u's - START:DASH!! [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
100
show more
Jikson[m9]

bbj0920 wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue.

Jik's Ura Oni
General : Only 67 notes more than Inner Oni. How about just Jik's Inner Oni?
00:00:770 (3) - k done
00:33:770 (148,149) - ^ nochange
00:35:270 (154) - ^ nochange
00:40:070 (190) - d changed together with previous one
01:12:370 (374,375) - ^ only changed 374
01:15:370 (387) - D nochange
01:23:770 (439) - k nochange
01:29:070 (473) - Move to 01:29:170 - changed with the next one
01:44:770 - just slider plz 1/4 slider is difficult to hit here so I chose spinner
02:04:870 (81) - k done
02:30:770 (228,233) - d changed
03:04:970 (56,59) - ^ done
03:21:570 (126,127,128,129) - k no change
03:23:970 (133) - K done
03:50:170 (303,304) - k nochange
04:01:570 (22,24) - ^ done
04:04:170 (37) - ^ done
04:05:370 (43,44) - You can make it 1/6 stream, because it works. I doubt...
OK thanks

http://puu.sh/9EY1B/32f7441a4c.osu
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic

bbj0920 wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue.

Kantan
00:36:370 (55) - k Retained to keep it consistent to 00:39:570 (61) -
01:05:170 (5) - ^ no change because of the drop in vocal pitch .
01:57:370 (94) - K....? change 01:56:570 (93) - to K instead.
02:11:570 (117) - d k is used to map the snare.
02:28:370 (29) - k same as 01:05:170 (5) -

Futsuu
00:06:370 (9,10) - k fixed
00:22:770 (46) - ^ nope, the sound is identical to 00:22:370 (45) -
00:55:770 (119) - d Taking 00:56:170 (120,121) - into consideration, k would be fine imo.
00:56:570 (121) - k It has the same vocal pitch as 00:56:170 (120) - , so no change.
01:20:170 (44) - ^ fixed
01:44:770 (97) - D The background sound is softer than that in 01:46:370 (100) - , so d would be better.
03:06:770 (109) - k fixed

Muzukashii
00:06:370 (19) - k The instrument there has a lower pitch than 00:05:970 (17) - , so d could fit.
00:19:170 (57) - There's no slider tick at the end Umm... how to fix it? In fact I think it doesn't matter.
01:09:570 (23) - D fixed
01:50:170 (143) - k fixed
02:56:970 (119) - ^ no change. The pitch is lowest among 02:56:370 (117,118,119,120,121,122) -
03:14:370 (168) - ^ The pitch of the instrument goes down, so d is fine imo.
03:50:370 (276) - ^ no change, same pitch as 03:50:170 (275) -

Oni
00:06:370 (23) - d refer to Muzukashii
00:19:770 (76) - ^ k is fine imo, as it fits the snare.
00:22:770 (86,87) - reverse remain unchanged to keep it consistent to 00:22:370 (84) -
00:54:970 (219) - k fixed
01:44:770 (181) - D fixed
01:47:770 (191,192) - reverse The vocal at 01:47:970 (192) - is high-pitched, so no change.
02:05:170 (259,260,261,262) - k ddd would fit the song imo changed 02:05:570 (262) - as K instead.
02:46:770 (139) - Doesn't fit Why?
03:14:370 (226) - k refer to Muzukashii
03:21:870 (251) - d I'll keep the kkk first and seek further opinion.
04:02:170 - Add a note for the guitar. added d there.

Inner Oni
00:06:370 (25) - k refer to Muzukashii
00:30:470 (148) - d fixed
00:35:970 (176) - ^ k would be better for the strong cymbal
01:06:370 (19) - ^ k could fit the relatively high-pitched vocal in a way better.
01:28:570 (131) - ^ It is already a don.
01:44:570 (198) - d I keep mine here as both are okay imo.
02:01:870 (279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286) - Out of topic, this part is so great. Nice to hear that~
02:21:870 (53) - I don't think this is needed fixed
02:25:870 (69) - k I think the snares start at 02:25:970 -
02:33:170 (108) - ^ d would be better, as it has the same vocal pitch as 02:34:570 (114) -
02:38:770 (139,142) - reverse no change, as high-pitched vocal occurs at 02:39:170 (141) -
03:14:170 (258) - k pitch mapping for the vocal, no change here.
03:21:870 (293) - d same as Oni
04:05:270 (537) - k..? Do it if you want d could result in a better flow.
OK thanks Do you know how many hours did I spend for the set?

And Updated~
JUDYDANNY
Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda Taiko Moding Queue

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.
[Kantan]

  • uum,Good. Nothing to say for this time but I guess this is hard.
    Break times over divisor 2/1 are very few , and I felt density is even flat yet.

    I recommend you to change on this density. http://puu.sh/agvdI/a2747abf80.zip
    I will come again after check your response.
[Futsuu]
  1. 00:19:970 (39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - uum, I recommend to change the strategy to follow simple. These sounds little and I think its not important to follow on this density as futsuu. How about this?
  2. 00:28:370 (57) – delete?
  3. delete finisher 00:46:170 (3) –lol ,
  4. and if can, 00:45:570 (1) – too. looks hard to play as futsuu..?
  5. 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36,1) - notes>>stream , stream >>>notes sounds better as Vocal slar.but you put 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36) - notes to follow drums. So I recommend to (1) spiiner change to finisher K for decreasing uncomfortable.
  6. 01:21:370 (48) - k ?, same as 01:08:570 (15) -, 01:15:170 (32) - . kd>>dk>>kd>dk…
  7. 01:56:570 (127) – delete the finisher? , same as 1st phrase.
  8. 02:11:770 (1) – same as 1st phrase.
  9. 02:31:370 (47,48) – same as 1st phrase.
  10. 02:41:970 (68) – delete, or change k? no bass drums. sounds better than don imo.
  11. 03:12:770 (121,122,123) – delete these finishers.
  12. 03:41:770 (184,185) – change to kk?
  13. 03:49:170 (199) – add don here?
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:08:170 (4,5,6,7) - listening only 4567, weird for me this (7) k. I think the reason is k makes to cut as previous phrase atmosphere . Try to change Either suggestions?
    A. 00:07:970 (3) – change to k. can linked 00:09:170 (7) –k sound.
    B. 00:09:170 (7) – move to 00:10:170 (10) - and, 00:09:370 (7) – change k same as 00:08:570 (5) - this k.
    C. 00:09:170 (7) – delete or move to 00:10:170 (10) - , and change 00:09:570 (9) -  k.
    └――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  2. 00:20:170 (8) – delete this ?
  3. 00:32:170 (47,48,49) – kd*d >> dkdd ? or kddd?
  4. 01:01:370 (1) – same as Futsuu.
  5. 01:33:970 (98) – same as 1st phrase.
  6. 02:03:570 (181,182) - swap , same as 02:00:770 (175) – d, that follows 02:03:770 (182) - tinpani .
  7. 02:11:970 (1) – delete ?
  8. 02:57:170 (120) - k…?
  9. 03:00:370 (131) - ^?
  10. 03:10:570 (162) – add d?
  11. 03:21:170 (185,186,187) - how about additions divisor 1/2 note ? like… ddkkk
  12. 03:54:770 (291) – same as others.
[Oni]
  1. 00:12:170 (47) - add don? plays better , I guess.
  2. 00:13:770 (52) – delete? same as00:07:370 -.
  3. 00:41:770 (167) – add d? sounds not cut perfective.
  4. 01:27:170 (111,112,113,114) – ddd,k >>d,ddk ?
  5. 01:31:370 (128) - k? no bass sound.
  6. 01:41:370 (165) – add don.
  7. 01:41:770 (167) – delete?
  8. 02:00:370 (1,2,3,4) – kkd,d … uum Either?
    A. (2,3) delete?
    B. (1,2,3,4,) kkd,d >>k,ddd ?
    └――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  9. 02:04:570 (256) – add don?, feels lonely a bit.
  10. 02:41:770 (130,131) – change k?
  11. 02:56:070 (163) - k?
  12. 02:58:970 (174,175,176,177) – k,kdd> kkd,d ? how about?
  13. 03:17:770 (232) – delete ? for back sound slar.
  14. 03:21:870 (250) – delete? unnecessary imo
  15. 03:52:170 (385) - k?
[Inner Oni]
  1. 1st playing~
  2. 00:06:670 (27) - I think you can add d? for harp.
  3. 00:28:770 (140) – don?
  4. 01:01:070 (305) – add don? make up more power~.
  5. 01:03:470 (4) – add don?
  6. 01:12:770 (57) - k? or 01:12:670 (56) - ?
  7. 02:00:470 (296) – delete this? , unnecessary imo
  8. 02:02:670 (308) - ^ not sound …?
  9. 02:11:470 (355) – add don?
  10. 02:17:370 (25,26,27,28,29) - kkddk? Or kkdkk ?
  11. 02:37:570 (129,130,131,132) – ddd,k >>d,ddk ? more increasing vocal power.
  12. 02:49:570 (165,166,167) – k,d,k? just my opinion. More smoother?
  13. 03:17:570 (269) – finisher?
  14. good Inner~ :D
[Jik’s Ura Oni]
  1. 1st playing~
  2. uuum, too hard to listen... but I will do my best... ._.
  3. 00:20:170 (77,80) – delete, OOO,OOO rhythm is unnecessary imo.
  4. 00:21:670 (84) - ^?
  5. since00:33:370 (143) - ~~ . add 1/4 triplet … kkk?
  6. 00:46:770 (234) – delete the finisher, plz…
  7. 00:50:670 (251) – move 1/4 left I’m not sure that how other players feel this.but I guess sounds not good.
  8. 00:53:870 (265) -^
  9. 00:57:370 (287,288) – swap?
  10. 01:01:770 (309,310) – k sounds better.
  11. 01:12:770 (374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386) – wat..
  12. 01:14:570 (381,383) – delete? too noisy , I guess.
  13. 01:31:170 (478,479,480,481,482) – all k? same as 01:01:770 (309,310) – suggestion.
  14. 01:45:370 (1) - delete , plz…
  15. 01:49:370 (18) – add don?
  16. 01:52:570 (31) – add don?
  17. and, 01:52:370 (30) – change k? hits snare.
  18. 02:18:370 (161) - change d?
  19. 02:24:970 (195,197) – same as 1st part.
  20. 03:11:170 (88) - ~~~ 03:17:570 (110) - finisher K >>> D ? I feel this sounds low.
  21. 03:28:770 (165) - k?
  22. 03:29:370 (169) – and k?
  23. 03:42:270 (249) –delete this ? why rhythm was changed ? too hard I guess.
ok, That's all. I hope you to get rank this ><.
Good Luck! :D
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello~ :3
Here's a Taiko Mod via Juda Taiko Moding Queue

My mod is for suggetions. if you dont like, ignore please.
~Taiko~
d is Red Note.
k is Blue Note.
and, D ,K is finisher .. .
“+ ?” is I like pattern (※example→ add? , remove?
Big text is strong suggestion.
[Kantan]

  • uum,Good. Nothing to say for this time but I guess this is hard.
    Break times over divisor 2/1 are very few , and I felt density is even flat yet.

    I recommend you to change on this density. http://puu.sh/agvdI/a2747abf80.zip
    I will come again after check your response. Hmm... To be honest the Kantan is not very hard, as 2/1 breaks are everywhere. (e.g. 01:03:570 (2) - ; 01:41:170 (67) - ; 02:47:170 (58) - , etc.) Anyway, I'll seek further opinion about this.
[Futsuu]
  1. 00:19:970 (39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - uum, I recommend to change the strategy to follow simple. These sounds little and I think its not important to follow on this density as futsuu. How about this? I think 1/2 k d and d k is not very hard for Futsuu, so I would like to keep them.
  2. 00:28:370 (57) – delete? ^
  3. delete finisher 00:46:170 (3) –lol , fixed
  4. and if can, 00:45:570 (1) – too. looks hard to play as futsuu..? The stressed sound is so prominent that it cannot be ignored, so no change here.
  5. 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36,1) - notes>>stream , stream >>>notes sounds better as Vocal slar.but you put 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36) - notes to follow drums. So I recommend to (1) spiiner change to finisher K for decreasing uncomfortable. I think the spinner serves as a good transition to the kiai time and sounds good, so I would like to keep it.
  6. 01:21:370 (48) - k ?, same as 01:08:570 (15) -, 01:15:170 (32) - . kd>>dk>>kd>dk… fixed
  7. 01:56:570 (127) – delete the finisher? , same as 1st phrase. fixed
  8. 02:11:770 (1) – same as 1st phrase. same as 00:59:770 (33,34,35,36,1) -
  9. 02:31:370 (47,48) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
  10. 02:41:970 (68) – delete, or change k? no bass drums. sounds better than don imo. changed to k.
  11. 03:12:770 (121,122,123) – delete these finishers. no change, as they need to be emphasized.
  12. 03:41:770 (184,185) – change to kk? changed to d k.
  13. 03:49:170 (199) – add don here? It sounds good, fixed.
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:08:170 (4,5,6,7) - listening only 4567, weird for me this (7) k. I think the reason is k makes to cut as previous phrase atmosphere . Try to change Either suggestions? Applied option A+C
    A. 00:07:970 (3) – change to k. can linked 00:09:170 (7) –k sound.
    B. 00:09:170 (7) – move to 00:10:170 (10) - and, 00:09:370 (7) – change k same as 00:08:570 (5) - this k.
    C. 00:09:170 (7) – delete or move to 00:10:170 (10) - , and change 00:09:570 (9) -  k.
    └――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  2. 00:20:170 (8) – delete this ? fixed
  3. 00:32:170 (47,48,49) – kd*d >> dkdd ? or kddd? changed 00:32:770 (99) - as k instead.
  4. 01:01:370 (1) – same as Futsuu. refer to the explanation in Futsuu.
  5. 01:33:970 (98) – same as 1st phrase. fixed
  6. 02:03:570 (181,182) - swap , same as 02:00:770 (175) – d, that follows 02:03:770 (182) - tinpani . fixed
  7. 02:11:970 (1) – delete ? refer to the explanation in Futsuu.
  8. 02:57:170 (120) - k…? fixed
  9. 03:00:370 (131) - ^? ^
  10. 03:10:570 (162) – add d? fixed
  11. 03:21:170 (185,186,187) - how about additions divisor 1/2 note ? like… ddkkk It sounds good, fixed
  12. 03:54:770 (291) – same as others. fixed using option A.
[Oni]
  1. 00:12:170 (47) - add don? plays better , I guess. fixed
  2. 00:13:770 (52) – delete? same as 00:07:370 -. fixed
  3. 00:41:770 (167) – add d? sounds not cut perfective. fixed
  4. 01:27:170 (111,112,113,114) – ddd,k >>d,ddk ? fixed
  5. 01:31:370 (128) - k? no bass sound. It seems to be fine, fixed.
  6. 01:41:370 (165) – add don. fixed
  7. 01:41:770 (167) – delete? ^
  8. 02:00:370 (1,2,3,4) – kkd,d … uum Either? Applied option B.
    A. (2,3) delete?
    B. (1,2,3,4,) kkd,d >>k,ddd ?
    └――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
  9. 02:04:570 (256) – add don?, feels lonely a bit. fixed
  10. 02:41:770 (130,131) – change k? remain unchanged, k d d k suits the vocal pitch.
  11. 02:56:070 (163) - k? fixed
  12. 02:58:970 (174,175,176,177) – k,kdd> kkd,d ? how about? fixed
  13. 03:17:770 (232) – delete ? for back sound slar. fixed
  14. 03:21:870 (250) – delete? unnecessary imo fixed
  15. 03:52:170 (385) - k? fixed
[Inner Oni]
  1. 1st playing~
  2. 00:06:670 (27) - I think you can add d? for harp. fixed
  3. 00:28:770 (140) – don? no change, as the sound is similar to 00:25:970 (125,126) -
  4. 01:01:070 (305) – add don? make up more power~. fixed
  5. 01:03:470 (4) – add don? fixed
  6. 01:12:770 (57) - k? or 01:12:670 (56) - ? changed the former.
  7. 02:00:470 (296) – delete this? , unnecessary imo fixed
  8. 02:02:670 (308) - ^ not sound …? Nope. It pairs with 02:01:870 (303,304) - so that the patterns could be more balanced.
  9. 02:11:470 (355) – add don? fixed
  10. 02:17:370 (25,26,27,28,29) - kkddk? Or kkdkk ? changed to kkddk.
  11. 02:37:570 (129,130,131,132) – ddd,k >>d,ddk ? more increasing vocal power. fixed
  12. 02:49:570 (165,166,167) – k,d,k? just my opinion. More smoother? Comparing 02:48:770 (164,166) - , 166 is higher-pitched than 164, so d k d is preferred.
  13. 03:17:570 (269) – finisher? fixed
  14. good Inner~ :DNice to hear that~ :D

ok, That's all. I hope you to get rank this ><.
Good Luck! :D
Thanks for your mod JuDa~ :)
Q____X
Hello again here's my poor mod again

the diff it's fine
00:09:201 - d
00:15:570 - ^
00:51:970 (112) - D
02:02:370 (138) - D
00:57:370 - d
00:57:570 (173) - move to 00:57:770 -
01:33:170 - d
01:34:970 - d
02:07:770 - d
02:07:970 (197) - move to 02:08:170 -
03:56:170 - d
03:56:170 - d
01:37:470 - maybe d

Good luck :)
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic

Q____X wrote:

Hello again here's my poor mod again

the diff it's fine
00:09:201 - d Leaving a break here would be better.
00:15:570 - ^ ^
00:51:970 (112) - D As cymbal sound is absent, d is enough imo.
02:02:370 (138) - D ^
00:57:370 - d fixed
00:57:570 (173) - move to 00:57:770 - fixed
01:33:170 - d No change for the sake of pattern consistency.
01:34:970 - d ^
02:07:770 - d fixed
02:07:970 (197) - move to 02:08:170 - fixed
03:56:170 - d No change for the sake of pattern consistency.
03:56:170 - d It is already a don.
01:37:470 - maybe d no change, as I want to make this Oni easier.

Good luck :)
Thanks for your mod~ :)
Jikson[m9]

JUDYDANNY wrote:

[Jik’s Ura Oni]
  1. 1st playing~
  2. uuum, too hard to listen... but I will do my best... ._.
  3. 00:20:170 (77,80) – delete, OOO,OOO rhythm is unnecessary imo.
  4. 00:21:670 (84) - ^?
  5. since00:33:370 (143) - ~~ . add 1/4 triplet … kkk?
  6. 00:46:770 (234) – delete the finisher, plz…
  7. 00:50:670 (251) – move 1/4 left I’m not sure that how other players feel this.but I guess sounds not good.
  8. 00:53:870 (265) -^
  9. 00:57:370 (287,288) – swap?
  10. 01:01:770 (309,310) – k sounds better.
  11. 01:12:770 (374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386) – wat..
  12. 01:14:570 (381,383) – delete? too noisy , I guess.
  13. 01:31:170 (478,479,480,481,482) – all k? same as 01:01:770 (309,310) – suggestion.
  14. 01:45:370 (1) - delete , plz…
  15. 01:49:370 (18) – add don?
  16. 01:52:570 (31) – add don?
  17. and, 01:52:370 (30) – change k? hits snare.
  18. 02:18:370 (161) - change d?
  19. 02:24:970 (195,197) – same as 1st part.
  20. 03:11:170 (88) - ~~~ 03:17:570 (110) - finisher K >>> D ? I feel this sounds low.
  21. 03:28:770 (165) - k?
  22. 03:29:370 (169) – and k?
  23. 03:42:270 (249) –delete this ? why rhythm was changed ? too hard I guess.
ok, That's all. I hope you to get rank this ><.
Good Luck! :D
Almost all fixed, except some was changed in my own way to meet the mod. Thx for mod!

http://puu.sh/bd7A1/63d62c8365.osu
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic
Updated!
K-2
Hi~
I'm Lunaris Filia, mapping beginner 8-)
I will do my best 8-)

00:09:570 d k d k
00:53:170 d k d k d
03:36:770 k
How about moving 00:08:770 -> 00:08:570? (I think it sounds suitably)
00:30:770 k d k (I think snare sound is appropriate)
01:33:370 d
01:33:570 delete
01:33:770 d (I think it sounds suitably)
01:39:170 k d k k or k d d k ?
02:18:770 d
02:37:370 k
03:14:170 k (I think snare sound is appropriate)
03:14:770 d
00:15:170 delete
00:15:370 k d k d kkd ?
01:11:770 d
01:11:970 move to 01:12:170
01:44:770 I think this spinner is too short.
02:47:970 k

u's is so great!
Septembre
Oni : 00:08:170 (31) - out of rythm I think
and maybe add note here : 00:08:370 (32) -

No kudo
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic
Finally managed to revive the map. This set will be reduced to a 5-difficulty one after readjustment of difficulty spread.
_todestrieb
Wow I remember modding this mapset. Why isn't it not ranked yet?
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic

Lunaris Filia wrote:

Hi~
I'm Lunaris Filia, mapping beginner 8-)
I will do my best 8-)

00:09:570 d k d k fixed
00:53:170 d k d k d changed to d k d k k instead.
03:36:770 k fixed
00:15:170 delete
00:15:370 k d k d kkd ?
01:11:770 d
01:11:970 move to 01:12:170
01:44:770 I think this spinner is too short. fixed
02:47:970 k fixed

u's is so great!
Thanks for your mod~ :)

Septembre wrote:

Oni : 00:08:170 (31) - out of rythm I think There is a sound.
and maybe add note here : 00:08:370 (32) -

No kudo
Thanks for the check~
neonat
Kantan

I think reducing the amount of finishes here in this difficulty would be better, especially the more denser areas, where there are consecutive 1/1 beats instead 1.5~2 beats apart, but other than that I felt that you should have had those impacts and finishes on 01:09:570 (9) - 02:19:970 (9) - 03:01:570 (59) - 03:30:370 (99) - instead

Futsuu

00:09:570 (16) - shift to 00:09:370
00:15:970 (30) - shift to 00:15:770 - it lands better on the music here
01:20:970 (44) - k instead?
01:34:370 (70) - shift to 01:34:170
01:40:770 (84) - ^
03:01:570 (92) - finish
03:55:170 (203) - shift to 03:54:970
04:01:570 (217) - ^

Muzukashii

00:31:570 (96,97,98,99,100,101) - try dk k kd k, I think that works nicer

Oni

03:02:770 (197) - d instead?

Inner Oni

00:08:570 - should have an object here like a d so that the rhythm here does not feel incomplete, the rest of the song you made it along with the music, but this part feels detached
00:15:170 (50) - shift to 00:15:370 and it can either be d or k
00:27:170 (110) - change to k, have it differ from 00:26:770 (109)
01:22:370 (430) - finish?
02:09:370 (110) - I don't think the finish should be here, rather it should be at 02:08:770 (107)
02:32:770 (246) - finish?
03:43:170 (260) - ^


Good Luck
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic

neonat wrote:

Kantan

I think reducing the amount of finishes here in this difficulty would be better, especially the more denser areas, where there are consecutive 1/1 beats instead 1.5~2 beats apart, but other than that I felt that you should have had those impacts and finishes on 01:09:570 (9) - 02:19:970 (9) - 03:01:570 (59) - 03:30:370 (99) - instead Rearranged the use of finishes accordingly.

Futsuu

00:09:570 (16) - shift to 00:09:370 Hmm... I think the current position could result in a smoother flow.
00:15:970 (30) - shift to 00:15:770 - it lands better on the music here ^
01:20:970 (44) - k instead? Too many kats would lower the impact of the current ones, so it would be better to keep it as don.
01:34:370 (70) - shift to 01:34:170 same as 00:09:570 (16) -
01:40:770 (84) - ^ ^
03:01:570 (92) - finish fixed
03:55:170 (203) - shift to 03:54:970 same as 00:09:570 (16) -
04:01:570 (217) - ^ ^

Muzukashii

00:31:570 (96,97,98,99,100,101) - try dk k kd k, I think that works nicer The current pattern could follow the changes of vocal pitch in a way better imo.

Oni

03:02:770 (197) - d instead? fixed

Checking on behalf of Jikson as authorized.

Inner Oni

00:08:570 - should have an object here like a d so that the rhythm here does not feel incomplete, the rest of the song you made it along with the music, but this part feels detached Retained for break consistency as 00:07:770 -
00:15:170 (50) - shift to 00:15:370 and it can either be d or k fixed
00:27:170 (110) - change to k, have it differ from 00:26:770 (109) It would be better to keep the note consistent to the previous 00:23:970 (94) -
01:22:370 (430) - finish? fixed
02:09:370 (110) - I don't think the finish should be here, rather it should be at 02:08:770 (107) fixed
02:32:770 (246) - finish? fixed
03:43:170 (260) - ^ ^


Good Luck
Thanks for your mod~ :)
_Meep_
wish i can gd standard ;(
JUDYDANNY
Hello, Requested to check the oldest map via M4M.

  • Inner Oni needs more improvement and consistency… orz
 

  • | >> Little question and small suggestion.
    :idea: >> idea lol
  1. >> Normal suggestion.
    Big text >> Strong suggestion.
    :?: >> Questionable imo.
    :!: >>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
    No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.
 or JUST MY OPINION.

[Timing]

  • Maybe rise up more +10%.
    Vocal and accompaniment sounds loud.


[Kantan]
  1. 00:59:770 (75,76,77,1) - how about? spinner > finish seems better with vocal finish ww.

    • 1. 00:59:770 (75,76,77) - remove
      2. 01:01:370 (1) - move to 00:59:770 - .
      3. 01:01:370 - add note with finish!! and rise up the volume (80%?)
      http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7384495
  2. 02:10:170 (90,91,92,1) - same

    If you agree, try to reconsider other diffs too.

[Futsuu]
  1. 03:13:770 - add k? seems lack of hit sound and the 2nd similar patterns appeared them.
  2. 03:14:170 - ^? or 03:17:370 - remove?
  3. 03:18:170 (129) - , 03:19:770 - try to move ½ right (or 3/2 left?) . it seems better with play on-beat( white-tick lines).

    :idea: 00:22:370 (44,45,46) - , 00:33:570 (68,69,70) - only twice appeared 1/2 -triplet, but I think you can add more (to adjust the sounds pressure).
    1. 00:10:170 - add k , 00:16:570 - add d ? to enhance the trumpet.
    2. 01:34:970 - , 01:41:370 - ^
    3. 03:55:770 - , 04:02:170 - ^
    4. 00:48:170 - add d? the role is like 00:33:570 (68,69,70) - .
    5. 01:58:570 - ^?
    6. 03:10:570 - ^?

[Muzukashii]
  1. 03:50:270 - try add d? to enhance the more drum rolls.
  2. 00:12:770 (39,40) - not K only? if changed , 00:12:170 - how about add d too?
  3. 01:37:570 (116,117) - ^

[Oni]

  • Seems ok to me.


[Inner Oni]
  1. 00:03:370 - change to d? to different sound with back-sound appeared.
  2. 00:09:470 - remove?
  3. 00:10:170 - add k?
  4. 00:22:170 (85,86,87) - maybe change to k-dd ,and 00:22:770 - change to k seems better with plays pitch.
  5. 00:23:070 (90,91) - kd? 00:23:170 (91,92,93) - k-d-d seems … weired with vocal
  6. 00:38:670 - remove? feel a bit over.
  7. 00:41:870 (199,200) - dk? 00:41:970 (200,201) - k-d seems better with guitar tone.
  8. 00:46:970 - D? any sounds pitch are different from 00:45:570 - ,00:46:170 - .
  9. 01:00:770 - d seems better to make a balance with bass.
  10. 01:02:870 - maybe not bad to add k?
  11. 01:15:670 - ^
  12. 01:04:770 - k? not lower vocal pitch.
  13. 01:20:970 - change to d to make a balance? (different the sounds with any accompaniment sounds and vocals)
  14. 01:21:370 - ^?
  15. 01:23:770 - k the linked with 01:22:170 (430) - on vocal.
  16. 01:29:770 - maybe not bad to add k to make the smoother.
  17. 01:31:170 (483,484) - change to d? different from 2nd kiai colors. seems weird...uum..;;

    JUDYDANNY wrote:

    • No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.
     or JUST MY OPINION.
  18. 02:13:270 - add k?
  19. 02:15:170 - change k?
  20. 02:26:070 - add k?
  21. 02:31:370 (239,241) - change to d?
  22. 02:34:170 - change to k?
  23. 02:41:970 (305,306) - change to k?
  24. 02:51:370 - remove ? feel a bit over.
  25. 02:57:170 - add k , 02:57:870 - move to 02:57:470 - , 02:57:670 - add k?
    seems monotone ¼-triples, instrumental needs to make more variation imo.
  26. and, 03:00:370 - add k , 03:00:570 - ~~~ make the 1/4 -5plot d-kkddk?
  27. and, 03:03:570 - add k, 03:03:870 - add d, 03:04:270 - change to k?
  28. 03:17:570 - change to normal d same as 03:19:170 - .
  29. 03:25:570 - change to k?
  30. 03:28:770 - change to d?
  31. 03:36:470 - add k.
  32. 03:41:770 (256) - ,03:42:170 - change to d.
  33. 03:44:570 - change to k?
  34. 03:52:370 (326,327) - change to k?
  35. 03:55:970 - make a shorter spinner and , add ¼ triple ddd, same as Intro.
  36. 03:56:770 - , 03:57:570 - ,same.
  37. 03:58:170 - , 03:58:570 - add d. same as Intro.
  38. 04:00:370 (22,23,24,25) - change to ddk-”remove”. same as Intro.

Good luck (¦3[___]
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic
Applying the mod on behalf of Jikson as he became inactive.

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello, Requested to check the oldest map via M4M.

  • Inner Oni needs more improvement and consistency… orz
 

  • | >> Little question and small suggestion.
    :idea: >> idea lol
  1. >> Normal suggestion.
    Big text >> Strong suggestion.
    :?: >> Questionable imo.
    :!: >>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
    No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.
 or JUST MY OPINION.

[Timing]

  • Maybe rise up more +10%.
    Vocal and accompaniment sounds loud. Done.


[Kantan]
  1. 00:59:770 (75,76,77,1) - how about? spinner > finish seems better with vocal finish ww. Hmm, I would prefer the current arrangement as the spinner could accompany the guitar starting from 01:01:370 -

    • 1. 00:59:770 (75,76,77) - remove
      2. 01:01:370 (1) - move to 00:59:770 - .
      3. 01:01:370 - add note with finish!! and rise up the volume (80%?)
      http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7384495
  2. 02:10:170 (90,91,92,1) - same -> same as ^

    If you agree, try to reconsider other diffs too.


[Futsuu]
  1. 03:13:770 - add k? seems lack of hit sound and the 2nd similar patterns appeared them. fixed
  2. 03:14:170 - ^? or 03:17:370 - remove? Applied the former.
  3. 03:18:170 (129) - , 03:19:770 - try to move ½ right (or 3/2 left?) . it seems better with play on-beat( white-tick lines). Hmm, retained to follow the vocals there.

    :idea: 00:22:370 (44,45,46) - , 00:33:570 (68,69,70) - only twice appeared 1/2 -triplet, but I think you can add more (to adjust the sounds pressure).
    1. 00:10:170 - add k , 00:16:570 - add d ? to enhance the trumpet. fixed
    2. 01:34:970 - , 01:41:370 - ^ ^
    3. 03:55:770 - , 04:02:170 - ^ ^
    4. 00:48:170 - add d? the role is like 00:33:570 (68,69,70) - . No change here for the spread.
    5. 01:58:570 - ^? ^
    6. 03:10:570 - ^? ^


[Muzukashii]
  1. 03:50:270 - try add d? to enhance the more drum rolls. fixed
  2. 00:12:770 (39,40) - not K only? if changed , 00:12:170 - how about add d too? ^
  3. 01:37:570 (116,117) - ^ ^ and fixed 03:57:570 - as well.

[Oni]

  • Seems ok to me.


[Inner Oni]
  1. 00:03:370 - change to d? to different sound with back-sound appeared. fixed
  2. 00:09:470 - remove? No change here to keep the complexity.
  3. 00:10:170 - add k? Retained to keep a consistent break like 00:10:970 and 00:11:770 -
  4. 00:22:170 (85,86,87) - maybe change to k-dd ,and 00:22:770 - change to k seems better with plays pitch. fixed
  5. 00:23:070 (90,91) - kd? 00:23:170 (91,92,93) - k-d-d seems … weired with vocal ^
  6. 00:38:670 - remove? feel a bit over. ^
  7. 00:41:870 (199,200) - dk? 00:41:970 (200,201) - k-d seems better with guitar tone. ^
  8. 00:46:970 - D? any sounds pitch are different from 00:45:570 - ,00:46:170 - . ^
  9. 01:00:770 - d seems better to make a balance with bass. ^
  10. 01:02:870 - maybe not bad to add k? fixed
  11. 01:15:670 - ^ I guess he wanted to keep the triplet dynamic, but fixed to make it more interesting to play.
  12. 01:04:770 - k? not lower vocal pitch. fixed
  13. 01:20:970 - change to d to make a balance? (different the sounds with any accompaniment sounds and vocals) ^
  14. 01:21:370 - ^? ^
  15. 01:23:770 - k the linked with 01:22:170 (430) - on vocal. ^
  16. 01:29:770 - maybe not bad to add k to make the smoother. ^
  17. 01:31:170 (483,484) - change to d? different from 2nd kiai colors. seems weird...uum..;; I think this is due to the difference in lyrics. Fixed.

    JUDYDANNY wrote:

    • No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.
     or JUST MY OPINION.
  18. 02:13:270 - add k? fixed
  19. 02:15:170 - change k? ^
  20. 02:26:070 - add k? same as 01:15:670 -
  21. 02:31:370 (239,241) - change to d? fixed
  22. 02:34:170 - change to k? ^
  23. 02:41:970 (305,306) - change to k? ^
  24. 02:51:370 - remove ? feel a bit over. ^
  25. 02:57:170 - add k , 02:57:870 - move to 02:57:470 - , 02:57:670 - add k?
    seems monotone ¼-triples, instrumental needs to make more variation imo. Nice.
  26. and, 03:00:370 - add k , 03:00:570 - ~~~ make the 1/4 -5plot d-kkddk? ^
  27. and, 03:03:570 - add k, 03:03:870 - add d, 03:04:270 - change to k? ^
  28. 03:17:570 - change to normal d same as 03:19:170 - . Done.
  29. 03:25:570 - change to k? fixed
  30. 03:28:770 - change to d? ^
  31. 03:36:470 - add k. same as 01:15:670 -
  32. 03:41:770 (256) - ,03:42:170 - change to d. fixed
  33. 03:44:570 - change to k? ^
  34. 03:52:370 (326,327) - change to k? ^
  35. 03:55:970 - make a shorter spinner and , add ¼ triple ddd, same as Intro. ^
  36. 03:56:770 - , 03:57:570 - ,same. ^
  37. 03:58:170 - , 03:58:570 - add d. same as Intro. ^
  38. 04:00:370 (22,23,24,25) - change to ddk-”remove”. same as Intro. Okay.

Good luck (¦3[___]
Thanks for your mod JuDa~ :)
JUDYDANNY
Rererecheck inner.
  1. 00:10:170 - suggest to add k...? its too closed.

    About 01:46:370 - ~ 01:59:170 - comparing with 00:35:970 - ~ 00:48:770 - ,
    Its too airy dense.

    1. 01:46:970 - , 01:47:770 - , add k the gap with 1st.
    2. 01:48:170 - add 1/4 triple ddk, same reason.
    3. 01:48:770 - change to d,01:49:070 - move to 01:48:670 - ? same reason.
    4. 01:49:370 - change k? small suggestion, plays better imo.
    1. 01:50:170 - add k , 01:50:970 - add d? same reason.
    2. 01:51:370 - add 1/4 triple.....ddk or kkk?
    1. 01:53:370 - , 01:54:170 - add k,
    2. 01:54:370 - change to d, 01:54:570 - add 1/4 triple ddk.
    3. 01:55:470 - remove and ,01:54:970 - add 1/4 triple... dkddd like 1st.
    4. 01:55:770 - change k, 01:56:270 - add k, 01:56:770 - remove? like 1st?
  2. 00:45:470 (60,61) - change to...(remove, finisher)?
  3. 02:08:570 - add k, same 1st. and 02:08:270 - add k too? just small suggestion but it looks a bit bored 1/2 kkkk.
  4. 02:10:970 - add d, 02:11:170 - change to k? to make a similar dense like 1st. Its following the guitar...? maybe?
  5. 02:11:570 - change to k? the drum.. percussion sounds up.
  6. 02:09:570 (5,6,7,8) - maybe change to 5plet ddkkd seems better?
    •  ※1st 00:59:370 (6,7,8) - k-d-k → 01:00:970 (14,15,16) - kkd
       ※2nd 02:09:570 (5,6,7,8,9) - ddkkd→ 02:11:370 (15,16,17) - ddk
  7. 01:10:470 - , 02:20:870 - add d? 3times 1/4 seems a bit bored, Its needed more power imo.
  8. 01:20:070 - , 02:30:470 - add d? same.

  9. 02:39:170 (170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180) - prefer imo the colors lol,
    http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7676908
  10. 03:49:770 - add d, 03:50:570 - add k , 03:50:970 (325,326) - change kk? same reason, and drums sounds noisy. It needs more power.

  11. 02:53:570 (1) - maybe seems better to put the circles.
    how about"K-dK-dK" ?
    http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7676869

  12. 03:10:970 - remove and from 03:10:370 - ,add 1/2 triple KDD?
  13. 03:11:170 (96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117) -
    This is not enough to following the accompaniment . Suggest to no use the finish and focus the vocal?
    1. @Finishers: change to normal?
    2. @some kats: change to don?
      e.g. 03:11:370 - ,03:12:770 (102,103,104) - , 03:14:370 - , 03:15:970 - ?
  14. 03:18:770 - add d? the different sounds snare.
  15. 03:21:170 (133,134,135,136,137) - kkdkk? build up to next K-K-K.
  16. 03:23:770 - add d...? maybe it plays better as single diff imo,
  17. 03:31:270 - , 03:40:870 - add d? same reason 01:10:470 - , 02:20:870 - .
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Rererecheck inner.
  1. 00:10:170 - suggest to add k...? its too closed. Remain unchanged to keep it consistent with the stand alone ddd k at 01:35:170 and 03:55:970 -

    About 01:46:370 - ~ 01:59:170 - comparing with 00:35:970 - ~ 00:48:770 - ,
    Its too airy dense. Agreed.

    1. 01:46:970 - , 01:47:770 - , add k the gap with 1st.
    2. 01:48:170 - add 1/4 triple ddk, same reason.
    3. 01:48:770 - change to d,01:49:070 - move to 01:48:670 - ? same reason.
    4. 01:49:370 - change k? small suggestion, plays better imo.
    1. 01:50:170 - add k , 01:50:970 - add d? same reason.
    2. 01:51:370 - add 1/4 triple.....ddk or kkk?
    1. 01:53:370 - , 01:54:170 - add k,
    2. 01:54:370 - change to d, 01:54:570 - add 1/4 triple ddk.
    3. 01:55:470 - remove and ,01:54:970 - add 1/4 triple... dkddd like 1st.
    4. 01:55:770 - change k, 01:56:270 - add k, 01:56:770 - remove? like 1st? fixed
  2. 00:45:470 (60,61) - change to...(remove, finisher)?
  3. 02:08:570 - add k, same 1st. and 02:08:270 - add k too? just small suggestion but it looks a bit bored 1/2 kkkk.
  4. 02:10:970 - add d, 02:11:170 - change to k? to make a similar dense like 1st. Its following the guitar...? maybe?
  5. 02:11:570 - change to k? the drum.. percussion sounds up.
  6. 02:09:570 (5,6,7,8) - maybe change to 5plet ddkkd seems better?
    •  ※1st 00:59:370 (6,7,8) - k-d-k → 01:00:970 (14,15,16) - kkd
       ※2nd 02:09:570 (5,6,7,8,9) - ddkkd→ 02:11:370 (15,16,17) - ddk
  7. 01:10:470 - , 02:20:870 - add d? 3times 1/4 seems a bit bored, Its needed more power imo.
  8. 01:20:070 - , 02:30:470 - add d? same.

  9. 02:39:170 (170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180) - prefer imo the colors lol,
    http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7676908 Done
  10. 03:49:770 - add d, 03:50:570 - add k , 03:50:970 (325,326) - change kk? same reason, and drums sounds noisy. It needs more power.

  11. 02:53:570 (1) - maybe seems better to put the circles.
    how about"K-dK-dK" ? fixed
    http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7676869

  12. 03:10:970 - remove and from 03:10:370 - ,add 1/2 triple KDD? Changed something different to focus on the vocal and add variation.
  13. 03:11:170 (96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117) -
    This is not enough to following the accompaniment . Suggest to no use the finish and focus the vocal?
    1. @Finishers: change to normal?
    2. @some kats: change to don?
      e.g. 03:11:370 - ,03:12:770 (102,103,104) - , 03:14:370 - , 03:15:970 - ?
  14. 03:18:770 - add d? the different sounds snare.
  15. 03:21:170 (133,134,135,136,137) - kkdkk? build up to next K-K-K. Good idea.
  16. 03:23:770 - add d...? maybe it plays better as single diff imo,
  17. 03:31:270 - , 03:40:870 - add d? same reason 01:10:470 - , 02:20:870 - .
Almost fixed with some additional changes to make the flow smoother. Thanks again :3
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply