OK, re-read 3 has produced some things I want to look at.
This post bothers me. 0_o is speculating on the game set-up instead of scum-hunting, a supposed scum-tell, but it's really too early for that to mean much. However, he's making a case that Mafia are going to look like Townies. This is scummy because it gets people thinking that townies are really scum.
[quote="
Pasonia":702ff]EDIT @ adam: I'm sorry I haven't voted in weeks. >.>Sorry for inactivity? Then later he says that he had planned to lurk this game. Those two don't seem to go together.
[quote="
0_o":702ff]woah im on L-2 guys... watch where you're voting..
hey strager I haven't heard any claims against being mafia from you either.. :O
I'm not mafia
EDIT: also seems kinda fishy to me to put a "random" vote against someone who already has 2...
vote WojjanSelf-preservation is Scummy. Also, here 0_o says that putting someone at L-2 is "kinda fishy"
Which he himself did twice.
Pictures serve to distract people and generally hurt scum-hunting.
rust seems to have no problems putting someone at L-1.
[quote="
Wojjan":702ff]I lost count, am I on L-1 yet?
I take it this game won't last long for me this way
Again, self-preservation is scummy.
More self-preservationAdam in this post is asking other people to point fingers at each other. This isn't laziness, this is scummy.
Again, self-preservationThis post is very interesting. At the time, stragers vote was the one he received when he switched with SFG. I.E. he was NOT voting who he thought was scum. I think this gives credit to the "strager was a goon" theory.
LS wrote:
SFG: 4, 4, 3
rust45: 4, 3, 3, 3
strager: 3, 3, 3
0_o: 3, 3
LS: 3
Wojjan: 3
adam: -
Pasonia: -
adam has not done ANY scum-hunting and none of his posts has any quality.
Thoughts? Comments? Proverbial Expressions?