1. Hope (2.87 stars, 258 notes)
2. Normal (1.72 stars, 131 notes)

Love wrote:

Added yo hitsounds for you n00b.

Also.

01:10:813 (8) - NC this.

Irreversible wrote:

Hello dkun! hi irre bb

[General]

Nothing much I guess, the whistles seem a bit too loud for me, but it's fine I suppose.

[Normal]

00:21:046 (5,6,7,1) - The straight flow here seems rather bland for me, if you’d put it that way you’d gain some extra movement, which flows nicely. http://puu.sh/6oiEE.jpg done!
00:22:441 (1,2,3) - Mh, I kinda don’t like how this is placed at the moment, first of all the DS is wrong, additionally it also looks wrong (as you can see, 1 to 2 looks quite close to eachother, whereas 2 and 3 are quite far spaced) http://puu.sh/6oiLZ.jpg What about something like this? nice catch. done~
00:41:046 (5) - NC would fit here, if you apply this one I’d delete 00:42:906 (1) - (since the other one is stronger, if you ask me) done!
00:51:744 (8) - Can you check whether this is offscreen? My laptop doesn’t show it properly.. but yeah, my laptop is a tard seems fine to me.
01:51:279 (5) - You’ve ignored DS here in order that it looks nice, what about making this 01:54:999 (4) - here too? move to 408 160 I don't see why not
01:55:465 (5,6) - Just to avoid the overlap, actually i dunno if you can see this in game, gonna leave it anyway xD http://puu.sh/6oiXQ.jpg alright.
02:21:046 (3) - 304 104 would provide a better flow again (same reason as before) and it looks a bit more exciting, since for me, zickzack pattern plays better than a straight line, most of the time. applied.

[Hard]

00:21:046 (6) - Apply NC to keep consistency with the other patterns done!
01:05:232 (5) - a NC would emphasize the piano pretty well, woudln’t it? ^
01:14:534 (1,2,3) - Looks pretty weird in game, i suggest stacking them http://puu.sh/6ojjb.jpg (yes, it literally looked weird, i was supposing a stack there) I like how it is right now in-game, actually. it's intended!
01:19:651 (3,4,5,6) - You might wanna keep the DS consistent here? this is intended to keep with the combo. we talked about this!
01:21:976 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - This Combo seems a bit very long, consider adding a NC somewhere. I actually dunno where, but i guess one would be nice. if you could suggest a place, than I would add one. I don't know either. :p
01:34:534 (4) - According to her voice I actually wouldn’t follow the slider path, since the voice kinda goes up, so I suggest this: http://puu.sh/6ojpV.jpg (as well, the zickzack pattern suits me more :B) i'm cool with that.
01:40:348 (4) - 352 292 would increase the flow much, because you lead in 01:40:581 (5) - WAY better done!
01:41:744 (6,1,2,3) - Wrong snapped.. xD http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1258286 What about this (placing as well, I considered to move it a bit further, NC to singalize that it’s ⅙) 01:41:821 - start 01:42:131 - repeat 01:42:441 - end 01:42:674 - add a circle to get a better rhythm, stack on 01:42:906 - (i hope you understand that lol) I just moved the three circles to 1/6th. see how you like it like that?
01:42:906 (3) - NC due to the strong beat, also for consistency with the other patterns like that done!

Would put a star Icon, but osu won't let me .. Really excellent map two stars for two nice diffs, feel free to call me back C: (when you have enough SP)

Irreversible wrote:

Hard:
01:25:697 (9) - Maybe apply the NC here, the piano seems quite indicating
About the 1/6: Seems wronger than before, since you can't just go with 1/4 and then 1/6. (well, I guess it's a bit too confusing then), let's wait for some further mods~

Ayu wrote:

yay modreq

Normal

1. 00:20:116 (2,3,4) - Not sure if it's just me, but I kinda hate overlaps like this since it looks pretty lame imo. The actual spacing barely increases if you don't make them overlap, so I guess it should be safe. would prefer to keep as-is. DS is your friend!
2. 00:40:116 (4) - Red point seems unfitting to me, since you used a lot of curves. aw, come on. really? it's not thaaaat bad.
3. 00:50:348 (6,7,8) - And the overlapping here again
4. 01:09:418 (3) - I think you forgot a clap here added!
5. 01:15:930 (2) - 01:16:860 (3) - sloppy dkun pls....
6. 01:19:651 (2) - did you do this on purpose yes.
7. 01:24:302 (2) - wtf ???
8. 01:25:697 (1) -
9. 01:27:093 (2) -
10. 01:28:023 (3) -
11. 01:29:418 - Seems like you switched to another hitsound pattern here with the claps, I'm not sure why. I wouldn't. it's not so bad. it fits.
12. 01:49:883 (4) - Would look better if curved like (1), in my opinion. this is intended.

Hard

1. ~ I think tick rate 2 sounds great here, because of the sound on almost every red tick. sure!
2. 01:19:651 (3,4) - spacing here is a little inconsistent, those 2 are closer to eachother than the other ones. fixed.
3. 01:41:744 (6,1) - Sounds pretty strange here, I'd rather have the 1/3 piano mapped tried this, didn't really work. i'm open to alternatives, though!

That's about it, really great map. thx bby

that whistle hitsound sounds like a fart wow pls.....

1. What about moving the beginning of the break to 01:59:651 - or 02:01:046 - ? Would be very fitting. I'd choose the second one but it's your preference

1. 00:26:627 (2,3) - I'd replace them with a slider so that 00:27:558 (4) -, which has a piano sound on it unlike them, will be more emphasized
2. 00:37:325 (1) - This shape looks a bit too flat between all these nicely curved slider
3. 00:40:116 (4) - Why did you use a red point on this one? Doesn't fit much since it's the only one, so I tried to fix the whole pattern (suggestion above included), here's the code:
   SPOILER

   360,96,37325,6,0,P|264:48|160:48,1,214
   40,100,38720,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   112,204,39186,2,0,L|88:308,1,107
   212,336,40116,2,0,B|264:340|264:340|320:332,1,107,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

4. 00:50:348 (6) - I think a circle + 1/1 slider would fit more since 00:50:813 is strong enough to be in a slider's head than a repeat
5. 01:09:883 (4,5) - This could be better if it was a single slider since (4) has a totally different sound than (5) and 01:09:883 - will be emphasized more, which is much better in my opinion
6. 01:24:767 (4,5) - Same as above
7. 01:28:023 (3,4) - For the same reason, I'd switch them. Not a big deal, but I't better to have things clear, ya knowww
8. 01:40:116 (3) - x:112 y:276 for a better symmetric slider. If you do that, you should move 01:41:511 (4) - to x:204 y:376

1. 00:25:930 - You missed a circle here, you probably won't add but just telling you that it would be cooler ;_;
2. 00:53:139 (3) - Not perfectly symmetric hue
3. 01:14:534 (1,3) - Not a fan of these patterns, but why didn't you stack them?
4. 01:41:744 (6,1) - Should be 1/3 here, right? I tried with 3 beats (01:41:821 (x) - 01:42:131 (x) - and 01:42:441 (2) - ), and it fits nicely since there isn't that variation of rhythm and it won't be a mess to understand. However, if you don't like it, you could always try with a slider with repeat, using the timestamp I linked before for start, repeat and end.
5. 02:30:348 (8) - I'd personally use a slider here, follow vocals in a very good way

Leader wrote:

hi my belovedkun hi ldr bby

[General]

1. What about moving the beginning of the break to 01:59:651 - or 02:01:046 - ? Would be very fitting. I'd choose the second one but it's your preference listen to it closely! it sounds just fine at where it's at now.

[Normal]

1. 00:26:627 (2,3) - I'd replace them with a slider so that 00:27:558 (4) -, which has a piano sound on it unlike them, will be more emphasized sure!
2. 00:37:325 (1) - This shape looks a bit too flat between all these nicely curved slider alright.
3. 00:40:116 (4) - Why did you use a red point on this one? Doesn't fit much since it's the only one, so I tried to fix the whole pattern (suggestion above included), here's the code: fixed the slider, your code didn't work! :p
   SPOILER

   360,96,37325,6,0,P|264:48|160:48,1,214
   40,100,38720,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   112,204,39186,2,0,L|88:308,1,107
   212,336,40116,2,0,B|264:340|264:340|320:332,1,107,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

4. 00:50:348 (6) - I think a circle + 1/1 slider would fit more since 00:50:813 is strong enough to be in a slider's head than a repeat mm, I don't like this.
5. 01:09:883 (4,5) - This could be better if it was a single slider since (4) has a totally different sound than (5) and 01:09:883 - will be emphasized more, which is much better in my opinion bit iffy on making this a slider. I understand where you're coming from, but different hits/different sound, right?
6. 01:24:767 (4,5) - Same as above ^
7. 01:28:023 (3,4) - For the same reason, I'd switch them. Not a big deal, but I't better to have things clear, ya knowww soz, but ^
8. 01:40:116 (3) - x:112 y:276 for a better symmetric slider. If you do that, you should move 01:41:511 (4) - to x:204 y:376 wasn't aiming for symmetry on the X-axis here

[Hard]

1. 00:25:930 - You missed a circle here, you probably won't add but just telling you that it would be cooler ;_; you know me so well...
2. 00:53:139 (3) - Not perfectly symmetric hue wasn't meant to be!
3. 01:14:534 (1,3) - Not a fan of these patterns, but why didn't you stack them? wasn't meant to be stacked. looks fine in play!
4. 01:41:744 (6,1) - Should be 1/3 here, right? I tried with 3 beats (01:41:821 (x) - 01:42:131 (x) - and 01:42:441 (2) - ), and it fits nicely since there isn't that variation of rhythm and it won't be a mess to understand. However, if you don't like it, you could always try with a slider with repeat, using the timestamp I linked before for start, repeat and end. okay. let's try it as a slider then.
5. 02:30:348 (8) - I'd personally use a slider here, follow vocals in a very good wayI tried, but I personally like the slider better.

Solid map, couldn't find much, good luck~

SuperMICrophone wrote:

yoooo

these hitsounds though <3

[General]

It'd be a hassle I understand but hear me out... Instead of using the "sampleset" window for changing the hitsounds to Soft consider using the "Additions" window (setting the sampleset one back to Auto). It sounds a bit more consistant for me, although it does sound fine as is. duly noted for future maps; will keep as-is as it works fine currently.

[Normal]

00:26:627 (2) - You're missing a clap on the start of this slider.
01:09:418 (3) - You're missing a clap here.
01:15:930 (2) - Missing a clap on the start.
01:19:651 (2) - Missing clap
01:20:116 (3) - Missing clap on end
01:24:302 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Mssing claps :c
01:33:604 (4) - Missing clap
01:36:395 (2) - Missing clap at the end
01:39:186 (2) - Missing clap at the beginning

It's at this point I begin to realize you only put claps on every fourth beat... LOL consider changing or keep it the way it is, it's fine either way. (But I prefer claps every 2 and 4 :O) hahah, smooooth. will keep as-is. :p

01:55:465 (5,6) - Why not ctrl+c (1) and (2), paste them, ctrl+j+h, and then move them around a bit? You can also ctrl+g (2) to keep the original pattern a bit. I would like to keep as-is because it creates variation.
01:57:325 (1) - Needs a Finish okay!
02:18:255 (1) - RNC sure!
02:23:372 (3) - Consider rotating clockwise by around 15-30 degrees to help flow. I don't see this being much of a help flow wise.


[Hope]

Is this diff name unrankable now with the new naming rule? Just wondering. yeah, I know of the rule.

00:40:813 (6) - Consider a Soft whistle here.
00:59:651 (1) - Can you rotate this a bit so it flows better? o3o http://puu.sh/6Fe5A.jpg
I rotated (1) by 30 degrees and respaced itself and (2).
01:33:139 (1,2,3) - Niiiicceee
01:55:465 (1) - Consider moving this forward a tick (keeping the same ending point however) and adding a circle here with a soft Finish. If you do this, also consider adding a whistle to the start of this: 01:54:534 (1) -
02:21:279 (2) - Whistle here sounds odd, I would remove it.

took everything via hard except 01:55:465 (1) -
---

Really clean mapset as always, GL for rank! :O thanks! <3

HabiHolic wrote:

Diff name fixrd please.. Unrakeble

HabiHolic wrote:

Unrektable

Frostmourne wrote:

HabiHolic wrote:

Unrektable

akrolsmir wrote:

Finally! I've been waiting for the next (Serious Mix) song for far too long. Does this mean we'll see Why eventually :3

Sidenote: I would have expected that Despair would have been the harder difficulty, but I guess this works too.

dkun wrote:

akrolsmir wrote:

Finally! I've been waiting for the next (Serious Mix) song for far too long. Does this mean we'll see Why eventually :3

Sidenote: I would have expected that Despair would have been the harder difficulty, but I guess this works too.

Eventually! (I hope....)

In response to why I put Despair as the lower difficulty, I believed that it would be better this way due to the nature of the song (what the lyrics actually signify). Give it a read!