You're getting closer. Add one more significant detail and it becomes scummy.
Raging Bull wrote:There's nothing significant about my ISO, unless that is what you meant (haha).
Because your playing style as scum does not mean his playing style as scum.
CalignoBot wrote:Why exactly can't I do this?
Raging Bull wrote:@ Calingo, you can't really say that just because Rantai has same style like you as scum that Rantai is scum.That doesn't invalidate the reason for using it in the first place.
Raging Bull wrote:You also can't seem to back it up with anything since you even said we cannot prove or disprove it.
And you realize at the same time, it doesn't validate the reason for thinking he's scum.
#1: That logic doesn't really work. I use that logic train because I understand why scum would do those actions. If someone else does those actions, I see it more likely coming from mafia than town (this is pretty much the basis of at least 95% if not ALL scumhunting). You're basically arguing here that I can't use this train of logic because I don't know what he's thinking.
#2: Two questions. 1. Why would my reasoning need to be validated? 2. Why would it need to be proved to be valid?
Raging Bull wrote:And why did you even get off Rantai case? Has he done anything to you that feel like unvoting for? Or perhaps you are just unvoting now since people just aren't jumping on Rantai bandwagon as you hoped it would.
My read on Rantai has not decreased. Rather, my read on you has escalated beyond it.