[Oni]
00:11:985 (13,14) - Making it Dk would fit much better to the song, as the D would make a better continuity with 00:10:596 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - , and also in terms of song-wise noting: The following 00:13:096 (15,16,17) - uses pitch relevancy as support of noting.
Noting, not nothing.00:19:763 (30,31,32,33) - How about d k k D ? Your whole section pretty much revolves around pitch consistency and these notes aren't so consistent as 00:20:179 (31) - and 00:20:596 (32) - are very close (maybe the same but I doubt it.)
00:27:263 (47,48) - I would invert the d and the D here, the first being more impacting than the other in the music.
00:34:207 (77) - Make it D, instead ? It's not really kat-worthy here as the riff starting at 00:29:763 (59) - repeats here as well.
00:36:429 (86) - This big note is a bit random to the music. I see why it is here, but it's not really big worthy there as it (the strong kick) also repeats 00:36:985 (88) - .
00:45:040 (123,124) - Same as 00:27:263 (47,48) -
01:03:374 (176,177,178,179) - I'm certain you can variate it a bit by doing it 2-2.
01:15:318 (225,226,227,228,229,230) - I'd recommend moving 227 forwards as 226 has a crash behind. You'll have some space for a finisher on 226.
http://puu.sh/6uavi.png01:21:151 (248,249,250) - Uncertain about this one but.. dkk doesn't fit that much. It works to your mapping, but it sounds a bit odd. You may change to dkk, but it's not a must.
01:23:651 (258) - There's a strong hi-crash there, make it K ? If you apply it, move 259 to 01:23:929 (259) - .
01:25:596 (269,270,271,272,273,274,275) - You could make a better flow effect by applying this
http://puu.sh/6uc1P.png. 271 isn't a must, but it works better. The inversion of 274 and 275 is pretty much required as the lower pitched syllable is on 274 and not 275, which is what you've done on 01:26:013 (271,272,273) - .
01:27:540 (277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284) - ^ (283 and 284 can be both kats.)
01:34:485 (306,307,308,309,310,311,312) - ^
01:36:707 (315,316,317,318,319,320,321) - ^
01:53:651 (388,389,390,391) - Hm, here you can put a kdd K without any problem, beside the non-regular that are in the song this is the only one havign irregular groove (that is, not 1/2).
02:14:485 (479,480,481,482,483,484,485,486,487) - It doesn't really need a 1/4 on all three. You may want to switch 02:15:318 (484) - to a D, and take out 02:15:179 (483) - in order to map the note like 02:14:207 (478) - .
02:18:651 (498) - Same as above, it should be a D to map a strong note, but needs deletion of 02:18:790 (499) - .
02:28:096 (543,544,545,546,547,548,549,550,551,552,553) - The patterns is a bit breaking your drum mapping purpose (what you did).
http://puu.sh/6uedA.png{
The first and last note are highlighted, because there are where big notes should occur.
However, before 553, there is also a don. If you wish to keep the stream, change the 552 to a k to comply with the rules that state that no monochromatic stream finishing by a big of the same color should occur (dD is one of them).
02:28:235 (544) - should also be moved to 02:28:374 - if you're willing to change the first note as a big note.
}
02:39:485 (599,600,601,602) - I see the variety you've wanted to make, it works out well here !
02:47:540 (637) - Any reason for the missing D ?
02:47:540 (637,638,639,640,641,642,643,644,645,646) - The feeling of this pattern should be the same as 01:25:596 (269,270,271,272,273,274,275) - as it's the exact same, but you can allow yourself some changes.
02:49:763 (647,648,649,650,651,652,653,654,655,656) - , 02:56:429 (676,677,678,679,680,681,682,683,684,685,686,687,688,689,690,691,692,693,694,695) - are the same as well.
03:06:151 (718,719,720,721,722,723,724) - It's a bit different from dddkd K which would be most expected, maybe make it that as well ?
03:21:568 (785,786,787,788) - Hold'em together, that way it'll flow better than now.
03:47:263 (900,901,902) - Just keep 1/2 on it, the 1/4 isn't as necessary as you think.
03:50:040 (907) - And here, the finisher isn't that needed as well, because you're just on a simpler kick.
03:56:429 (924) - Add in a finisher here ? Cymbal crash.
04:11:151 (995,996,997,998) - You hear a cymbal crash on your k, so maybe shift your pattern to ddK d in order to have a finisher ?
04:25:596 (1067,1068,1069,1070,1071,1072) - ^, shift your pattern to ddK ddd ?
04:32:679 - I hear a drum here, why not mapping it ? If you accept it, you'll have to fix some of your hitsoundings here and there, but there's no problem.
04:48:374 (1178,1179,1180,1181,1182,1183) - Same as 04:25:596 (1067,1068,1069,1070,1071,1072) - (ddK kdk / ddK ddk).
04:49:485 (1184,1185,1186) - ^ too, keep on 1/2 and then d D.
[Muzukashii]
00:13:929 (15) - Pitch consistency with 00:13:513 (14) - ? Both are the same note.
00:18:651 (26) - Here, you'd be better taking off the big note, but that's not a must.
00:27:540 (46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55) - In the pattern, 00:28:513 (49) - is completely unnecessary as there is nothing behind it. 00:27:540 (46) - can be reduced down to a single d as the previous note is the exact same.
00:34:207 (71) - Change to a D, you'd be consistent to the repetition of riff - the crash only being an add-on.
00:36:429 (79) - ^
00:39:485 (89,90,91) - (and all instances) Why did you suddenly decide to change to ddk even though the riff in the song is the exact same, and ddd worked well !
00:45:318 (111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121) - This pattern sounds very off, as the song - besides the crash - has barely nothing audible.
00:51:707 (131) - and 00:56:151 (142) - If you delete that you'd make a nicer flow effect to the song, 4 consecutive notes are not really good for this part of the song.
01:01:429 (155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179) - That's a bit Oni-like right here, you'll need to town down your patterns.
01:10:874 (189,190,191) - ddd, dkd doesn't work well for a muzu.
01:19:763 (219,220,221) - ^, ddk doesn't work well as a whole.
01:23:096 (229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237) - Same as 00:27:540 (46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55) -.
01:25:318 (238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256) - Mapping to the vocal here is just plain odd as it ends up being the exact same as the Oni. Focus on the drums, here.
01:34:207 (268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286) - ^.
01:39:485 (288,289,290,291) - Here, making it ddd d instead of dd kd would work much better, like here. 01:41:429 (295,296,297,298) -
01:42:540 (299,300,301,302,303,304) - A bit tough to play due to the big kats, you might take them out (or one of them) as successive crashes lose effect.
01:44:068 (305,306,307,308,309,310) - The pattern itself has surprised me, the offset notes are unexpected. You can bring them in another way that it shouldn't be unexpected.
01:44:763 (307,308,309) - Delete all big notes.
01:53:651 (337,338,339,340) - k d D, as the 1/4 is quite unnecessary here.
02:01:429 (366,367,368,369,370,371,372) - Same as 01:44:068 (305,306,307,308,309,310) - . Also, kdd can be changed to a simple d d.
02:06:429 (383,384,385) - Maybe make it ddd as well ? The riff is the same as 01:47:540 (317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324,325) - .
02:07:540 (387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394,395) - I'm unsure about this, but it's worth a try anyway: If you wish to keep the kats as is, make it
http://puu.sh/6xzpd.png -- that would create a nicer flow without having problems about pattern formations.
02:14:207 (410,411,412,413,414,415,416,417,418) - ^ -- but you can make it different.
02:19:763 (432,433,434,435,436) - ddd k ? You don't need to put that many notes.
02:24:207 (451,452,453,454) - dk dk doesn't fit at all here. ddd k fits more.
02:28:096 (466,467,468,469,470,471,472) - This pattern can be toned down as 00:27:540 (46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55) -.
02:31:985 (482,483,484,485) - Try out d d k alone ? It would create a nicer groove.
02:34:207 (490,491,492,493) - ddd k, so you can make a groovier pattern with ddd k ddd d k, which makes variety and not blank patterns as you've got.
02:38:651 (509) - D, or d, whichever suits you best here. Here, your
1-2-3-4-1 breaks as you've made a
1.
02:39:485 (511,512,513,514) - d ddd doesn't feel much right here, may you put a ddd d it would play better and fit better.
02:41:707 (520,521,522,523) - dd kd doesn't fit at all here. Keep it simple !
02:47:540 (543,544,545,546,547,548,549,550,551,552,553,554,555,556,557,558,559,560,561) - Mapping to the vocal here is just plain odd as it ends up being the exact same as the Oni. Focus on the drums, here.
02:54:763 (567) - move it 1/4 backwards ?
02:56:429 (573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591) - Same as big-mention-right-above.
03:01:707 (593,594,595,596) - dd kd doesn't fit here as well, change it to something more simple and fitting (ddk d or ddd d) !
03:04:763 (603,604,605,606,607,608,609,610,611) - This whole pattern plays weird, honestly. You pushed it to the limits of the Muzu so hard that it's almost becoming Oni, here. Reduce a bit the pattern difficulty ?
03:07:540 (614) - Here, you can change to D to keep your riff consistent.
03:13:651 (638,639,640) - Try to cut this into two distinct notes ?
03:15:874 (643,644,645,646) - k d D in 1/2 ? the 1/4 is not necessary here.
03:21:429 (663,664,665,666,667,668,669) - Pattern a bit complicated here, change the skeleton of it ?
03:24:207 (675,676,677,678) - There are no crashes here, so here the dk dk is pretty... useless
03:28:374 (690,691,692,693) - I'm certain ddd k plays as good as d ddk.
03:30:735 (699,700,701,702,703) - This is even more unexpected and here it is even surprising ! Use dk dk d d instead if you want to keep it simple.
03:32:818 (706,707,708) - ddD ain't allowed bro, regardless of what difficulty it is. Moreover it plays pretty badly in the whole pattern, which is the following.
03:32:540 (705,706,707,708,709,710,711,712,713) - Here you've made a pretty weird pattern that makes it inconsistent with the rest of the chart, as there's no "mention" of kkd. As said above, you've also included a ddD 1/4 which is not allowed by the rules. The best would be: k ddd d k d d.
03:37:540 (726,727,728,729) - As always, make your pattern groovier by putting ddd k.
03:40:874 (738,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747,748) - This pattern is difficult to play for a muzukashii, tone down the difficulty ?
03:47:540 (758) - I'm certain this should be a D, as your crash is a low-note.
03:49:763 (762,763,764) - Actually you have two almost silent drum kicks and a strong thing there that would be big note, so instead of DDk it should be ddK.
03:51:985 (769) - Uncertain about it, but make it a small don ? 03:50:318 (764,765) - were stronger big notes so here it should be less intense in order to stay on song
03:55:874 (777,778,779,780,781,782,783,784,785,786,787,788,789,790,791,792,793,794,795,796,797) - This pattern is a bit doubtful as well, due to the volume of the drums. You may want to add some small pauses where you can possibly put one (03:58:929 (789) - being very recommended) and tone down the patterns, ddk doesn't fit really much here. It might, though.
04:06:429 (817,818,819,820) - ddd k for more groove, as always.
04:11:985 (839) - Why's that a kat ? You've broken your main riff here, so make it a d ?
04:16:429 (854,855,856,857,858) - dk dk ? It's pretty obvious here.
04:19:485 (866,867,868,869) - , 04:21:707 (875,876,877,878) -, 04:23:929 (883,884,885,886) - and so on... Here, all your 2/2 are not really fitting at all. You're making difficulty for the sake of making difficulty (which is almost what is your whole kiai at the moment), and is contrary to what you've mapped so far.
04:34:207 (923,924,925,926,927,928,929,930,931,932,933,934) - This pattern is a bit ugh, it doesn't really belong to the Muzu level.
04:44:763 (963,964,965,966,967,968,969) - Make it simpler ! You are putting away a potential big note here.
04:49:485 (980,981,982) - I'm certain this can be put as 1/2.
04:50:318 (984,985,986,987,988,989,990,991,992,993,994,995,996,997,998,999) - Cut out this in parts ? It should be better.
[Futsuu/Kantan later]
Offset late, +10~40ms (consult timing professional for accurate amount)
You said you know what you are doing, so I will just give the rating without commenting too much. Just letting you know IMO this is the only thing that I cannot guarantee carrying the map across the ranking line.
Could you try find a 192kbps one? I will also be on the lookout for one if needed.
