That's awesome. The only thing I would like you to do (as a favor) is to ask Kyou-kun to send me a message so I can Verify that he does want to be in this Tournament (Just as a precautionary Measure and whatnot, this would need to happen for anybody else who is silenced from Message Boards and wants to join as well.)Callum wrote:
Kyou-kun asked me to sign up for him since he is silenced:
Name: Kyou-kun
Tournament you are Joining: Expert
Rank as of this moment: #79
confirmCallum wrote:
Kyou-kun asked me to sign up for him since he is silenced:
Name: Kyou-kun
Tournament you are Joining: Expert
Rank as of this moment: #79
I would very much like these rank-based groups too.Golf129 wrote:
2) I think the expert group should be split into 2 or more levels because I think the level gaps are too wide. e.g. it can be 75,000 - 30,000 then higher than 30,000 or even better 30,000-10,000 and then higher than 10,000. But I know this might make it more difficult to organise so anything you feel comfortable with is fine.
Exactly how I feel right now[AirCoN] wrote:
72 in expert what
Yeah, because that seems fair after CookieAM and I have already been practicing for a week, preparing for the tournament.Kyou-kun wrote:
why not just remove the lower levels? a tournament like that would be so boring
I'd also say that this would be the right way to go, but I dont know the the prizes would be handled (I mean, the prizes were made for 75k-1) Someone has to throw in some more prizesPayaya wrote:
I would very much like these rank-based groups too.Golf129 wrote:
2) I think the expert group should be split into 2 or more levels because I think the level gaps are too wide. e.g. it can be 75,000 - 30,000 then higher than 30,000 or even better 30,000-10,000 and then higher than 10,000. But I know this might make it more difficult to organise so anything you feel comfortable with is fine.
If it's too difficult to organize i could try to help you if you like.
I'll send the winners some cookiesYauxo wrote:
I'd also say that this would be the right way to go, but I dont know the the prizes would be handled (I mean, the prizes were made for 75k-1) Someone has to throw in some more prizesPayaya wrote:
I would very much like these rank-based groups too.
If it's too difficult to organize i could try to help you if you like.
The most logical solution would be to give the prizes meant for the expert group to the first 10k (unless the donator disagrees), since they're most likely the best out of us. For me, it would be totally fine since I play the tournament for fun and not for the prizes.Yauxo wrote:
I'd also say that this would be the right way to go, but I dont know the the prizes would be handled (I mean, the prizes were made for 75k-1) Someone has to throw in some more prizes
I don't believe it's the right way to just count all the points together that a player received throughout the tournament, since some of the maps have got really different attributes (max. combo, style, difficulty) than others, thus resulting in total imbalance. So while players may get 500k points on one map (if they even pass) they could get those 500k by hitting 30 or so notes in a 1k combo. With this system, from my point of view it would be the smartest thing to say: "Why should I bother with passing Cirno's Perfect Math Class if I could get a ton of points by learning to get FC on Netoge Haijin Sprechchor with a lot less effort?"I would say the way it is makes it more like the way osu actually plays. When you are playing a map for a good rank the only thing that matters is getting a good combo. That's just they way osu was made, and this is an osu tournament. I would also say that the disadvantages of the system you said are worse. In that case you don't actually know how well you did in the tournament overall, all you know is how well you did in your bracket of people. If you get placed In a bracket with really good people then you are last, where you might actually get a half-decent rank.
Just because it's more like the way osu actually plays doesn't mean we have to do the same. I wouldn't wanna have someone who FC'd 5 maps and got 0 points on everything else as the winner. The winner should be someone who is actually better than the rest. The bracket problems would also be somewhat solved with a potential expert tournament split, even though they would remain to some extent. But a similar problem is in the current system: If you can play one of the harder maps better than other people, but fail like them, you'll get nothing from that. And even if you don't fail, it will count as almost nothing. I think that's worse, since all efforts are wasted and then it's better to not even try.Spyrunite wrote:
I would say the way it is makes it more like the way osu actually plays. When you are playing a map for a good rank the only thing that matters is getting a good combo. That's just they way osu was made, and this is an osu tournament. I would also say that the disadvantages of the system you said are worse. In that case you don't actually know how well you did in the tournament overall, all you know is how well you did in your bracket of people. If you get placed In a bracket with really good people then you are last, where you might actually get a half-decent rank.
The only thing I'm not sure if I agree with is the 0 if you fail thing. I'm having to put in some effort to learn to pass some of these songs, which I'm fine with, but I wonder how the people that are worse than me are doing.
