CalignoBot wrote:
He explained it after that with enough variance from Saki's explanation that I didn't get that scummy sheep feel from it.
SenaSaki wrote:
When I skimmed rEdo's ISO I didn't really note much interaction between you and rEdo despite both of you being fairly active at around the same time.
Personally, their explanations here seem really close to each other, unlike what Cali says. Feels like Cali keeps defending Royston for some reason.Royston wrote:
I voted for Caligno because rEdo ISO seemed to be very passive when talking to him
Could be attempted WK/buddying, though I don't get why Cali would try it again especially since rEdo was caught.CalignoBot wrote:
It actually looks really slimy that people are jumping on him for his posts, anti-town as they are. At this point, he's being so incredibly anti-town that I don't feel it's mafia-motivated.
They're the same subject, but the reason itself is very different. Saki's reason was lack of interaction, while Royston's was the style of interaction.Jinxy wrote:
Personally, their explanations here seem really close to each other, unlike what Cali says. Feels like Cali keeps defending Royston for some reason.
What do you mean by again?Jinxy wrote:
Could be attempted WK/buddying, though I don't get why Cali would try it again especially since rEdo was caught.CalignoBot wrote:
It actually looks really slimy that people are jumping on him for his posts, anti-town as they are. At this point, he's being so incredibly anti-town that I don't feel it's mafia-motivated.
Again as in rEdo buddied Sakura D1, got called out by Quotes, and your interactions with Roy look a little bit like buddying, so, "again".CalignoBot wrote:
What do you mean by again?Jinxy wrote:
Could be attempted WK/buddying, though I don't get why Cali would try it again especially since rEdo was caught.
Also, what are your individual reads of both of us?
There's your scumslip, why would you need to hypothetically think you wont flip scum?Royston wrote:
Sakura, if it turns out I'm not scum, who would you suspect?
How does this work with 1 scum dead?Royston wrote:
You don't know if I'm scum or not (unless you're scum yourself)
My main scum suspects haven't changed since D1. rEdo was lynched, Royston acted quite scummy in D2, and you're still a scum suspect for me, but I didn't get something that makes me clear who of you or who else can be scum. I don't get why you vote me, are you merely basing in activity, that's a wrong way to find scum. What did change your mind about Royston, earlier and in D1 you even voted him, why the change?Irreversible wrote:
Unvote
Let's stop this, Royston is rather town for now, because he's trying to get out of the scum thing but can't, because you keep pressuring him.
What about Dake btw? His posts are small, asking a question, because he doesn't know what to do, probably tries to 'look' active, but actually isn't really telling anything. Dake, you've said to Royston: "Why shouldn't I vote for you", also you've asked "are you scum", he replied 'no I'm town", so now, it doesn't look like you're really scumhunting, because you've just gave up your hints, and now you've changed your scum-thoughts. What were the causes of these sudden changes? And it's pretty cool that you've asked who we are thinking is scum, what would you have done if someone said you're scum? Because I think you are.
Vote: DakeDekaane
Hey, Regfan found scum by that in a game I was at.CalignoBot wrote:
Calling that a scumslip is weak at best. Saki's sheep is even worse.
My issue with Royston is that he had to wait until getting voted to appear.
My vote has been on you since the start of the Day.SenaSaki wrote:
if you want to lynch someone
push them harder
I don't have to remind you guys to post content? Don't be lazy and just post to not get prodded, that's really lazy.
