This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
So.. you are saying that the mafia is incapable of coming up with a valid reason to lynch someone?Echo wrote:
Nope. It depends on the context; if the last person votes with a valid reason, then it's sweet.0_o wrote:
Well in that case no one is gonna be lynched since anyone who delivers the final blow is gonna be considered mafiastrager wrote:
Even if strager is innocent, the mafia wouldn't jump on since that'd be a huge scum tell.
Due to Olinad being replaced the voting period will likely be extended.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
to other M2 players: this is the last day before we need to have a decision. if we do not decide, the mafia will get a free nightkill while we dither around not lynching people. Change your vote before time runs out~ (wow that sounded DOOM-y lol)
Interesting. I didn't mean to imply that not talking removed suspicion but you have a point about not wanting to slip up in a post. Caution is a bad thing, I guess?0_o wrote:
From what I remember looking through the first WW game, when adam and yoshikart were mafia, adam was on L-1 and yoshikart didn't say a thing. In fact, every post that he made was either a vote or a vote change, with little to no explaination. So don't think that being quiet means they are innocent; they are just as likely to be a wolf who is afraid of posting something suspicious.
So that's what you did with me? xD0_o wrote:
That, and throwing someone on L-2 is a pretty effective way of getting them to speak up
Derekku, 0_o, SFG, BagelBob.Derekku Chan wrote:
nardi is on L-1 ;/0_o wrote:
That, and throwing someone on L-2 is a pretty effective way of getting them to speak up
When you say "his buddy" who are you referring to? (nardi is "a Mafia" in that sentence, yes?)strager wrote:
Woah there.
Hasty.
I have noticed nardi in the "Users browsing the forum" at the bottom on several occasions and he hasn't posted. So here's what I think.
If he is a Townie, he's going a pretty horrible job at "blending in." He stands out as a lurker and doesn't even attempt to post anything meaningful.
If he is a Mafia, he's trying to sabotage the game by the same cause so Mafia loses. That's Pretty Gay (tm).
I really doubt a Mafia would sabotage his buddy like that so I'm leaning toward the possibility of him being a Townie.
Yes, I'm defending nardi, but it's not like he's hereso he canto defend himself anyway. =\
EDIT: [strike] and added "to" to make sentence more understandable.
That is exactly what I'm saying. There should be no evidence in posts against townies, which means mafia won't be able to bring up a valid reason to lynch a townie.0_o wrote:
So.. you are saying that the mafia is incapable of coming up with a valid reason to lynch someone?
Why not? Humans come up with "evidence" against other humans to lynch them, the only difference is that the mafia actually knows that they are lynching a human.Echo wrote:
That is exactly what I'm saying. There should be no evidence in posts against townies, which means mafia won't be able to bring up a valid reason to lynch a townie.0_o wrote:
So.. you are saying that the mafia is incapable of coming up with a valid reason to lynch someone?
"His buddy" being the other Mafia.BagelBob wrote:
When you say "his buddy" who are you referring to? (nardi is "a Mafia" in that sentence, yes?)strager wrote:
Woah there.
Hasty.
I have noticed nardi in the "Users browsing the forum" at the bottom on several occasions and he hasn't posted. So here's what I think.
If he is a Townie, he's going a pretty horrible job at "blending in." He stands out as a lurker and doesn't even attempt to post anything meaningful.
If he is a Mafia, he's trying to sabotage the game by the same cause so Mafia loses. That's Pretty Gay (tm).
I really doubt a Mafia would sabotage his buddy like that so I'm leaning toward the possibility of him being a Townie.
Yes, I'm defending nardi, but it's not like he's hereso he canto defend himself anyway. =\
EDIT: [strike] and added "to" to make sentence more understandable.
Um lol? You are mafia. No contradiction whatsoever.strager/agreeing with 0_o's post wrote:
Indeed. Echo himself used my mistakes as evidence that I am a Mafia, which contradicts what he says here.
Ah, kill me, I misread what you wrote. Sorry. x_xEcho wrote:
Um lol? You are mafia. No contradiction whatsoever.strager/agreeing with 0_o's post wrote:
Indeed. Echo himself used my mistakes as evidence that I am a Mafia, which contradicts what he says here.
True until proven false is your word?Echo wrote:
Until you do that, what I've said stands true.
I could almost say the same.Echo wrote:
I'll give you a hint, it's the bolded half sentence in the second unquoted paragraph.
You be the judge.Echo wrote:
Whereas I've conjured up a single sentence with enough evidence to send you to kingdom come, none of which you've satisfactorily defended against, you've brought none of my posts against me.
EDIT:strager wrote:
True until proven false is your word?
Well you're not getting it.Echo wrote:
I would like you to do two things:
- refute my 3 points in the linked post
- attack me with my posts
You hope I'm not joking? That means you are mafia? :<strager wrote:
I hope not?Derekku Chan wrote:
jk
If you want to take one for the team, why don't you do it now?Echo wrote:
@derekku: then lynch strager today and me tomorrow. It's not like you can lynch two people on the same day. If we're both mafia, it won't make a difference. I don't mind dying, if it'll help townies win. It's a team game after all.
What are you citing to come to this 'conclusion' exactly?Echo wrote:
@strager: then tell me why anyone should be listening to you.
Funny, that's exactly what someone who is in the mafia would saystrager wrote:
I am not a Mafia.Derekku Chan wrote:
That means you are mafia? :<
any response to this?0_o wrote:
Why not? Humans come up with "evidence" against other humans to lynch them, the only difference is that the mafia actually knows that they are lynching a human.Echo wrote:
That is exactly what I'm saying. There should be no evidence in posts against townies, which means mafia won't be able to bring up a valid reason to lynch a townie.0_o wrote:
So.. you are saying that the mafia is incapable of coming up with a valid reason to lynch someone?
Echo brings up good points. :/Echo wrote:
You're refusing to defend yourself against my evidence, and you're refusing to bring any evidence against me, yet you claim you are townie and I am mafia?
I think the simple answer is that there is no evidence you can use to defend yourself, and there is no evidence you can bring against me. Which means you are mafia, and I am townie.