People asking questions like this one.Raging Bull wrote:
What did you want to achieve with that DD?
People asking questions like this one.Raging Bull wrote:
What did you want to achieve with that DD?
Care to elaborate?CalignoBot wrote:
BTW Rantai is a legitimate scumread of mine.
Just noticed that my vote didn't make that clear at all.
DakeDekaane wrote:
People asking questions like this one.Raging Bull wrote:
What did you want to achieve with that DD?
This is a pretty solid hint as to why.Rantai wrote:
Apparently a little RP is a scumread.
I rarely make a plan, as other people often screw it up making some other stuff that I don't expect, so I lure one fish and focus on it while watching the others and so.Raging Bull wrote:
I assume you wanted a reaction test. Well you got one, what is your follow up action? Or did you not even plan it through at all?
Sakura wrote:
vote: Roystone
no is not trueSakura wrote:
Voting the conf.town?
@Caligno: could you link to a game or something where you acted like this as scum?Quotes wrote:
Hi it's me, the obvscum
Yet your vote is on Rantai.DakeDekaane wrote:
And Royston is still voting a confirmed town. Silly scum.
pieguy1372 wrote:
Quotes (Suga Kyoutarou) wins with town.
He isnt? In fact I'm debating who to vote between him and DD.Raging Bull wrote:
Well actually judging how Sakura worded it, how is Rantai conf town to you Sakura?
DD is calling Royston scum for having his vote on the Innocent Child, yet DD is voting Rantai instead of Royston.Sakura wrote:
Yet your vote is on Rantai.DakeDekaane wrote:
And Royston is still voting a confirmed town. Silly scum.
He is rp'ing on purpose.Rantai wrote:
Actually just to spite you I'm just going to try rp for as long as I can keep it up.
Because reading Rantai gives me a headache.Raging Bull wrote:
@DD, why didn't you vote for Royston then?
Why exactly can't I do this?Raging Bull wrote:
@ Calingo, you can't really say that just because Rantai has same style like you as scum that Rantai is scum.
That doesn't invalidate the reason for using it in the first place.Raging Bull wrote:
You also can't seem to back it up with anything since you even said we cannot prove or disprove it.