1. 00:18:570 (119,120,121,122,123) - kdkkd? Ends the phrase better I think.
2. 01:19:320 (541,542) - Better to remove I think. It creates more emphasis on the next section. Consistency reasons too because 01:22:508 (560) - is alone (and it should be).
3. 01:33:008 (629) - Can be changed to k for the piano, but I am not sure if you want this. Just a suggestion, since you seem to be focusing more on the strings here, but you mapped 01:33:195 (630,631,632,633) - which go with the piano better so I think you should probably change this so the piano is complete.
4. 02:09:758 (105) - Because you followed the strings at 02:03:758 (59) - and 01:57:758 (18) - , you might want to have a k here. However, if you do this, then the pattern is maybe awkward to play, so you might want to consider another pattern. Up to you.
5. 02:15:383 (145,146,147,148,149,150,151) - Same thing.
6. 02:21:570 (193,194,195,196,197) - kdkkd? Ends the phrase better I think.

1. 00:06:195 - kkk expected for structure reasons (00:03:195 (9,10,11)). I don't think it's too hard.
2. 00:54:008 (264) - K fits better I think, because the next D begins another section. It creates a nice variety.
3. 00:54:758 (267,268,269,270,271) - d dkd or ddddk suggested. I don't think current pattern is that appropriate because if you followed the background percussion you should probably have ddddk, but you chose to go with the melody instead so splitting up the two works better I think.
4. 01:18:008 (402) - D? Creates more emphasis on this change. Fits the music better too since there is a crash. (you have it in inner)
5. 01:24:195 - kkk expected for structure reasons. Same thing as the beginning kinda.
6. 02:21:008 (153) - D? Makes it so much better imo, just like in the previous kiai that was suggested.

1. 00:03:382 (7,8,9,10) - k k x k k suggested instead. It fits the rhythm better because of the alt sound. (x = nothing)
2. 00:06:570 (17) - Best to remove I think. Still sounds nicely without and it's easier and more appropriate imo.
3. 00:24:383 (89,90,91) - kkk suggested because you try to go for the melody here.
4. 00:36:383 (133,134,135) - Same thing.
5. 00:42:945 (159) - Consider k here. Makes things more simple and it also fits the music so no fear there.
6. 00:59:070 (228,229,230) - kkk suggested because the melody is much stronger here, compared to 01:00:758 (236,237,238). This goes for the second kiai too, which has the same structure like this one.
7. 01:11:070 (283,284,285) - Same thing. Also in the 2nd kiai.
8. 01:30:195 (352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359) - I would suggest you use all kats here. It fits the drum type used here and it also fits the melody better because it's strong.
9. 01:37:133 (375,376) - I think the big note should be 376 instead. In Oni and Inner Oni you had patterns which would support the intensity here, however in this muzukashii 1/2 notes are not strong enough for big note on 375 I think. Big note on 376 fits the crash sound too, also the piano which is more intense.
10. 01:40:133 (384) - d suggested because it's the same note played in the music just like 01:39:758 (383), which is a don.
11. 01:42:008 (389) - D expected because of 01:41:258 (386) - and 01:40:508 (385).
12. 01:55:133 (1) - k suggested because the intensity isn't stronger than at 01:54:383 (442).
13. 02:02:820 (36,37,38) - kkk expected because of 01:02:820 (245,246,247) - and 02:03:383 (39). The don at 02:03:383 (39) - plays and sounds really bad if you don't change.
14. 02:04:320 (43,44,45) - I am ok with this. It's different to what you have in the other kiai but it fits the melody.

1. 00:16:508 (36) - K suggested. Fits the music better I think.
2. 00:43:133 (105,106) - Because of light patterns around, I suggest big note at 106 instead of 105. Big note on 105 feels too strong.
3. 00:49:508 (121) - Should be a big note, if the above change is applied (I think it should be applied).
4. 01:12:758 (186) - Remove finish? I would suggest you use big drum rolls in the 2nd kiai instead.
5. 01:18:008 (202) - Big note? Same reason as Muzukashii.
6. 01:25:133 (217,218) - Same reasons as 105,106.
7. 01:55:133 (1) - k suggested. Same reasons like in Muzukashii.
8. 01:56:258 (4,5,6) - Should be at 01:57:758 (9,10,11) - and 9,10,11 should be here maybe. I don't think you need to create so much variety here if the structure suffers (1/2 k k kdk d d dkd, when it's d k dkd and k d kdk everywhere else).
9. 02:00:758 (18) - Big roll suggested if you applied the suggestion at 01:12:758 (186).
10. 02:02:258 (21,22,23) - Same thing as 01:56:258. (you also did it nicely at 02:07:508 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47) - which is even more reason to change I think)
11. 02:18:008 (72) - big note?
12. 02:21:008 (81) - ^

1. 00:07:508 (7) - Big note suggested.
2. 00:43:508 (63) - ^
3. 00:49:508 (73) - ^
4. 01:18:758 (124) - Remove maybe? It brings more attention to 01:19:133 (125) if you remove. Also consider a big note at 01:18:008 (123).
5. 01:36:383 (148,149) - Use kats? It would fit better I think.
6. 01:52:508 (1) - Personally, I don't think this fits that well. I would suggest to map notes until 01:54:008 - instead.

lolcubes wrote:

╭( ･ㅂ･)و

[Inner]

1. 00:18:570 (119,120,121,122,123) - kdkkd? Ends the phrase better I think. - sounds good.
2. 01:19:320 (541,542) - Better to remove I think. It creates more emphasis on the next section. Consistency reasons too because 01:22:508 (560) - is alone (and it should be). - it has the triplet sound certainly like 01:22:695 (561,562,563) -
3. 01:33:008 (629) - Can be changed to k for the piano, but I am not sure if you want this. Just a suggestion, since you seem to be focusing more on the strings here, but you mapped 01:33:195 (630,631,632,633) - which go with the piano better so I think you should probably change this so the piano is complete. - the don is intentionally because that point has a bit lower pitch piano sound than 01:36:008 (643) -
4. 02:09:758 (105) - Because you followed the strings at 02:03:758 (59) - and 01:57:758 (18) - , you might want to have a k here. However, if you do this, then the pattern is maybe awkward to play, so you might want to consider another pattern. Up to you.
5. 02:15:383 (145,146,147,148,149,150,151) - Same thing. - i dont like the kdkkkdk. i changed to ddkdkkkdk
6. 02:21:570 (193,194,195,196,197) - kdkkd? Ends the phrase better I think. - i think 02:21:851 (196,197) - these notes are should keep don because i really want to enphasize 02:22:133 (198) - that K. should be emphasized more. so, for the end of song.

[Oni]

1. 00:06:195 - kkk expected for structure reasons (00:03:195 (9,10,11)). I don't think it's too hard. - yea, youre right. but just i want to emphasize snaredrum sound.
2. 00:54:008 (264) - K fits better I think, because the next D begins another section. It creates a nice variety. - i dont like the xxx X with the same color basically. but agreed to that nice variety.
3. 00:54:758 (267,268,269,270,271) - d dkd or ddddk suggested. I don't think current pattern is that appropriate because if you followed the background percussion you should probably have ddddk, but you chose to go with the melody instead so splitting up the two works better I think. - ddddk!!!!!!
4. 01:18:008 (402) - D? Creates more emphasis on this change. Fits the music better too since there is a crash. (you have it in inner) - i gotto itto.
5. 01:24:195 - kkk expected for structure reasons. Same thing as the beginning kinda. - kept. same as 00:06:195
6. 02:21:008 (153) - D? Makes it so much better imo, just like in the previous kiai that was suggested. - yes.

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:03:382 (7,8,9,10) - k k x k k suggested instead. It fits the rhythm better because of the alt sound. (x = nothing) - good contrast with d d.
2. 00:06:570 (17) - Best to remove I think. Still sounds nicely without and it's easier and more appropriate imo. - sure.
3. 00:24:383 (89,90,91) - kkk suggested because you try to go for the melody here. - but its still lower pitch than 00:24:758 (91) - imo.
4. 00:36:383 (133,134,135) - Same thing. - ^. 00:36:195 (131) - has too higher pitch.
5. 00:42:945 (159) - Consider k here. Makes things more simple and it also fits the music so no fear there. - try it.
6. 00:59:070 (228,229,230) - kkk suggested because the melody is much stronger here, compared to 01:00:758 (236,237,238). This goes for the second kiai too, which has the same structure like this one. - nice
7. 01:11:070 (283,284,285) - Same thing. Also in the 2nd kiai. - fixed.
8. 01:30:195 (352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359) - I would suggest you use all kats here. It fits the drum type used here and it also fits the melody better because it's strong. - hmm okey, i try it.
9. 01:37:133 (375,376) - I think the big note should be 376 instead. In Oni and Inner Oni you had patterns which would support the intensity here, however in this muzukashii 1/2 notes are not strong enough for big note on 375 I think. Big note on 376 fits the crash sound too, also the piano which is more intense. - i see. got it!
10. 01:40:133 (384) - d suggested because it's the same note played in the music just like 01:39:758 (383), which is a don. - why did i use a don?
11. 01:42:008 (389) - D expected because of 01:41:258 (386) - and 01:40:508 (385). - awesome.
12. 01:55:133 (1) - k suggested because the intensity isn't stronger than at 01:54:383 (442).
13. 02:02:820 (36,37,38) - kkk expected because of 01:02:820 (245,246,247) - and 02:03:383 (39). The don at 02:03:383 (39) - plays and sounds really bad if you don't change. - fixed all sections of 2nd kiai.
14. 02:04:320 (43,44,45) - I am ok with this. It's different to what you have in the other kiai but it fits the melody. - i changed to same as 1st kiai

[Futsuu]

1. 00:16:508 (36) - K suggested. Fits the music better I think. - yes.
2. 00:43:133 (105,106) - Because of light patterns around, I suggest big note at 106 instead of 105. Big note on 105 feels too strong. - sounds good.
3. 00:49:508 (121) - Should be a big note, if the above change is applied (I think it should be applied). - wakatta!
4. 01:12:758 (186) - Remove finish? I would suggest you use big drum rolls in the 2nd kiai instead. - なるほど。
5. 01:18:008 (202) - Big note? Same reason as Muzukashii. - yes.
6. 01:25:133 (217,218) - Same reasons as 105,106. - ok.
7. 01:55:133 (1) - k suggested. Same reasons like in Muzukashii. - fixed.
8. 01:56:258 (4,5,6) - Should be at 01:57:758 (9,10,11) - and 9,10,11 should be here maybe. I don't think you need to create so much variety here if the structure suffers (1/2 k k kdk d d dkd, when it's d k dkd and k d kdk everywhere else). - fixed. and i added a k here 01:59:820 and 02:11:820 for 2nd kiai.
9. 02:00:758 (18) - Big roll suggested if you applied the suggestion at 01:12:758 (186). - yes.
10. 02:02:258 (21,22,23) - Same thing as 01:56:258. (you also did it nicely at 02:07:508 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47) - which is even more reason to change I think) - ok!
11. 02:18:008 (72) - big note? - changed to a finisher.
12. 02:21:008 (81) - ^ - ^

[Kantan]

1. 00:07:508 (7) - Big note suggested.
2. 00:43:508 (63) - ^
3. 00:49:508 (73) - ^ - all changed to a finisher.
4. 01:18:758 (124) - Remove maybe? It brings more attention to 01:19:133 (125) if you remove. Also consider a big note at 01:18:008 (123). - わかりました！
5. 01:36:383 (148,149) - Use kats? It would fit better I think. - fixed.
6. 01:52:508 (1) - Personally, I don't think this fits that well. I would suggest to map notes until 01:54:008 - instead. - i thought you would say so. ww

╭( ･ㅂ･)و

rank please.

Satellite wrote:

╭( ･ㅂ･)و