forum

ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting

posted
Total Posts
56,155
show more
Foxtrot

B1rd wrote:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2431924

"There is no evidence of an overall increase in congenital malformations among babies born to teenagers."
yeah but this doesn't even mention older women having higher chances of birth defects either, which is what you claimed. in fact, at one point this study suggested that teenagers have a harder time giving birth due to lower weight and undeveloped body. here, have a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility

"After puberty, female fertility increases and then decreases, with advanced maternal age causing an increased risk of female infertility."

it also mentions that fertility is at its peak during a woman's 20s because that's when their puberty ends. at one point you said that

So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty.
which is not true at all. some girls don't even start their periods at that age. you've gone through your puberty once you hit your early 20s, but at that age they're actually at their peak of puberty.
B1rd

Foxtrot wrote:

yeah but this doesn't even mention older women having higher chances of birth defects either, which is what you claimed. in fact, at one point this study suggested that teenagers have a harder time giving birth due to lower weight and undeveloped body. here, have a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility

"After puberty, female fertility increases and then decreases, with advanced maternal age causing an increased risk of female infertility."

it also mentions that fertility is at its peak during a woman's 20s because that's when their puberty ends. at one point you said that

So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty.
which is not true at all. some girls don't even start their periods at that age. you've gone through your puberty once you hit your early 20s, but at that age they're actually at their peak of puberty.
And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.

I didn't make any definite statements because I didn't have any evidence, basing the statement on something I read years ago. But it isn't particularly important that teenagers are more fertile than women in their 20s, because it is sufficient to back up my point that they are simply capable of reproduction, which is what the study I linked said. And if you read it carefully, it says that pregnancy only poses a problem for under 15 year olds, and lower birth weights can be attributed to differing socio-economic conditions. It doesn't matter if teenagers haven't finished puberty yet, they have most of their secondary sex characteristics, and are reproductively viable, and these are the things that are important for attractiveness.

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.
DaddyCoolVipper

B1rd wrote:

It doesn't matter if teenagers haven't finished puberty yet, they have most of their secondary sex characteristics, and are reproductively viable, and these are the things that are important for attractiveness.

In your opinion, mate.

Maybe don't confuse your own preferences with whether or not something is normal for grown men in general. I wouldn't want to have anything to do with a fucking 15-year-old
Mahogany
nice
B1rd
Do you make it a point to be antagonistic about everything? Go vent your self-righteous moral outrage somewhere else.
Taj
intravenous custard is anything but a recipe
then you confused it with
a fucking poisonous fish

you can just go into a lake full of
piranhas

with anything
nothing better than cockroaches on a pizza
Mahogany

B1rd wrote:

Do you make it a point to be antagonistic about everything? Go vent your self-righteous moral outrage somewhere else.
imagine actually using this as a defense IRL
Foxtrot
But it isn't particularly important that teenagers are more fertile than women in their 20s, because it is sufficient to back up my point that they are simply capable of reproduction
thanks for stating the obvious. and also you seemed pretty fixated on fertility so that's why i pointed it out. oh, and by that logic, you'd probably think it's okay for men to go as low as 12 as long as they're capable of reproduction because it seems like nowadays the average age for first period is 12

http://www.obgyn.net/sexual-health/firs ... ical-signs

and you know, that's kind of awful

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.
15 year old girls have such baby faces. they all look like kids. i would be really concerned if someone who's 25 was attracted to such.

[And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.
do you really need a source on biological clock lol c'mon
B1rd

Foxtrot wrote:

thanks for stating the obvious. and also you seemed pretty fixated on fertility so that's why i pointed it out. oh, and by that logic, you'd probably think it's okay for men to go as low as 12 as long as they're capable of reproduction because it seems like nowadays the average age for first period is 12

http://www.obgyn.net/sexual-health/firs ... ical-signs

and you know, that's kind of awful

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.
15 year old girls have such baby faces. they all look like kids. i would be really concerned if someone who's 25 was attracted to such.

And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.
do you really need a source on biological clock lol c'mon
The point isn't that they're merely capable of reproducing, but rather they are capable or near as capable as a woman in her early twenties. I'm not really interested unless you want to try and disprove the point I made that there aren't any biological - rather than sociological - reasons as to why it is abnormal for men to be attracted to teens who're well-capable of reproducing. But apparently neither you nor anyone else can separate science from issues of morality and ethics, and you go on to make ridiculous strawmans, like that I think it's okay to have sex with 12 year olds.
DaddyCoolVipper
What about the power dynamic that inherently exists between two different people who are at completely separate stages of life, B1rd? That's the main argument against incest after all
Antlia-
What the actual fuck has happened sense I've been gone, also if a girl at 15+ looks mature then attraction is normal.
Aurani
I'm willing to bet my ass that you're younger than 20 so you claim that. Of course a 15yo will be attractive to someone barely out of puberty.
johnmedina999
Nice sig Maho
DaddyCoolVipper

Aurani wrote:

I'm willing to bet my ass that you're younger than 20 so you claim that. Of course a 15yo will be attractive to someone barely out of puberty.
This, absolutely. Young girls tend to be seen as attractive by other kids, or shut-ins who haven't had much contact with the opposite sex
B1rd
Actually, it doesn't stand to reason that men's sexual preferences would drastically change with their age, men don't suddenly become attracted to grannies as they become older, pretty sure most men would get with a younger women if they could. Typically, rich and powerful men have younger wives than normal.

As I've already noted, I haven't been talking about whether it's alright for older men to be in relationships with 15 year olds, just that attraction is normal. So perhaps we can get past these nonsense inferrals that anyone who finds anyone below 20 attractive has something wrong with them. Also, I don't think you understand what incest means.
Milkshake
DaddyCoolVipper
I haven't been arguing between "alright/normal" either, I just told you that you were projecting your own beliefs. You believe it's a normal thing, but that's an assumption. I think most people wouldn't agree that grown men are generally attracted to girls who haven't even finished puberty; just because they CAN have a baby, that doesn't mean they're entirely developed and sexually attractive to most adults, you understand?

Explain your incest line, since it seems especially thoughtless. Incest is sexual relations between family, nothing more.
Aurani
To be honest, Daddy, I don't think we'll gain much by trying to discuss that topic here of all places. Osu is chock-full of kids, shut-ins, socially inept individuals as well as anime lovers, so it stands to reason that you'd find this much opposition when it comes to paedophilia and general attraction to younger girls.
As such, it'd be more reasonable to attempt to communicate with a fucking wall than this bunch.
DaddyCoolVipper
I guess. I do enjoy educating people when it comes to moral arguments against incest though, it's a pretty well-known taboo subject but most people couldn't actually argue rationally for why it is bad unless they've seen such discussions already
B1rd
Rather, you're just projecting your own beliefs. I'm not defining "normal" as "whatever is the norm is society", because that's just completely arbitrary and changes from one century to the next. It's likely that people mold their sexual preferences based on societal pressures, and I think that human sexuality is much more plastic than most people realise. So, considering this, it stands to reason that the most reliable way to measure whether it's "normal" or not would be based on biological fertility. So I can say that being attracted to pre-pubescent girls is abnormal, but simply being attracted to a teenage girl who is showing secondary sex characteristics is not abnormal. It doesn't have to be one's most preferred age but I think you'd have a hard time arguing that, biases notwithstanding, older men have no attraction to girls under 18.

And I'm not sure what you are talking about with incest, you mischaracterised it by implying that the main problem with it was of two people "being at seperate stages of life". The problem with incest is it produces babies with birth defects. But there is nothing immoral about having an incestuous relationship if the couple doesn't have a baby, even if it may be a bit creepy.

Milkshake wrote:

Nice graph.
Comfy Slippers
Children's nyquil is the best cure for stuffy no's.
Mahogany

johnmedina999 wrote:

Nice sig Maho
;)
DaddyCoolVipper

B1rd wrote:

The problem with incest is it produces babies with birth defects. But there is nothing immoral about having an incestuous relationship if the couple doesn't have a baby, even if it may be a bit creepy.
Many people feel that incest is immoral even without pregnancy being involved, i.e. using protection or same-sex relationships. They can't usually argue why such a thing would be immoral, though.


(The reason is the power dynamic creates an inherent problem with establishing consent, which seems to be a topic that mr B1rd doesn't understand, so that conversation isn't exactly gonna go anywhere)
Comfy Slippers
The best part about screwing twenty six year olds is that there's 20 of them.
B1rd

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

B1rd wrote:

The problem with incest is it produces babies with birth defects. But there is nothing immoral about having an incestuous relationship if the couple doesn't have a baby, even if it may be a bit creepy.
Many people feel that incest is immoral even without pregnancy being involved, i.e. using protection or same-sex relationships. They can't usually argue why such a thing would be immoral, though.


(The reason is the power dynamic creates an inherent problem with establishing consent, which seems to be a topic that mr B1rd doesn't understand, so that conversation isn't exactly gonna go anywhere)
Are you really gonna pull out some nonsense argument that fully-grown adults somehow can't establish consent?


Comfy Slippers wrote:

The best part about screwing twenty six year olds is that there's 20 of them.
This is why hyphens exist.
Razzy

Comfy Slippers wrote:

The best part about screwing twenty six year olds is that there's 20 of them.
whathappenswhenyoudonthirecopyeditors.jpg
DaddyCoolVipper
It really depends on the relationship @B1rd

A father and his daughter will probably have some pretty deep-rooted power dynamic shit going on, even if the daughter is an adult, y'know? But yeah, it is generally a case-by-case thing
B1rd
You could say that there are power dynamics in a million of other cases too. But regardless, it's arbitrary. Adults make their own choices and have responsibility for their own lives. It's no one else's right to impose their will upon the lives of mentally valid adults concerning what relationships they can or cannot have.
Milkshake
Raspberriel, initial UR hanayo is the saddest UR ever. no one will recover her spaghetti hands.

also B1rd, yes, it is a nice graph. I wish I didn't lose the source though
DeletedUser_6709840
@B1rd you're referring to Ephebophilia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

That still doesn't mean that fucking a 15 year-old is ok just because they've completed puberty. They can't really consent to a relationship with someone of 18 or older because of brain development as well.

In the US, the age of consent is 18 but it really should be 21 because physiologically the human brain isn't developed until your 20s because of the frontal lobe (which controls decision making and logical judgement)

In regards to pedophilia, if you're sexually attracted to a drawn character that looks 12 that is different than actually being attracted to real girls. However, it can be a warning sign for those who are mentally ill and are pedophiles. Just saying, you wanna be careful and not become a disgusting pedophile.
B1rd

RoseusJaeger wrote:

@B1rd you're referring to Ephebophilia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

That still doesn't mean that fucking a 15 year-old is ok just because they've completed puberty. They can't really consent to a relationship with someone of 18 or older because of brain development as well.

In the US, the age of consent is 18 but it really should be 21 because physiologically the human brain isn't developed until your 20s because of the frontal lobe (which controls decision making and logical judgement)

In regards to pedophilia, if you're sexually attracted to a drawn character that looks 12 that is different than actually being attracted to real girls. However, it can be a warning sign for those who are mentally ill and are pedophiles. Just saying, you wanna be careful and not become a disgusting pedophile.
Redundant. Nothing you've said rebuts anything I've said. And I'm pretty sure that looking at loli pics won't make me a "disgusting paedophile". Regardless, nothing wrong with being a paedophile as long as they don't hurt anyone. If you're left-wing, actually be tolerant for once.

Milkshake wrote:

Raspberriel, initial UR hanayo is the saddest UR ever. no one will recover her spaghetti hands.

also B1rd, yes, it is a nice graph. I wish I didn't lose the source though
Feels bad having sourceless graphs.

B1rd
Also, something else that was brought to me attention: http://puu.sh/wDQmR/4c1577378b.webm

As someone who wants to be a translator myself, I find this absolutely disgusting - to insert LGBT progressive agenda where it doesn't belong. Not only that, but it completely changes the meaning and is completely contrary to how that character was written. Everyone who works at Funimation deserves to be crucified.
Faust
Hm.


Anyway, how is everyone ?
Aurani
I'm calling 10000% bullshit on those graphs Bird, at least when it comes to countries on the Balkan.
Rurree
i hate kids
lol

Madvillain wrote:

i hate kids
cmon bro ur literally handing someone a 'but ur a kid urself' meme on a silver platter and they arent exactly wrong either

lets think about what we type before we
Aurani



lol wrote:

cmon bro ur literally handing someone a 'but ur a kid urself' meme on a silver platter and they arent exactly wrong either
Stop reading my mind.
Rurree
i got the responses i expected so it was funny lmao
Aurani
Why wasn't the earthquake right below Villain's house? Gods, why must you punish me so?
Taj

Aurani wrote:

Why wasn't the earthquake right below Villain's house? Gods, why must you punish me so?
don't know why
the gdp has 188 memebrs
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply