1. Easy (1.85 stars, 174 notes)
2. Hard (4.91 stars, 532 notes)
3. Kill!!! (4.86 stars, 784 notes)
4. Normal (4.37 stars, 336 notes)

eikkaleyd wrote:

[Kill]
00:38:686 (4,5) - 听不出4这个circle的音，推荐互换，4那里放长拖条 为了和前面保持节奏一致性 不会很违和因为滑条头压了重音
00:49:304 (3) - 说不定可以放到6的那个位置上，反正就感觉在14中间会好些 嗯把滑条反过来然后调了一下
00:54:866 (5) - 推荐调头。。这个反向flow觉得不是很必要而且整体好像是往下走的样子 k
01:14:332 (2) - 这个感觉难读得很，要不把尾巴朝右上这样如何。。 另一种方式改了
01:31:607 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - 这是什么形状吗？ 啥也不是……
02:09:697 (3,4) - 好像应该互换 互换然后调转了方向
02:24:866 (3,4) - ^ 感觉容易搞错 好 我把12互换了
02:28:237 (2) - 不要完全和1平行，往下一些如何，有点从中间往外展开的感觉 不太喜欢 2往右下的话 2到3的手感不好
挺喜欢下的音效的，梗用的很好，但是没梗的部分感觉有点杂乱，觉得还可以再扣一下会更整洁

[Normal]
00:40:203 (6) - 和4上下对称会好些，考虑到和5的DS问题的话，可以让46更加水平一些 k
00:42:225 (4,5) - 读了好几次还是有点难读，推荐换成一个reverse的拖条 感觉换成reverse移动不流畅
01:50:147 (4,5) - 个人感觉应该是01:49:978 一个1/2拖条，01:50:484 再一个1/2拖条的节奏 k
03:40:709 (3) - 好像凹着比较好看，可以包围下一个note k

[Easy]
01:35:989 (3) - 感觉和2一样弯着比较好看 k
其它没啥。。

sheela901 wrote:

Hi! From my queue~

[General]
Hard has no tag
01:02:296 - The inherited point (green) snap to 01:02:282

[Kill!!!]
00:19:136 (1) - Line with 00:19:641 (3)

Good Luck and star!

lkx_Shore wrote:

[First]
为啥换了个bg...我觉得原来的好

[Kill]
00:24:023 (1) - 叠在00:23:686 (4) - ，00:24:192 (2) - 叠在00:24:529 (1) - k
00:35:989 (5) - 第一个红点拉高点？ 修了下
00:42:225 (7) - 刚好相反，我认为这滑条应该放在左边然后趋势是向下 这我觉得挺好
01:01:607 (1,1) - 这里开始和前面没在一条直线 fixed
02:15:091 (3) - 我觉得ctrl+g效果会好很多(当然你还得把连打的位置改掉 这里都改了
03:43:911 (6,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 人性:d

[Other]
莫名，你滑条是不是随便拉的... 从来都是……

Goodluck,star

MineC24 wrote:

Modding queue~

Easy

00:24:529 (1) - Awkward whistle sound by slider's end (because 00:25:203 - sound like a down beat)
or down Volume I got your point, not changing it currently but will gather more opinions
00:25:877 (2) - ^
00:27:225 (3) - ^
00:44:753 (5) - In my opinion, grid up a slider's end point k
02:27:900 (5) - make a curve not really

Normal

00:25:203 (3) - same as Easy diff
00:44:922 (4) - remove 2nd slider point sorry I think it's fine
02:16:104 (3) - Unsnapped. omg weird problem
02:40:709 (3,4) - how about this beat pattern? -> (1 reverse pattern) not neccessary big fix

Kill!!!

00:20:484 (5) - add NC and 00:20:652 (1) - remove NC right
00:50:652 (2,3,4,5,6) - looks bad note shape... more improve this part will
00:58:742 (3) - imo, stack by 00:58:068 (1)'s end no
02:48:630 (7,1,2,3,4) - same reason as 00:50:652 (2,3,4,5,6) k

GL

Onisakura wrote:

SPOILER

Hi
from my queue

[General]

donno what's a point: set diffrent combo colours on easy/normal and hard/insane if u have same BG ORZ I even can't remember how did I do this, fixed
but kiai...if it's all your diff - it was be same, i'm just saying.. :3

[Easy]

00:23:686 (2) - change on short slider (1/4) with reverse, cuz newbie can miss that circle sorry I think it's ok because the time gap is big enough
01:38:686 (5) - set like 01:35:989 (3) for rhythm..don't follow vocal in this part hmm, actually they don't have much difference as the drums are quite intense

[Hard]

00:33:293 (3) - remove this and move slider 00:33:461 (4) - at this place (gitar in this part too loudly, so player didn't hear drum anyway..like here for example 00:38:686 (3,4) - ) I was also not sure of this point, but not changing it currently, I need more opinions

00:55:540 (1,2,3) - jump will be looks batter here...so remove 00:55:540 (1) - and put circle at 00:55:535 - ...then stack move 00:55:877 (2) - at 00:55:709 - and stack it 00:55:540 (1,2) -

exsample

did some change,though jumped not at the same point
00:59:079 (6,7,8) - or set on proportionally triangle or change 7 and 8 places, for rhythm wave well I think this point is nice
i know you are too cool for distance snap....but this:

click

if u don't use distanse - be careful with simple symmetry please :3 fixed
01:09:023 (1,2,3,4) - stack 1 with 3 and 2 with 4 nice
01:18:461 (1,2,3,4) - ^ same (too many of this same parts...it needed) didn't fix this group but the next one
03:07:675 (1,2,3,4,5) - and symmetry for pattern too =.= they are in pairs of 2, I think it's fine
03:12:225 (1,2,3,4,5) -

before

after

sorry but I think both are ok, the current 1 2 3 are really regular triangle
03:42:900 (2,3,4) - change on runing triple not changing it currently, I don't get it neccessary

[Kill!!!]

for me - it's nice..accept few thing
1. pattern need more symmetry ok I will check some circles carefully
2. 03:17:787 (6) - this object too high ...move down a little this doesn't have any problem, it touches nothing

still thinking it was profit mod...LOL

anyway good luck ^_^Thx for your mod~

UnitedWeSin wrote:

Hey /

Kill!!!

1. 00:19:136 (1,2,3,4) - Honestly, this will read 100x better if you make larger spacing from the 1 to the 2. Right now the 2,3,4 is super surprising and doesn't feel very nice. fixed
   
   
2. 00:24:360 - Consider adding a note. Like so maybe:
   
   Plays really nice. yeah it works
   
   
3. 00:574 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - IMO, it would play more smooth if you made the first square 1.0 spacing and the second 2.0 like it is. You more than quadruple spacing for the second square, but the sound in the music is the same, so it doesn't make much sense. hmm, not changing it currently =.= I will miss them if I changed >.<
   osu won't let me link the actual time orz [color=#0000FF]I realized what you were talking about before I read this line :3
   it's 28:574[/color]
   
   
4. 00:35:652 (3,5) - Move these down slightly to make a perfect hexagon. k
   
   
5. 00:43:574 (5,1) - Call me crazy, but I think switching NC's here will make the phrase easier to read. k
   
   
6. 00:51:327 (6,1,2) - The 1/3 is really hard to read here. I recommend do not use the same spacing between the 1 and 2 that you do between the 6 and 1. It's really easy to read the 1,2 as 1/2 timing. It would play better if you moved the 1 closer to the 6. Also consider adding some sliders at 00:50:652 (2,3,4,5,6) instead of all the singles. It will make the 1/3 easier to understand. yeah, used slider bifore the 1/3 jump
   
   
7. 00:51:495 (1,2,3,4) - For these, since they are 1/3, instead of the square, experiment with larger spacing. Try having cross screen jumps between each hit. That could be really epic. :3 >.< evil laugh
   
   
8. 00:57:731 (5,6,1) - Kinda weird flow. Try stacking the 6 on the 00:57:225 (2). k
   
   
9. 01:07:001 (6,5) - Make these sliders reflect each other perhaps. 01:09:697 (5) also. not quite getting it, I think they are fine
   
   
10. 01:14:079 (1,2) - Lots of people will have tons of trouble reading that. The downbeat is on the end of the slider 01:14:332 (2) and right after that is this huge spacing jump patter. Why not make something nicer to read. Replace the 01:14:079 (1) with a circle at 01:14:079 and then a triplet at 01:14:248. That will read really well.
    fixed, and make the spacing more interesting I think
    
    
11. 01:49:135 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - I don't really like this phrase. The 01:50:315 (1,2,3) is pretty awkward imo since it's following vocals, and this nice percussion jumping that you have before it stops. Try making a jump to the 1, and maybe stacking it with the 2. did so, simple in-and-out jump
    
    
12. 01:34:978 - Highly suggest add something here since you're following percussion. The gap between 01:34:641 (1,1) coupled with them being stacked is extreamly painful to read, especially because percussion is very active in between them. Try a 1/2 slider at 01:34:810. not changing it currently, actually I quite like the gap here, I would need more opinions
    
    
13. 01:53:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Really bland and frustrating pattern that's ignoring some really interesting opportunities for jumps in the music. Just an idea: try stacking the 01:53:855 (3,4) and having a jump to the 01:54:192 (5). Also stack the 01:54:529 (7,8) with a jump to the 1. So many things could work here, you can make a more interesting placement than this. nooooooo! I love my regular octagon T_T I think small spacing this is quite intense and fitting the music and also I like the trend which is from the outside to the center
    
    
14. 02:00:765 (7,8) - I'd say reduce this jump. It's one of the largest in the map, and it's too sudden for the slower part imo. ok 3.4x to 3.0x
    
    
15. 02:23:686 (2) - This can be really confusing. It's very difficult to read it as a jump since it's breaking the pattern that 02:17:787 (1,2) used. Players can easily read the 2 as if it were at 02:23:855 on the white tick. So I suggest either remove the jump or delete the 2 and put a circle at 02:23:855 instead. hmm I'd say no, slider to slider is easier than slider to circle so a 3.7x spacing comparing with 2.8x , I don't think it's doo much
    
    
16. 02:59:248 (6) - I prefer it at (332,112) The pattern looks bad without symmetry imo. Try this:
    k
    
    
17. 03:02:197 - Why this NC spam? It's fine I guess, but you didn't do it anywhere else so it's like, "What? Ok...." no no no, ths paticular spam is intended for HP restoring for HR players, because this gap is larger than the ones before
    
    
18. 03:10:203 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Surprising pattern change here. I know it's in the music and it's fine, but just consider doing something to make it less surprising. Maybe make the last triplet a 1/4 repeating slider instead. That would play nicer imo. k
    
    
19. 03:22:506 (3) - Try curving it more so it matches the 03:22:843 (4) a little better, it will look nicer. k
    
    
20. 03:38:855 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - That's some mean spacing you got there. It's fine and all, but I think it's made much more difficult by the fact that the downbeat that it starts on 03:38:686 is on the end of the slider 03:38:518 (1). So the jumping kinda starts in the music before we start playing it. I think you could make a much better pattern if you had circle on that downbeat instead. but I also like the previous pair of two sliders =.= sad
    
    Sweet diff. Lots of angry jumps, I love it. ^^ yeah I'm angry

Hard

1. 00:40:540 (1) - Really necessary NC? It's another one of those, "Oh, alright then" things. Same with 00:45:933 (1). Those are the only two in the diff. ok, I once added them to emhasize the spacing though
   
   
2. 01:03:293 (4,5) - Since this is the first appearance of this section for this diff. I don't think this is a good rhythm choice to introduce it. The two 1/1 sliders are really bland and ignore the rhythms in the percussion and vocals. Just a sample rhythm to use:
   ok
   
   
3. 02:40:709 (1,2) - The spacing is going to confuse a lot of people after playing the 02:39:360 (1,1). I suggest continue the pattern and stack the 2 on the tail of the 1. no, I think it just need the difference, imo stacking, for 1/1 gap, while unstacking for 1/2 gap is quite nice
   
   
4. 03:12:225 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - Too difficult for hard imo. Try making the 4,5 a slider instead. Or try reducing spacing orz. k
   
   
5. 03:33:461 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - Again, I think it's way too difficult to read a confusing rhythm like this. Try making something more simple. It would be much better to start the 8 on the red tick 03:34:135 where the drums start again in the song. Try replacing the 7 with a circle instead and repeating the 03:33:461 (4,5,6) for the 8:
   nice idea, I was concerned for this part too

Normal

1. 00:45:428 (5) - Give it some red anchors so it has a sharp wiggle. k
   
   
2. 00:49:473 (2,3,4) - Really don't like that placement. It would be so easy for a newer player to hit the 3,4 way early and be super confused. Try to make a placement that has equal distance between the 00:48:798 (1,2,3), and I'm not talking distance snap. got it
   
   
3. 00:51:495 (1,2) - Since the slider ends in 1/3 and the 2 is in 1/4, I suggest delete the 2 and add another repeat to the slider. It will be easier to understand if you have all the 1/3 inside the slider. no, I'm strongly against multi-reversig short slider in E/N
   
   
4. 00:57:900 (3,4) - Highly suggest delete the 4 and extend the 3 to end at 00:58:237 instead. It makes the 00:58:574 (5,6) easier to understand. ok
   
   
5. 01:12:731 (6) - Try replacing this with another 1/2 slider. That follows the music and plays nicer imo. yeah, nice
   
   
6. 01:38:012 (2,3,4,5) - That rhythm is all 1/2 sliders and is really hard to follow for a normal. I suggest make it more simple and add some vocals in. Try like:
   I need to consider more about this
   
   
7. 01:42:394 (4) - Seem much nicer if you move it to 01:42:225. I realize you're following vocals by having it where it is, but it's awkward because vocals hold at 01:41:888 but we aren't playing a slider, we hit a slider end, so the player hears the percussion dominantly. ok
   
   
8. 01:49:978 (4,5) - Again pretty awkward rhythm imo. You're following the vocals with the 4 but they start again at 01:50:315. I suggest simplify it. Delete the 4 and add a circle at 01:50:147 with the clap. k
   
   
9. 01:52:001 (3,4,5,1,2) - You spam 1/2 sliders too much an create a confusing rhythm that switches back and forth between vocals and percussion. Here I suggest to extend the 3 to 01:52:338 and have a circle at 01:52:506. Then a 1/2 repeating slider at 01:52:843 and delete the 01:53:349 (1).
   only changed 3
   
   
10. 02:27:225 (3,4) - How about deleting the 4 and adding a repeat to the 3 to make this different from the 02:27:900 (5,6) since the music is so different for each. it works
    
    
    Be careful with so many 1/2 sliders in Normal. You can make your rhythms unintuitive really fast. =.= yeah it's the most hard-to-map diff in the set

Easy

1. 00:23:180 (1,2,3) - Pretty complicated for the first circles in the diff imo, I think it would be better as a slider with a repeat on the red tick 00:23:686. well ok, though I really like it here
   
   
2. 00:39:360 (4,5,6) - I'd rather you not do that. Try following the guitar with a 1/1 repeating slider at 00:39:360. That or make these 3 circles a slider with repeat on the red tick like 02:27:225 (3,4). It would play more naturally imo. ok 2/3 reverse
   
   
3. 00:59:585 (1) - It seems much nicer to end the spinner at 01:00:933 and have a circle at 01:022 to start play. See if you think the spinner would be too short. need more opinions, yeah I was afraid of short spinners
   
   
4. 01:53:518 (1) - Same as 00:59:585 (1).
   
   
5. 03:06:327 (4) - Too many 2/1 sliders is a row imo. Maybe replace with a 1/1 repeating slider, or two circles. yeah did some changes
   
   
6. 03:15:765 (4,5,1,2) - Same thing here, I don't like how the music changes at the 1 but there is no change in rhythm. also here

Awesome!
I hope you can get this ranked. ^^

fanzhen0019 wrote:

Hi :3 From my queue

General

• 好像是各难度KIAI不同步 真是ORZ我同时开着4个记事本儿对照着看终于发现了几根结束kiai的绿线偏移了1ms=。=
  ..这种hitsounds完全不会mod啊..

Easy

Hitsounds

• Fine.

Arrangement & Design

• 02:59:248 (6,1) - 这居然是叠着的..我还想让你改对称 就是把6放中轴直着拉 =。=我觉得这样还好

Normal

Hitsounds

• 开头还是和I一样

Arrangement & Design

• 其实可以nazi很多.. =。=好难过

Hard

Hitsounds

• 开头和I建议一样

Arrangement & Design

1. 02:48:124 (3) - 放下来一点 快挨着了 fixed

KILL!!

Hitsounds

• 最开始的那段用80%大了吧..建议弄小点 嗯所有diff都改了

1. 00:33:293 (3) - 是不是漏了whistle oh yes

Arrangement & Design

• 
  Random Jump >.>

1. 00:51:495 (1,2,3,4) - 这有点屌 这确实有点=。=
2. 00:55:540 (1,2) - 按flow来这里不用叠着好像打着爽些 像这样移一点点
   嗯不错
3. 01:58:068 (6) - Ctrl+G? 待定 我只是单纯感觉这个往上走比较符合鼓和音乐 看看别人怎么说
4. 02:45:428 (3) - 放下来点 后面的I也重新拉一拉
   只改了后面的1
5. 03:37:169 (7) - 没叠好 可能我当时就没想全盖住…嘛 现在觉得全盖住也不错

..貌似看不出啥东西orz

1. 01:53:180 (3) - I have trouble seeing what this note represent. Besides 01:52:169 to 01:53:180 sounds a lot like 01:50:821 to 01:51:832. But you didn't put any note at 01:51:832 so.... Maybe remove it?
2. 02:23:180 (1) - Finish at the start? Like you did in the other diff.
3. 02:42:057 (5) - NC? 7 is a little bit long for a combo in Easy.
4. 02:52:843 (5) - ^
5. 02:58:237 (5) - ^

1. 00:28:574 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern is a little bit hard for a "Normal" imo. Using just 4 notes instead of 4 sliders works too and it's easier.
2. 02:59:585 (3) - NC? Like you did in Hard and Insane diff.
3. 03:28:574 (5) - Move it 1 grid up for a perfect parallelogram with 03:27:225 (2,3,4).
4. 03:38:686 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:28:574.
5. 03:44:079 (1,2,3,4) - ^

1. 00:27:900 (3,1) - Not very well stacked.
2. 02:03:125 (2,5,1) - ^
3. 02:14:079 (3,4) - Move 3 to x=192 y=256 and 4 to x=128 y=220?
4. 02:17:113 (1,2,3,4,1) - Maybe you could do somehting like this in order to complete the pattern of 02:17:113 (1,2,3,4):
   
   
   You just have to swap 02:17:450 (3,4) then put 02:17:787 (1) to x=304 y=4 and do a blanket.
5. 03:38:012 (4,1) - It's not a good looking overlap imo. The start of the second slider is half hidden.

1. 00:37:169 (4) - Move it to x=104 y=368 for the parallelogram?

HelloSCV wrote:

From my queue

Easy

01:12:394 , 01:12:562 - not used green lines yeah, dealt with them all
02:13:573 , 02:14:922 - ^
03:38:349 , 03:38:686 - ^
03:43:742 , 03:44:079 - ^
03:44:753 (5) - maybe 1/1 slider is better I'm also not sure of this, but it's for consistent ending time, hmm, I'll need more opinions

Normal

01:08:686 , 01:08:855 - not used green lines yeah also delete them
02:13:574 , 02:14:922 - ^
03:06:832 (4) - maybe soft whistle on end is better than clap actually at some point they sound quite close, I used clap at these series of point throughout the map, so I'd rather not change them
03:10:371 , 03:10:709 - not used green lines
03:17:619 (4) - same as 03:06:832 (4) -

Hard

00:50:821 , 00:50:989 - these green lines don't need imo yes
00:58:574 (5) - maybe NC ok
01:03:293 (4) - ^ for consistence (with 01:14:079 (1) - here) also
01:09:697 (5) - just little thing, try to keep DS as 1.5x? since current DS feels little bit awkward for me :/ (and i know you haha, ok I did01:19:135 (5) - increased DS here too but this part is fine) at least I achieved make the distance equal
01:22:506 (5) - NC for consistence k
03:03:293 (4) - ^ ^

Kill!!!

00:37:169 (4) - i think NC:2 clap is needed yeah bang !
00:51:495 (1,2,3,4) - well i think this DS is too big i may know what you want to express on this part but still too far for me I'd like to keep it, haha
01:11:046 (3) - missed whistle oops
03:41:888 (4) - clap on start? yeah

that's all xD good luck with this!

HabiHolic wrote:

From My Queue

[Easy]

01:44:079 (4,5,6) - 为什么不试试喜欢的图片吗 ?

k

01:50:821 (1) - Arrow in the clap clap removed and added to the end no
02:42:057 (5) - NC? nope, for consistency
02:52:843 (5) - ^ also
03:44:753 (5) - 为什么不试试喜欢的图片吗 ?

not really fond of that


[Normal]

01:10:371 (5) - NC nice point, fixed other similar ones
01:10:709 (1) - Remove NC

[Hard]

00:29:922 (1,2,3,4) - spacing intended to do so, I wanna make the spacing larger between sliders and circle, smaller between circles and circles
00:32:282 (3) - ^
00:34:135 (2) - ^
00:34:809 (2) - ^

GL~

1. Seems good.

1. 01:53:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I still hate this pattern... It's just so much missed potential. At least consider something like this:
   
   Image

   
   Jump and NC at 01:54:192. The music really asks for groups of 4 notes here with a jump in between. I can't even believe how much better it plays like this.
2. 02:06:327 (6) - NC is really nice here for readability. The phrase is difficult to pass without it imo, similar to how 03:39:360 (1) makes that phrase read better. Also the spacing might be a bit much here orz. You could experiment more with it. I think a smaller spacing between the 02:06:327 (1,2) might be better since the sound is so much softer.
   
3. 02:39:360 to 02:50:147 - Try to have a gradual increase in volume here. The reason I say this is because claps like at 02:41:214 are so loud compared to the rest of the hits. It just feels a bit awkward in the beginning of this section. You could start more quiet and then increase to 100% at 02:50:147. You'd want to do it in each diff I guess.
   
4. 02:59:416 (7) - Nazi lol. Move it down to (176,272). Makes a better line with the 02:59:248 (6,1).
   
5. 03:02:619 (1,1) - Did you want it to be perfectly symmetrical?
   
6. 03:12:731 (6,1) - I think larger spacing would be better here to be honest, a large jump feels awesome for this part of the song. The small spacing feels a bit strange. You could move it to one of the corners and change the direction of the 6 a bit.

1. 00:39:360 (1,2,3,4) - I think it would be much better to make a pattern that followed the guitar here...Since 00:38:012 (1,2,3,4) and everything before was following the guitar. The gap at 00:39:697 was really confusing. You could use a rhythm like this and still keep your claps:
   
   
2. 03:12:562 (3,4,1) - I feel the spacing is too large for Hard, especially between the 3 and 4.

1. 00:55:540 (3) - Didn't you want this to be a drum finish on the head? The Normal finish is super loud...

1. 00:59:585 (1) - Decide what to do with these spinners. Personally I don't think they are too short if you end them earlier and have a circle on the downbeat. Your call here. I think it feels/sounds terrible where they end now.
   If you don't remember what I mean then look at my old mod.
   
2. 03:44:753 (5) - Just a fun idea. Make the shape more interesting to play around with the high pitched hold in the music. A wave, or some red anchors might be fun.^^

UnitedWeSin wrote:

Alright. Here's a recheck.
We did some IRC mod yesterday, I don't have the log. >< lol I don't have it neither

Check these and let me know what's up.^^