This could really help as well.Oinari-sama wrote:
And may I suggest using a command like /npm since it's easier to remember?
This could really help as well.Oinari-sama wrote:
And may I suggest using a command like /npm since it's easier to remember?
IMO it should be exclusive to #lobby and private messages.Oinari-sama wrote:
It should have a built in cool down for spam protection, eg each mp room is allowed 1 link per minute per channel.
People honestly won't mind by that.deadbeat wrote:
inb4 more #lobby spam
but yeah, i like this idea. could work well
Then the name of that channel won't be #lobby anymore... But #MPInvite(?) (In irl, lobby are supposed to be a place for chatting while waiting for something right?)Marcin wrote:
I was about to post the same request, disallow writing in #lobby, and allow only putting invite link by clicking a button
That'll make #lobby a lot more useful than its current form. The room host however should be allowed to post comments too, since not everyone is familiar with [URL Comments] in chat.Marcin wrote:
I was about to post the same request, disallow writing in #lobby, and allow only putting invite link by clicking a button, this way we can get rid of moderating that channel and forcing people to do what they are supposed to do (which is impossible anyway)
#lobby opens automatically every time you enter multiplayerYukiteru Amano wrote:
If you already have made the room and want to inv people. Wouldn't a simple /mg in any chat be better ? In #CTB or #Taiko since in Lobby there almost only Standard players!
Marcin wrote:
I was about to post the same request, disallow writing in #lobby, and allow only putting invite link by clicking a button, this way we can get rid of moderating that channel and forcing people to do what they are supposed to do (which is impossible anyway)
Small but useful Idea. Since no one talks in #lobby, might as well use it for inviting purposes.LixRei wrote:
Whew... well, yeah.
It should be implemented soon. It would save many people.
Edit: Whoa... such an old req. suddenly being bumped by someone else...
not yetTHDTC wrote:
When update