1. Why does the spinner finish at 02:49:570 - ? It would actually go much better if moved 1/1 later, considering that the piano phrase starts here, and following it with this spinner is the best option, imho.

1. 00:24:894 (1,2,3) - Considering how the piano chords go there, I would personally restructure the pattern to follow them correctly. The current pattern is ok, though I think 00:25:355 (2) - really semplifies too much the pattern... What about instead using 2 1/1 sliders separated by a 1/2 space? If done well, this follows really well the piano, and plays nice as well! Here's what I have done, see if you like it!
   
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   328,36,24432,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   244,44,24894,6,0,P|220:76|207:108,1,75.000002861023,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   204,148,25586,2,0,P|172:168|120:172,1,75.0000028610231,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   88,244,26509,2,0,L|96:296,1,37.5000014305115,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:28:586 (5) - Not really a big issue, though a New Combo here would work really well, considering it starts a new piano phrase, preventing your combo here from being too long. Try it out!
3. 00:32:509 (2,3) - Hmm... Why did you separate the two sliders in red ticks? I personally don't think this is a great idea, as it follows just the weak beats of the piano instead of the strong ones, making it kinda strange and unpleasing to play... What about instead making 00:32:509 (2) - 1/2 shorter, so that you can move 00:34:125 (4) - 1/2 forward (making it 1/2 shorter as well) and adding a note at 00:33:663 - ? I think it plays way better than your actual setting.
   
4. 00:44:509 (3) - Another minimal rhythm changement... What do you think about using instead a pattern with a 1/1 slider combined with a 3/2 one? Imho it really goes great, considering how the song plays here... Here's an example of what I mean there:
   
5. 01:10:812 (3) - Imho you should remove the whistle at the end of the slider. If you hear carefully, you can hear that there is no real high-pitch piano chord there, so I guess you should leave this blank to emphatize instead the other chords. Your choice, though!
6. 01:35:159 - Please, use at least a 15~20% volume section here instead, as the notes here are almost silenced, which is really bad. I think having a 20% volume section here instead would go great.
7. 02:24:659 (2,3,4,5) - This arc could really be rearranged better... While it isn't that bad, it isn't really that smooth to play... I would rearrange the whole arc making it more curved, so that it totally follows 02:26:043 (5) - , making it really smoother to play. Here's what I have done: see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   68,148,144659,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   52,256,145120,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   140,324,145582,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   244,288,146043,2,0,P|320:293|361:311,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   394,310,146735,2,0,L|423:255,1,50,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   436,156,147428,6,0,L|416:100,2,50,2|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   396,196,148120,2,0,L|280:184,1,100,4|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

1. 00:31:586 (1) - Here I would see a New Combo really good, rather than the one at 00:32:740 (3) - ... While I get your intentions on what you are following here, I think this new combo arrangement isn't so great, instead I think that having one of them here and removing the one from 00:32:740 (3) - would follow better the piano chords.
2. 00:32:509 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - As in the normal diff, this arch could have been made definitely smoother... It doesen't really flow so smooth actually :\ With some tweaking and rotating instead you could get a really better arch: here's what I have done, see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   120,248,32509,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   156,292,32740,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   208,312,32971,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   264,320,33202,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   324,312,33432,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   376,292,33663,2,0,P|408:245|413:218,2,56.2500021457673,2|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   264,320,34586,2,0,P|231:366|226:393,2,56.2500021457673,0|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:36:663 (x)- Please, consider at least adding a note here. It just goes perfectly with your pattern as it follows the piano transition, and as you have done it in the following patterns as well it wouldn't really hurt to add one here as well, considering it fits really good with the piano.
4. 00:49:632 - As the Normal diff, please make this section with at least 10~15% of volume.
5. 00:54:530 (3) - A whistle at the head of this slider would really fit perfectly, considering that it's almost as high-pitched as 00:54:991 - , so adding a whistle here would emphatize both of them perfectly! Remember that the same applies for 01:58:582 (4) - and 01:53:735 (3) - !
6. 00:55:453 (4) - Same as 00:31:586 (1) - , considering that here begins a new piano phrase I would see really good a New Combo... So why not adding it? It would go really well here, even pattern-wise
7. 00:59:376 (4,5,6,7,8) - Your hitsound pattern here goes quite wrong, as you are using just a whistle at 01:00:761 (6) - , which doesen't follow well the piano chords here at all. What about instead using whistles on all the slider 00:59:376 (4) -, on 01:00:530 (5) - and on 01:00:991 (7) - 's beginning and ending? It would go really good! I have made the blanket here better as well, see if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   172,352,59376,2,0,P|124:292|148:224,2,150,2|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   248,340,60530,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   200,280,60761,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   220,208,60991,2,0,P|205:175|167:148,2,75,2|0|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   200,280,61684,1,0,0:0:0:0:

8. 01:03:068 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - As 00:32:509 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -, you could smooth out the flow here by using another smoother arc there... I'm quite sure it goes really better than your actual pattern! Here's what I have done, see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   316,88,63068,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   248,52,63299,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   172,56,63530,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   104,92,63761,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   64,160,63991,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   40,236,64222,2,0,L|24:320,2,75,0|4|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

9. 01:53:735 (3) - What about using CTRL+G on the top of this slider? It would gust go perfect, as it follows really better 01:53:735 (3) - 's track and as it fixed the spacing problem at 01:54:659 (1) - that is quite flow-breaking. Imho, I think this is the best option you have to fix it here!

1. 00:25:586 (2) - whistle on beginning of slider instead of finish?
2. 00:26:971 (4) - whistle at the end of slider?
3. 00:27:894 (5) - This confusing me a bit. How about swap new combo with next note to make it follow pattern here?
4. 00:28:817 (4) - Whistle on reverse is unneeded imo.
5. 00:31:125 - feels empty, how about add note here + whistle?
6. 00:32:281 - ^
7. 00:33:663 (7) - whistle to the end of slider
8. 00:49:125 (3,1,1) - please keep them with same spacing. it is really hard to catch rhytm here due to bpm change and not same spacing makes it much more harder.
9. 01:03:299 (4,6) - try to add whistles at this notes + whistle at 01:04:222 (8) - (to slider end). Sounds good, imo.
10. 01:07:120 (4) - add whistle, and if you accept this, remove whistle from 01:07:351 (5) - and add finish instead and add whistle at 01:08:043 (6) - imo it sounds better
11. 01:12:428 (4) - try to add finish to head of slider and whistle to the end
12. 01:13:351 (1) - whistle to the end of slider
13. 01:15:197 (1) - ^
14. 01:17:966 (1) - 5% is still too much audible for such quiet part like this. add empty "soft-hitnormal3.wav" and use it on spinner's end as custom sample.
15. 01:21:197 (2) - whistle on reverse is unneeded imo
16. 01:22:120 - here definitely should be something audible. try to change the whole pattern or just add storyboarded whistle.
17. 01:23:735 (3,4,5) - i'd add new combos to all those notes to emphazire spacing/rhytm changes
18. 01:27:428 (3) - remove whistle from head of slider
19. 01:30:659 (1) - add whistle
20. 01:34:351 (1) - add finish, silencing end of spinner is unneeded here imo, just reduse volume to ~20%
21. 01:52:351 (5) - add whistle
22. 01:56:966 (7) - remove whistle
23. 01:57:659 (9,1) - swap nc please follow pattern
24. 01:58:351 (3) - change whistle to finish to keep your hitsounds patterns consistent
25. 02:00:197 (7) - please ctrl+h it and back to the current position for better flow
26. 02:01:351 (1) - whistle to the end of slider
27. 02:02:274 (2) - remove whistle from reverse
28. 02:03:428 (4) - finish to the end of slider instead of whistle?
29. 02:05:735 (3) - whistle instead of finish
30. 02:07:120 (5) - why whistle here?
31. 02:08:274 (3) - remove whistle from end of slider. and maybe add finish?
32. 02:11:735 (6) - remove whistle
33. 02:17:043 (1) - same as 01:17:966
34. 02:18:889 - raise volume, i can barely hear hitsounds here (to ~50%)
35. 02:24:197 (1,2,3,4) - silence ends of all this slider or just better replace it with notes, song didnt call for sliders here (lol)
36. 02:33:428 (1) - silence slidertick, it sounds ugly
37. 02:37:812 (3) - add whistle
38. 02:40:120 (6,7,8) - please stack this notes to make this pattern looks more pretty
39. 02:46:582 (1) - add finish to end of spinner

1. 00:21:663 (2) - remove whistle
2. 00:23:509 (4) - same (from head of slider]
3. 00:40:125 (2) - whistle to the end of slider
4. 00:52:222 (2) - ^
5. 01:08:966 (4) - ^
6. 01:17:851 (1) - silence it as i suggested on Hard diff
7. 02:17:043 (1) - ^

Maddy wrote:

Normal
S ~ 01:17:274 (5) - Fallo parallelo a quello prima Sarai te parallelo plz

apaffy wrote:

artist: 07th Expansion

really

apaffy wrote:

it's a nice map but...


artist: 07th Expansion

really

[Luanny] wrote:

>Ayu
>promises
lel