Yeah, that's why. His last post was a month ago but he didn't post anything concerning his departure. He just kinda left without warning.Raspberriel wrote:
Has he even been here recently?
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
56,159
As if you had to warn people because you go on hiatus.
You were here for quite a long time and you're surprised..... lolEndaris wrote:
As if you had to warn people because you go on hiatus.
When you put it that way, sure it seems silly. I guess I'm just used to farewells; hell, even Kisses posted a farewell post before he said he was leaving.Endaris wrote:
As if you had to warn people because you go on hiatus.
But Kisses is still here.
who cares if you're still in contact?
You did this kind of stuff before when posting for the whereabouts of various people, it's incredibly pointless.
I have nothing good to say so I'll post the lil bamboo I bought for myself.
It looks pretty cute!Milkshake wrote:
I have nothing good to say so I'll post the lil bamboo I bought for myself.
put a shekel in there
Or i just want to have an enjoyable time without having to see the posts of shitfaces like you and jordan.B1rd wrote:
Nothing is more symptomatic of this sheltered generation than people who block others at the slightest sign of them having a different opinion.
that is a nice bamboo.Milkshake wrote:
I have nothing good to say so I'll post the lil bamboo I bought for myself.
may i ask why a bamboo over other plants?
Doesn't bamboo grow like super fast?
yes it does.
some kinds of bamboo grow so fast in fact that they were used for torture/execution purposes.
so i guess that's why milkshake got hers.
some kinds of bamboo grow so fast in fact that they were used for torture/execution purposes.
so i guess that's why milkshake got hers.
actually no. I'm a soldier atm and my position in army is a pretty unique one - I'm not in a base, but in an apartment the army rents us. I wanted to decorate the desk I have in my own room and chose a plant I wouldn't have to water often, because sometimes I might not be at the apartment for weeks.
so it totally is a torture device.
since you are in the army there is no denying it. case closed.
since you are in the army there is no denying it. case closed.
i am not a fan of this plan.
poor tom
he's only a tool for me to gain control over all of you!
What's your position.Milkshake wrote:
actually no. I'm a soldier atm and my position in army is a pretty unique one - I'm not in a base, but in an apartment the army rents us. I wanted to decorate the desk I have in my own room and chose a plant I wouldn't have to water often, because sometimes I might not be at the apartment for weeks.
I sent in an application to join the army. Turns out though that I didn't actually completely year 10 so that's gonna be a problem. Doesn't help that they're straight up discriminating against men top get their magical diversity quotas.
Your problem is you can somehow hate us when we have done nothing to you. You have thin skin.silmarilen wrote:
Or i just want to have an enjoyable time without having to see the posts of shitfaces like you and jordan.B1rd wrote:
Nothing is more symptomatic of this sheltered generation than people who block others at the slightest sign of them having a different opinion.
I'm a soldier-teacher.
edit: are they actually discriminating against men? it's the goddamn army, wtf. men are way more useful to army than women 90% of the time. lol
edit: are they actually discriminating against men? it's the goddamn army, wtf. men are way more useful to army than women 90% of the time. lol
what do you teach the soldiers?
Yep. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/n ... a2e3e5680aMilkshake wrote:
I'm a soldier-teacher.
edit: are they actually discriminating against men? it's the goddamn army, wtf. men are way more useful to army than women 90% of the time. lol
It sucks since apparently the role they are fast-tracking women through are the combat roles which are the ones that I'm interested in. There weren't any positions available in the army for a rifleman so I had to change my preference for the Reserve instead.
And its especially stupid because there are plenty of roles in the army that women would be suitable for, but combat roles aren't any of them.
Can you link a source that doesn't force you to subscribe before you can read anything?
I can access it without subscribing to any thing.
Why do you need to try and solve or point out every problem? There's all sorts of humans and people not-so-human out there. Of course not everyone is gonna stand your guts. Ultimately, who gives a rat's ass if one bloke doesn't like you; I'm sure half your neighbours can't stand you for reasons unknown either.B1rd wrote:
Your problem is you can somehow hate us when we have done nothing to you. You have thin skin.
Just ignore it, mate...
It immediately redirects me to some subscription page and if anything it wants me to AT LEAST log in before I can continue to that article.
I'm not teaching soldiers. I'm basically qualified to teach Hebrew so I'm working at middle/higshschools and in the evenings I work with that they call 'youth at risk'. you could say it's like social service on army uniform, tbh...but I did go through bootcamp and a course and all that shit. It sounds all fun and dandy until you get your schedule and you see you have 12 working hours excluding the drives I do a day lmao fuck my shit up famTanzklaue wrote:
what do you teach the soldiers?
also b1rd: this is the dumbest shit I've heard of in a while. I'm actually speechless
@lamey[b] the army man where are u
jeffrey dahmer was one fucked up individual.
sorry for replying late but I completely forgot that this argument happened (I even forgot about my involvement), but better late than never!Jordan wrote:
silmarilen wrote:
If it involves a fight between a man and a woman, don't take jordan seriously. He has a history of hating women in general regardless of what actually happened.
Unlike what tumblr people call mysoginist (basically anybody that isn't a woman agreeing with their point of view), i think he actually is one.
https://i.imgur.com/dtAOP0b.jpg
y'all remember that argument?
lol @ the possibility of me ever being wrong
The shit you spouted back then could have been valid if you had known of the screenshot back then, but alas you didn't.
All of the things we said back then are still just as valid, because they criticized your mindset, aka how you arrive at your decisions. Time has proven you correct in this instance (or at least it appears so for now), but that doesn't mean you're any less of an idiot. An example of how being technically correct doesn't prove that you're not a moron:
A: "HEY, the rain tonight is a bad omen because the rain gods told me so!"
B: "but wait, rain is just a natural phenomenon, it follows a patter, a pattern that you could calculate if you had enough time and computation powe.."
A: "NO, you're WRONG, just wait and you'll see!!"
- then some random bad shit happens to B
A: "See, I told you so, I was right and therefore my methodology is proven over this thing you call naturalism or balanced scepticism or whatever. Hail the rain gods!"
In other words: You're the A-guy, who is like "I told you so!!!". But no. I doubt that anything has changed and there still aren't any rain gods.
Who was in the screenshot and why are all these dweebs hating on Jordan
if you google Jordans quote, you should find the pages on ITT where the discussion happened.
No idea what you expect me to Google.
Anyone can point holes in someone's belief system. You can criticise the Ancient Israelites for only eating Kosher food because they thought that God would punish them otherwise. But even if that weren't correct, it still ended up protecting them from the multitude of parasites that you fin in pork that wasn't perfectly prepared, and from a practical standpoint they were more correct than the gentiles. That's the error of psuedo-intellectuals, they think that because they can point out a few logical inconsistencies in someone's belief system they can then attribute that entire system to irrationality. But it's a lot easier tear something down than to construct an entire system of values that will help you get along in the world, something most atheists lack.
Anyone can point holes in someone's belief system. You can criticise the Ancient Israelites for only eating Kosher food because they thought that God would punish them otherwise. But even if that weren't correct, it still ended up protecting them from the multitude of parasites that you fin in pork that wasn't perfectly prepared, and from a practical standpoint they were more correct than the gentiles. That's the error of psuedo-intellectuals, they think that because they can point out a few logical inconsistencies in someone's belief system they can then attribute that entire system to irrationality. But it's a lot easier tear something down than to construct an entire system of values that will help you get along in the world, something most atheists lack.
yehaj