Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

Taishi - goldenslaughterer(Taishi's VW2 Edit) [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
55
show more
wasonz
714 posts
Joined July 2013
wasonz
Hi From my queue sorry for very late ;w;

04:17:087 (67,68,69,70,71,72,73) - This pattern not fit to the song imo so ..
  1. 04:17:087 (67,68) - Ctrl+G
  2. 04:17:957 (72,73) - Ctrl+G
08:01:870 (72) - k please :| more fit imo

08:03:066 (80) - remove ~ decrese some difficulty
08:04:479 (89) - ... consider from 08:03:174 (80,81,82,83,84) -

08:18:827 (23,24) - remove why you add there ?

sorry for short mod :P
Good Luck ~ :)
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro

[I]MMoRTal[S] wrote:

Hi From my queue sorry for very late ;w;

04:17:087 (67,68,69,70,71,72,73) - This pattern not fit to the song imo so ..
  1. 04:17:087 (67,68) - Ctrl+G okay~
  2. 04:17:957 (72,73) - Ctrl+G okay~
08:01:870 (72) - k please :| more fit imo okay~
[*]04:17:957 (72,73) - Ctrl+G[/list]

08:03:066 (80) - remove ~ decrese some difficulty okay~
08:04:479 (89) - ... consider from 08:03:174 (80,81,82,83,84) - okay~

08:18:827 (23,24) - remove why you add there ? wanted to ease into next section, so keeping

sorry for short mod :P
Good Luck ~ :)
thanks for mod~
Stefan
Global Moderator
10,393 posts
Joined January 2011
Stefan
That song ww

02:08:392 - 03:04:153 - the idea to increase the SV is good but 1,25x looks too unnatural and not really good. Decrease it to 1,10x or 1,15x.
02:16:435 (69) - I would remove this circle, you already have the exact pattern at 02:17:740 (78,79,80,81,82,83,84) and repeating this is kinda boring so better make a rhythmical difference between these parts.
02:35:493 (203,204,205,206,207) - That... doesn't plays good. That's not even mapped to the song.
04:33:609 (170) - D on the begin of a Stream? I don't think this is intended.
05:41:870 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - The idea is good but it's quite hard to read, use these lines. They make it much better to read: http://puu.sh/beSfh/d0b7579c6e.png
05:56:218 (43,44,45,46,1) - ^
06:23:609 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - ^
06:42:740 (8) - I honestly find it boring to play several times kkddk in a row.. The sound is nice no question! But you could create some more variety. Remove this circle so you got kk dk which plays with the following kkddk cool.
06:46:218 (8) - ^
06:51:000 (18) - ^^
06:55:348 (22,23) - Either switch their position because 06:55:348 (22) actually has the highe sound or remove k from (23) because it sounds quite misplaced.
09:01:000 - Same issue like 02:08:392 - 03:04:153.
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro

Stefan wrote:

That song ww

02:08:392 - 03:04:153 - the idea to increase the SV is good but 1,25x looks too unnatural and not really good. Decrease it to 1,10x or 1,15x. okay, set to 1.15
02:16:435 (69) - I would remove this circle, you already have the exact pattern at 02:17:740 (78,79,80,81,82,83,84) and repeating this is kinda boring so better make a rhythmical difference between these parts. okay~
02:35:493 (203,204,205,206,207) - That... doesn't plays good. That's not even mapped to the song. it's mapped to the synthesizers...I think it's fine though
04:33:609 (170) - D on the begin of a Stream? I don't think this is intended. yeah, it wasn't. fixed.
05:41:870 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - The idea is good but it's quite hard to read, use these lines. They make it much better to read: http://puu.sh/beSfh/d0b7579c6e.png
05:56:218 (43,44,45,46,1) - ^
06:23:609 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - ^ fixed all~
06:42:740 (8) - I honestly find it boring to play several times kkddk in a row.. The sound is nice no question! But you could create some more variety. Remove this circle so you got kk dk which plays with the following kkddk cool.
06:46:218 (8) - ^
06:51:000 (18) - ^^ fixed all~
06:55:348 (22,23) - Either switch their position because 06:55:348 (22) actually has the highe sound or remove k from (23) because it sounds quite misplaced. swapped
09:01:000 - Same issue like 02:08:392 - 03:04:153. fixed~
thanks for mod~
qoot8123
1,500 posts
Joined March 2011
qoot8123
Hi, request via in game :)

[ onislaughterer]

  1. 07:11:653 (16,17,18,19,20) - how about change to kkddk , the music's pitch is changed variety
  2. 07:25:566 (16,17,18,19,20) - ^
  3. 07:42:087 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44) - try to reduce this stream , it is a bit long to me
  4. 07:56:000 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44) - ^
Nice diff!
call me back :)
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro
all mods accepted~
Nwolf
2,604 posts
Joined September 2012
Nwolf
hype?
qoot8123
1,500 posts
Joined March 2011
qoot8123
good map =w=b
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro
yay thank you~
neonat
Beatmap Nominator
3,526 posts
Joined April 2012
neonat
Good luck on this and your exams ^^
Kurokotei
Featured Artist
1,648 posts
Joined June 2010
Kurokotei
wow 1st bubble
maybe I should revive my goldenslaughterer full mapset lol
Stefan
Global Moderator
10,393 posts
Joined January 2011
Stefan
no kd

[Best Difficulty name ever]
00:58:827 - 01:26:653 - All these spinners aren't very... intuitive to play. I mean they play weird here and feels wrong used for such things. Try to do something better than these spinners. Spinners should for usual be used for longer stuff.
02:35:348 (201,202,203,204,205,206,207) - I guess we can leave them how they are. I was in doubt to be honest but I think they are fine since it's not crappy 1/6 which plays uncomfortable.
03:28:392 and 03:31:870 - This lines cause unrankable overlaps. Fix this by this way: Move 03:28:392 to 03:28:827 and change it as 0.70x, move 03:31:870 to 03:30:566 - and change it as 0.60x. There is no reason to have 0.50x on 03:31:870 tbh and it would still cause an overlap between 03:31:435 (2,3).
03:46:870 (54) - I find ddkdk sounds quite weird after ddddk when the sound is completely identical. I consider to change this as ddddk.
04:00:783 (9) - ^
06:03:609 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - please consider a change like this: http://puu.sh/cpQ4w/034b57d218.jpg
06:55:783 - 07:06:218 - Here I wished you would have used some more Doubles and/or more 1/4 k
08:33:174 - Change the SV here to 0.95 and add a line with 1.10x at 08:32:957. This should solve the overlap and making it readable since 0.80x on 08:33:174 would looks like that 08:33:392 (22) stays on 08:33:174 instead of the current time.


Gotta ask about the overlaps at 02:08:247 (9,10) and 07:37:377 (9,1).
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro

Stefan wrote:

no kd

[Best Difficulty name ever]
00:58:827 - 01:26:653 - All these spinners aren't very... intuitive to play. I mean they play weird here and feels wrong used for such things. Try to do something better than these spinners. Spinners should for usual be used for longer stuff. removed all the spinners and mapped some notes to the empty section
02:35:348 (201,202,203,204,205,206,207) - I guess we can leave them how they are. I was in doubt to be honest but I think they are fine since it's not crappy 1/6 which plays uncomfortable. ah well, okay
03:28:392 and 03:31:870 - This lines cause unrankable overlaps. Fix this by this way: Move 03:28:392 to 03:28:827 and change it as 0.70x, move 03:31:870 to 03:30:566 - and change it as 0.60x. There is no reason to have 0.50x on 03:31:870 tbh and it would still cause an overlap between 03:31:435 (2,3). fixed
03:46:870 (54) - I find ddkdk sounds quite weird after ddddk when the sound is completely identical. I consider to change this as ddddk. okay
04:00:783 (9) - ^ ^
06:03:609 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - please consider a change like this: http://puu.sh/cpQ4w/034b57d218.jpg make it like the second set? okay done
06:55:783 - 07:06:218 - Here I wished you would have used some more Doubles and/or more 1/4 k
08:33:174 - Change the SV here to 0.95 and add a line with 1.10x at 08:32:957. This should solve the overlap and making it readable since 0.80x on 08:33:174 would looks like that 08:33:392 (22) stays on 08:33:174 instead of the current time.


Gotta ask about the overlaps at 02:08:247 (9,10) and 07:37:377 (9,1). yeah, these are a little hard to fix completely... maybe leave them as is, for a challenge? since when playing it it might be intiutive? idk
thanks, updated~
OnosakiHito
osu!taiko Paragon
6,812 posts
Joined March 2010
OnosakiHito
Did some IRC modding for the overall SV and Sv changes. Stefan knows about it, it applies to his mod and concerns.

SPOILER
14:27 CoroQuetz: ah, I dropped out of #spectator
14:27 CoroQuetz: anyway, yes the SV?
14:28 OnosakiHito: oh
14:28 OnosakiHito: http://puu.sh/cGMDA/99002f319b.png
14:29 CoroQuetz: ah got it
14:29 CoroQuetz: i'll set sv to 1.4
14:29 CoroQuetz: but i already have green points on the kiais so i'll leave it at 1.4 all the way
14:30 OnosakiHito: If you really, really want to use SV 1.6, that's fine. I can't forbbid it and won't. Maybe you used it because of SV changes as well, since in this way notes overlap less.
14:30 CoroQuetz: let me see how it looks
14:30 OnosakiHito: but I think because of this, you lost some other great possibilities in the map, by having kiai changes from 1.4 to 1.6
14:30 OnosakiHito: sure
14:30 OnosakiHito: I will check it as well.
14:30 CoroQuetz: well, it seems fine
14:31 CoroQuetz: i'm okay with changing it to 1.4
14:31 CoroQuetz: ah about the speed bursts
14:31 OnosakiHito: Yep?
14:31 CoroQuetz: the first one i changed to 1.05->1.10
14:31 CoroQuetz: since it's transistioning from 1.00->1.15 after the set
14:32 OnosakiHito: 02:06:653 - ?
14:32 CoroQuetz: the second i kept on flat 1.25 since before and after is 1.25
14:32 CoroQuetz: yep that's the one
14:34 OnosakiHito: Dunno. Want me to give some suggestions about SV changes...?
14:34 OnosakiHito: Or should I leave it into your hand?
14:34 CoroQuetz: sure, why not
14:34 OnosakiHito: Well, then give me some time. I will have to play once again through the map.
14:34 CoroQuetz: alright~
14:43 OnosakiHito: 04:38:392 - these sliders mabye as big one as well...?
14:44 CoroQuetz: hmm I made them small since the pitch was going down
14:44 CoroQuetz: felt it fit the atmosphere
14:44 OnosakiHito: okay
14:44 OnosakiHito: that's fine.
14:56 OnosakiHito: okay
14:57 OnosakiHito: I give you the first timelines I got. You can make a copy of your version, so it is easier to check for you.
14:57 CoroQuetz: okay
14:57 OnosakiHito: ==== Overall SV 1.40 (without any SV achnges atm)
14:58 OnosakiHito: 03:05:348 - x0.50 + deleting the two previous notes, k d.
14:59 CoroQuetz: okay
14:59 OnosakiHito: 03:25:348 - from here I delete some notes for the paste of song, maybe you like it. Fits to the x0.50 SV: http://puu.sh/cGO2I/222197c7a0.jpg
14:59 CoroQuetz: sounds a bit empty without those two notes though, hmm
14:59 CoroQuetz: ah that makes more sense
14:59 OnosakiHito: haha
14:59 OnosakiHito: 03:33:609 - x1.00
14:59 OnosakiHito: 04:34:914 - x2.00
15:00 CoroQuetz: new timing point on top of the red one?
15:00 OnosakiHito: 04:48:827 - x1.00 (even though it is Sv 1.4 again, it should have a higher impact now, since previous SV was x2.00)
15:00 OnosakiHito: Yes.
15:00 CoroQuetz: okay
15:01 CoroQuetz: umm though now that I look at it
15:01 CoroQuetz: i think 2x is a bit fast
15:01 CoroQuetz: since it's post-kiai
15:01 OnosakiHito: You can use it for now because, you will have to play it first.
15:02 CoroQuetz: so ideally it should be slower than the kiai, since the music is winding down slowly, at least for me
15:02 OnosakiHito: It's not a must. For now just suggestion from me which you can change as much as you want.
15:02 CoroQuetz: but okay
15:02 OnosakiHito: 05:28:827 - x1.20
15:03 OnosakiHito: Somewhere from 05:39:261 - or 05:40:566 - you can slower down to x1.00 up to 05:43:609.
15:03 OnosakiHito: 05:54:914 - ~ 05:56:653 - and then you could rise up to x1.20 again
15:05 OnosakiHito: for now you can test that. Checking the other half of the song.
15:06 CoroQuetz: alright
15:07 OnosakiHito: In that time, I will paste the other suggestions from time to time.
15:07 OnosakiHito: 06:40:131 - x1.00
15:09 OnosakiHito: 07:36:653 - ~ 07:37:522 - rise up to x1.20 with +0,3 acceleration
15:17 OnosakiHito: 08:33:174 - x0.50 (maybe accelerate it a bit down, make some bigger break or move that Sv change somewhere else?)
15:17 OnosakiHito: 08:47:087 - x0.75 (actually x0.50 would have work, but due to 1/4 patterns we can't do that)
15:18 OnosakiHito: 09:01:000 - x1.00 + kiai up to 09:28:827 -
15:18 OnosakiHito: and that's it. Just checking once again the k k k k SV change.
15:19 OnosakiHito: I placed the SV changes now faster as I usually do. It's just some overall idea from me, to show you how I think about some parts. Maybe you don't like any of it. Also possible.
15:20 CoroQuetz: ah okay i changed the first half
15:20 CoroQuetz: so far I think it's good
15:20 CoroQuetz: certainly works better
15:20 CoroQuetz: looking at second half now
15:21 OnosakiHito: Second one is a bit tricky. If you want me to refine it -in case you don'tl ike it so much, but would like some changes - I will do so.
15:21 CoroQuetz: regarding 07:36:653 though, the previous timing points are at 1.25
15:22 CoroQuetz: so rising up to 1.2?
15:23 CoroQuetz: unless you meant for everything before it to be at 1.0?
15:23 OnosakiHito: http://puu.sh/cGPbv/7223db4b80.png
15:24 OnosakiHito: behind 07:36:653 - everything is mapped on x1.00
15:24 CoroQuetz: ah okay
15:27 CoroQuetz: alright I like your changes
15:27 CoroQuetz: i did a couple of things to fit them better
15:27 CoroQuetz: so um at 03:05:348
15:27 CoroQuetz: I deleted a couple of notes to accomodate the break so it sounds more natural
15:27 OnosakiHito: Oh forgot to mention that I put x1.00 on 08:05:348 - and 08:12:305 - . First time line would need some fixes due to overlapping. Sorry.
15:27 CoroQuetz: like at 03:06:218
15:27 OnosakiHito: Ah, you did allready some chabges by your own? Great!
15:28 OnosakiHito: ok
15:28 CoroQuetz: then to accomodate the 0.5 at 08:33:174
15:28 CoroQuetz: i deleted the notes at 08:32:305 and made it into a spinner
15:29 CoroQuetz: oh sorry i meant 08:31:435
15:29 CoroQuetz: yeah, spinner from that point, so no overlap
15:29 OnosakiHito: 08:31:435 -
15:30 OnosakiHito: always make a "-" behind a timestamp :D
15:30 CoroQuetz: ah right
15:30 CoroQuetz: aaand that's it, I've applied all changes
15:30 CoroQuetz: I'm fine with your suggestions so I applied them
15:31 CoroQuetz: i guess i even came round to the 2x after first chorus
15:31 OnosakiHito: It is so easy to suggest SV changes in your case. You apply things like spinner and stuff without me saying it.
15:31 OnosakiHito: normaly people ask "hoooow".
15:31 OnosakiHito: lol
15:31 CoroQuetz: lol haha
15:32 CoroQuetz: I've been mapping/modding for a long time now despite being on and off
15:32 CoroQuetz: so I'll just update now and see?
15:33 OnosakiHito: Yeah, I noticed that long time ago. I can see in your maps and modding that you hae experience.
15:33 OnosakiHito: Okay.
15:33 CoroQuetz: my old maps are still derp though haha
15:33 CoroQuetz: since I never really touched them for a while
15:33 CoroQuetz: mingmichael had a field day with one of my older maps lol
15:34 CoroQuetz: half the things he suggested to change i'd have done it myself
15:34 CoroQuetz: k updated
15:34 OnosakiHito: In such cases, I can always just refere to the mapper who has about 200 maps on low quality.
15:34 OnosakiHito: me. hahaha
15:34 OnosakiHito: So it's fine.
15:34 OnosakiHito: That's what makes out a modder / mapper. Gaining experience thought failures.
15:34 OnosakiHito: Okay, let me see.
15:35 OnosakiHito: through*
15:41 OnosakiHito: 03:05:348 - ~ 03:31:870 - Hm. Not sure if having at 03:17:957 - x0.80 is good. because the pase of song acclerates more down than up if you ask me. And doesn't look even with all the upcoming changes.
15:41 OnosakiHito: If you want more SV changes, you could have at 03:05:348 - x0.75 and then later at 03:17:957 - or so x0.50
15:42 OnosakiHito: in case you don't like x0.50 to appear that soon (03:05:348 - )
15:42 CoroQuetz: ah i believe that was a mistake
15:42 CoroQuetz: forgot to remove it after putting .5 earlier
15:43 CoroQuetz: it's flat .5 to the spinner now
15:43 OnosakiHito: ok
15:46 OnosakiHito: 05:40:566 - great
15:46 OnosakiHito: didn't even notices the change before lool
15:47 CoroQuetz: ah thank you
15:47 OnosakiHito: 05:54:914 - stanza /barline is is still on slower SV. If you can't fix it on normal way, just put the greenline one tick backwards.
15:48 OnosakiHito: you see that on playmode
15:48 CoroQuetz: moved it back one tick
15:48 CoroQuetz: k
15:49 OnosakiHito: yep
15:49 OnosakiHito: 06:23:609 - nice too
15:51 OnosakiHito: 08:05:348 - wanna keep it as 1.20?
15:52 OnosakiHito: 08:12:305 - ^
15:53 CoroQuetz: it's already at 1.2 right?
15:53 OnosakiHito: Yeah.
15:53 CoroQuetz: or if you're asking if i want to change it ah
15:53 CoroQuetz: eh i think it's fine
15:53 OnosakiHito: Yeah, maybe you like x1.00 more.
15:53 OnosakiHito: Oh, okay.
15:53 CoroQuetz: final chorus doesn't really need more sv changes i feel
15:54 OnosakiHito: okay
15:54 OnosakiHito: Okay. That's all. I will post a log into your thread, so Stefan sees it. After his check, I will be back.
15:55 OnosakiHito: Will also ask one more time in the team about the diff name.
15:55 CoroQuetz: alright~
15:55 OnosakiHito: Based on the rule it is fine. Yet, I want to make sure.
Stefan
Global Moderator
10,393 posts
Joined January 2011
Stefan
OOHHHHHHHHH DEEEEESIREEEEEEEEEE


2nd bubble
OnosakiHito
osu!taiko Paragon
6,812 posts
Joined March 2010
OnosakiHito
  1. 02:06:653 - First I wasn't sure about the kiai, but it should be fine. Without I find the part "impactless". At 07:35:783 - is no kiai, but only because the main kiai appears afterwards, so everything should be fine.
  2. I still find diff name "Oni" better, but the rule supports this diff name and it isn't that unfitting at all. So whatever.
Really nice beatmap with good structure. Use of patterns is good.

Qualified (ranked)
Nwolf
2,604 posts
Joined September 2012
Nwolf
wooo gz : D
Dainesl
898 posts
Joined May 2012
Dainesl
grats!
TKS
Former osu!taiko Champion: 2014
1,380 posts
Joined July 2011
TKS
official hasnt used a space between goldenslaughterer and (Taishi's VW2 Edit).
http://www.codeztslabel.com/disco.html
http://www.codeztslabel.com/liner/l016.html

also source should be "Umineko no Naku Koro ni". dont use upper-case such as Ni.
Hanjamon
1,461 posts
Joined June 2012
Hanjamon
nice map, gratz!
p3n
Global Moderator
947 posts
Joined June 2009
p3n

TKS wrote:

official hasnt used a space between goldenslaughterer and (Taishi's VW2 Edit).
http://www.codeztslabel.com/disco.html
http://www.codeztslabel.com/liner/l016.html

also source should be "Umineko no Naku Koro ni". dont use upper-case such as Ni.
Please fix the meta data.

Even though I know it is harsh but we need to get 2x bubble + 1x heart icon again to re-qualify it (to keep it inside the test system limitations).
OnosakiHito
osu!taiko Paragon
6,812 posts
Joined March 2010
OnosakiHito
I was checking the source before, but didn't notice that one space between "goldenslaughterer" "(Taishi's VW2 Edit)".
Well, since the map is overall fine, I will ask the other BATs to check it. Maybe TKS will help here?
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro

OnosakiHito wrote:

I was checking the source before, but didn't notice that one space between "goldenslaughterer" "(Taishi's VW2 Edit)".
Well, since the map is overall fine, I will ask the other BATs to check it. Maybe TKS will help here?
umm, is rebubbling not an option? I don't wish to have to bother more BATs than I need...
OnosakiHito
osu!taiko Paragon
6,812 posts
Joined March 2010
OnosakiHito
That's no problem. Asked already some.
For now, it would be good if you apply what TKS said.
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro
Ah, I already fixed the metadata (almost immediately, actually)
TKS
Former osu!taiko Champion: 2014
1,380 posts
Joined July 2011
TKS
will be back here for short mod.
Yuzeyun
7,622 posts
Joined September 2010
Yuzeyun
Didn't find big flaws and actually really liked some parts, so we're good to go to the 1st bubble!

TKS will take care of the mapset in a later date (hopefully very soon) so it's requaled again.


I'd put a WinDEU YES pic but I'll reserve that for when it's ranked again.
Veemon
91 posts
Joined June 2013
Veemon
congratzz !!
TKS
Former osu!taiko Champion: 2014
1,380 posts
Joined July 2011
TKS
for the 2nd bubble.

some notes are unsnapped within 1ms yet. 04:02:087 (153) - 04:07:087 (187) - and many more i guess.
please resnap all notes on 1/12 divisor since the diff has 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6 patterns.

patterns are fine. therefore no kds for this.
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro

TKS wrote:

for the 2nd bubble.

some notes are unsnapped within 1ms yet. 04:02:087 (153) - 04:07:087 (187) - and many more i guess.
please resnap all notes on 1/12 divisor since the diff has 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6 patterns.

patterns are fine. therefore no kds for this.
resnapped and updated
UnderminE
osu! Alumni
4,011 posts
Joined August 2010
UnderminE
Rip this one https://osu.ppy.sh/s/145859

I love this song and even lovelier because it's taiko <3 gratz
TKS
Former osu!taiko Champion: 2014
1,380 posts
Joined July 2011
TKS

CoroQuetz wrote:

TKS wrote:

for the 2nd bubble.

some notes are unsnapped within 1ms yet. 04:02:087 (153) - 04:07:087 (187) - and many more i guess.
please resnap all notes on 1/12 divisor since the diff has 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6 patterns.

patterns are fine. therefore no kds for this.
resnapped and updated
still unsnapped. i tried resnap all notes but i guess that is it just a bug? orz
well, they are actually within 1ms. maybe should be fine as it is.

#2 then.
kanpakyin
Global Moderator
4,231 posts
Joined June 2010
kanpakyin
ok.

Approved.

(ノ・ω・)ノ
HabiHolic
5,372 posts
Joined October 2012
HabiHolic
Gratz~
Nwolf
2,604 posts
Joined September 2012
Nwolf
YES

re-congratz!
DakeDekaane
osu! Alumni
3,500 posts
Joined February 2012
DakeDekaane
OH MY... THIS GOT APPROVED!!!

Congratulations :D
Duh Anus
3 posts
Joined June 2013
Duh Anus
nice beat maps :D
Modem
3,013 posts
Joined February 2014
Modem
Congraatz!!!
Kurosanyan
2,642 posts
Joined November 2009
Kurosanyan
  1. The SV is meh. The x1,15 part, the x1,25 one, the x1,2, etc. Also the x2 for the rolls part makes it hard to do for no reason. x1,5 would be way enough. It's disturbing as hell and not in a good way.
  2. More than half of the map is made of boring and repetitive patterns where it could have been way more interesting and challenging (like 01:40:566 - until 02:06:653 - )
  3. Or made of patterns without any mapping consistency (like 02:08:392 - until 02:35:131 - )
  4. Those parts feels like they came out of a Futsuu because of how much empty it is and the fact it sticks to white and red ticks while it shouldn't :
    01:57:522 - until 02:01:435 -
    03:04:044 - until 03:31:870 -
It could have been a way better map if it followed the drums and melody correctly instead of a big mass of boring copy paste, mapping inconsistency and bad SV choices, but meh, whatever, can't reject a mapper's "style" I guess.
Coro
2,394 posts
Joined September 2010
Topic Starter
Coro

Kurosanyan wrote:

  1. The SV is meh. The x1,15 part, the x1,25 one, the x1,2, etc. Also the x2 for the rolls part makes it hard to do for no reason. x1,5 would be way enough. It's disturbing as hell and not in a good way.
  2. More than half of the map is made of boring and repetitive patterns where it could have been way more interesting and challenging (like 01:40:566 - until 02:06:653 - )
  3. Or made of patterns without any mapping consistency (like 02:08:392 - until 02:35:131 - )
  4. Those parts feels like they came out of a Futsuu because of how much empty it is and the fact it sticks to white and red ticks while it shouldn't :
    01:57:522 - until 02:01:435 -
    03:04:044 - until 03:31:870 -
It could have been a way better map if it followed the drums and melody correctly instead of a big mass of boring copy paste, mapping inconsistency and bad SV choices, but meh, whatever, can't reject a mapper's "style" I guess.
Well, you're allowed your opinion, I guess~
I put in SV changes according to how I felt the intensity of the song changed, so a more dynamic scroll speed could enhance the experience. The SV changes I ironed out with Ono so that there wouldn't be any reading issues, so that's my reason.
Due to the electronic nature of the song, I mapped it in a more freeform way to have beats that fit the song and still play in an interesting way. I'm not sure why everyone is so up-in-arms against repetition - I feel if the song repeats certain motifs, I'll follow that and repeat it as well, though if it's too repetitive I'll reconsider the viability of the map for taiko mapping.
Personally, given what I had in this song, I feel I did a good job varying the patterns enough to keep the song interesting. In all honesty, I did follow the drums in some parts and the melodies in others, so I don't really know where you're coming from. The repetitiveness of certain parts I get, but I don't think the parts that are repeated are indeed repeated that many times until they're boring (but here's an area of subjectivity, I guess). Ironically, I think that if I mapped even more strictly to the drums, it'll have been even more boring.

Why don't you try your hand at mapping this song yourself? I love seeing different mapping styles and I'm always looking to improve my maps. Seeing how you'd map this song might allow me to learn more, if you're willing~
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
13 / 55