happy623 wrote:

來嚕
都是nazi, 沒用的話便不要kd了

General

1. so clean

Easy

1. 00:16:487 (2) - 開首用Normal sampleset? good
2. 00:31:644 (2) - 這樣? 恩好像没啥区别……
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:55:644 (1,1) - 尾巴用normal sampleset跟前面 00:50:592 (1,1) 一樣感覺好點 这里是我失误……我觉得soft比较好
4. 01:18:381 (3,2) - 這2個有點太近, 怕新手忽略了 01:19:644 (1) 这个应该没啥问题吧……改的话很麻烦

Normal

1. 01:19:644 (3) - 把中間的點放到slidertick比較好 虽然没懂但是照做了
2. 好好看的Normal B)

Hard

1. 01:29:750 (1) - 考慮把他左移一格 完全覆蓋後面的滑條如何 我觉得反而不是很好看
2. 01:44:118 (3) - blanket done
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:01:329 (1) - ^ done
   
   SPOILER

   

Lunatic

1. 01:01:487 (1) - 感覺不太需要NC 暂时保留着，感觉对提示节拍有帮助。看看别人怎么说
2. 01:56:750 (4) - 這邊NC 刪去後一個的NC? 感覺易看一點 不好，因为这里是按照重拍来划分的，如此做虽然形状出来了但是也是去NC本来的意义了
3. 02:07:487 (3) - ^ 我觉得就现在这样比较好……

ﾟωﾟ)ﾉ✧ 收星

1. 128k的mp3，要不要换一下？192k：http://pan.baidu.com/share/link?shareid=1335575736&uk=4029469308
   320kSource：http://nicosound.anyap.info/sound/sm19536325
   
2. 音乐音量会不会响了一点？音效有点听不清了。

1. 没看到什么问题...

1. 01:32:592 (2) - 改成这样会不会好一点？
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   288,176,92276,6,0,P|328:184|356:176,1,65,0|2,1:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   460,84,92592,2,0,P|430:112|420:139,1,65,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   424,216,92908,2,0,P|440:256|436:284,1,65,0|8,1:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 01:42:697 (2) - 这个地方按照音乐是1/2的slider，拉成1/1是有意为之吗？
3. 01:45:223 (2) - ^
4. 01:47:750 (2) - ^
5. 01:52:802 (2) - ^
6. 01:55:329 (2) - ^

1. 00:57:066 (2) - 00:57:223 (3) 这两个note稍微换一下会不会好一点？感觉打起来顺些，或者把形状做成L形也好。。
2. 02:10:566 (5) - 02:10:644 (6) 这两个note往右边偏成“\”形呼应一下？

1. 打不过也欣赏不来;w;就不看了

popner wrote:

[Hard]
01:00:697 (1,2) - 这一对slider很好，但是怎么只用了一次？我觉得01:05:750 (1,2,3)可以再用一次 这里要remap的话会很乱，而且表示一下减速我认为已经足够了，因此保持不变

[Lunatic]
00:01:013 (3,4) - ctrl+g flow好 我认为这里flow让00:01:171 (4,1) - 接着更流畅一些，所以不改

-Umi- wrote:

hi hi flower >3</

let'su go (useless mod incoming)

Easy

- 00:17:750 (1,2) - why not same as 00:15:223 (1) - or 00:12:697 (1) - it fit better imo I make the style, that the rhythm change every fourth bar, so yeah
- 00:37:960 (1) - hum like this, because your current slider is kinda weird xD yeah. I am surprised no one have noticed this

SPOILER

- 01:19:644 (1,2) - no whistle ? Intended. same as other diffs
- 01:22:171 (2) - middle point x:360,y:195, end point x:254,y:100 for better blanket yeah
- 01:51:223 (2) - Nazi nazi ! second point x:402,y:201 yeah
- sometimes whistles on reverse like 01:46:171 (2) - sometimes no like 01:44:908 (1) - why ? '-' same as 00:17:750 (1,2) - , I make change every 4th bat xD

Normal

- 00:00:066 (1) - move to x:291,y:53 ? well no
- 00:02:592 (1) - what about this ? I really tried it and it took me a century making the blanket... well I still think it better as it was xD

SPOILER

- 00:25:329 (1) - middle point to x:354,y:118 already shapes well imo
- 00:41:592 (3) - same shape as 00:40:487 (1) - ? '-' it's intentional
- 01:22:802 (3) - one grid down y:324 ? I think not. the slider 2 does not really end at y:324, if you look at other nodes
- 01:29:276 (2) - move to x:317,y:238 for perfect blanket sure

Hard

- 00:01:013 (3) - move to x:53,y:108, and then end point to x:52,y:33 done
- 00:12:697 (1) - more curve ? I think it blankets well, but I made some change
- 00:31:644 (1,2) - 1/2 slider instead ? fit better imo it fits the downbeat, so yeah
- 00:58:644 (2) - x:422,y:283 k
- 01:25:013 (5) - ctrl g ? I'd like to keep the DS >.<
- 01:33:855 (2) - ^
- 01:34:487 (4) - ^

Lunatic

- 01:36:697 (3,6) - intentional ? it is :>
- 02:02:592 (1,2,3,1,2) - what about this ? hmmm... I don't quite like the feel

SPOILER

love this diff :3

no suggestion about skystar diff, she look awesome (i can't play it >.<)

well awesome mapset :3 and it seems it will be ranked soon so gogo >3</

Flower wrote:

popner wrote:

[Lunatic]
00:01:013 (3,4) - ctrl+g flow好 我认为这里flow让00:01:171 (4,1) - 接着更流畅一些，所以不改 (4)后面(1)开始新的一段，flow断一下刚好合曲，为什么不明白

popner wrote:

(4)后面(1)开始新的一段，flow断一下刚好合曲，为什么不明白

1. 01:41:118 - consider a better transition effect? maybe a pulse?

1. 00:13:644 (8,1) - perhaps do not stack them but move (1) to 323:358? also 00:14:276 (2) - to 505:323
2. 00:23:276 (3,4,5,6) - here the beat is heard weird a bit due to the triplet on white tick has no good support. oppositely, the piano is more palpable. So i'd like to suggest combine 00:23:276 (3,4,5) - to a single slider
3. 00:44:750 (1,2) - the reason of black notes here is ? and also 00:49:802 (1,2) - , i suppose white is better
4. 02:04:013 (1) - here...i suggest you to re-arrange your combo colour. i thought you chose different colour for different patterns, so perhaps, black -> reduced speed slider, white-> special triplets, red&pink -> normal combos

Scorpiour wrote:

some minor suggestions

red - must be fixed
blue - highly recommend to consider
black - only suggestions

[Storyboard]

1. 01:41:118 - consider a better transition effect? maybe a pulse?

[Skystar]

1. 00:13:644 (8,1) - perhaps do not stack them but move (1) to 323:358? also 00:14:276 (2) - to 505:323
2. 00:23:276 (3,4,5,6) - here the beat is heard weird a bit due to the triplet on white tick has no good support. oppositely, the piano is more palpable. So i'd like to suggest combine 00:23:276 (3,4,5) - to a single slider
3. 00:44:750 (1,2) - the reason of black notes here is ? and also 00:49:802 (1,2) - , i suppose white is better
4. 02:04:013 (1) - here...i suggest you to re-arrange your combo colour. i thought you chose different colour for different patterns, so perhaps, black -> reduced speed slider, white-> special triplets, red&pink -> normal combos

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

第一條fix
第二條跟的是那條音軌 既然跟了總不能這裡不跟吧
第三四條NC問題我覺得沒法動了...

-Umi- wrote:

and it seems it will be ranked soon