Priti wrote:

Together

1. 00:17:510 (3) - Something in its' shape feels a bit awkard, try moving the points around a bit to change the angle. nope
2. 00:21:328 (4) - This slider is lame, the way it overlaps (3) isn't good looking and it doesn't work its' way well into (5), try something else. will think about
3. 00:41:100 (1) - Doesn't make sense at all, just start the break here. nope
4. 01:03:873 (4) - Awful curve, use 4 points and make it more symmetrical
5. 01:15:054 (4,1) - Awkward ugly overlap
6. 01:15:327 (1) - Shape doesn't feel good, slightly move the points.
7. 01:16:691 (2,1) - Bad overlap
8. 01:18:600 (1) - Bad curve
9. 01:21:873 (1) - Shape is a bit awkward, try lowering the fourth point a bit more.
10. 01:23:236 (4,1) - Bad overlap
11. 01:29:782 (2,1) - ^
12. 01:34:691 (3,1) - ^ for now won't fix any overlap
13. 01:49:691 (1) - Bad shape, try something like this uh why if now is perfect ? http://puu.sh/5vYbT.jpg
14. 01:51:054 (2,1) - Bad overlap
15. 01:51:327 (1) - Second half of this slider doesn't look so good. nah i prefer it so
16. 01:52:964 (1) - Feels forced, just map this normally not really
17. 01:57:600 - Missed a pretty obvious beat i prefer without
18. 02:09:327 (4) - Bad curve nah
19. 02:15:600 (3,1) - Bad overlap
20. 02:16:691 (2) - Put a circle instead and then put a 1/2 slider at 02:16:964
21. 02:32:236 (1) - Bad curve, use 4 points instead
22. 02:33:873 (4) - Bad shape, try something like this is kinda the same
23. 02:35:509 (1,2) - Doesn't look good together, try moving 2's second point a bit more up and right. nah

Alone

1. 00:03:328 (1) - Bad curve, make it a bit more curvy or just make it a typical straight sliders. i prefer to keep it because a straight slider feels not so good for such relaxing map
2. 00:16:419 (1,2) - Badly shaped, make them a bit more curvy or a bit less curvy nah
3. 00:26:237 (4) - Its kinda boring how its just the exact same shape as 3 mirrored, try something like this maybe? i don't like straight sliders ;_; and i like this 2 mirrored sliders
4. 00:38:237 (1) - Ugly curve don't think so
5. 00:41:100 (1) - Unfitting, just start the break here no but did the spinned shorter
6. 01:10:418 (2) - Awful curve, try a red anchor slider. nah
7. 01:21:873 (3) - Bad curve, use 4 points or just try another concept of slider changed a bit in ma way
8. 01:52:418 (3) - The middle on the red tick doesn't work well, try replacing this with two 1/1 sliders or just do something else. i follow the vocal here sono
9. 01:58:964 (3) - ^-^
10. 02:12:054 (3) - ^-^
11. 02:28:964 (1) - Curve this a bit more ok
12. 02:35:509 (4,1) - Damn awful curve meh
13. 02:45:327 (2) - Don't just mirror 1, try a nice blanket by making 2 a straight slider like this nah

Nemis wrote:

[General]

1. This isn't a real problem, but there is an additional space between the tags "Crannies" and "All". ok fixed
2. I'd suggest to keep one background only, I personally don't like multiple backgrounds in a mapset except in some cases, but this is just my opinion. I'd keep the one in the easier difficulty! will think about

[Togheter]

1. 00:02:783 (3) - Consider rotating this slider a little bit to obtain a better flow between 00:02:510 (2,3) - these objects and 00:02:783 (3,1) - these. I see this little flow issue in other pattern in the whole pattern, I would suggest to fix them all.
   
   SPOILER

   
   ok o3o
2. 00:39:873 (2) - There is no sound at the end of this slider! Just place a note at 00:39:873 (2) - instead of a 1/2 slider. per ora lo tengo cosi perchèla nota del pianofinisce li piu o meno come suono
3. 00:41:100 (1) - You should end this spinner at 00:45:873 (1) - instead of 00:43:691 (1) - here since in the first position there is a sound, and in the second there isn't! risposta nella altra diff
4. 01:03:873 (4) - The structure of this slider looks really unbalanced! I'm sure you can make this ~ slider better! Try moving the sliderpoints a bit to the middle, at this moment the one in the bottom (the second) is a bit down; move it a bit up:
   
   SPOILER

   
   l'ho cambiato di cira un pochino,ma non come hai detto tu
5. 01:15:054 (4,1) - Here I find the manual stack cool, but 01:16:691 (2,1) - here I don't. I would suggest to keep 01:15:054 (4,1) - this one only, the second one is too much in my opinion! ok o3ob
6. 01:46:418 (1,2,1) - What about making a perfect triangle with these three elements? At this moment the triangle looks a bit crushed horizontally. spero sia meglio ora
7. 01:57:600 (4) - Why haven't you mapped this note? There is a sound and also a vocal, there is no reason to keep this space empty. Consider filling it with a note! added
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 02:07:691 (1,2) - Consider improving this blanket a little bit for a better esthetic of the pattern. Just move the second point of 02:07:760 - this slider at x:16 y:212, it should be fine. ok
9. 02:23:508 (3) - Its end is unsnapped by ~1ms! Resnap it in time. uh done
10. 02:43:145 (1) - I know you decreased the spacing between 02:42:600 (4,1) - these two sliders 'cause 02:43:145 (1) - this one is slower, but I'd suggest to keep the same distance snap as you did until here or just move 02:43:145 (1) - this slider under 02:42:600 (4) - this slider's end.ok

[Alone]

1. There are lots of unused greenlines! I think you took them from the harder difficulty, but you must remove them since they are unneeded!
2. 00:24:601 (3) - Consider moving this slider at x:208 y:168 to obtain a better curvy flow between 00:24:056 (2,3) - these two elements. What I mean:
   
   SPOILER

   
   ok done o3o
3. 00:41:100 (1) - You should end this spinner at 00:45:873 (1) - instead of 00:43:691 (1) - here since in the first position there is a sound, and in the second there isn't! no perchè finisc il suono del piano a 00:43:691 - se noti per quello l'ho finito li
4. 02:09:327 (4,1) - I don't like how these two elements look one next to the other. I would suggest to change 02:10:964 (1) - this slider's shape or just move it a bit down (at x:468 y:276 should be fine) to make a blanket with a cool adherence between 02:09:327 (4,1) - these two sliders. me gusta done
5. 02:43:691 (1,2) - What about making these two objects perfectly symmetric? Just move 02:45:327 (2) - this slider at x:304 y:124:
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   ok done o3o

Good luck Lally! <3

Natsu wrote:

HI~ Lally forum pm request

Mod Info:

1. Unrankable or very questionable stuff
2. Highly suggestion
3. Coment or opinions about some
4. nazi stuff or normal suggestions

General:

1. I like your idea of multi BG but since the one in alone diff dont fit to much with the song and the other one in together maybe look for other one? imo

Together:

1. If you ask me od5 is really low O.O up it to 6 will be better thought O^O it was a fail fixed ty
2. mmm the 5% volume lines are almost inaudibles thought up it to 10% atleast to get a better feedback from the end of the sliders? fixed
3. 00:02:510 - 00:04:146 - 00:04:146 (2) - and alot of others circles dont have support from the music I thing the diff will be alot better withouth them but maybe you have some nice reason to have them thought just kinda curious about it
4. 00:02:510 (2) - x:240 y:356 will make a perfect triangle with 00:01:692 (1,2,3) - also right now 00:02:510 (2,3) - look to close each other fixed in ma way
5. 00:00:056 (1,2) - maybe make them symetrical since the curve of the first one look kinda messed changed a bit
6. 00:06:056 (1) - mmm Im kinda curious about this NC 00:14:237 and this other I understand what are you trying to follow but why you dint add a NC here 00:40:964 since its consistent with thre previous 2 ones forgot about ty
7. 00:08:783 (2) - ctrl G? since it will bring more empathize with the song about the cursor movement (If you do fix the distance a little) why not done
8. 00:11:510 (1,2) - reduce the distance to a properly one 1.10 I guess actually when you saw 00:11:510 (1,2,3) - look kinda symilar in spacing but 3 have a big gap in the timeland can be confuse thought i prefer not
9. 00:16:965 (2,3) - fix this blanket hue nazi o3o hue (fixed)
10. 00:18:874 this feel really awkward to play since the start of the slider dont have support from the music :/ but the tail have the strong sound here I suggest you to redo this rhythm no
11. 00:21:056 (3) - and yes this kind of beat (overmaped o.o) dont play really good thought i don't think so
12. 00:23:783 (2) - nazi x:364 y:56 look alot better than the current way I mean the blan with previous slider if you apply be sure to move 00:24:328 (3) - a little to keep the properly distance there iprefer to don't move it
13. 00:34:419 (1) - this need whistle on the repeat you can hear how symilar is the sound in the music will be nice If you support the sound with it k
14. 00:58:964 (1,1) - really nazi stack them perfect? lazy and is not needed
15. 01:03:873 look like you are missing NC here? since you was adding them every 1 stanza
16. 01:06:600 (3) - huehue u will kill me but i preffer to have this beat on the center of the grid in x:256 y:364 01:06:873 (4) - and move this a little to fix the spacing some like: o3o uguu but i prefer to leave it as itis o3o
    
    SPOILER

    
17. 01:19:418 (2,1) - this blanket could be alot better maybe you want to improve it is ok as it is
18. 01:34:145 (2) - this straight slider dont fit this part of the song since a little curved one will fit the peace in the music alot better imo nah
19. 01:34:691 (3,1) - mmm this manual stack have more distance to the others considerd to make it consistent with previous one actually look like 1/4 beat or some and can be really confuse imo for example u use 0.25 here 00:21:056 (3,4) - and look nice but the one i point to you have 0.50 then this part dont look intuitive anymore thought fixed
20. 01:38:236 U need to add a circle here and start the spinner in 01:38:373 like u was doing in previous spinners also I believe this follow the music really great K
21. 01:52:964 (1) - same as above hmm i'll try it out
22. 01:57:054 (2) - this is stacket to close of the head of 01:57:873 (1) - making a bad overlap consider to stack it exactly in the body without touching the slider head since there is enought time before the (1) appears is not needed because is not an overlap that causes a slider break or a combo break if it were those case i would consider to change it but in this one no
23. 02:07:145 (2) - look like you forget finish here? u was adding Finish + claps in symilar parts clap + whistle
24. 02:15:600 (3,1) - symilar to the other one u need to add less distance here in the manual stack to keep consistency with them
    02:19:145 same as 01:38:236
25. 02:22:418 (1,2) - this look like 00:00:056 doesnt it? and yes make them symetrical The first one curve look kinda weird imo fixed
26. 02:22:418 (2) add new combo is bugged now ok
27. 01:26:236 why NC? if its about antijump it is perfect readable without it better remove it since look weird thought i just like how it looks like OuO''i dunno why

Alone:

1. AR5 make this diff more confortable to play if you do up od to 4 too i believe is better for this diff ok
2. 00:04:965 (3,1) - mmm I really dont accept this antijumps on the ¨easy diff¨ of the set newbies cant read this hidden circles I highly suggest you to use a properly distance here is a normal but i think is ok
3. 00:03:328 (1,2,3) - also why you dont make a symetrical pattern here like: i don't wanna have much symmetrie ;;
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:12:601 (2,1) - same as 00:04:965 - this is not acceptable for the easy diff of the mapset I guess same :V
5. 00:40:964 (3) - I guess this need NC like the previous ones in 00:06:056 (1) - for example also im not a really fan of this stacks on easy diffs 00:39:873 (2,3) - new players click very fast and they will be miss or get 50 100 etc also take in consideration ur AR is really slow and the stacks can look more close than the real spacing there thougth fixed
6. 01:30:054 (1,2,3) - for parts like this I really believe u should use ar5 here :D
7. 01:38:236 (1) - this should finish in the next red tick to have an empathize with the vocals actually dont make so much sense there
   02:26:509 mmm this is overmaped and it dont feel confortable to play (this a easy diff of the set) o.o better remove it and some others symilars too dont make so much sense here i don't think so i used in slower songs muchcomplicated pattern as this one and for me fits ovo
8. 02:29:782 (2) - I really dont catch what are u trying to follow better recheck and remove those beats without support from the music ^
9. 02:35:509 maybe a mistake? since you was using NC every 2 stanzas and yeah for consistency this one need to be 02:37:145 and yeah remove it from here and etc etc unless you do this on purposefixed

Lovely song and map GL

Aka wrote:

wuw wuw suggestions

[general]

1. your comboing in [together] is shorter than in [alone] lol.. note it o.o i'd lengthen em to 6-7 fixed

[alone]

1. imho i feel like these 00:01:146 (2) -, 00:09:328 (2) -, 00:17:510 (2) reverse sliders are better to replace as note-slider i prefer not :V
2. 00:22:965 (1) - rotate by ~18° right? flows smoother after 00:22:419 (3) fixed by changing a bit the last slider point
   
   all D:

[together]

1. 00:03:328 (1,2,3) - idk in what fckin way my brain is working but i can't understand the flow of this patt x~x fixed
2. 00:08:237 (1,2,3,1) - you could move em a bit right-down and also make a blanket 00:09:328 (3,3) - o3o nah o3o
3. 00:16:419 (1,2,3) - nuuu.. i'd play with ctrl-g here -v- dun like exactly how 00:16:965 (2,3) - flows, maybe just place (3) as (1,2)'s continuation, gradually changing the slope like thissss.. b-but actually at first i thought about this or thissss i prefer to keep it like it is atm
4. 00:22:965 (1,2) - blanket like you did with 00:21:328 (4,5) - ? ò__o just while testplaying this slider feels out cuz of this place between them lol fixed a bit
5. 01:10:418 (1,3) - stack em normally pls lol ok o3o
6. 01:26:782 (1,2,3) - the lyrics start exactly from there 01:27:327 -, so i'd suggest start slider instead of finishing it here fixed but not like this
   also a spontaneous thought came into my mind, lel..
7. 01:37:691 (3,4) - make (4) flow a bit more naturally pls ;w; some grind left pls ;w; done o3o!
8. 02:43:145 (1) - DDDDDDDDDDD: i sliderbroke here tested by me and some other players and is not such a big problem ovo

zts ol
dis song meid mi kri

good luck nyally and sry for short mod chan QvQ)//*~

Andrea wrote:

~General~

1. These difficulty names aren't acceptable anymore, please change them to the standard ones. ok
2. Many tags are too short to be found, keep only the necessary ones.

ok

~Alone~

1. 00:06:056 (1) - Do not stack this note under the slider, it's pretty confusing for beginners to read and play. ok
2. 00:06:328 - Remove this break, it's too short anyway. ok
3. 00:14:237 (1) - Do not stack this note under the slider, it's pretty confusing for beginners to read and play. ok
4. 00:14:510 - Remove this break, it's too short anyway. ok
5. 01:38:236 (1) - If you want to follow the lyrics perfectly use 1/8 here and make this spinner end at 01:40:623. ok

~Together~

1. 00:09:328 (3,1) - I don't like this overlap at all, try to make it nicer like the others. i don't think so i will keep this one
2. 00:21:056 (3,4) - It would be better to stack these two objects together, they look weird like this imo. ok
3. 00:24:328 (3,1) - ^ And so on for the same patterns like this one.here not o3o
4. 01:34:964 (4,5,6) - Spacing is inconsistent here, make sure to fix it properly. rovino del tutto la blanket e poi edi poco ;_;
5. 01:38:373 (1) - Adding a finish at the end of this spinner would be nice.ok
6. 02:00:600 (6,1) - Try to avoid this anti-jump here, it kinda ruins the flow of this part.ok
7. 02:28:418 (1) - Remove the new combo from here. ok
8. 02:28:964 (2) - Add new combo here instead, where lyrics actually begins again. ok