Irreversible wrote:

[Easy]

00:49:304 (3,4) - not sure how confusing this is for an easy, i mean imagine you're a beginner and see the circle next to 2 (in this case: 4), and you want to click it, fail. Can you replace that one maybe? http://puu.sh/6YryI/6f3fa819e8.jpg Maybe like that? /*Changed the rhythm instead, it should be better now.

Rest is fine!

[Normal]

01:12:678 (4,5) - Same for this one, it would be nice if you could slightly replace that one. if you Need further help, you can contact me obviously /*Even if the approach rate helps here, I tweaked this part to make it more intuitive.

> Rhythm is rather confusing, but it's fine as it is.

[Hard]

Fine!

[Insane]

00:32:003 (1) - This is really a misleading antijump, i mean if you check the DS before, and the timeline as well, you can see yourself that this one might be a bit too misleading. How about increasing the DS? /*Done
00:33:292 (6) - Just a personal Preference, but how about stacking this one with 2? The flow created between 6 > 1 will increase as well, because like now it's just .. a flat curve, and something like that doesn't flow that well if you have a gap in the timeline like that. /*With the previous change I had to change this too, but still got your point and did something about that.
00:36:789 (1) - I wish you would increase the DS here as well just for a bit, idk, maybe it's just me, but the DS here seems a bit low as well >< /*Done and changed a lot this part too.
00:44:151 (5) - 182 317 00:44:335 (1) - 20 258 00:44:703 (2) - 101 145 and again - a quite misleading structure you've got there. The fact that this is 1/1 should definetly mean: increase the spacing here. You can Change the positions of course, but please take a look at it. /*Ok, I agree here too.

Call me back! :3

Gero wrote:

Grats Man! :3/

Amare Amare AMARE!

Lanturn wrote:

And then we will dance the night away

SPOILER