response
Flask's Normal
02:32:082 (1,2,3) - I think these could be moved to positions: (x:424 y:304) for (1); (x:356 y:156) for (2) and (x:264 y:276) for (3). I chose these positions to make the shape easier to read and a smooth flow onto the 4th note. I'd like your views on this too unfortunately this overlaps in a poor way with the following combo :/
02:40:810 (1,2,3) - ^ Same reasons at positions: (x:92 y:72) for (1); (x:168 y:224) for (2) and finally (x:260 y:80) for (3)
Nyquill's Hard
02:25:265 (8) - I suggest moving this from from positions x:204 y:223 to positions x:200 y:176 I think it'll add to the new combo more making it stand out while retaining a flow. this also causes a lot of messy overlaps, and it doesn't really add anything ;_;
02:32:082 (1,2,3) - I think these could be moved to positions: (x:424 y:304) for (1); (x:356 y:156) for (2) and (x:264 y:276) for (3). I chose these positions to make the shape easier to read and a smooth flow onto the 4th note. I'd like your views on this too unfortunately this overlaps in a poor way with the following combo :/
02:40:810 (1,2,3) - ^ Same reasons at positions: (x:92 y:72) for (1); (x:168 y:224) for (2) and finally (x:260 y:80) for (3)
Nyquill's Hard
02:25:265 (8) - I suggest moving this from from positions x:204 y:223 to positions x:200 y:176 I think it'll add to the new combo more making it stand out while retaining a flow. this also causes a lot of messy overlaps, and it doesn't really add anything ;_;
thank you for taking a look of your own volition, but didn't change anything. (seems like cheesiest also isn't going to change anything...)