forum

DJ Shimamura ft. Yukacco - Movin' Shadow

posted
Total Posts
39
show more
Chloe
Hi there~ as your requested

Only a lazy mod, sry ;_;

[Yukecco]

  • HP-1?
  1. 00:00:142 (1) - x 148 y 93 for a better design
  2. 00:17:627 (7,8) - how about stack with 00:16:599 (1,2) - ?
  3. 00:54:484 (7) - delete
  4. 00:59:970 (9) - ^
  5. 01:42:656 (5) - stack like 01:41:627 (1,3) -
  6. 01:54:656 (2,3,4) - increase the ds for a better readable
  7. 02:35:113 (4,5,6,7,8) - umm, it's an unperfect pentagram
If you use offset stacks in insane diff ,I think it would be more funny! Good luck <3.
Topic Starter
Kecco

Chloe wrote:

[Yukecco]
  1. 01:42:656 (5) - stack like 01:41:627 (1,3) -
  2. 02:35:113 (4,5,6,7,8) - umm, it's an unperfect pentagram
Fixed these two.
Distant years
from splorg q :3

  • [Norkecco]
  1. 00:04:256 (3) - move this to x:164 y:156 to make perfect blanket pls
  2. 00:22:084 (5) - NC?
  3. 00:34:427 (2) - move this a little to the left (2 grids or so) so it doesn't touch 00:33:056 (1) -
  4. 00:39:913 (2) - ^ but move it to the right
  5. 01:40:256 (2) - this overlap is pretty ugly, I'd do something like this (http://puu.sh/3SRBP.jpg)
  6. 02:03:913 (2) - I'd make this slider like this (http://puu.sh/3SRKz.jpg) so it blankets the circle and everything becomes prettier
  7. 02:11:799 (1) - blanket pls and fix the other slider ofc (http://puu.sh/3SRN8.jpg)
  • [Hakecco]
    General: doesnt this seem a bit hard for a hard? make less jumps maybe cus this seems a bit hard for me
  1. 00:21:056 (2) - ctrlg? would flow better
  2. 00:38:199 (1) - remove NC
  3. 00:38:542 (1) - NC
  4. 00:58:084 (2) - ctrlg? would flow better
  5. 00:58:770 (4) - ^? and make it into something like this (http://puu.sh/3SSaI.jpg)
  6. 01:09:056 (2) - , 01:09:742 (4) - and 01:10:427 (6) - ctrl g these? would flow betterrr
  7. 01:15:227 (5) - ^
  8. 01:17:284 (2) - ^
  9. 01:18:313 (1) - ^
  10. 01:18:999 (3) - ^
  11. 01:19:342 (4) - ^
  12. 02:02:199 (1) - ^
  13. 02:05:284 (2) - ^
  14. 02:15:570 (4) - make this into something like (http://puu.sh/3SSpM.jpg) so it follows the pattern better
  15. 02:37:513 (3) - and 02:38:199 (5) - ctrlg for flow?
  16. 03:48:142 (2) - ^
  17. 03:50:199 (1) - doesn't need NC imo
  • [Yukecco]
  1. 00:38:199 (1) - remove NC
  2. 00:38:542 (3) - NC
  3. 01:27:142 (2) - this note isnt necessary imo.
  4. 01:32:370 (2) - ctrlg?
  5. 03:05:284 (9) - ugly
  6. 03:50:199 (1,1,1,1,1) - unnecessary NC spam
Good luck~
Topic Starter
Kecco

nouk wrote:

from splorg q :3

  • [Norkecco]
  1. 00:04:256 (3) - move this to x:164 y:156 to make perfect blanket pls
  2. 00:22:084 (5) - NC?
  3. 00:34:427 (2) - move this a little to the left (2 grids or so) so it doesn't touch 00:33:056 (1) -
  4. 00:39:913 (2) - ^ but move it to the right
  5. 01:40:256 (2) - this overlap is pretty ugly, I'd do something like this (http://puu.sh/3SRBP.jpg)
  6. 02:03:913 (2) - I'd make this slider like this (http://puu.sh/3SRKz.jpg) so it blankets the circle and everything becomes prettier
  7. 02:11:799 (1) - blanket pls and fix the other slider ofc (http://puu.sh/3SRN8.jpg)
Everything fixed

  • [Hakecco]
    General: doesnt this seem a bit hard for a hard? make less jumps maybe cus this seems a bit hard for me It's a light Insane, it isn't a Hard but is indeed a lot easier than the Insane diff.
  1. 00:21:056 (2) - ctrlg? would flow better Fixed
  2. 00:38:199 (1) - remove NC
  3. 00:38:542 (1) - NC
  4. 00:58:084 (2) - ctrlg? would flow better
  5. 00:58:770 (4) - ^? and make it into something like this (http://puu.sh/3SSaI.jpg)
  6. 01:09:056 (2) - , 01:09:742 (4) - and 01:10:427 (6) - ctrl g these? would flow betterrr
  7. 01:15:227 (5) - ^
  8. 01:17:284 (2) - ^
  9. 01:18:313 (1) - ^
  10. 01:18:999 (3) - ^
  11. 01:19:342 (4) - ^
  12. 02:02:199 (1) - ^
  13. 02:05:284 (2) - ^
  14. 02:15:570 (4) - make this into something like (http://puu.sh/3SSpM.jpg) so it follows the pattern better
  15. 02:37:513 (3) - and 02:38:199 (5) - ctrlg for flow?
  16. 03:48:142 (2) - ^
  17. 03:50:199 (1) - doesn't need NC imo
Fixed everything except the last one

  • [Yukecco]
  1. 00:38:199 (1) - remove NC Fixed
  2. 00:38:542 (3) - NC Fixed
  3. 01:27:142 (2) - this note isnt necessary imo. No, sorry.
  4. 01:32:370 (2) - ctrlg? Fixed
  5. 03:05:284 (9) - ugly I like it.
  6. 03:50:199 (1,1,1,1,1) - unnecessary NC spam
Meh, if the BATs have some problems with it I'm gonna fix it.

Good luck~
Alarido
Ciao Kecco ^^
Free Mod dalla Coffee Party Queue -- ROUND VI

Legenda wrote:

:!: → Cose Unrankable, deve fissare
:?: → I miei dubbi umani, cose da considerare
: Idea: → Consigli e suggerimenti per rendere tuo map migliore
♥ → Saluti
* → soli commenti, non mods
Linee semplice → Mods
* No hai nessuna cosa sbagliata qui.

[Norkecco]
01:42:313 (2) - Fai questo mai perfetto, fai il secondo nodo del slider stare a x:92 y:68
01:45:742 (4) - Stessa cosa qui, fai il secondo nodo stare a x:4 y:304
02:09:742 (2) - Fai questo slider mai perfetto >> http://puu.sh/3TavY.jpg
02:23:799 (2) - Fai la nota stare a x:204 y:284 per una perfetta spaziatura ^^
02:52:942 (1,2,3,4) - Fai un migliore pattern qui >> http://puu.sh/3TaDY.jpg
03:42:313 (1,2) - Un migliore pattern qui >> http://puu.sh/3TaJN.jpg

[Hakecco]
♥ Buono!

[Yukecco]
♥ Meraviglioso ^^
♥ 03:50:199 (1,1,1,1,1) - Bello

Tuo map è più bello !!!! C'è un capolavoro di Lei

Buona Fortuna per raggiungere il ranking de tuo map ^^

Prendete una stellina!

Att.
Topic Starter
Kecco
Aggiustato tutto tranne questo.

Alarido wrote:

02:52:942 (1,2,3,4) - Fai un migliore pattern qui >> http://puu.sh/3TaDY.jpg
Grazie mille per il tuo mod! :3
Marcin
[General]

  • Hello mister butthurt :33333333
  1. Please, crop / resize your background to be either 1024x768 (4:3, standard) or 1366x768 (16:9, widescreen)
  2. Isn't there any better audio other than 128 kb/s with fade in at the start? I believe there is, try and find one.
  3. While trying to find you better audio, I spot that title is incorrect - please fix that according to his (official?) soundcloud https://soundcloud.com/djshimamura/dj-s ... -yukacco-6
  4. Add "drum and bass" to tags. And maybe, every tag on the soundcloud link up there.
NVERMIND, IT'S TOO FUCKING HOT TO DO ANYTHING, I'LL EDIT THIS POST TOMORROW OKAY?
Topic Starter
Kecco

Marcin wrote:

[General]

  • Hello mister butthurt :33333333
  1. Please, crop / resize your background to be either 1024x768 (4:3, standard) or 1366x768 (16:9, widescreen)
  2. Isn't there any better audio other than 128 kb/s with fade in at the start? I believe there is, try and find one.
  3. While trying to find you better audio, I spot that title is incorrect - please fix that according to his (official?) soundcloud https://soundcloud.com/djshimamura/dj-s ... -yukacco-6
  4. Add "drum and bass" to tags. And maybe, every tag on the soundcloud link up there.
NVERMIND, IT'S TOO FUCKING HOT TO DO ANYTHING, I'LL EDIT THIS POST TOMORROW OKAY?

Done!
sheela
[Yukecco]
01:07:579 (3) - y:288
01:07:922 (4) - y:276
01:08:950 (3) - y:68
01:09:293 (4) - y:80 so they look the same
01:26:779 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Move it to x:356 y:108 for the distance.
02:15:293 (8) - Remove it? For me, it fits with the music.
02:16:150 (3) - x:76

[Harkecco]
02:37:236 (1) - x:408 y:96 so the circle could fit to the curve of the slider

Good Luck!
Marcin
[Eakecco]
  1. 01:26:779 (2) - Finish?
  2. 02:26:436 (1,2,3) - Are they supposed to not be symmetric? (even if intended - refrain from doing that kind of variety in easy - it simply doesn't work)
  3. 02:49:065 (2) - Missing hitsound?
  4. 03:47:350 (4,5) - same as previous - doing little bit to nothing variety doesn't make sense in easy diff due to big hit circles.
  5. 03:48:722 (1) - FINISH IT! (actually, feels empty without anything at the end)
    Good hitsounding o/
[Norkecco]
  1. AR5 OD4 Please?
  2. 00:54:379 (4,5) - Uh... I simply cannot read it, I think 1/2 stack is too much, especially that it's harder later to distinguish if later note is 1/2 or 1/1.
  3. 01:48:379 (2,3) - Is (3) supposed to be lower than (2) ? (Symmetry)
  4. 02:18:207 (1) - Missing hitsound (clap)
  5. 03:12:379 (1) - Is it supposed to be that low :(?
[Harkecco]
  1. 01:26:779 (3) - Finish :)?
  2. 01:39:465 (4,5,6,7) - Curve this stream a little? (so the start of stream will be more flow friendly iykwim)
  3. 02:12:379 (7) - Feels empty - maybe some hitsound?
  4. 03:04:836 (1,2,3,4,5) - Missing finish at this stream (and also the finish which I proposed earlier)
  5. 03:40:493 (1) - ^
    Great flow
[Yukecco]
  1. 00:21:636 (1,2) - IMO remove clap at both slider ends
  2. 02:04:150 (4) - Is it really necessary to put this slider that far? It makes the next jump too hard IMO (lower distance a little bit, so player may rest before next jump series)
  3. 02:10:665 (3,4,5,6) - OH GOD, TOO MUCH ALEKS MAPS, I thought this was anti jump with 1/2 notes (that's rather suggestion) xD
    Nothing to add, for me perfect diff.
Topic Starter
Kecco

Marcin wrote:

[Eakecco]
  1. 01:26:779 (2) - Finish? Fixed
  2. 02:26:436 (1,2,3) - Are they supposed to not be symmetric? (even if intended - refrain from doing that kind of variety in easy - it simply doesn't work) Fixed the symmetry only
  3. 02:49:065 (2) - Missing hitsound? Fixed
  4. 03:47:350 (4,5) - same as previous - doing little bit to nothing variety doesn't make sense in easy diff due to big hit circles. Nope
  5. 03:48:722 (1) - FINISH IT! (actually, feels empty without anything at the end) Fixed
    Good hitsounding o/
[Norkecco]
  1. AR5 OD4 Please? Done.
  2. 00:54:379 (4,5) - Uh... I simply cannot read it, I think 1/2 stack is too much, especially that it's harder later to distinguish if later note is 1/2 or 1/1. Fixed by placing a slider.
  3. 01:48:379 (2,3) - Is (3) supposed to be lower than (2) ? (Symmetry) Fixed
  4. 02:18:207 (1) - Missing hitsound (clap) Fixed
  5. 03:12:379 (1) - Is it supposed to be that low :(? Fixed

[Harkecco]
  1. 01:26:779 (3) - Finish :)? Fixed
  2. 01:39:465 (4,5,6,7) - Curve this stream a little? (so the start of stream will be more flow friendly iykwim) Fixed
  3. 02:12:379 (7) - Feels empty - maybe some hitsound? No, I didn't place any hitsounds in this section on purpose, in every diff.
  4. 03:04:836 (1,2,3,4,5) - Missing finish at this stream (and also the finish which I proposed earlier) Fixed
  5. 03:40:493 (1) - ^ Fixed
    Great flow
[Yukecco]
  1. 00:21:636 (1,2) - IMO remove clap at both slider ends Fixed
  2. 02:04:150 (4) - Is it really necessary to put this slider that far? It makes the next jump too hard IMO (lower distance a little bit, so player may rest before next jump series) Fixed
  3. 02:10:665 (3,4,5,6) - OH GOD, TOO MUCH ALEKS MAPS, I thought this was anti jump with 1/2 notes (that's rather suggestion) xD Aleks what????
    Nothing to add, for me perfect diff.
Thank you, Marcin. <3
11t
Modkecco



[General]
01:28:836 - You could make this section a Kiai, for consistency with the section at 03:07:579 , and also since the like whole first 3/4ths of your map is completely Kiai-less and it's weird.
[Yukecco]
Wow, this is a great map.

I'm going to go light on the symmetry this time around because due to the way your map is arranged as a whole, I think forced symmetry would conflict with the more natural flow that this map exhibits.

00:17:522 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - omg ilu
These sorts of jumps are so fun and I like how you aren't using some generic polygon shape for this pattern.

00:23:007 (1,2) - This is personal preference but for me the paired notes in this section lack the impact that they have in the music. I don't think it's a spacing issue, as exaggerating the spacing here might seem too forced, and stacking them wouldn't fit the pitch change. Maybe using a more emphatic hitsound would help to add impact, though I'm not really sure what sort of hitsound you could use. This really isn't such a big deal, but I personally would've expected these notes to have a bit more oomph to them.

01:26:693 (8,1) - This looks awkward. There are other ways of creating a separation and/or adding contrast within the stream, such as varying the distance snapping, using a stack->stream pattern, etc.:
Something like this would feel very different from what you have at the moment, though.

I think the real issue is that the stream as a whole looks messy, and the pattern is straightforward and admittedly somewhat anticlimactic given all of the clever jump patterns you had building up to this. Slightly curved stream -> slightly curved stream doesn't work as well aesthetically, in my opinion, as straight stream -> curved stream or convex stream -> concave stream. But if you are going to keep this stream pattern as it is now, you should rework 01:26:093 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) anyway using Convert slider to stream... because at the moment, (6,7,8) are misaligned.

03:04:836 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Another potentially problematic stream. There's nothing wrong with the flow, it just looks awkward. The increased spacing at 03:05:436 (8,1) is somewhat unnecessary and doesn't seem to change how it plays, but it does seem to disrupt the aesthetics, and isn't entirely consistent. If you put a gap here, why not at 03:06:122 (8,9) as well, for example? Why are the streams just barely curved? And again, the end of the first 8-note stream is misaligned. See above at 01:26:693 (8,1) for some personal suggestions.

03:06:893 (2,1,2) - There's nothing wrong with this, but it feels a bit awkward for me to have hitcircle jumps like this directly after a slowed slider. How about something like this?
This sort of flow - slow curve, then straight downwards - has more impact for me personally, and the blanket makes everything look nice. If you decide to do something like this, consider increasing the SV of the second slider to something like 1.5x: not much faster than the 1.25x in the rest of the section, but enough to make things more dramatic.

Stack Fixes
Some of your stacks are messy. Note that in actual play none of this matters because of autostack spatial leniency, but I recently got yelled at by a BAT for having an imperfect stack and if you care about how your things look in the editor then whatevs, I'll just leave these here because I already went through the trouble to type them out.
  1. 00:52:836 (6) - 224,116
  2. 01:03:807 (7) - 19,18
  3. 02:02:265 (2,3) - 213,147
  4. 02:07:750 (2,3) - 208,41
  5. 03:24:550 (3) - 146,131
[Hakecco]
00:05:179 (5,6,7) - You could rearrange this so that (6) blankets (7).
.osu code
340,168,5179,2,0,P|308:148|288:104,1,80,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
424,44,5522,2,0,P|404:75|360:95,1,80,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
276,36,5865,2,0,P|309:18|357:22,1,80,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
I copied your hitsounds, and (5,6,7) are clones, as you had previously.

00:11:350 (7,8) - Aren't these a bit too close? The spacing here is inconsistent with your other blanket spacings. It looks like you sorta ran into the wall there and had to squeeze it in, but you could just move 00:10:665 (5,6,7) over to the left since the gap at 00:10:322 (4,5) doesn't seem to be any particular distance snapping, and that gives you more room.
.osu code
376,68,10665,2,0,P|400:108|396:156,1,80,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
276,244,11007,2,0,P|306:208|352:196,1,80,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
480,276,11350,2,0,P|438:254|417:210,1,80,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
496,196,11693,1,4,0:3:0:0:
384,332,11865,1,4,0:3:0:0:
496,196,12036,1,4,0:0:0:0:

00:17:179 (7) - Consider making this slider the same angle as 00:16:836 (6) . This would look neater, and be more consistent with the rest of this section, cf. 00:19:236 (1,2,3) , 00:20:950 (1,2) , etc.

00:20:950 (1,2) - And actually these aren't slanted at the same angle either; they're very slightly different. Just Ctrl+C+V+G (1) over to (2).

00:47:693 (5,6) - I know this is intentional but hhhngngngahhgr
Are you sure you don't want to blanket this somehow?

00:53:179 (5,6) - fungaaaaaaahghrwurglgl

01:39:465 (4,5,6,7) - Looks strange, and seems a bit unnecessary. I think making this straight would work just fine.

02:45:636 (1,2,3,4) - Somewhat odd; (1,2,3) follow a CCW rotation but (4) is rotated in a CW direction from (3). Plays fine but the pattern looks inconsistent, and there isn't anything particularly special about (4) in terms of the music.

02:56:607 (1,2,3,4) - You could make these patterns more symmetrical by copypasting the first slider three times and applying 60,120, and 180 degree rotations to the second, third, and fourth sliders.

03:25:407 (4) - Fix blanket; mid 399,266; end 439,183.
[Closing]
These are fantastic difficulties! The jump patterns of Yukecco are extremely fun and feel new and unique, and I really liked the way Hakecco flows as a whole. There are no outstanding problems as far as I can tell; most of the things I've pointed out in Yukecco are based on personal preferences, and Hakecco only had some minor aesthetic issues. Great work as usual!

☆~
Topic Starter
Kecco

11t wrote:

Modkecco



[General]
01:28:836 - You could make this section a Kiai, for consistency with the section at 03:07:579 , and also since the like whole first 3/4ths of your map is completely Kiai-less and it's weird. Done.
[Yukecco]
Wow, this is a great map.

I'm going to go light on the symmetry this time around because due to the way your map is arranged as a whole, I think forced symmetry would conflict with the more natural flow that this map exhibits.

00:17:522 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - omg ilu
These sorts of jumps are so fun and I like how you aren't using some generic polygon shape for this pattern. ^^

00:23:007 (1,2) - This is personal preference but for me the paired notes in this section lack the impact that they have in the music. I don't think it's a spacing issue, as exaggerating the spacing here might seem too forced, and stacking them wouldn't fit the pitch change. Maybe using a more emphatic hitsound would help to add impact, though I'm not really sure what sort of hitsound you could use. This really isn't such a big deal, but I personally would've expected these notes to have a bit more oomph to them. Added finishes on 00:23:007 (1,2) - and 00:28:493 (1,2) - in every diff, didn't add them on the following similar notes because would've have felt too repetitive, and also because there's actually the vocal in the following parts so I don't think those couple of notes need to emphasized that much.

01:26:693 (8,1) - This looks awkward. There are other ways of creating a separation and/or adding contrast within the stream, such as varying the distance snapping, using a stack->stream pattern, etc.:
Something like this would feel very different from what you have at the moment, though.

I think the real issue is that the stream as a whole looks messy, and the pattern is straightforward and admittedly somewhat anticlimactic given all of the clever jump patterns you had building up to this. Slightly curved stream -> slightly curved stream doesn't work as well aesthetically, in my opinion, as straight stream -> curved stream or convex stream -> concave stream. But if you are going to keep this stream pattern as it is now, you should rework 01:26:093 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) anyway using Convert slider to stream... because at the moment, (6,7,8) are misaligned. All I did on that stream was on purpose, like the misalignments and the "weirdness" I gave to the stream as a whole. I'd prefer to keep it as it is right now.

03:04:836 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Another potentially problematic stream. There's nothing wrong with the flow, it just looks awkward. The increased spacing at 03:05:436 (8,1) is somewhat unnecessary and doesn't seem to change how it plays, but it does seem to disrupt the aesthetics, and isn't entirely consistent. If you put a gap here, why not at 03:06:122 (8,9) as well, for example? Why are the streams just barely curved? And again, the end of the first 8-note stream is misaligned. See above at 01:26:693 (8,1) for some personal suggestions. Same reply for this. Btw I'll see what other people suggest and if necessary I'll change them.

03:06:893 (2,1,2) - There's nothing wrong with this, but it feels a bit awkward for me to have hitcircle jumps like this directly after a slowed slider. How about something like this? Broken image
This sort of flow - slow curve, then straight downwards - has more impact for me personally, and the blanket makes everything look nice. If you decide to do something like this, consider increasing the SV of the second slider to something like 1.5x: not much faster than the 1.25x in the rest of the section, but enough to make things more dramatic.

Stack Fixes
Some of your stacks are messy. Note that in actual play none of this matters because of autostack spatial leniency, but I recently got yelled at by a BAT for having an imperfect stack and if you care about how your things look in the editor then whatevs, I'll just leave these here because I already went through the trouble to type them out.
  1. 00:52:836 (6) - 224,116
  2. 01:03:807 (7) - 19,18
  3. 02:02:265 (2,3) - 213,147
  4. 02:07:750 (2,3) - 208,41
  5. 03:24:550 (3) - 146,131
Done
[Hakecco]
00:05:179 (5,6,7) - You could rearrange this so that (6) blankets (7). Fixed them in another way
.osu code
340,168,5179,2,0,P|308:148|288:104,1,80,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
424,44,5522,2,0,P|404:75|360:95,1,80,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
276,36,5865,2,0,P|309:18|357:22,1,80,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
I copied your hitsounds, and (5,6,7) are clones, as you had previously.

00:11:350 (7,8) - Aren't these a bit too close? The spacing here is inconsistent with your other blanket spacings. It looks like you sorta ran into the wall there and had to squeeze it in, but you could just move 00:10:665 (5,6,7) over to the left since the gap at 00:10:322 (4,5) doesn't seem to be any particular distance snapping, and that gives you more room. Fixed
.osu code
376,68,10665,2,0,P|400:108|396:156,1,80,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
276,244,11007,2,0,P|306:208|352:196,1,80,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
480,276,11350,2,0,P|438:254|417:210,1,80,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
496,196,11693,1,4,0:3:0:0:
384,332,11865,1,4,0:3:0:0:
496,196,12036,1,4,0:0:0:0:

00:17:179 (7) - Consider making this slider the same angle as 00:16:836 (6) . This would look neater, and be more consistent with the rest of this section, cf. 00:19:236 (1,2,3) , 00:20:950 (1,2) , etc. Fixed

00:20:950 (1,2) - And actually these aren't slanted at the same angle either; they're very slightly different. Just Ctrl+C+V+G (1) over to (2). Fixed

00:47:693 (5,6) - I know this is intentional but hhhngngngahhgr
Are you sure you don't want to blanket this somehow? Nou :<

00:53:179 (5,6) - fungaaaaaaahghrwurglgl ^ xD

01:39:465 (4,5,6,7) - Looks strange, and seems a bit unnecessary. I think making this straight would work just fine. Fixed

02:45:636 (1,2,3,4) - Somewhat odd; (1,2,3) follow a CCW rotation but (4) is rotated in a CW direction from (3). Plays fine but the pattern looks inconsistent, and there isn't anything particularly special about (4) in terms of the music. Fixed

02:56:607 (1,2,3,4) - You could make these patterns more symmetrical by copypasting the first slider three times and applying 60,120, and 180 degree rotations to the second, third, and fourth sliders. No need

03:25:407 (4) - Fix blanket; mid 399,266; end 439,183. Fixed
[Closing]
These are fantastic difficulties! The jump patterns of Yukecco are extremely fun and feel new and unique, and I really liked the way Hakecco flows as a whole. There are no outstanding problems as far as I can tell; most of the things I've pointed out in Yukecco are based on personal preferences, and Hakecco only had some minor aesthetic issues. Great work as usual!

☆~
Thank you a lot <3333
Ritzeh
<3333333 should be ranked D:
11t
Kecco where are you ;_;
this is such a good map omg
Topic Starter
Kecco
I'm here :3
Alarido
Ma... che c'e questo map fa qui senza vita?
Andiamo, fratellino! Andiamo nostra via dalla gloria !
Blueprint
Welcome back ^
Topic Starter
Kecco

Blueprint wrote:

Welcome back ^
♥ much much love
Blueprint
I hope to see this ranked in some months ^^ just curious do you plan on full remapping it or leaving it the way it is with a few changes I love it the way it is :)

Topic Starter
Kecco

Blueprint wrote:

I hope to see this ranked in some months ^^ just curious do you plan on full remapping it or leaving it the way it is with a few changes I love it the way it is :)

I'll leave it as it is :3
riffy
Did some changes to the Easy diff via in-game. Also fixed some unrankable stuff in general. Lost the log due to sudden pc reboot, sorry.
BeatofIke
Decided to look at this map @Kecco!
Topic Starter
Kecco

BeatofIke wrote:

Decided to look at this map @Kecco!
Alrighty! Thanks!
Alarido
\o/

Yeeeeeeeeeeeah!

(Only thing I should say: the difficulty scale feels a bit (or a lot) .... well, Hard is much more farther from Normal, if compared to the distance between Hard and Yukecco.
This is the only complaint from me. Everything else is perfect ♥
Satellite


Red : Unrankable issue / must fix.
Bold : Should be fixed / highly suggested.
Black : Just suggestion.


[General]
  1. Artist Name : Is it really right? Dj Shimamura ft. Yukacco Changed DJ Shimamura ft. Yukacco ?
  2. PreviewTime : 185970 is Not Snapped Please Change 18597"2" It's 1/16 snapped. Please should fixed all difficult :3
  3. NOOOOOOOOOOO. Mapset Balance should be in a continuous About : Mean difficulty( 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 )
    You are mapset Easy 1.98 -> Normal 2.17 -> Hard 4.2 -> Yukecco 5.03
    You must made add Difficulty 3.00~3.99 ? diff... imo. Please ask QAT team member~
  4. Only Normal difficult WidescreenStoryboard: "1" Changed "0" same as other diff ~
  5. "Yukecco" diff name should be not used "Username" It's Unrankable. please change other.
[Easy]
  1. AR+1 AR2 is very hard to see imo.
  2. 00:01:065 (1) - Move X:148 Y:100 because clean more flow.
  3. 00:05:179 (3) - Only this place "distance 1.3" other part "distance 1.2" you should be changed "distance 1.2" better.
  4. 00:11:350 (4) - Oh you. w-why? used Reverse point Additions : D and Finish ? I think not fit. add only clap better.
  5. 00:14:779 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:05:179 (3) - this. Why not used "distance snap 1.2" ? I think Lowest degree of difficulty should be Unify to distance snap.
  6. 01:01:407 (7) - add Nc ? because same as this part 00:23:007 (1) -
  7. 03:30:550 (3) - Please check distance snap. It's too very far not fit this difficult
[Normal]
  1. 00:23:007 (1) - Not too fond of the straight flow here. Try an arrange like this.
  2. 00:35:179 (2,4) - Overmapped. Remove note better. Please hear this place.
  3. 00:40:665 (2) - ^
  4. 00:55:065 (5) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me.....Try an arrange like this. I say this because it could confuse players, it would be better to fix it please.
  5. 02:18:207 (1) - Distance 1.00 → 1.55 too far... This spacing is really awkward.
[Hard]
  1. This is Insane, not Hard ... Please make more easier to Hard
  2. 00:56:779 - add note because more better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this.
  3. 01:28:836 (3) - add Nc because same as 03:07:579 (1) - this. please fix it.
Sorry ! I can not be mod to fast bpm song ;_; Hope to help ~ Good Luck :3
Flask
placeholder!!!!!!!!
Topic Starter
Kecco

Satellite wrote:



Red : Unrankable issue / must fix.
Bold : Should be fixed / highly suggested.
Black : Just suggestion.


[General]
  1. Artist Name : Is it really right? Dj Shimamura ft. Yukacco Changed DJ Shimamura ft. Yukacco ?
    Fixed
  2. PreviewTime : 185970 is Not Snapped Please Change 18597"2" It's 1/16 snapped. Please should fixed all difficult :3 So Nazi >w< Fixed
  3. NOOOOOOOOOOO. Mapset Balance should be in a continuous About : Mean difficulty( 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 ) There'a 2- stars diffs, so that's ok I guess.
    You are mapset Easy 1.98 -> Normal 2.17 -> Hard 4.2 -> Yukecco You must made add Difficulty 3.00~3.99 ? diff... imo. Please ask QAT team member~ Will do.
  4. Only Normal difficult WidescreenStoryboard: "1" Changed "0" same as other diff ~ Fixed
  5. "Yukecco" diff name should be not used "Username" It's Unrankable. please change other. Fixed
[Easy]
  1. AR+1 AR2 is very hard to see imo. Fixed
  2. 00:01:065 (1) - Move X:148 Y:100 because clean more flow. Fixed
  3. 00:05:179 (3) - Only this place "distance 1.3" other part "distance 1.2" you should be changed "distance 1.2" better. Fixed
  4. 00:11:350 (4) - Oh you. w-why? used Reverse point Additions : D and Finish ? I think not fit. add only clap better. I like it :<
  5. 00:14:779 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:05:179 (3) - this. Why not used "distance snap 1.2" ? I think Lowest degree of difficulty should be Unify to distance snap. Fixed
  6. 01:01:407 (7) - add Nc ? because same as this part 00:23:007 (1) - Fixed
  7. 03:30:550 (3) - Please check distance snap. It's too very far not fit this difficult Fixed
[Normal]
  1. 00:23:007 (1) - Not too fond of the straight flow here. Try an arrange like this. Fixed
  2. 00:35:179 (2,4) - Overmapped. Remove note better. Please hear this place. Fixed
  3. 00:40:665 (2) - ^ Fixed
  4. 00:55:065 (5) - This rhythm is kind of questionable for me.....Try an arrange like this. I say this because it could confuse players, it would be better to fix it please. Fixed
  5. 02:18:207 (1) - Distance 1.00 → 1.55 too far... This spacing is really awkward. Fixed
[Hard]
  1. This is Insane, not Hard ... Please make more easier to Hard There are many maps out there with harder Hards ;_;
  2. 00:56:779 - add note because more better rhythm,follow with lyrics,like this. Fixed
  3. 01:28:836 (3) - add Nc because same as 03:07:579 (1) - this. please fix it.Fixed
Sorry ! I can not be mod to fast bpm song ;_; Hope to help ~ Good Luck :3
Ritzeh
maybe yukecco insane difficulty could be od8? :D
Topic Starter
Kecco

Ritzeh wrote:

maybe yukecco insane difficulty could be od8? :D
I'll consider this in another moment :P
Alarido

Kecco wrote:

NOOOOOOOOOOO. Mapset Balance should be in a continuous About : Mean difficulty( 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 ) There'a 2- stars diffs, so that's ok I guess.
You are mapset Easy 1.98 -> Normal 2.17 -> Hard 4.2 -> Yukecco You must made add Difficulty 3.00~3.99 ? diff... imo. Please ask QAT team member~ Will do.
Hm...

I would suggest you rename the [Insane] diff to Extra, then rename the [Hard] diff to Insane and then map a Hard diff with something around 3.00~3.30 stars, preferably with no 1/4 triples.

^^
Topic Starter
Kecco

Alarido wrote:

Kecco wrote:

NOOOOOOOOOOO. Mapset Balance should be in a continuous About : Mean difficulty( 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 ) There'a 2- stars diffs, so that's ok I guess.
You are mapset Easy 1.98 -> Normal 2.17 -> Hard 4.2 -> Yukecco You must made add Difficulty 3.00~3.99 ? diff... imo. Please ask QAT team member~ Will do.
Hm...

I would suggest you rename the [Insane] diff to Extra, then rename the [Hard] diff to Insane and then map a Hard diff with something around 3.00~3.30 stars, preferably with no 1/4 triples.

^^
That's already in progress! :>
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply