咲 -Saki- Mafia (GAME OVER)

posted
Total Posts
339
show more
DakeDekaane
I bet there's scum in Royston wagon if he's town.

inb4 omg that's so obvious
Sakura

DakeDekaane wrote:

I bet there's scum in Royston wagon if he's town.

inb4 omg that's so obvious
So your doubting Royston's towniness yet you think there's scum on his wagon?, if you're doubting royston's towniness and he's town it's more likely that scum is standing by watching town mislynch on their own.
DakeDekaane
Indeed I'm doubting Royston's towniness, I don't have the feeling of he being likely town, null so far.

I'd want to read what everybody think about him.
Raging Bull
Wow i forgot im inthis game. Give me time after work
Rantai
Well the only 2 majr things I saw from Royston was a misread and a joke rvs vote on a confirmed town (I already gave my opinion on that matter).

Unless I missed something else I don't really think I see him as either or at the moment.
Rantai
major*
Kytoxid
Hey all. Reading the thread, here's what I got. Lemme know if I misunderstood/missed anything.

- Page 3: Quotes is mod-confirmed town. (and a rather unremarkable Saki character)
- Page 4: Rantai gets wagoned early. Not sure why.
- Page 5: Royston votes Quotes, gets some flak for voting confirmed town. Probably just an honest mistake, not sure why anyone would do that otherwise.

Rantai wrote:

Actually just to spite you I'm just going to try rp for as long as I can keep it up.
- This bugged me, I can't see this benefiting the town at all?
- Page 6-7: And then he starts posting stuff actually in RP. Bah, I can't understand it at all.

Irreversible wrote:

I'll try to catch things up, my post will come in a few hours for sure, sorry for inactiity
- Page 9: Rantai starts to form a bit more coherent arguments, albeit under spoiler tags. A bunch of meta arguments I don't get since I haven't played Mafia with you guys. Irreversible also shows up for a sec, but his promised post doesn't. Sakura is around but seems content to watch the CB-vs-Rantai dance.
- Page 10-12: Suddenly no one is voting Rantai anymore. No real progress happens.

Honestly, the gut feel I get is that we've spent most of our time watching two townies rip into each other, and now no one has any idea what to do, and we've spent 3 pages slowly running in circles. We need a direction to go.

I want to see what Ono and Irreversible are up to. Irreversible is the "more inactive" one, so Mod: Can we prod Irreversible?.

Ono has been around though, just not posting anything helpful: http://puu.sh/4Wdip.png.

Unvote
Vote: OnosakiHito

Ono, I know you're new here like me, but I feel like we need voices, opinions, and analysis as much as we need to put pressure on people. Right now there really isn't anything happening to shape the town's opinion, and you can see that reflected in the vote count, and how everyone is just randomly running around. If you could lynch anyone based on the posts so far, who would you lynch and why?

CalignoBot wrote:

Free cookie to anyone who can guess what the problem with his ISO is.
If you see something, please let us know what it is. Also, noob question: What's ISO?
Amianki

Kytoxid wrote:

CalignoBot wrote:

Free cookie to anyone who can guess what the problem with his ISO is.
If you see something, please let us know what it is. Also, noob question: What's ISO?
ISO = Isolation; literally just one person's posts in isolation

I believe people are more likely to believe my point if they find out for themselves. I'll only reveal it if no one guesses it right.
Topic Starter
pieguyn
Irreversible has been prodded
Raging Bull
There's nothing significant about my ISO, unless that is what you meant (haha).

CalignoBot wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@ Calingo, you can't really say that just because Rantai has same style like you as scum that Rantai is scum.
Why exactly can't I do this?

Raging Bull wrote:

You also can't seem to back it up with anything since you even said we cannot prove or disprove it.
That doesn't invalidate the reason for using it in the first place.
Because your playing style as scum does not mean his playing style as scum.

And you realize at the same time, it doesn't validate the reason for thinking he's scum.


And why did you even get off Rantai case? Has he done anything to you that feel like unvoting for? Or perhaps you are just unvoting now since people just aren't jumping on Rantai bandwagon as you hoped it would.
Irreversible
Sorry, that's the last time I get prodded, i'm sorry but school started and orz

Unvote

i got some thoughts tho

Sakura, in other games you're always really scumhunting, but not in this game. and i mean.. you were the one who even taught me scumhunting so.. :/

then dake's post:

DakeDekaane wrote:

I bet there's scum in Royston wagon if he's town.

inb4 omg that's so obvious
Uhm yes, i don't really get if this is meant ironic or not.. maybe you just said it, without voting him to pretend looking scummy and put the suspiciousness (?) on the others, and this is what currently buggs me the most

Vote: DakeDekaane
DakeDekaane
So people just parking their votes and probably disappearing until the lynch isn't suspicious for you? Doesn't that look familiar to you? :P
Topic Starter
pieguyn
Votecount 1.9

Royston (2) - Sakura, Nyquill
CalignoBot (1) - DakeDekaane
Raging Bull (1) - CalignoBot
OnosakiHito (1) - Kytoxid
DakeDekaane (1) - Irreversible

Not voting - NoHItter, OnosakiHito, Raging Bull, Rantai, Royston Quotes

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is in 6:36.
Kytoxid
Mod: Irreversible has voted for DakeDekaane.

Ugh, this inactiveness. I come back and find that basically nothing useful has been posted, and we're just as scattered as before.

Irreversible wrote:

Sakura, in other games you're always really scumhunting, but not in this game. and i mean.. you were the one who even taught me scumhunting so.. :/
So you think Sakura is scum?

To be honest, there isn't enough discussion happening at all and just looking at the votecount, I can tell we're basically doing a random lynch D1. I'm okay with a Royston lynch, but I would prefer if we lynched someone inactive, or this is going to just get progressively worse in terms of people being inactive, so I'm keeping my vote on Ono.

I've got midterms early tomorrow, so I'm heading to bed.
Royston
also I'm currently not voting for anyone, I unvoted Quotes ages ago

Great, I'm going to get lynched by two inactive players and their parked votes. Bloody fantastic.

Caligno: I thought you were going to provide the reason RB's ISO was suspicious if nobody guessed it? There isn't much time left

Irreversible: Why'd you vote for Dake over Sakura?

Why hasn't Quotes been posting more? Since he's the only confirmed town he's probably gonna be nightkilled and he hasn't said anything at all recently
Topic Starter
pieguyn
sry, fixed

deadline is in 5:22
Amianki

Raging Bull wrote:

There's nothing significant about my ISO, unless that is what you meant (haha).
You're getting closer. Add one more significant detail and it becomes scummy.

CalignoBot wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@ Calingo, you can't really say that just because Rantai has same style like you as scum that Rantai is scum.
Why exactly can't I do this?

Raging Bull wrote:

You also can't seem to back it up with anything since you even said we cannot prove or disprove it.
That doesn't invalidate the reason for using it in the first place.
Because your playing style as scum does not mean his playing style as scum.

And you realize at the same time, it doesn't validate the reason for thinking he's scum.

#1: That logic doesn't really work. I use that logic train because I understand why scum would do those actions. If someone else does those actions, I see it more likely coming from mafia than town (this is pretty much the basis of at least 95% if not ALL scumhunting). You're basically arguing here that I can't use this train of logic because I don't know what he's thinking.

#2: Two questions. 1. Why would my reasoning need to be validated? 2. Why would it need to be proved to be valid?

Raging Bull wrote:

And why did you even get off Rantai case? Has he done anything to you that feel like unvoting for? Or perhaps you are just unvoting now since people just aren't jumping on Rantai bandwagon as you hoped it would.
Neither.
My read on Rantai has not decreased. Rather, my read on you has escalated beyond it.
Amianki
That entire spoilbox should be in a quote tag.
Rantai
You know I'm not so keen on a Royston vote. I'd rather be lynching Ono simply for the fact that he was flying low during the earlier posts.

Vote: Ono

Also Caligno never answered my question.
Amianki
Which question? I probably missed or forgot about it.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply