Consider the following.
0_o wrote:
There you go, now our vote counts are equal 
Originally, LS has zero evidence of not being scum. However, bear in mind that LS, like myself and BB, did not declare a role for themselves. Only you and DChan did, so I am not at all surprised that both of you are staring at me hard.
I admit it was my error, because I was lazy to keep referring and re-referring to posts every day I put forth an argument.
You didn't unvote anybody. However,
you HIGHLIGHTED L1 on me and refused to push a vote, then complained when I unvoted saying someone has to be voted off in order to avoid the 4-man LyLo. You flip-flop on decisions.
Two possibilities.
If you're not Traitor, you're totally terrified of lynching the wrong person.
If you're Traitor, you're totally terrified of drawing flak and fire.Whereas, from the start to the finish, I made every decision based on the game condition at that point of time, from my first vote to the unvote/nolynch and then vote you.
DChan, if there is your so-called shit logic in anything I've been saying, there's two possibilities.
1. You did not bother to read through carefully anything I've posted thus far, mostly because they were addressed at 0_o for the most part.
2. You are the scum yourself, and you refuse to accept any of my arguments and brand them as shit (without any clear logic to your arguments either, really) because
you want people to believe I'm not making sense. That is scummy behavior.
Also,
I reject 0_o scumpainting LS because I am currently given the impression that LS is feeling lost; it could be possible that LS didn't get any role appends but is also a Mafia (not traitor). But if new arguments emerge from LS that points to other possibilities I wouldn't dismiss it either.
Liar, liar, who's the liar? Likely the man with the crooked face.
Also, HOS on both 0_o and DChan. (as if that wasn't very obvious...... -_-|||)
