1. [Shi-Ra]'s Heaven [HD] - 7Key (4,64 stars, 1346 notes)
2. [Shi-Ra]'s High Sky [NM] - 7Key (3,06 stars, 901 notes)
3. Aka's Hard (4,77 stars, 366 notes)
4. Insane (5 stars, 605 notes)
5. ryuu's Easy (1,39 stars, 121 notes)
6. TK'S Muzukashii (4,54 stars, 460 notes)
7. TK'S Oni (4,89 stars, 702 notes)

Kodora wrote:

nice map

ziin wrote:

[easy]
02:06:319 (3) - something like this? http://i.imgur.com/Z5lPeKz.png sorry, i like my shape :3

ziin wrote:

Hi. mod because m2u hi, ty
[general]
bpm is 230 6/8 (3/4) or 76.66667 2/8 (2/4). Don't worry about throwing off people because of abnormally high BPM. This is natural in 6/8 songs. I recommend 230 and cut the SV in half. Nobody will complain about 230 BPM, since you aren't switching to 4/4. bpm is correct, no need to doubled it
The last spinner in the song needs to be the same length across all difficulties. Easy has it shorter than the rest, and absurdly long spinners are pointless.it's a guest diff, so i leave this to a mapper's decision

[insane]
HP drain seems a little low for this map, but I like being able to actually pass maps. HP drain is enough. tested for A LOT times
00:23:275 (2) - take the beginning of this note off (put silence on this beat). It makes the rhythm much better. no need
00:38:232 (5,6) - doesn't fit. better to simplify into straight 1/2 notes. it fits
00:41:602 (7,8,9) - doesn't fit. You can't correctly and play-ably map the piano here, so don't do it at all.same as above
00:41:732 (9,1) - careful with poor spacing. Make sure compressed streams are equal fixed, ty
00:46:232 (7,8,9,10) - doesn't fit. You can't correctly and play-ably map the piano here, so don't do it at all.same as above
00:52:493 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't fit. You can't correctly and play-ably map the piano here, so don't do it at all.same as above
00:55:884 (1) - I feel this is the perfect spot for some tornado combos. To each his own. ty for idea, maybe i reworked this place a bit later
01:06:841 (3) - this isn't stacked? fixed
01:12:058 (3,4,5) - these aren't stacked, and look bad http://i.imgur.com/quzW4r9.png it stacked, didn't you even see that in editor?
01:42:841 (1,2) - not stacked fxd
01:44:667 (2) - in general these are poor ways to map this type of note. They are impossible to hit late without a slider break (unless you crank OD up to 10) and you can recreate the same fingering with just a normal slider.it's ok, plays well and noone of testers missed it
01:45:449 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - spacing. Make sure actual distance is the same, don't worry about the number you get in the corner. fxd
01:47:471 (11,1) - spacing fxd
01:47:797 (2,5) - minor detail, both these sounds are the same, but mapped using different methods. not very consistent. it's ok
01:49:819 (5,1) - spacingfxd
02:21:971 (5) - not stacked fxd
02:24:319 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think this looks better not stackedty for noticed it, rearrange it later

Pagliaccio wrote:

[general]
bpm is 230 6/8 (3/4) or 76.66667 2/8 (2/4). Don't worry about throwing off people because of abnormally high BPM. This is natural in 6/8 songs. I recommend 230 and cut the SV in half. Nobody will complain about 230 BPM, since you aren't switching to 4/4. bpm is correct, no need to doubled it

it's definitely 6/8 at 230 BPM. Looks like o2jam got it horribly wrong. Since o2jam is using the wrong BPM, I won't argue the point further. Cytus also has some horrible BPMs on their songs.

[insane]
01:12:058 (3,4,5) - these aren't stacked, and look bad http://i.imgur.com/quzW4r9.png it stacked, didn't you even see that in editor? If you can't see what I'm talking about in the picture (slider end is 1 pixel off and right) then at least you can see that the circle isn't in the same place. Press ctrl+H on the slider and you'll see what I mean. It isn't a big deal if you only have 1 note after the slider end, but when you have 2 notes, there's a clear distinction (to me). This is merely polish on a great map already.

01:44:667 (2) - in general these are poor ways to map this type of note. They are impossible to hit late without a slider break (unless you crank OD up to 10) and you can recreate the same fingering with just a normal slider.it's ok, plays well and noone of testers missed it these sliders have a hit window of -130 / +65 ms for OD7. It's a bug in osu that will probably never be fixed.

Chocoliti wrote:

Mod by request

Column 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

[7K NM]

HP -3 maybe Awwww, reduced, don't know why it was 10 xD

02:29:275 (149275|3) - doesn't have any sound at this part. Try to remove this LN or fix this. - There's correct background sound to accent it in this way, but it may be hard for NM / fixed

[7K HD]

00:45:710 - add one more note, you already used triple notes at 00:44:145 - Ok, it's missed x.x / added now to 3rd column
01:31:884 ~ 01:36:580 - Actually, I'm not good at mapping by o2jam style, but here feels too monotone. (It doesn't have any critical problems, but I suggest these patterns. You can feel free to ignore it, Just example. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1244188 http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1244200) - Re-arranged a little using first suggestion
01:49:362 ~ 01:49:884 too harsh pattern at HD Difficulty imo. Sorry, it's suitable for HD ~25 lvl - it's FCable and follows the sound correctly, so no changes
02:29:275 (149275|3) - Same reason with NM Difficulty - Hmm, no, there's suitable sound for it and it's well-playable for HD diff

Epic song and maps. Good Luck!

PROGUY wrote:

Hi there. Here's my mod as requested.

[[Shi-Ra]'s High Sky [NM]]
(lol HP Drain 10 are you masochistic)
HP Drain - 2 or 3
OD +1 - Fixed

[[Shi-Ra]'s Heaven [HD]]
HP Drain +1 - Fixed
02:29:667 (149667|2) Move long note end to 02:32:928. - Fixed

Other than that, I don't have any problems with these charts.
Hope this helps though. Good luck!