1. 00:09:810 (2,3,4) - I feel this one is much harder to hit compare to other triples, maybe you can reduce spacing?

1. 03:24:118 (2,3) - I know you used 0.75xBPM here, but this spacing still looked awkward here, I'd suggest use a slider instead or stack these 2 notes, that would help

Breeze wrote:

Hi random quick check

[Crazy]

1. 00:09:810 (2,3,4) - I feel this one is much harder to hit compare to other triples, maybe you can reduce spacing?

Agreed. Fixed

[Hard]

1. 03:24:118 (2,3) - I know you used 0.75xBPM here, but this spacing still looked awkward here, I'd suggest use a slider instead or stack these 2 notes, that would helpMade a slider out of them!

Tony wrote:

Can't help myself. This post deserves kudosu imo. Hope you don't mind xD

Everything changed. Oh and about the video... T-ara didn't release a music video for this song

1. 00:28:733 (3) - This is a really little thing, just fix if you want: What do you think about making this slider start 1/2 later, obviously making it 1/2 shorter as well? It's not a big change, though it follows perfectly the synth being played right there, other than playing overall quite good as of the rhythm change. Try it out!
   
2. 00:56:195 (2,3,4) - Not really a big deal, though this triangular pattern didn't flow as expected for me, as of 00:56:195 (2,4) - 's curves not continuing their oval flow in a so great way, so what about tweaking a bit the sliders by rotating and position them so that the whole pattern flows a bit smoother? Here's what I have done here, as example: feel free to use it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   172,40,55733,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   248,76,56195,2,0,P|322:85|385:60,1,140,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   460,32,57580,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   484,112,58041,2,0,P|486:182|430:243,1,140,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   380,288,59426,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   296,272,59887,2,0,B|264:260|252:244|252:244|212:256|156:240,1,140,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   92,280,61272,1,0,0:0:0:0:

3. 01:20:195 (4) - While I think all the other 2/1 sliders work great here, imho this one could be divided as a note + 1/1 slider, as you have been totally skipping the vocal chords, which imho feels quite strange considering how you've been following it up to now with patterns like 01:28:964 (1,2,3,4) - and so going. I've tried to remake the pattern using this "logic" as well: see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   420,44,79272,2,0,L|324:36,1,70,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   276,80,80195,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   204,40,80657,2,0,P|164:28|120:28,1,70,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   72,80,81580,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   100,160,82041,2,0,P|96:220|120:276,1,105,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   104,304,82964,2,0,L|196:292,1,70,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   248,260,83887,2,0,P|312:268|364:288,1,105,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   I really can't find anything more. Great Easy diff, awesome 1/2 usage and great flow as well. Great job, I really like it!

1. 00:10:503 (4) - Not a really big deal, though this slider right now doesen't really continue well 00:09:580 (3) - 's oval flow, making this pattern a bit uncomfortable to play. It is ok as it is, but it can surely made better - what about rotating a bit 00:09:580 (3) - and placing 00:10:503 (4) - above it so that it definitely continues better its oval flow? It's a little change that could make the flow there smoother :p Here's what I have done here, see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   416,164,9580,2,0,P|461:152|509:161,2,90,4|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   360,212,10503,2,2,P|344:264|380:332,1,120,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   232,372,11426,6,0,P|256:313|240:261,1,120,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:13:272 (3) - Seeing how 00:13:272 (3) - is going I would totally see better this reversed using CTRL+G, imho it flows quite smoother, other than continuing well the pattern! If you do this, I'd recommend you to put 00:15:118 (1) - at x:180 y:140 to finish the pattern properly with this new reversed slider!
3. 00:33:118 (x)- A really little thing here: what about adding a note here? It feels quite strange not following the claps here when you have clearly done that with 00:31:272 (3) - . It isn't just for consistency, but also for the fact that it will complete the whole rhythm in your pattern, instead of finishing your pattern on that vocal chord!
4. 01:10:272 (1,2) - This is really a subjective thing, so skip it if you really don't feel like doing it: what about making these two sliders encircle, continuing the pattern in this ways? I honestly think it works really well, considering that the dropoff between them imho works great. The actual pattern is really good anyways, so feel free to ignore! Here's what I have done: see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   312,196,70272,6,0,B|336:144|336:144|372:80|440:104,1,180,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   408,172,71195,2,0,B|384:224|384:224|348:288|280:264,1,180,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   210,291,72118,2,0,P|239:199|311:195,1,180,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   280,264,73041,2,0,L|160:128,1,180,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   16,104,74195,6,0,P|0:184|24:212,1,120,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

5. 01:19:733 (1) - Using just some whistles at the start and at the end of the slider sounds really strange, actually... o.O Wouldn't it be better if you instead added a whistle as well at the repeat? It would follow really good the synth that is playing right this moment in the bg!
6. 02:20:657 (4) - Same as above. Also, it seems you have forgot a NC at this point, as you have clearly used it at 01:19:733 (1) -, and as it follows pretty good the song itself why not using it here as well? :p
7. 03:06:810 (1) - Guess what? Same as above!
8. 03:09:118 (1) - While a 1/1 repeated slider here doesen't sound bad at all, imho a 3/2 repeated slider with a note 1/2 later fits the vocal being played there even better! I like how that pattern plays in this way, so imho you should consider doing that (even though it's optional, feel free to fix just if you want). Here's what I have done: see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   68,220,189118,6,0,L|56:328,2,90,8|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   52,148,190041,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   32,80,190272,2,0,P|112:56|184:116,1,180,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

1. 00:08:657 (3,4,1,2) - Well, your actual blanket there broke a bit 00:08:657 (3) - 's oval flow, and imho could be rearranged better to make the whole pattern flow smoother... Instead of directly blanketing here, what do you think about making it still continue under 00:08:657 (3) - 's track to make 00:09:580 (1) - encircle 00:09:349 (4) - ? Here's what I have done here: see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   236,120,8657,2,2,P|312:76|392:128,1,180,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   420,200,9349,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   492,252,9580,6,0,P|452:284|372:272,1,135
   373,272,10041,2,0,P|392:304|392:364,1,90
   308,332,10503,2,2,B|257:344|219:332|219:332|181:319|131:332,1,180,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:24:695 (x) - I guess you want to follow the vocals here, though the missing note here seems really strange, considering your use of doublets and considering that there is an actual synth chord there... I would really suggest you to add a note here, it would really go well with the synth there!
3. 00:46:503 (4) - What about having a New Combo here, seeing how you've used the New Combos so far? It is the only place where you haven't use it, so I guess you must have forgot it here!
4. 00:51:580 (1) - On the other side imho there is no real changement in the rhythm there, so I fing your New Combo here to be pretty useless... I would personally remove this New Combo exactly for this reason. Your choice, though!
5. 01:20:426 (5) - Well, seeing how you've arranged your whistle patterns, I find this whistle at the beginning not to fit very well into the bg. Considering that I don't find any valuable places to add whistles to complete this patterns, I'd suggest instead to remove the whistle from the beginning and add it instead to the repeat and the end to follow the vocals there! If you do that remember that the same applies for 02:21:349 (4,5) - and 03:07:503 (3,4) - !
6. 01:58:272 (1) - and 01:59:657 (2) - Dunno why, but I personally would see these sliders better reversed. It could be because of the jump with 01:57:810 (2) - which imho fits really good, still I think it fits really good, even if this is is a totally subjective thing, so ignore if you don't want to do that!
   03:22:272 (2) - Instead of using that blanket, I find again this slider to be played quite better reversed. Not a big deal though... Try it out!

1. 00:42:810 (1) - Again, this slider would totally benefit it reversed using CTRL+G. Other than following really well 00:42:118 (5) - 's oval flow it continues really well your pattern 00:43:272 (2,3,4) - . You should really try it out, as it plays really great with that little jump!
2. 00:52:849 (4,5,6) - This triangular pattern imho doesen't really go that well if you use it with 00:53:887 (1) - ... Its structure kinda breaks the flow brought from 00:52:849 (4) - to 00:53:887 (1) - and imho you should fix this. What about instead using an arch-pattern? It works really well there, as it follows both the oval flows better and continues really good the flow there. Here's what I've done, see if you like it! Remember that the same applies for 02:39:926 (4,5,6,1) - as well!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   56,288,52849,2,0,P|5:230|41:138,1,165,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   112,24,53426,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   264,52,53657,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   300,200,53887,6,0,P|296:280|180:332,1,220,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 01:11:887 (1) - Considering 01:11:195 (3) - 's oval flow, wouldn't it be better if you directly stacked this on the top of 01:12:118 (2) - ? It would totally follow that oval flow with a symmetrical pattern, and as you have done that, doing it here would work pretty good as well!
4. 01:19:733 (1) - As the normal diff, a whistle at the end of the slider would totally work good with the synth in the bg, other than completing your hitsounds pattern by using a 3/4 pattern, which imho works pretty good there. Try it out! If you apply, remember that you have to do the same for 02:21:003 (7) - and 03:07:157 (4) - !
5. 01:25:041 (x) - Considering the vocals that are being played here, why don't you add a note here as well? Other than following really well that vocal chord, it would work pretty good with the jump 01:24:118 (4,5) - , making the flow even smoother! If you want to place it, then I'd suggest you to place it at x:312 y:252. Your choice, though!

1. Countdown is enabled in all the diffs except for Crazy. Please make it consistent.
   
2. Consider adding a silenced slider-slide. It's pretty loud and obnoxious in the easier diffs. :<

1. 00:14:657 (1,2,3) - Increase spacing so that the 2 and 3 are the same distance from the slider body 00:14:195 (5) that the 1 is.
   
   Image

   
2. 00:22:964 (1,2) - This spacing is confusing after the spinner since it's in 1/2 yet there was a whole beat between the spinner and the 1. I suggest stack the 1 and 2.
   
3. 00:29:887 (1) - I understand that by making this 1/4 shorter than the previous sliders, you are following the new beat introduced, but I think you should do the same thing with 00:31:733 (1). It would make more sense to have the same rhythm at each spot. So either extend the 00:29:887 (1) by 1/4 or shorten the 00:31:733 (1) by 1/4.
   
4. 00:36:349 (4) - This note feels bad imo because it's not following the melody. Try deleting this, I think the gap feels much better.
   
5. 00:41:657 (3,4) - Too many circles in 1/4 here it sounds bad. I prefer it if you replace these two with a 1/2 slider to follow vocals better.
   
6. 00:47:426 (4) - Seems better to remove the whistle from the end since the vocals aren't as sharp as they were at 00:44:195. It makes it consistent with 00:40:503 (4).
   
7. 01:15:580 (5,6) - Try moving the 5 and 6 around so you don't have this straight left flow. It's kind of uncomfortable imo. You do this same thing elsewhere also. I find it more enjoyable if you make the flow less linear. Try something like this:
   
   Image

   
8. 02:20:426 (5,6,7,8,1,2) - Placement here feels a bit sloppy to me. Try to place the sliders in a better pattern with the previous 02:18:580 (1,2,3).
   
9. 03:30:464 (1) - This spinner feels really strange because the music cuts out. Plus the 03:28:964 (4) is pretty strange with the multiple repeats. You could try something like this to follow the music better:
   
   Image

   
   You could do that or you could delete the 4 and move the spinner earlier like in the other diffs.

1. 00:11:772 (2,3) - The double is not fitting the song here since it's the first portion of the melody like at 00:00:349 (1,2,3,4). Look at the previous patterns and you will see. Delete the 2 is best here.
   
2. 00:28:964 (2) - I'd prefer that you delete this to follow the melody nicer, but it might break your patterns so it's up to you.
   
3. 01:08:426 (1) - Move it to the right a bit to make a nice triangle. (404,88).
   
   Image

   
4. 01:23:426 - Add a note here to make a nice triplet seems nice.
   
5. 01:35:195 (2) - Try rotating the 2 by -3 degrees to make a better blanket.
   
6. 01:55:503 (2,3) - It would be better if you didn't have this jump here. You can place the 01:54:810 (1,2) in a blanketing pattern without breaking spacing, or you can make it like 00:53:887 (1,2).
   
7. 02:07:503 (5,1) - I feel like this stacking these will confuse players because they will read it as 1/1 because of the small spacing with the 02:05:657 (1,2,3,4). Try using 1.0 spacing between the 5 and 1 here, I feel it would be easier to understand if you change the pattern like that on the downbeat.
   
8. 02:30:349 (1) - I prefer that you replace with 3 circles so that we can hit along with the vocals at 02:31:272 and since the combo follows the vocals later on.
   
   Image

   
9. 02:35:772 (2) - Ctrl +G and then have the 02:36:118 (3,4) flow to the right side of the screen to avoid overlapping the same place as before.
   
10. 03:25:272 (1,2) - I found that spacing to be pretty annoying. Same with 03:28:041 (2). Consider just normal spacing here, the reduced SV is enough slow down.

1. HP+1 seems nicer for diff spread.
   
2. 00:37:733 (1,2) - I really don't agree with stacking these...Since there is 1 + 1/2 beats between the 1 and 2, it's really difficult to read that rhythm when they are stacked. I guess it's alright since you did it through the whole section.
   
3. 01:20:887 (3,1) - Make them the same slider so that the blankets 01:21:580 (1,2) and 01:20:657 (2,3) are the same.
   
4. 01:26:657 (3,1,2,3) - Looks really not so good imo. Try to make the 1 and 2 have a similar curve and then place the 01:28:503 (3) so that it's not overlapped with the 01:26:657 (3).
   
5. 02:11:195 (3,1) - NC's kinda weird here. Maybe switch these to be consistent with what you do elsewhere.
   
6. 02:20:657 (4) - NC? NC's in the chorus' seem strange, check them through the whole map please.

1. 02:17:426 (4) - Try Ctrl+H?
   
   Image

   
2. 02:30:349 - Since this is the mapper's selected kiai time, you could try adding some sliders/notes here to fill it out. It's a bit strange that the kiai has such a small note density compared to the rest of the map.

-kevincela- wrote:

Hey!

[Beamsy]

1. 00:28:733 (3) - This is a really little thing, just fix if you want: What do you think about making this slider start 1/2 later, obviously making it 1/2 shorter as well? It's not a big change, though it follows perfectly the synth being played right there, other than playing overall quite good as of the rhythm change. Try it out! nice suggestion,but after some time thinking left it as it is
   
2. 00:56:195 (2,3,4) - Not really a big deal, though this triangular pattern didn't flow as expected for me, as of 00:56:195 (2,4) - 's curves not continuing their oval flow in a so great way, so what about tweaking a bit the sliders by rotating and position them so that the whole pattern flows a bit smoother? Here's what I have done here, as example: feel free to use it! changed 1-st slider,should be a little smoother now
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   172,40,55733,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   248,76,56195,2,0,P|322:85|385:60,1,140,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   460,32,57580,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   484,112,58041,2,0,P|486:182|430:243,1,140,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   380,288,59426,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   296,272,59887,2,0,B|264:260|252:244|252:244|212:256|156:240,1,140,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   92,280,61272,1,0,0:0:0:0:

3. 01:20:195 (4) - While I think all the other 2/1 sliders work great here, imho this one could be divided as a note + 1/1 slider, as you have been totally skipping the vocal chords, which imho feels quite strange considering how you've been following it up to now with patterns like 01:28:964 (1,2,3,4) - and so going. I've tried to remake the pattern using this "logic" as well: see if you like it! hmm..thanks,but will keep mine!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   420,44,79272,2,0,L|324:36,1,70,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   276,80,80195,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   204,40,80657,2,0,P|164:28|120:28,1,70,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   72,80,81580,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   100,160,82041,2,0,P|96:220|120:276,1,105,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   104,304,82964,2,0,L|196:292,1,70,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   248,260,83887,2,0,P|312:268|364:288,1,105,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   
   I really can't find anything more. Great Easy diff, awesome 1/2 usage and great flow as well. Great job, I really like it!

UnitedWeSin wrote:

[Beamsy]

1. 02:17:426 (4) - Try Ctrl+H? nah,wanted that shape
   
   Image

   
2. 02:30:349 - Since this is the mapper's selected kiai time, you could try adding some sliders/notes here to fill it out. It's a bit strange that the kiai has such a small note density compared to the rest of the map. well..perhaps,I mapped this when there was no kiai at all. so it's to Tony to decide. but I wanted this rhythm,so if it's okay to leave it as it is- I would be glad

1. 03:28:964 (1) - It seems a lot better to end the spinner at 03:30:580 which is when the music cuts out and the vocal echo starts.

1. 00:10:964 (6,7,1) - Seems to play nicer if you use a consistent 1.5 spacing through the combo. So move the 1 up to (408,204) or so.
   
2. 00:40:964 (1,2,3,4) - Please give a reason for denying the suggestion here in my other mod. I still feel that all the 1/4 here isn't fitting. You could try changing 00:41:426 (2,3) into 1/2 slider to follow the synth.
   
3. Remove these NC? Seem kind of extra here:
   03:11:195 (1)
   03:13:041 (1)
   03:14:887 (1)

1. 02:31:503 (2) - You denied suggestion here in last mod but I think this part could play better so here is another suggestion. I'd prefer that you shorten the 2 by 1/2 and have the triplet separate.
   
   Example

   
   Or an alternative, shorten the 2 by 1/2 then move it forward 1/2, then add a circle stacked on it at 02:31:503.
   
   Example

   

1. 01:27:118 (4,5,6) - This placement doesn't look very nice imo in comparison with your other placements. It would be nicer if the 4 and 5 had the same curve.