yay!Irreversible wrote:
Rebubbled!
yay!Irreversible wrote:
Rebubbled!
i receive helloscv's mod check, so i check that, and map has updated. next, i receive ra-s's mod check, so i check that and updated. but helloscv's checks are not submitted? hm why... sorry for that.Irreversible wrote:
popped!
Sorry, I didn't quite realize that. Please fully consider our mods, and then you can call me back. (Also, why did you call me for rebubble if you didn't update the diff?)
that's maybe because of a vacant line on the end of .osu file imo, you may notice easily that all of things that i commented before were changed after you try the previous code that i postedLoctav wrote:
no. File content of currently submitted .osu and SCV's posted one are different
IMO, I don't need to change others.Irreversible wrote:
[Insane]
00:46:605 (3,4,1) - Kind of weird flow, would you mind making it a bit curvier? http://puu.sh/73kWE/ed821cfbe9.jpg - little changed
02:15:645 (2) - Well, why not following the main rhythm here?
02:23:085 (1) - I think this clap is wrong, it's not following any consistency :/ It sounds rather random.
02:24:765 (4,5,1) - That doesn't Play well again, having a jump like that with circles is Kind of difficult many times. You might try another Placement but uh..
Thanks~Asphyxia wrote:
[Collab Insane]
- 02:26:925 (1,2,3) - It'd be very cool if you could give these a bit more spacing, the music is a bit stronger than earlier so it would make sense, right? http://puu.sh/73ttF.jpg "- I think this notes which similarity with 02:26:805 (7,1)"
- 02:27:405 (3) - You probably forgot to add NC here because you NC'd this note in your hard diff too. - Fxied
그 외에는 전부 수정 완료했습니다.Sonnyc wrote:
이지에 클랩 누락된 부분 확인 부탁합니다.
01:51:405 (2) - (1)처럼 리버스에 휘슬? 여기엔 히트사운드가 어울리지 않습니다.
체크 완료했습니다.Ra-s wrote:
http://puu.sh/7fRjV.osu
ㄴ프
츠키코기여어
popner wrote:
[Hard]
00:06:525 (4) - why leave here empty but put beat on 00:08:205 (2) - the end? what should i do?
00:37:245 (4,5,6) - put them in a line? Or a more bending way? fixed
popner wrote:
[Normal]
01:21:645 (1) - this may be tricky because you used 01:11:325 (2,2) - // Sorry, I don't want to change this... 2 reverses aren't always confusing, and a long term to the next slider 01:22:605 (1) won't cause much problem. Similar melody in the song is 01:13:965 (1), and I wanted to give variations.
02:23:085 (1) - ^