Oh no, don't bring Rome into all of this..... my professors would be getting cancer lmao.
You completely misread my last comment and needed vipper to explain to you what I meant, don't be so cocky.B1rd wrote:
You an abraker are perfect for each other, you can't read and he can't write. That's the second time in a row you've misread my posts.
On that note, I could call you a buffoon, but that wouldn't be productive now, would it?
What are you saying here? "Your moral system would support apartheid and is therefore bad?" Well yes, it does favour apartheid when the only alternative is an insanely murderous dictatorship...B1rd wrote:
By the way, Zimbwe was objectively better off under every relevant measurement under apartheid. Isn't all that matters, Mr. "we should dispense with common moral conceptions in favour of what's best for society"?
B1rd wrote:
And as for the apartheid argument, I'm just holding you to your political philosophy of expedient utilitarianism, considering that according to you, if it were proven that Blacks were better off being rules by Whites, then that should be the case, since you don't value individual autonomy as intrinsically valuable.
B1rd wrote:
Unlike the Left I don't base my estimation of someone on whether or not they've violated my PC codes, I base it on their achievements. If I were to use your tactics, I'd dismiss your Rome video because the author called Zimmerman White. If some Tweets are the only ammunition you've got against J. Peterson, you need to re-evaluate why you hate him so much. I think it's because he isn't partisan or politically inclined, but instead used his extensive knowledge of psychology and philosophy to rebut left-wing ideology, and it really hurts the left if they can't dismiss all those who disagree with them as ignorant religious fundamentalists. Sorry, but you can't dismiss him with a Tweet.
This video is actually so deluded and naive that I wish it were all an elaborate joke.B1rd wrote:
Well the NAP basically is the law. See this video for greater details about how law and order could work without government.
B1rd wrote:
I don't know, I don't spend my time scouring the Twitter of people I don't like. And it's not something I making up that Vipper and the Left try to discredit someone or something by posting something they've said or done as if it invalidates everything else. It's a tactic he consistently uses.
imagine using the internet for the sole purpose of getting angry over stupid shitDaddyCoolVipper wrote:
When I post particularly stupid tweets/videos from people I dislike
FuZ wrote:
imagine using the internet for the sole purpose of getting angry over stupid shitDaddyCoolVipper wrote:
When I post particularly stupid tweets/videos from people I dislike
DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
(also because I find them amusing and they bait arguments to some extent)
imagine finding "amusing" stupid shit that makes you angryDaddyCoolVipper wrote:
(also because I find them amusing and they bait arguments to some extent)
That chart assumes the the services are controlled in the manner displayed. Example: graph doesn't apply to cases where Energy is government controlled while everything else isn't. I know that's rare or might even be possible to come by, but in theory, the discrepancy remains.B1rd wrote:
Yeah, because I'm sure you wouldn't want a tool to identify if the courses you're spending tens of thousands of dollars on aren't secretly Nazi, because free speech? We should dispense with all tools that helps us label the information we are to consume.
Also, I'm sick of people misidentifying what a classical liberal is. It's not just a buzzword for pro civil rights. It's a broader philosophy that advocates for limited government, property rights and laissez-faire capitalism.
inb4 it was just a bait post.
If you're forcing people to choose what services they use by forcing them to use tax to fund certain services, then you're controlling people's ability to affect themselves.Momiji wrote:
can the government stop controlling people's ability to affect themselves (e.g consuming powders)
afterwards i wouldn't care what is "controlled"