003 (1) - This is different because the followed note is a slider which feels way more comfortable to hit.
06:36:510 (1) - Having both silence for slidertick and sliderslide is deemed unrankable.

I think this can be set once the mod above is applied! (osu! icon)

Dainesl wrote:

SPOILER

hm...maybe i'll mod this thing.

Ono's Taiko Oni
00:39:409 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - Hm...I think this pattern should be simplified as the instruments don't suggest all the notes have a reason for being there, unless you have a reason for this, perhaps? Maybe you chose additive mapping as your key idea? Right, additive mapping. That's actually how I mapped in this song in general.
00:44:046 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - If you simplified the previous pattern, simplify this one as well, otherwise keep it as it is. The instruments here tend to play on the 1/2 beats, so maybe base the patterns on that? ^
01:49:554 (1,2,3,4) - I see that you want to emphasise these but the problem is that you emphasised all of them, making them seem average in comparison. I'd personally recommend that you remove the finishers on some of these notes (1-3 perhaps?) to make the others more emphasised. It'd also fit to the music a bit more imo as (4) lands on a very emphasised instrument. Oh, good idea. Applied.
02:04:046 - to 02:41:003 - I would recommend you use a more don-based rhythm because the song sounds quite...dramatic (if that's a good word to use in this situation), plus you seem to be mapping more towards the instruments, so having a stronger and more dramatic rhythm by using dons would support the music more. Nothing really nitpicky I can say here but just as a general idea you may wish to use a don-based rhythm rather than an equal rhythm similar to the non-Kiai parts. Alright, I will see what I can do here.
03:25:496 (1) - 03:25:930 (1) - and 03:26:365 (1,2,3,4) - These notes seem to sound a bit softer, which would suggest that finishers would not be the ideal way of showing this relative softness to the music. Again, these notes would be seen more as the average if you emphasise them all; which would probably not be the ideal intention here as the Kiai Time approaches. If you applied 01:49:554 then apply it here too, otherwise keep it as it is. Applied it for now. Not sure, because actually I like how it is played. But you provided a valid point. Also, I added some finishers in previous part.
03:43:757 (1,1,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,2,1) - Not sure what to make of this 17-note pattern, while it prepares you for a stupidly long stream it's also the first time it's been used in a Kiai; normally it's 5 or 9-note patterns. The longest pattern in the first Kiai was 11 notes, this is 17. I think that you could do what you did with that 11-note pattern, which is to break it up into smaller sections, so that it feels more consistent to the first Kiai. Hm, tried some variations, but I kinda like this one. Another reason for using a longer stream was to rise he difficulty from time to time. So I guess I will just leave it as it is. - I'm suprised you analyzed in this way, great!
04:19:554 (1) - Perhaps make this a big don to emphasise it more; I feel that it should be emphasised due to the sound that pretty much only applies to this bit of the song. Sounds good! Applied.
04:35:351 (1,2,3,4) - Same deal as with 01:49:554, you're using too many finishers and as a result you lose some of the emphasis. If you applied the suggestion there apply it here, otherwise keep it as it is. Hm, applied for now. Somehow, the more and more I changed it, the more I have the feeling to keep it since it feels nice to play these kat finishers. lol
06:11:003 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Not sure if this was intentionally done but this is a nice concept; not increasing the maximum number of notes in a single pattern of a Kiai; emphasises the deathstream more, as it already happened. Gives a "you know that deathstream? we want you to remember it." kind of feeling. You kinda impressed me with your thinking in this mod. lol

Meh, very nice map, if only I put this amount of thought into my own mapping style

OnosakiHito wrote:

Okay, I'm not sure when another TBAT appear, but I told them about the set so they know about it.
I hope you can stay a bit more patient. Sorry for the inconvenience!