HelloSCV wrote:

[Easy Collab]

1. 00:25:744 (3,4) - using 1/2 beats on Easy diff isn't recommended, maybe changing them like this would be better — yes!
2. 00:39:933 (5) - same as above, what about changing it to a note? — unfortunately no, I want to keep it because of double hit
3. 02:33:852 (1,2) - are the sliders without clap intended? then what about adding it? feels really nice — tried to emphasize the pause in vocals by not following 2-4 pattern, but oh well
4. 03:48:852 (2,3) - it would be better if this rhythm was reversed. most of parts fit with the vocal nicely while this part doesn't — yes
5. 03:53:311 (1) - same opinion as Normal, this isn't really necessary — see my reply below
6. 04:19:257 (1) - ^ — ^

[Normal Collab]

1. 00:12:365 (4) - why don't you set the slider head's sampleset as soft or auto? oh and adding finish would be nice as well — changed to auto with no finish because it will stand out
2. 01:03:041 (1) - dividing it into a 1/1 slider and a note feels better — okay
3. 01:26:960 (2) - same opinion as above, current one feels a bit weird — done
4. 01:29:798 (2,3,4) - since this doesn't have nice flow but it has larger distance compared with other objects, what about stacking them with 01:28:176 (3) - this slider's tail? you also have to adjust distance among 01:30:203 (4,1,2) - these — changed that part somehow
5. 02:15:203 (2,3) - reversing this rhythm by using ctrl g fits with the vocal better fixed
6. 02:39:325 (7) - well ignoring the awesome vocal sound isn't really good idea. try changing the rhythm like this — fixed
7. 03:53:311 (1) - what about removing NC? it doesn't really necessary. it seems like you added NC to emphasize this part but i'm not sure if this deserves to have it while breaking consistency. i know that you already used some kind of this NC pattern but most of them are placed nicely and they are quite reasoanble — I think that every part like this, except these in the middle of kiai sections, deserves that emphasis, even though it breaks the consistency
8. 04:19:257 (1) - ^ — ^
   
   to be honest, i don't enjoy some kind of 00:39:528 (5,6,7,1) - this pattern on low diffs, they are just random and unpredictable. maybe that's just because of the difference of standard of low diffs. let's see how they work. — uh, I don't know. To me, they're well predictable, because they follow the beat, and the pattern of slider+ note + slider when the middle note stands on 1/2, is fairly easy to catch. Different sliders length is a different story, though, but again, I tried to make these parts easy to follow by a player and add short 1/1 pauses in between
   i also found some hitsounds errors which may be caued because it's collab (they are quite annoying), for example like 02:17:028 (6,7) - this, what about arranging those mispalced hitsounds so that this diff could have consistency — what do you mean by misplaced? Both clap and two whistles around are well in place, at least to me and my ears. Also, all hitsounds (except Vass-RJ's) were copied off Insane where I tried to be as consistent as possible and I think I arranged these high whistle-like sounds good enough even without flooding the map with whistles

[Insane]

1. Tick rate 2 fits this song best higarven — I was about to agree, but then I saw things like http://puu.sh/fsYtN/adf63f16ea.jpg or http://puu.sh/fsYxt/39d61be4f0.jpg and reverted the change immediately. Sorry! Anyway, slider ticks aren't loud at all, so that's not gonna be a big loss
2. 00:01:420 (1) - what about using 5 notes stream instead of a note? i think more notes are needed due to the song. after adding more notes, consider changing last 4 notes' (00:01:521 (2,3,4,5) - ) sampleset to soft to fit with the song — please, no! I want to keep the pause to emphasize the first note by leaving a few beats around unmapped, I don't have to map them all
3. 01:18:852 (1) - according to the song, it would be nice if the finish on this note is moved to next note — yes!
4. 01:26:554 (3,4,5,6) - i think current pattern feels a bit uncomfortable? for play. well this may because of difference of preference about using jump pattern, but i think using more neat square or different pattern seems a bit better. or just reducing distance between 01:27:162 (6,7) - these would be nice as well — I don't like the movement on these examples at all, sorry. 3 could work if it didn't have such a sloppy ending
5. 01:32:027 (5) - since there isn't proper sound for placing a note here, how about removing this note and changing the pattern a bit? — you know what, you saved me. I couldn't get what EXACTLY is wrong with this part, and now it's all clear to me. I used my own pattern, though
6. 01:44:595 (5) - try adding NC for consistency and as indicator — it was there, but I removed it for consistency lol
7. 01:56:554 (5) - ^ — ^
8. 01:51:487 (14) - remove clap for consistency? or add it on 01:48:243 (7) - here or 01:49:865 - here etc. i prefer latter one lol — well, the music has it, but it';s really inconsistent. changed to soft whistle
9. 02:20:473 (17) - maybe you forgot to add whistle on slider's head — I am sure you want to say "Tail! Oh, where's the tail whistle, for the love of all the offbeat hitsounds and their Lord!" I can only agree to you. Just kidding, I don't always favor downbeat whistles, because downbeats are strong enough, and it's often the offbeat that needs to be arranged in order to accompany the music in a nice manner
10. 02:23:716 (1) - missed whsitle? also, consider removing its NC, it isn't really necessary and to keep consistency with next part 02:33:446 (16) - — but consistency is 00:39:933 (1) -, and 00:52:906 (1) - , and other patterns!
11. 02:28:582 (4) - using 1/2 slider seems better than 1/4 slider with a repeat because of the vocal sound — yes
12. 02:36:487 (3) - actually i expected different placement on this note. it's just my feeling (can't explain exactly lol) but i think this note should be stacked with 02:35:473 (1) - this according to the song. this feels a bit better — I see
13. 02:42:771 (7) - hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm i think giving jump distance feels a bit better than current one due to the vocal sound. for better flow, try adjusting this slider a bit. using 3/4 slider by following the sound (i don't know the instrument's name exactly lol) would be nice. oh and since you didn't use large distance suddenly, you'd better adjust distance between 02:42:771 (7,1) - these as well for better playing. — reversed. I don't think I need to tweak the spacing, though. As for the instrument, I think it's a synthesizer of some sort
14. 02:46:622 (7) - whistle is really nice to hear
15. 02:49:054 (5) - ^ yes and yes
16. 03:23:311 (8) - is this slider's head intended to have soft sampleset? if it is, what about changing it to Auto? this feels better imo — changed. It was soft because I swapped it with the stream's beginning recently, and it had a finish before
17. 03:41:554 (5,6) - same opinion as 01:18:852 (1) - — fixed
18. 03:56:960 (1) - i think reversing this by using ctrl g has better flow with both previous and next slider — yes, I did the change rapidly and left the rest untouched
19. 04:00:608 (1) - this NC seems unnecessary, what about removing it? — fixed

tomhet65 wrote:

Это снова я. У тебя в папке два бг, или у меня так перекачалось? — а у меня один! Все ожидаемо круто, как всегда, мои советы могут выглядеть слишком категоричными, а все потому что я не хочу писать в каждом предложении "мне кажется наверное чуть-чуть может быть я бы сделал ящитаю может быть вот так...". — не вижу ничего плохого

Insane

1. 00:16:825 (10,11) - Ящитаю тут удачнее было бы http://puu.sh/fsCpd/48b7ab5640.jpg — так и было. наверное, надо вернуть обратно
2. 00:39:730 (9,1,2) - А попробуй так http://puu.sh/fsCDr/f8032a2f42.jpg или еще как-то там сделать что-то с такими спейсингами. да! Это оно
3. 00:44:392 (4) - Что нибудь такое может? http://puu.sh/fsCO3/9157df6090.jpg Что-то меня там смутило, но как сделать лучше сам не знаю, в общем. — зато я знаю, слайдер 5 с картинки надо реверснуть
4. 00:48:041 (7,8,9,10) - Как будто ноты не хватает. — придётся вернуть её обратно на место
5. 01:02:635 (18,19,1) - Чуть больше сделать разницу джампа тут http://puu.sh/fsD87/a76504c215.jpg — да
6. 01:08:108 (6,7) - Стак мешает фану. — сдвинул вверх
7. 01:11:960 (8) - Совсем жмется к хп-бару. — чуть опустил
8. 01:11:554 (7) - Слегка выпрямить для красоты, чтоб как 01:11:149 (6) - ? — да
9. 01:15:608 (10,11,1) - Джамп побольше сделать? Понимаю, музыка идет ровно но вроде и как-то веселее. — попробовал
10. 01:46:014 (3,4) - Может в разные стороны сделать? http://puu.sh/fsDS5/a9fee9cd9a.jpg Хотя злоупотребление уже наверное, но там всегда так, потому когда не так это и заметно. — наоборот, очень удачно
11. 02:19:662 (14,15,16,17) - Как-то оно сжато выглядит, растянуть бы по Y. И стак межту слайдерами чуть-чуть ровнее расположить.— исправил. У меня на этот паттерн зуб с самого момента его создания. в самых первых вариациях там спейсинг был ещё меньше, на уровне 1.1
12. 02:20:473 (17) - Аж 17 в комбе, может разбить? — нет! Пока нет
13. 04:03:852 (4) - Плохо на него курсор заходит, я сделал вот так, поприятнее http://puu.sh/fsF9r/1a87bcd6f1.jpg — да, а всё потому, что он ниже, чем нота. Ниже, значит, надо выгнуть так, как ты предложил, выше — так, как я сделал. Исправлено
14. Всё — (почти) всё!

A Mystery wrote:

Hello! From my queue

General

1. "2 years ago" You can see that a little bit — did you mean "a lot"?
2. Combos are getting very high at certain places, consider using NCs a bit more — this is intentional, but I'll see if I'm going to split them in the future
3. I'm sorry for the wall of text ;_; but I'd like to suggest everything that bothers me or that could be a little bit improved in my eyes. — I understand, and I'll only comment on these I did -not- fix. I'm trying to find some time to self-mod it, but every time it turns out I don't really have any free minutes

Insane

1. 00:03:852 (9) - Stack — I prefer to keep them unstacked for more clear reading due to 00:04:460 (11,1)
2. 00:12:669 (6) - The start of the stream is quite confusing because it starts on a blue tick. You could make this clearer by using a different combo color, or stacking 00:12:669 (6,7) - . The combo is getting high here anyway — I carefully prepare a player to the stream using 00:12:365 (4,5). See, the stream and the double have half a beat in between, so that it plays more intuitively
3. 00:27:264 - It feels kinda wrong to ignore the triple bass drum sound here, maybe you should make this a triple — sorry, no, gotta keep it this way to have 00:26:757 (1) - and emphasize 00:27:365 (1)
4. 00:28:987 (5) - Move up for a blanket — useless
5. 00:48:446 (11) - NC maybe? Combo is getting pretty long — explained in the beginning of my post
6. 01:01:825 (13) - Again about the NC — nah
7. 01:05:676 (3,4) - Maybe it's better to increase the distance because of the big gap — I don't feel like doing this
8. 01:07:095 (3) - Stack is off with both the circle (6) and the slider (1) — fixed, but does 1px matter anything? That's right: NO
9. 01:11:149 (6,7,8) - You can try something like — this looks exactly the way I want it to be
10. 01:26:554 (3,4,5,6) - I think this shape is a bit weird, don't you as well? — nah-uh
11. 01:44:595 (1) - Same about the bass in the background. Up to you - declined it already
12. 01:52:095 (2) - Idk about the curvepoint outside the grid, the slider is going pretty far — "pretty far" starts from a circle being fully outside, and that's still acceptable because it doesn't leave the play area even on 4:3 resolutions
13. 02:12:568 (7) - Make this a blanket maybe? — there are many nice tactics out there, other than blanketing everything
14. 02:19:257 (12) - NC? — see above
15. 02:32:230 (12) - NC? — see above
16. 02:42:770 (7) - Why is there a random finish? — to fit vocals? Haven't decided yet
17. 03:29:798 (4) - Blanket? — no
18. 03:33:852 (1,2) - Hmmm, idk. The way this is placed kinda feels awkward coming from the jump from 03:33:446 (5) - . Consider moving 03:34:054 (2) - a little more to the left — doesn't feel awkward to me

Normal Collab
Idk about the stacks you made. They might be a bit confusing in a Normal, at least the way you used them — will check them later, but honestly they're all pretty readable and follow the beat, so there shouldn't be any confusion.. or so I think

1. 00:50:068 (1,2) - A bit empty between this? — made for emphasis
2. 02:13:379 - I think you should map the vocals — planned
3. 02:42:771 (6) - You have the same weird finish here as in the insane — see my reply on Insane
4. 03:31:217 - Add a circle — I prefer to keep a gap here
5. 04:13:176 (4) - Space — intended

Easy Collab

1. 01:03:852 - You might want to add something here, as it won't be easy to hit it on the red tick (polarity) — barely possible without missing a beat or adding a dull note which is mapped to nothing
2. 01:43:582 (3) - Wouldn't this be better? — keeping Easy clean from 1/4
3. 01:46:825 (4) - Improve the blanket — why do you think it's supposed to be a blanket
4. 02:34:865 (2) - Same as the previous suggestion about it— same as the previous reply about it

Kyubey wrote:

Привет!
У ENS вообще бывают треки медленнее 140 и быстрее 150 бпм? — http://puu.sh/gWqnX/aa653ed79c.jpg, и это только те, что в осу
И ещё хочу предложить свапнуть 2 и 3 комбоцвета, чтобы при игре разница была намного заметнее, а не просто «чуть светлее, но тот же цвет». — мне не хочется

[Изи]
00:50:068 (1,2) - может, как-нибудь подвинуть двойку, чтобы её голова была ближе к хвосту единички? а то мало ли, спутать может такое положение, и игрок попытается нажать по хвосту двойки — некуда, и вообще, вокруг головы аппроач сходится. ещё там число нарисовано

Назвали изей, а в итоге получился нормал. Сплошной 1/1 ритм, эти кикслайдеры, места с синглом по 5 нот подряд, как по мне — можно было бы сделать всё полегче. — переоцениваешь

[Лунатик]
00:33:852 (1) - новая партия начинается, почему бы под неё не подвинуть этот слайдер подальше от пятёрки? — он и так подвинут
03:37:095 (1) - может, лучше под вокал здесь слайдер поставить? заканчивающийся триплетом — нет

Sekai-nyan wrote:

General:

1. Maybe you might want to enable the epilepsy warning, since you added some flashes so i think it might be needed =3=/ — there are no rapidly flashing or alternating colours
2. I search for the metadata and this what i found o.o, maybe add "yuduki tsubaki" to the tags, since she's the one singing this. — added tsubaki already

Normal:

1. 00:03:852 (5) - maybe add whistle to this slider's repeat? it'll follow the piano sound in the music o.o/ and it'll sound great imo — I don't like how it sounds, no
2. 02:45:203 (5) - same as i said here 00:03:852 (5) - , whistle might sound great on the repeat o.o
3. 02:48:447 (4) - ^ — no and no, they sound disrupting, also that was synth and not piano

Hard:

1. 02:38:717 (5) - I don't think the finish is really needed at slider's repeat, so how about removing it. to be honest i don't hear any in the music so yeah
   >< — it's similar to the sound repeats are mapped to, but needs to be a little bit more quiet

Lunatic:

1. 00:05:473 (3) - maybe add a whistle in this slider's repeat to follow the piano sound in the music o3o — no, the whistle on the tail goes hand in hand with the one on 00:06:284 (1)