よろしくおねがいしま~す
Please remember me IIRCnardi11011 wrote:
QFTEcho wrote:
よろしくおねがいしま~す
like i know what it means
Are you trying to be punny?nardi11011 wrote:
Anyway, I'm keeping my vote on strager as he just seems to be acting too strange to me.
Again, claiming Doctor was a mistake. I didn't mean to "risk dying" by doing it because I didn't mean to do it.nardi11011 wrote:
Especially his very first slip-up doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of his posts, as I don't see why someone would rather risk dying the first night than lie about their role.
Could you explain farther what you mean by "fit in with the rest of his posts"? Also, are you going to be more active, or are we going to see you once every three days?nardi11011 wrote:
Holy shit, 6 pages? I hate timezones. Anyway, I'm keeping my vote on strager as he just seems to be acting too strange to me. Especially his very first slip-up doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of his posts, as I don't see why someone would rather risk dying the first night than lie about their role. I don't see anyone else as overly suspicious, so I'm not changing my vote.
also,QFTEcho wrote:
よろしくおねがいしま~す
like i know what it means
I'm indifferent on whether we lynch nardi or adam, and nardi hasn't said anything that would convince me to change my vote, so for now, my vote stands.BagelBob wrote:
0_o, who are you voting for right now? That last one was only 80% there.
BagelBob was referring to this:0_o wrote:
I'm indifferent on whether we lynch nardi or adam, and nardi hasn't said anything that would convince me to change my vote, so for now, my vote stands.BagelBob wrote:
0_o, who are you voting for right now? That last one was only 80% there.
Please state CLEARLY who you are voting for.0_o wrote:
Funny, that's exactly what someone who is in the mafia would saystrager wrote:
I am not a Mafia.Derekku Chan wrote:
That means you are mafia? :<
vote stra-
lol
I'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.
Which actions/posts make you believe that Echo and SFG are townies?0_o wrote:
That vote for you was a joke, I obviously wouldn't defend you this whole time, then vote for you because you said you weren't mafia
And I'm voting for him because as I've already saidI'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.
strager answered your question about Echo aboveBagelBob wrote:
Which actions/posts make you believe that Echo and SFG are townies?
They both voted for strager, just like nardi and adam, who you believe is the doctor.
First of all, he's at L-2 - Bagelbob retracted his votestrager wrote:
0_o, IMO voting because of the number of votes on one's head isn't a good idea for a Townie (only a Mafia because a Mafia knows if he's lynching a Townie or not). If you are split between nardi and adam you'll need another reason to vote for one or the other. If you stick to your vote for nardi solely to keep him at L-1 without another reason I'm more incline to believe you are a Mafia. (This is supported by you avoiding voting on Echo.)
BagelBob wrote:
Which actions/posts make you believe that Echo and SFG are townies?
They both voted for strager, just like nardi and adam, who you believe is the doctor.
Well, it is kuu...0_o wrote:
1) I don't think he would quit if he was mafia
I don't see a reason not to lie, other than wanting to be truthful.0_o wrote:
2) why would he lie if he is quitting?
strager wrote:
0_o, IMO voting because of the number of votes on one's head isn't a good idea for a Townie (only a Mafia because a Mafia knows if he's lynching a Townie or not). If you are split between nardi and adam you'll need another reason to vote for one or the other. If you stick to your vote for nardi solely to keep him at L-1 without another reason I'm more incline to believe you are a Mafia. (This is supported by you avoiding voting on Echo.)
Not at the time you voted.0_o wrote:
First of all, he's at L-2 - Bagelbob retracted his vote
Still doesn't mean anything to me. I understand it, but it's definitely not a reason from what I can see.0_o wrote:
I'm not really split between them, I'm indifferent between them. I would be just as happy voting off adam as I would nardi. And since nardi is the more likely candidate right now, it would be pointless to vote for adam since that would just make it more difficult to lynch nardi, whom I believe is just as likely to be mafia as adam.
I hope that made sense?
strager wrote:
Well you're not getting it.Echo wrote:
I would like you to do two things:Echo wrote:
Whereas I've conjured up a single sentence with enough evidence to send you to kingdom come, none of which you've satisfactorily defended against, you've brought none of my posts against me.
- refute my 3 points in the linked post
- attack me with my posts
I defended too, somewhat:Echo wrote:
You're trying to bring suspicion onto someone who is obviously townie. Now why would you do that?
And isn't the point of the game is to present likely possibilities and have others debunk them?strager wrote:
SFG's first vote on me was just a bandwagon vote it seems, because I was the more suspicious.
SFG's second vote on me was a misunderstanding: viewtopic.php?p=141154#p141154
Because nardi hasn't defended himself either. He was at L-1 and still hadn't posted. He may just be a townie that does't give a crap about the game, though. =/Echo wrote:
Can someone explain to me why we just jumped to voting for nardi when strager has been so suspicious and refusing to defend himself?
Yes it is a loss. That's one Night the Mafia has to waste their kill on.Derekku Chan wrote:
But as one of you said: If a townie gets lynched that didn't contribute in the first place, it wouldn't even be a loss. :<
I doubt your Mafia buddy would kill you, and I doubt today we'll lynch you. You'll have your chance to lynch your own friend someday.Echo wrote:
I just fear I won't be around to lynch a mafia :X
That reasoning goes both ways really. That is, he could be a major asset to the Mafia.0_o wrote:
Echo is coming out very strongly this game, and while he does have that level of suspicion, he can also be very useful if he is pro-town. I don't want to lynch him yet because the potential of Echo being a strong asset for the town is greater than my suspicion that he is mafia.
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
Because you know things we don't I'm more inclined to think you are a Mafia.0_o wrote:
There are a few more specific reasons that I don't want to lynch Echo yet, but I can't say them here because I don't want these reasons to be visible to the mafia.
strager wrote:
That reasoning goes both ways really. That is, he could be a major asset to the Mafia.0_o wrote:
Echo is coming out very strongly this game, and while he does have that level of suspicion, he can also be very useful if he is pro-town. I don't want to lynch him yet because the potential of Echo being a strong asset for the town is greater than my suspicion that he is mafia.
That's true, but again I have other reasons for keeping him around that I can't let the mafia be aware of.So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.Because you know things we don't I'm more inclined to think you are a Mafia.0_o wrote:
There are a few more specific reasons that I don't want to lynch Echo yet, but I can't say them here because I don't want these reasons to be visible to the mafia.
Unless you discovered these reasons through real reasoning, of course.
I don't have evidence per se, but theories of how the mafia will behave (not on how they are behaving now). I obviously can't openly discuss these theories, because the mafia of course will see them and act accordingly.
I see that, but it wasn't in that one sentence (only Echo was) so I got a bit suspicious...0_o wrote:
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.
That's because Bagelbob was only asking about Echo, nardi and adam. I just threw you in as another example.strager wrote:
I see that, but it wasn't in that one sentence (only Echo was) so I got a bit suspicious...0_o wrote:
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.
Any ideas on who strager's buddy is?Echo wrote:
I think lynching nardi is a mistake.
I'm inclined to think too. 0_oEcho wrote:
I'm inclined to think 0_o
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
I have to agree, though, and the buddying is kinda annoying. I understand you trust me but we don't have to be friends for that. ;PI'm not trying to be your bff, I'm trying to keep the person who is most likely to be the doctor alive
Actually I made a mistake. I must have misread what you wrote, because I don't really see how that'd be a Scum tell. =S0_o wrote:
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
Maybe that's what you meant?0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.