e
Actually could you just allow both options? I'd love to know how much time I took for (insert number here) clicks. Great job by the way!Aqo wrote:
could you make it live?
i.e. instead of selecting a limited amount of clicks, just have a reset button, and then as soon as you start streaming it starts filling up the graph on the fly as you stream and showing you your average on the fly while the graph shows the deviation (and as you stream more and more, the graph would squish up over time)
If you're gonna cheat, at least do it right.LukerMaster wrote:
If Java is installed correctly it should be executable with a normal double klick. Have you installed Java from here? If it's still not working after a correct installation of Java, then I don't know, I'm sorry.B1rd wrote:
How do I execute the .Jar file? I downloaded Java but Windows still doesn't recognise how to start the file.
If you kept a lower unstable rate then you would be able to stream that speed, but you have 160 which is mashing rates. I would aim for less than 70 and you will have a decent reading.Woobowiz wrote:
How do I cookiezi?
No for reals though 20 clicks
100 clicks
It then becomes apparent that streaming for much longer locks up my fingers, so I had to slow it down. But the Unstable rate helps a TON in practicing.
May I suggest adding a disclaimer stating that just because you can stream Sanic Fast doesn't mean you can stream maps at that BPM, maybe maps that are 20-30 BPM slower.
I average 150-160 Unstable rate :/Mathsma wrote:
If you kept a lower unstable rate then you would be able to stream that speed, but you have 160 which is mashing rates. I would aim for less than 70 and you will have a decent reading.
I guess that is just inexperience to the finger movements. Over time you will be able to do it better and the tool will be more accurate.Woobowiz wrote:
I average 150-160 Unstable rate :/Mathsma wrote:
If you kept a lower unstable rate then you would be able to stream that speed, but you have 160 which is mashing rates. I would aim for less than 70 and you will have a decent reading.
Not sure what I'm doing wrong. My strokes feel and sound uniform