lolcubes wrote:

Hi.
Suggestions only, nothing really wrong here, except that timing could be tweaked a little bit.

[General]
Timing: I am getting offset 1440. done
Volume: I would recommend to use 85%, 100% feels a bit too loud. done

[Taiko]
Will copy the timeline using offset 1440.

1. 00:27:428 (149,150,151) - Shouldn't this be kkd? Snares are in the music and it would probably make more sense to have them because of the longer kdd<something> patterns here. It is also kinda expected since you mapped kats on red ticks around here. done
2. 00:28:823 (162,163,164,165,166,167,168) - kdkkddk? It would make sense to have a kat on the downbeat because the melody is progressing upwards, culminating there. Since you have a kat on the white tick afterwards, you would essentially having k d k dkd d which also plays and sounds really good. I just don't think ddkkkkd has enough impact, and since the last stream ended with a don, you can start with a kat for nice effect too, thus the kdkkddk. to me, using kdkkddk would feel weird to play, and it's not something I would use at all. So I'll leave this.
3. 01:21:498 (449,450,451) - I personally think that kdd doesn't fit that good if the emphasis is on the final note of the pattern. kkd fits much better. You used dkd later on and I like that one. If you want variety you could use dkd here and then you use kkd at 01:24:288 (464,465,466). I'll stop yapping about kdd here, just consider something else if you have a breakthrough @kdd patterns if the emphasis is on the last note, for the most of the map.
4. 01:24:812 (468,469,470,471,472) - Since there are no real snares in the music, I would recommend kdkkd. I just love how it sounds and plays here. The same applies to 01:47:137 (596,597,598,599,600) and other occurrences like this (03:10:684 (1087,1088,1089,1090,1091,1092,1093), etc). I'll just combine these 2 together for a reply. I'll change 01:21:498 (449,450,451) to kkd so that I can change the small roll of 5 to kddkd and leave the dkd before it alone, that way it feels better to play and just flows into it.
5. 02:06:846 (712) - k? Sounds better. Left this as a d, just because I'm manly hitting the kicks for this part.
6. 02:12:166 (751) - I would suggest removing this. My thoughts are the same in this case as well, kdd and emphasis just like the above. I can't find a working alternative where to place this note so you can just remove it I guess. For this, I understand the kdd explanation, so instead of removing that, I just change that into dkd. That way I can go with the rim-snare that is played in the song itself.
7. 02:20:800 (804,805,806) - dkd? Fits better than kdd imo. done
8. 03:04:928 (1055,1056,1057,1058,1059,1060,1061,1062,1063) - kkddkdkkd? Since there is no distinct snare pattern here, you can improvise, and I like this better. done, I'd definately use something like this XD.
9. 03:43:126 (1268,1269,1270,1271,1272) - Comparing this to 03:48:707 (1295,1296,1297,1298,1299) makes either of those look inconsistent. Intentional? Probably, since it happens later on as well, but just check to be sure. This was intentional, the higher pitch of the crash made me feel like I should use K.
10. 04:34:143 - Probably intentional, but consider placing a kat here. didn't want to make it seem too awkward to play, so I left that spot empty. Having a roll end on a different finger than you started with it pretty weird to play.
11. 04:46:091 (1634) - k? Same logic about melody going upwards etc. done
12. 04:54:288 (1684 ... 1706) - I would suggest to reconsider about not mapping the drumline here. kkd finish is preventing you from having a really long and awesome stream I think, so I think you should remove 04:54:376 (1685) and then map something like ddddddddkkkkkkkkddddkkkkddkkddkkd. Has a much better impact if you ask me. instead of removing that one note, I just added more to it.
13. 05:57:253 (2039,2040,2041,2042,2043,2044,2045,2046) - I found this quite hard to read because of the finishes. I would suggest making 05:57:777 (2042) a don and then just removing finish from 05:57:951 (2043). You still get impact and emphasis where this finish was, and it's much more simple to read. Actually this also applies to 03:54:463 (1326,1327,1328,1329,1330,1331,1332,1333), forgot to mention that one. done, thanks for clearing this part up

Stefan wrote:

ReTaikolution!

Congrats

LoliFlan wrote:

lol @ the map BG, its actually a hatsune miku wallpaper I had on my dekstop a month ago.

Love wrote:

I give no futts.

Love wrote:

I give no futts.

those wrote:

Love wrote:

I give no futts.

You oni have one diff