Yuii- wrote:

[I]MMoRTal[S] wrote:

;)

Oh, so YOU are Immortals... hello.

[I]MMoRTal[S] wrote:

mod

01:50:218 - add d here and then 01:49:843 - kdkdk cuz kdkdkd ftw hmmm I prefer to not add a note there because the part is kinda calm, also please no kdkdk

01:51:718 - add k if you agree above ^ ^
01:53:218 - add k ^
01:52:843 - kdkkd kkkkd seems fine imo

02:07:878 - Finish before long break feel good hmm, I might consider this one, but leaving as it is for now

02:20:711 - change snap divisor to 1/6 then move it too 02:20:667 - (2/6) oh yeah, moved

02:41:036 (25,31) - swap color cuz D K D K D look better imo and in color stream fit with piano pitch 02:41:144 (25) - changed this one to k but I prefer to keep K at 02:41:797 -

02:44:623 - ddk... changed

03:17:421 - not a mod ok d k k k d k k k d k k k okay ... okay .... okay lol

03:36:769 - i think piano sound on here not so loud and d work better with sound like this yeah but pitch D:

Ppus wrote:

From My Queue

Oni00:23:347 (40,41) - kk keeping dk to emphasize dk (pitch)
00:31:222 (63,64,65,66,67) - kkkdk kdddk follows the piano's pitch better imo
01:10:593 (14,15,16,17,18) - ^ kkddk flows better with the song
01:36:843 (183,184,185,186,187) - dkkdd dkkkd is better because it emphasize the melody at 187
01:44:593 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - kkkkddkkd basically the same reason as above
01:48:843 (55,56,57,58,59) - ddddk ^
02:01:022 (128,129,130) - Ctrl+G ddddkdk fits the piano's pitch better
02:53:536 (113,114,115) - kkd Kdd is here to emphasize the chord
03:13:526 (74,75,76,77) - Ctrl+G hmm, idk, both seems to fit, but I'll keep my pattern for now
03:26:334 (140) - Change This To K wow no K feels weird with all those d before
04:06:440 (215) - Change This To k d seems to follow the piano's pitch better
04:21:616 (32) - Change This To k d seems fine imo

Good Luck With Rank

[I]MMoRTal[S] wrote:

04:43:986 - k fit with pitch pitch goes up on 15 so no

05:48:715 - not a mod omg red line, i appreciate your timing skill lol thanks

06:15:301 - k changed

06:35:924 - d "pitch" k seems fine imo

06:41:537 - move to -> 06:41:605 - (2/3) gotta go hard nice one, moved

06:46:789 - K sound good to me D also sounds good imo

07:13:119 - I like the k spam LOL

08:07:616 - kdd it's feel calm here changed to kkd instead
08:09:195 - fak ^ ^
08:11:037 - D: ^ kkk seems fine pitch-wise imo
08:12:353 - ^ changed

08:54:310 - add k cuz player need more note I think it's better to cover every note in the end of song added
08:55:102 - ^ added

Ppus wrote:

05:03:083 (125) - Add Finish no, chords begin at 126
05:26:369 (146,147,148,149,150) - kkkkd keeping ddddk for consistency
05:50:508 (2) - Change This To k ddkkd sounds better pitch-wise
06:46:789 (89) - Change This To K D seems fine
07:23:587 (16) - Change This To d k is better pitch-wise
07:27:471 (44,45) - Ctrl+G kkddk follows the pitch well imo
08:30:248 (294) - Change This To d k is better to emphasize pitch change on 295

Good Luck With Rank

_Gezo_ wrote:

j'suis ok pour 99% de la map, y'a quelques petits détails quand même
- y'a des petis overlaps mais je pense que tu vas osef vu que c'est lisible oui wala
- 08:18:522 (253) - c'est du 1/8 déplacé
- OD6 c'est un peu chaud pour un timing erratique, baisse à 5 ptêt ok



au passage mon speedrun a foiré RT

1. Try 0,80 for the background?
2. AiMod...　オ、スナッピ！
   
   
3. First line seems noticeably late in the editor. 80 sounds at least better
4. 00:28:027 (55) - and this is hella off, seems to work better on the 1/8 before.
5. 00:37:843 (77,78,79,80,81) - ok let me guess this song is 14500% untimeable with barlines and 1/8 usage is frowned upon so this is pointless to fix ok nvm me then
   
   
6. 01:34:093 (169) - d, since these patterns seem to highlight the high piano notes, while this note kinda interferes with it.
7. 02:31:165 (82) - k? regardless of what source of piano you're following it's more recognizable for this to be k
8. 03:25:465 (132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140) - ok mr. downer I think there's a bit more color here than you mapped
9. 03:36:769 (1) - d? The next k notes are much more noticeable than this one
10. 03:39:594 (19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26) - kdkkdkdk ok ozzy maybe don't influence him to make this have any difficulty
11. 03:59:703 (158,162) - Swap? I think emphasizing the trill then leading into the other thing fits nicer.
12. 06:18:247 (251,252,253,254,255,256,257) - Maybe instead of a stream, some big notes could emphasize the big piano hits being played.
13. 07:26:879 (38) - Delete? Since the last 3 have been, maybe you can wait until the next verse/whatever it's called musically to start throwing in the double 1/4 combos. Maybe simplify the whole pattern for the same reason.
14. 07:47:276 - what the fuck

OzzyOzrock wrote:

[Oni]

1. Try 0,80 for the background? yeah looks better, changed
2. AiMod...　オ、スナッピ！ooooooh unsnapped notes, fixed them (also no I won't change SV)
   
   
3. First line seems noticeably late in the editor. 80 sounds at least better changed + moved some timing points
4. 00:28:027 (55) - and this is hella off, seems to work better on the 1/8 before. you're right, moved
5. 00:37:843 (77,78,79,80,81) - ok let me guess this song is 14500% untimeable with barlines and 1/8 usage is frowned upon so this is pointless to fix ok nvm me then lol
   
   
6. 01:34:093 (169) - d, since these patterns seem to highlight the high piano notes, while this note kinda interferes with it. changed
7. 02:31:165 (82) - k? regardless of what source of piano you're following it's more recognizable for this to be k changed
8. 03:25:465 (132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140) - ok mr. downer I think there's a bit more color here than you mapped I want to emphasize 132
9. 03:36:769 (1) - d? The next k notes are much more noticeable than this one changed
10. 03:39:594 (19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26) - kdkkdkdk ok ozzy maybe don't influence him to make this have any difficulty please
11. 03:59:703 (158,162) - Swap? I think emphasizing the trill then leading into the other thing fits nicer. hmm yeah changed
12. 06:18:247 (251,252,253,254,255,256,257) - Maybe instead of a stream, some big notes could emphasize the big piano hits being played. yeah but big notes are on chords so no
13. 07:26:879 (38) - Delete? Since the last 3 have been, maybe you can wait until the next verse/whatever it's called musically to start throwing in the double 1/4 combos. Maybe simplify the whole pattern for the same reason. deleted
14. 07:47:276 - what the fuck blame ming

IT'S CUTE

OzzyOzrock wrote:

スナッピ

_Gezo_ wrote:

im ok with this

OzzyOzrock wrote:

スナッピ

are you serious it's スナップ you buttcheeky UNDESSERTFUL spider-loving skeletal NYEH

00:16.7

00:17.828

00:54.890

00:57.180

00.59.341

3:26.00~3:36.00

4:54.00~5:03.169

Jonah wrote:

00:16.7

I recommend to put one more Don between two notes I think the note isn't significant enough to put a not there

00:17.828

Add two Don to make "Don Don Kat" pattern no note there so no

00:54.890

Add spin nah, it would feel too overmapped

00:57.180

Add spin ^

00.59.341

Add spin ^

3:26.00~3:36.00

I won't put spin on that side. Try to fill with don&kat how am I supposed to map this with notes? lol, also I feel like a spinner is okay

4:54.00~5:03.169

Connect all notes I think it's okay, it helps to distinguish measures so it makes the part more tidy

I hope my recommendation helps!
This is my first modding. So, don't get angry with my suggestion

JessiChan wrote:

Note: My english is very bad, but i try.

Hello Sayaka! Hmm well, this is a opinion right? Not is obligatory. This song is a "Vals" the Vals ever is ternary temp, that means your indicator figure (in the music) that is, this: https://puu.sh/rEHPj/51796b56a6.png must be 3/4. In your map it is set as 4/4. The bpm would be more accurate if you put in 3/4. Of course, this is only an opinion, not necessarily have to do, but anyway you is like learning. I am a student of classical music and I like to teach others what I have learned over the years. Well, good luck with your map, I like your maps, really. ♥

Sayaka- wrote:

JessiChan wrote:

Note: My english is very bad, but i try.

Hello Sayaka! Hmm well, this is a opinion right? Not is obligatory. This song is a "Vals" the Vals ever is ternary temp, that means your indicator figure (in the music) that is, this: https://puu.sh/rEHPj/51796b56a6.png must be 3/4. In your map it is set as 4/4. The bpm would be more accurate if you put in 3/4. Of course, this is only an opinion, not necessarily have to do, but anyway you is like learning. I am a student of classical music and I like to teach others what I have learned over the years. Well, good luck with your map, I like your maps, really. ♥

You know, I studied music for more than 8 years and I make music so I know how it works lol
The thing is that I used 6/8 (and not really 4/4) to put more emphasize on fast parts, which are timed in 3/4. This is a very personal choice but I believe it's not wrong so I'm gonna keep it like this