Source : 涼宮ハルヒの憂鬱
Song name : ハレ晴レユカイ
Artist : 平野綾
if you need japanese information about this song to insult. i think its needed
Song name : ハレ晴レユカイ
Artist : 平野綾
if you need japanese information about this song to insult. i think its needed
insane
00:40:413 (6) - how about stack to 00:39:541 (3) ?
00:54:890 - i would use circle here too. this sound is missing
01:06:053 - ^
01:07:273 (3) - move this circle to another position. it would curse player to miss reading and 01:07:448 (4) - here has pretty strong sound so there should be some distance
01:15:646 - if you are following instrument 01:15:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) . here should be a note too.
01:18:785 (7) - not perfectly stacked to 01:18:262 (5)
01:31:605 (1) - stack to 01:30:646 (4) - its sliderhead for better visuality?
01:39:890 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - here sounds gets more bigger. can you make this jump to get more distance in process of time?
02:22:621 (3) - ^^^^^
00:54:890 - i would use circle here too. this sound is missing
01:06:053 - ^
01:07:273 (3) - move this circle to another position. it would curse player to miss reading and 01:07:448 (4) - here has pretty strong sound so there should be some distance
01:15:646 - if you are following instrument 01:15:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) . here should be a note too.
01:18:785 (7) - not perfectly stacked to 01:18:262 (5)
01:31:605 (1) - stack to 01:30:646 (4) - its sliderhead for better visuality?
01:39:890 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - here sounds gets more bigger. can you make this jump to get more distance in process of time?
02:22:621 (3) - ^^^^^
collab
00:21:838 (2,3) - how about using triple? I feel like 00:21:750 - this sound is missed
00:33:000 (2,3) - ^
00:44:425 (3) - good idea :3
00:51:925 (5) - try not to use repeat slider here. 00:52:274 - expressing here with sliderend isnt that good idea I think since here has pretty strong sound (and its on while line)
00:57:506 (4) - nc? because you nced on every 3 notes 00:56:460 (1,2,3) - here
01:18:436 (1) - isnt it unrankable? owo..
03:07:099 (4,5,6,7,8) - I would stack one of these notes to 03:06:053 (1) - this. It looks better I guess owo
00:33:000 (2,3) - ^
00:44:425 (3) - good idea :3
00:51:925 (5) - try not to use repeat slider here. 00:52:274 - expressing here with sliderend isnt that good idea I think since here has pretty strong sound (and its on while line)
00:57:506 (4) - nc? because you nced on every 3 notes 00:56:460 (1,2,3) - here
01:18:436 (1) - isnt it unrankable? owo..
03:07:099 (4,5,6,7,8) - I would stack one of these notes to 03:06:053 (1) - this. It looks better I guess owo