B1rd wrote:
Googling that gives me nothing.
And yet value systems are often much more beneficial than not, because they have evolved over time and take in to account a large degree on social phenomena that aren't readily apparent to "rational" interpretation.
Calling Jordan a "misogynist" is a non-argument. And likely it ignores the underlying reasons as to why he believes what he does and just oversimplifies in into a claim that "he just hates all women". Considering that he was right about whatever he was right about indicates that his interpretations are more well-founded than yours.
When you Google, leave out the " ".
The second part of your post has Little to do with what I wrote. Sure, value systems are often beneficial, so what? What are you even arguing for at this point? You're just distracting from the original argument:
"Only because you happened to get a good result, doesn't mean that your methodology, aka the way how you arrived at your conclusion, was correct. THIS is what you responded to initially, so how the heck did we even end up agreeing over these platitudes? "Value Systems evolved over time", well no fucking shit and yes of course I agree, but what is your point and why are you even saying this? It has nothing to do with my initial statment, or with the discussion I was trying to have before you derailed it completely. Please just stop.
The second part of your post is completely irrelevant because you don't even know the topic. I was talking to Jordan anyway, not to you.
Misogynist is an ample description of Jordans behavioral bias, so what do you mean by "it's a non-argument?" Again, what's your point? I feel like half of the time what you're trying to say is so far away from what was being discussed, it's hard to have any sort of discussion at all. You bring up something thats only tangentially related, and then the argument devolves until it starts being about something completely different. This is no fun, no fun at all. This is why arguing with you never ends with a solid conclusion. I don't know how to keep going like this.
And likely it ignores the underlying reasons as to why he believes what he does and just oversimplifies in into a claim that "he just hates all women.
.. ok ? Of Course ist simplifying, I'm not a psychologist with 100 hours to waste on the most accurate Analysis of his state of mind. Whats your point?
Neither do I care about the underlying reasons. I was merely pointing it out in that argument that happened about 7 months ago, because I recognized the pattern. Fuck me. See? As soon as I go into this, you will respond to it with something else thats only tangentially related and that is exactly what I meant before. All you do here is derailing the topic.