You can say that about pretty much anything though. Plus your statement doesn't give a reason not to debate over homosex nonsense.Bassist Vinyl wrote:
but trueBrian OA wrote:
Talk about oversimplification.
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
56,174
it's more that the people that 'argue' against it dont really have any validity because like i said it's not their business
>2014
>Homophobia still exists
>Racism still exists
>Sexism still exists
World still sucks.
>Homophobia still exists
>Racism still exists
>Sexism still exists
World still sucks.
Like I said, you're oversimplifying it. Whatever they may be debating about—which we have no info about—could be more complicated than "we can't have gays." We can't just assume it's that simple, and even he's ultimately wrong debate is necessary for the opposing party to realize that.Bassist Vinyl wrote:
it's more that the people that 'argue' against it dont really have any validity because like i said it's not their business
It's been getting better though—that's what matters.Yoeri wrote:
>2014
>Homophobia still exists
>Racism still exists
>Sexism still exists
World still sucks.
Personally I think we ought to be focusing more on improving sustainability. The continent of America in general needs to work on that.
You need to work on your geography son because America is split into two continents.Brian OA wrote:
Personally I think we ought to be focusing more on improving sustainability. The continent of America in general needs to work on that.
Both y'all need to work on your geography cuz murrca is a country duhJarby wrote:
You need to work on your geography son because America is split into two continents.Brian OA wrote:
Personally I think we ought to be focusing more on improving sustainability. The continent of America in general needs to work on that.
That's not what I was taughtJarby wrote:
You need to work on your geography son because America is split into two continents.Brian OA wrote:
Personally I think we ought to be focusing more on improving sustainability. The continent of America in general needs to work on that.
Not that it matters anyway
That's just what the US wants us to believe.Jarby wrote:
You need to work on your geography son because America is split into two continents.Brian OA wrote:
Personally I think we ought to be focusing more on improving sustainability. The continent of America in general needs to work on that.
it wasn't 3(North America, Center America and South America)?Jarby wrote:
You need to work on your geography son because America is split into two continents.
I thought it was 5(North America, East America, Center America, West America and South America)
Jarby wrote:
You need to work on your geography son because America is split into two continents.Brian OA wrote:
Personally I think we ought to be focusing more on improving sustainability. The continent of America in general needs to work on that.
it depends on each education.
afro-eurasia 
australia is always on its own because fuck australia, seriously
and antarctica is too cool to hang out with the other continents
and antarctica is too cool to hang out with the other continents
that thing in your sig is weird..Jarby wrote:
You need to work on your geography son because America is split into two continents.Brian OA wrote:
Personally I think we ought to be focusing more on improving sustainability. The continent of America in general needs to work on that.
theres a reason ive only passed like a handful of od9 and all with C.. spoiler i suck
If you guys want to know, basically I started the thing by saying homosexuals have the choice to live the life they want to as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others. (We know it's not a complete choice and genes may play some part, but for the sake of argument we rolled with that)
His points: By choosing to be homosexual, they are infringing on the rights of their future offspring that could have been born.
Homosexuals also negatively affect the survival of the society as a whole due to their choice to not procreate.
Homosexuals are more promiscuous and more likely to have STDs, and thus they are more likely to spread STDs and affect others' right to health.
Lastly, HIV treatment has a large financial impact and as a large majority of cases are from homosexuals, they hold the responsibility.
For those interested/know more, I just want to know what you guys think of his points and why? I've already given counters to his first 3 points and I don't know jack about macroeconomics so I can't argue the 4th soundly, I just wanted to hear some other opinions.
His points: By choosing to be homosexual, they are infringing on the rights of their future offspring that could have been born.
Homosexuals also negatively affect the survival of the society as a whole due to their choice to not procreate.
Homosexuals are more promiscuous and more likely to have STDs, and thus they are more likely to spread STDs and affect others' right to health.
Lastly, HIV treatment has a large financial impact and as a large majority of cases are from homosexuals, they hold the responsibility.
For those interested/know more, I just want to know what you guys think of his points and why? I've already given counters to his first 3 points and I don't know jack about macroeconomics so I can't argue the 4th soundly, I just wanted to hear some other opinions.
hiv isn't limited to just homosexuals. it's quite the thing among the opposite sexes as well.
The first two points are pretty stupid. Especially the first one.
Supposedly it's more common amongst homosexuals since they're more promiscuous, though I wonder where he's bringing that from.
HIV still affects mankind in general. The only thing that requires work there is to improve awareness and continue developing treatments against it. It'd still be a thing regardless of homos being there or not.
Supposedly it's more common amongst homosexuals since they're more promiscuous, though I wonder where he's bringing that from.
HIV still affects mankind in general. The only thing that requires work there is to improve awareness and continue developing treatments against it. It'd still be a thing regardless of homos being there or not.
I hope he doesn't fap because he's literally infringing on the rights of all those sperm cells would could have found an egg.
RIP his sperm. ;_;7
RIP his sperm. ;_;7
umm hello, I'm a forum newbie. 
Where can I advertise my forum?
Thanks, sorry I"m newbie
DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN BE RUDE TO ME, 'KAY?!
Where can I advertise my forum?
Thanks, sorry I"m newbie
DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN BE RUDE TO ME, 'KAY?!
Fuck the hell off.
( ﾟ ワ 。)Dulcet wrote:
antarctica is too cool
Geez.
Still waiting for the day I find Shellghost in my anime.
Or is there already.
Still waiting for the day I find Shellghost in my anime.
Or is there already.
Topic Starter
On your forum.Sword Hunter wrote:
Where can I advertise my forum?
Are you seriously saying that because they don't have children, these hypothetical future children have had their right to live taken away? They don't exist, how can they have their rights infringed upon? Also, gay people can have biological children through the use of a surrogate mother, or they can adopt.Jinxy wrote:
His points: By choosing to be homosexual, they are infringing on the rights of their future offspring that could have been born.
How? Society isn't in any sort of population crisis- you can actually argue that we are rather overpopulated. We don't need to make as many babies as possible anymore, and plenty of couples choose to have no children at all.Jinxy wrote:
Homosexuals also negatively affect the survival of the society as a whole due to their choice to not procreate.
"Homosexuals are more promiscuous" isn't true at all. If you're gay, you're not required to fuck a bunch of men. In fact, because gay men have a much smaller pool of potential partners, you could say that they don't have to opportunity to be as "promiscuous" as a straight person. STDs are more easily caught via anal sex, yes, but we have tests for STDs so people can find out if they have a disease and then choose to have no sex after finding that out. Also, if you're having sex with someone you don't know well and aren't even sure if they have HIV or something like that, then that's your mistake.Jinxy wrote:
Homosexuals are more promiscuous and more likely to have STDs, and thus they are more likely to spread STDs and affect others' right to health.
You can't blame a certain group for it. That's like saying "HIV started in Africa, so the Africans hold the responsibility". How can you blame a group for something like that when most gay people had absolutely nothing to do with it? Also, even if nobody had any gay sex, it probably would've spread anyway- just less fast.Jinxy wrote:
Lastly, HIV treatment has a large financial impact and as a large majority of cases are from homosexuals, they hold the responsibility.
I don't think he knows what he's talking about and is just spouting shit he read on the internet/heard from his parents.Jinxy wrote:
For those interested/know more, I just want to know what you guys think of his points and why? I've already given counters to his first 3 points and I don't know jack about macroeconomics so I can't argue the 4th soundly, I just wanted to hear some other opinions.
sickburn
Well, DaddyCoolVipper nailed most of what my responses were, except for the last one which I didn't really make a response to but another person who was reading and self-assigned "adjudicating" ended up responding to that instead...
That was what I was curious too, so I checked it out. As it turned out, his sources were from conservative sites, and the studies those sites cited were over 30 years old. Not even kidding.Brian OA wrote:
Supposedly it's more common amongst homosexuals since they're more promiscuous, though I wonder where he's bringing that from.
I was taught it's Oceania, not Australia.Dulcet wrote:
it depends on each education.
Where's my education on there?
Jinxy wrote:
By choosing to be homosexual
Australia is both a continent and a country. Australasia is a larger region which includes both Australia and some other islands. Oceania is another region which includes even more. Australia being a continent is really not up for debate as the other names simply include land nearby that is separated by ocean.Yoeri wrote:
I was taught it's Oceania, not Australia.Dulcet wrote:
it depends on each education.
Where's my education on there?
Reason was because, does it matter if it's a choice or not? By giving "they can't choose" as a defense it can be interpreted that IF they could choose, then they'd choose not to be homosexual, which wasn't really what I wanted to argue.Jinxy wrote:
(We know it's not a complete choice and genes may play some part, but for the sake of argument we rolled with that)
We actually digressed into genetics and he said "if it were controlled by genes, then homosexuals did not commit their act out of free love or will".
Why the fuck would you even want to be an oppressed minority anyway
Yoeri wrote:
Ask Tumblr
Being against homosexuality in 2014. What.
Anyway, this reminds me of our lovely politician Wilders who believes it is normal to ask an audience of followers "whether they want more or less people from Maroc in our country". The retarded bunch of course screamed "less" believing they were truly sophisticated people.
Wilders himself does not understand what is wrong about asking this question. NL best land.
Anyway, this reminds me of our lovely politician Wilders who believes it is normal to ask an audience of followers "whether they want more or less people from Maroc in our country". The retarded bunch of course screamed "less" believing they were truly sophisticated people.
Wilders himself does not understand what is wrong about asking this question. NL best land.
Yes I agree down with homos up with flags down with dirty immigrants #nederlander